ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Will muons reveal Maya mysteries?

Posted: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:05 AM by Alan Boyle

Physicists are closing in on new techniques to put ancient archaeological sites through a cosmic "CT scan" to look for hidden chambers, using showers of subatomic particles known as muons.

The idea was first put to the test in an Egyptian pyramid four decades ago - but researchers saw no surprises in that experiment. Now, scientists are hoping to enlist a new generation of muon detectors to solve long-running mysteries of the Maya.

Roy Schwitters, a physicist at the University of Texas in Austin, provided an update on his team's plans for archaeological scans on Sunday at the annual New Horizons in Science briefing, presented in Spokane, Wash., by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing. You can click through an early version of his PDF presentation here.

Schwitters and his colleagues are focusing on mounds in the jungles of Belize that are thought to cover the remains of structures dating back to the Classic Maya era (A.D. 250-900) or even earlier.

"There is good reason to believe they contain rooms and chambers ... that have been likely undisturbed since the time of the Maya," Schwitters told the audience here in Spokane. But you can't dig up the sites willy-nilly looking for lost tombs, and non-invasive techniques such as ground-penetrating radar, electrical probes or seismic sampling "just can't work in this medium," he told me during a Q&A.

This is where muons just might ride to the rescue. When cosmic rays hit Earth's atmosphere, they spark showers of muons and neutrinos that interact only weakly with intervening matter. The neutrinos are almost unaffected as they pass through our planet, but different densities of matter deflect the muons to different degrees. Thus, it's possible to build muon detectors to determine what those subatomic particles have passed through.

"It's just perfect for what we want to do," Schwitters said.

Over the course of several months, one detector can build up a picture showing the "shadows" of surrounding objects - like buildings on the Austin campus, for example. If you put in multiple detectors, or move a single detector to multiple locations, you can create a 3-D picture of the site using muons, in the same way that CT scans produce a 3-D picture of your body using X-rays.

"It literally is like tomography in the medical sense," Schwitters explained.

You do have to bury the detectors in the ground surrounding the site you want to survey - and that could pose a problem if the site is as culturally important as the places Schwitters and his team are targeting.

They started out building a prototype cylindrical detector that was about 5 feet (1.5 meters) wide and 15 feet (4.5 meters) tall. The device had to be constructed like an airplane fuselage, then filled with specially designed swirls of plastic and fiber-optic scintillators. "It's the biggest thing we could imagine getting into Belize," Schwitters said.

Since then, the Texas team has shrunk the design for the device into something that would be "about the size of a water heater," weighing 200 pounds (90 kilograms) rather than a ton, Schwitters said. Those detectors are now being built and tested, and the team's first archaeological scans in Belize could begin in the spring of 2009.

The smaller devices wouldn't be nearly as intrusive as the one-ton detector. Schwitters said a half-dozen of them could be buried at various spots around the edges of a target site, about 10 to 15 feet deep (as opposed to about 30 feet deep for the bigger version).

Schwitters said computer simulations indicate that the mini-muon detectors could spot the telltale signs of a buried chamber the size of a hotel ballroom - but he admitted that the system would have to be put through some test runs before beginning the Belize survey. "To convince people you can really do this, you need to do the voids," he said.

Meanwhile, other scientists are working on a more straightforward muon detection system to survey Mexico's Pyramid of the Sun - a structure that dates back to A.D. 200, before the age of the Aztecs. Those researchers, led by Arturo Menchaca-Rocha of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, have an advantage: They can place the detector right inside an underground tunnel that is thought to predate the pyramid itself.

In a paper submitted last month for online review, Menchaca-Rocha and his colleagues discuss simulations of data from the Pyramid of the Sun and mention the "poor quality of the experimental data at large angles." The references and the accompanying graphs imply that the team has started analyzing muon data but is not ready to draw any conclusions.

Muon detectors can be used to scope out nuclear waste sites ... check for smuggled nuclear materials ... or even look for the underground warning signs of a volcanic eruption. But Menchaca-Rocha's paper - as well as Schwitters' talk - make clear that hunting for ancient hidden chambers will require plenty of patience as well as careful calibration. Schwitters said it could be a few years before he had definitive findings from Belize.

The science is challenging, to be sure, but there's yet another reason why patience is required: The funding available for this kind of work just doesn't compare with the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars set aside for more traditional particle detectors such as the Compact Muon Solenoid. And that means the research is proceeding on a pay-as-you-go basis.

"The budget for this project is closer to archaeology than it is to high-energy physics," Schwitters said..

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Nasa should use this Techiques to scope out the "MOON AND MARS"for underground caves and volcanic activity.
What did you call me??!! I ain't no muon!
Can you reverse the usage of Muon to be used to ignited suppected IUD's in the war against terrorist. It seems that if these atoms (if thats what they are) could be used to saturate an area where an suspected IUD is and if the frequency is increased it will cause the munition to explode.
Interesting, but I would like to have been there when Henry Ford, and J.P. Morgan went into one of the Egyptian Pyramids with a long gone relation of mine, and just sat there, hoping to discover the secrets of immortality.
Imagine just exactly how wacky those guys were.
All the money in the world...for all intents and purposes, J.P. owned France for a while there...and they're sitting in some dank, dusty hole in the ground, wanting even more...
The long gone relation...Smyth, I forget his first name...was a premier Egyptologist of the day...there are books on the topic...check it out...much more romantically nuts than muons, etc...the definitive answer isn't always the best thing, eh?
This sure sounds pretty exciting! I wonder if they could also use thise technique to survey the newly found tomb of Aztec emperor Ahuizotl, at Mexico's downtown.

And I suppose that having to bury the detectors might rule them out on the tomb of the first chinese emperor. But who knows?
Detonating any IUD's could annoy a lot of women.  You do know that IUD stands for the birth control method called Intra-Uterine-Device?
How long does a body have to be buried before it's fair game for archeologists? Judging by the fairly recent desecra--I mean, excavation of the de Medici tombs in Florence, some of which are only three or four centuries old, it seems archeologists consider it open season on any grave or tomb. I imagine they'll soon be bombarding the local cemeteries with muons, after they've dug up our own dearly departed.

Oh, they'll do it all very respectfully, I'm sure--then rebury all the remains and artifacts in our modern mass graves, museums.

Do archeologists themselves get buried after they die? Why? To provide jobs for future archeologists, I suppose.
 
This system should be used in either Tiahuanaco, or in Cuzco, to plot the extensive tunnels there.  Humanity could learn much from what is in those tunnels reaching all the way to Brazil, with lost cities along the way.  It is also very curious why Zawi Hawass does not want the world to know what is under, and around the Sphinx in Giza.  A few of these devices buried there would solve alot of mysteries.
ok since the writer of the article didnt seem to think it was necessary, will someone explain 1st what MUON stands for or is?  
Before I get corrected...the above story comes from E.L.Doctorow's "Ragtime"...the characters are real, but the reality is not...oops!...early AM fantasy, I guess.
However, this will make up for the boo-boo.
http://www.smythspace.tv/oct23.html
Hi Al,
I think this one's good enough to include in the text.
A lot of people should have the opportunity to see it.
thanx
Exploding IUDs? Whoo, tough method of birth control.

Something to explode IEDs might be helpful, though.
Don!

How did we direct talk of scanning ancient pyramids into detecting IED's (not IUD's)?  Didn't you read the part about it taking extensive periods of time to gather the readings?  What would you have our troops do, have our EOD guys put a muon detector near a suspected IED and wait six months for the results?
If on read "The Emerald Tablets" of Thoth; available on line, then one sees we are about to SEE !

Reading " The Book Of Unrantia" is also a big help to understanding what has been and will be.
Using this technology on burial mounds in the MidWest would yield interesting results without destroying these ancient graves.  
wow interest stuff is there any way you can use that sort of technology through a telescope to discover planets
Don, sorry to rain on your parade, but the technology here really can't be turned around to induce an IED explosion.  

First, the muons (which are not atoms, but much smaller, high energy particles) are not being created by the scientists, but by the solar wind hitting our atmosphere.  The technology referenced in this article is simply taking measurements of the direction the muons are being reflected after hitting objects of differing densities (dirt, rock, open rooms, etc).  Actually generating these particles would take a huge amount of resources and is the sort of thing typically done only in particle accelerators.  

Second, setting off an IED is not as simple as bombarding it with high energy particles.  Contrary to what Hollywood special affects artists tend to portray, most objects will not explode when bombarded with large amounts of energy.  It is not a matter of simply "adjusting the frequency."  Then we have to contend with the fact that there are as many ways to build an IED as there are people building them.  Some use plastic explosives such as C4, others use more mundane chemicals such as gasoline.  Finding the proper "resonance points" for all of these materials, as well as all of the different possible packaging holding the IED together, would be incredibly difficult and resource intensive, assuming that we could even develop a technology capable of doing this.  Giving soldiers a bag of rocks to chuck out in front of their humvee at suspected IED locations would be much less resource (i.e. energy and research) intensive and much more likely to produce the desired results.

Based on the research discussed in this article, I would guess that we wouldn't want to use muons anyway simply due to the fact that they tend to bounce off of objects they encounter.  This is the property that is allowing the researchers to use muons for their work.  Imagine firing off a stream of high energy sub-atomic particles at a bomb, only to have those same particles bounce right off and come back toward you?  

Sorry to dissect your idea like this, but I come from a heavy background in science and really hate seeing exciting new research such as this turned around into something out of a sci-fi movie.  If you want a death-ray, go look up Nikola Tesla and then we'll talk ;)
This is a problem:
    "Schwitters said computer simulations indicate that the mini-muon detectors could spot the telltale signs of a buried chamber the size of a hotel ballroom..."
    This may work for locating caves, but the Maya were generally less ambitious in their architecture (a necessity as they lacked a Roman arch).  I have never excavated a chamber, nor have I ever observed a chamber at any consolidated Maya site, remotely close to the size of a hotel ballroom.
The last time somebody tried this the only result was the pyramid razor blade sharpener. Maybe this time we'll see something more useful. It would be nice to have something that finds my little screwdriver that I keep losing.
Great this is exactly how we need to find the unknown.  Once this is up and running can someone please check under the paw of the sphinx?
IUDs! ROFL!

Don, I think you meant IEDs.
Sorry, Kyle ... I just noted that muons are subatomic particles and left it at that. Muons are interesting critters to physicists because they're often what comes out when other, harder-to-spot particles decay. Muons interact relatively weakly with matter, and they're charged particles, so you can track them as they shoot out from a particle collision. Their discovery is famous in that it showed how varied and quirky the smorgasbord of subatomic particles can be. When physicist Isidor Rabi learned of the discovery of muons in the 1930s, he uttered the famous line: "Who ordered THAT?"

Here's an archived article that delves a bit more into muon mysteries without getting freakily technical:

http://physci.llnl.gov/Organization/NDivision/HEP/news/g2_nyt.html

(By the way, muons are called that just because they were designated with the Greek letter "mu," just as another type of subatomic particle is known as the pi lepton or "pion.")
"Nasa should use this Techiques to scope out the "MOON AND MARS"for underground caves and volcanic activity."

Just be mindful that to do this, you'd have to have boots on the ground (and living space for them) in signifigant numbers already. It's not something you could do from a manned or unmanned orbiter, to scout for possible natural shelters before committing crews to a landing there later...


I like it. I think it is good.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=423358

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google