ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Buzz builds for plug-in cars

Posted: Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:58 PM by Alan Boyle


Visionary Vehicles
A quarter-scale model shows the concept for
Visionary Vehicles' $35,000 luxury plug-in hybrid
electric vehicle. Production is targeted for 2010.

Even though the $10 million-plus Automotive X Prize hasn’t been officially launched yet, the competition picked up some extra flash today with the entry of auto-entrepreneur Malcolm Bricklin’s Visionary Vehicles electric plug-in hybrid.

Bricklin, the guy who brought Subarus (and Yugos) to America, promises to have the first prototype on the road next year and get the $35,000 vehicles rolling off the assembly line by the time the X Prize race really gets going in 2010. But in order to win the prize, Bricklin will have to vie with 31 other teams, and maybe more yet to be announced.

During today’s teleconference, X Prize founder Peter Diamandis also dropped a hint about next week’s biggest-ever X Prize. "It's in the space and exploration realm, but that's all I can say about it right now," he told reporters on the call.

The Automotive X Prize aims to promote the development super-efficient motor vehicles that would cut greenhouse-gas emissions and get the equivalent of 100 miles per gallon.

"That is exactly Visionary Vehicles' goal, and that is exactly what we're planning on doing," Bricklin said. "So entering this prize - and hopefully we are going to win this prize - is exactly what our mission is."

Most of the would-be entrants who made themselves known last month have said they would use some form of hybrid electric drive system - and the car that Bricklin is planning to build for the X Prize race follows that model as well.

The five-passenger EVX/LS plug-in hybrid luxury sedan that he unveiled today would use a lithium-ion battery system as its main power source. When the juice runs low - after, say, around 40 or 50 miles - a 60-hp engine would kick in to refill the battery, Bricklin said. The vehicle would surpass the 100-mpg mark, with a range of 850 miles.

"It is proposed to sell for approximately $35,000," Bricklin said.

That may sound like a steep price for the crowd that bought Subarus and Yugos in an earlier age, but Bricklin said the EVX/LS could be just his first entry in a market that is crying out to be born.

"People out there are demanding we get rid of this oil problem, where we're spending all the money and giving it to the wrong people, and this global [warming] problem - which is a real serious problem, not maybe not for me, but for my grandchildren and their grandchildren," he said. "And we are really anxious to do something about it, besides just making some money by selling some cars."

Right now, there's not much to show in public, other than a quarter-scale model of the car. Bricklin said he's still talking with potential suppliers and manufacturers, in the United States and abroad. But the engineering work is already under way, he said.

"You will see running prototypes on the road in '08, and you'll see cars coming off the manufacturing line in '09, and you'll see delivery of these cars in '10," he said.

That parallels the development curve for the Automotive X Prize: Executive director Don Foley said sponsors for the competition were still being courted, but the aim was to have a "minimum of $10 million" for the prize purse. The contest would get its formal launch in early 2008, with qualifying rounds for the contenders in 2009 and the race finals in 2010.

So far, the X Prize Foundation has had surprising success in coming up with the money for  the $10 million Ansari X Prize for private spaceflight (which relied on a tricky hole-in-one insurance policy) and the $10 million Archon Genomics X Prize for personal genome sequencing (funded by Canadian geologist-philanthropist Stewart Blusson). But the foundation will have to kick it up a notch if its offerings are to match Diamandis' target.

He told reporters that he aimed to launch "about a quarter-billion dollars in prizes over the next five years," with two major prizes making their debut each year. That would work out to an average of $20 million to $25 million per prize (with a few million left over for the "minor" prizes). Diamandis listed several potential areas for the awards: life sciences, and particularly cancer research; energy and environment; exploration in space and underwater; education, solutions to poverty, and global entrepreneurship.

"We think humans are genetically bred to compete," Diamandis said. "We do our best work. One of the issues, especially in America, is that we're becoming risk-averse as a nation, and without risk, you can't really have breakthroughs."

You can listen to today's entire telephone briefing by heading over to the EV World Web site, which has additional background about Bricklin's ups and downs in entrepreneurship. The initial reaction from AutoblogGreen is not optimistic about the prospects for the EVX/LS.

Will Bricklin and Diamandis hit their respective targets? Feel free to weigh in with your comments, and stay tuned for updates as the wraps are taken off still more X Prizes and future car concepts.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

As selfish as it sounds, i believe that it is the goal of every human to be productive for their own success and survival. In other words, compete for themselves in a free market society. While the goals of the prizes are geared toward "service to society," instead of service to self, as long as the issues affect on a personal level, this just might be the jump start that our society needs to overcome the boundaries created by tradition, religion, and politics on our advances in science.
As for my thoughts on the hybrids, i think everyone is aware of the effects that oil has had on our world, i think its time we overcome our need for it. I am very excited to see what the future holds for transportation and science as a result.
Plug-in automobiles may be a step better than what is currently out on the road, but they are missing the overall intent.  By having to "plug in" they are still consuming electricity that is having to be manufactured by another source.  In many cases this outside source is creating similar polutants to what would be generated by the automobile itself.  A better goal would obviously be a hybrid that draws its electrical needs from solar conversion.
Why not just wait another year for the GM VOLT and buy an actual commercial product with a 15 year battery and more power and better looks and a lower price? Bricklin will NEVER be able to build a practical electric plug-in without a practical battery pack - and he doesn't have one.
Lithium Ion Batteries in cars are nothing new have been in use already for many years in the Nissan Hyper-Mini and Nissan Altra battery electric vehicles. The closest thing to 100 mpg was the Honda Insight (60+ mpg hwy), which unfortunately is not sold in the US anymore since barely anyone bought them. Check out this group of Insight owners that modifies them to get very high MPG:  99mpg.com
Bob Reid hasn't been paying attention.   The electrical grid is much cleaner than conventional combustion engines today, especially considering that every car on the road could go plug-in today, and 70% could recharge in their homes without any additional power plants built.  Study after study over the past 3 months have indicated this.

Check these links:
http://www.calcars.org/priusplus.html

http://www.soultek.com/clean_energy/hybrid_cars/
hymotion_plug_in_conversion_kit_announced_today.htm


and this from the Los Angeles Times:
According to the study, a marginal improvement in power plant emissions, coupled with ownership of plug-ins by 20% of U.S. drivers by 2050 — the report's worst-case scenario — would cut annual greenhouse gas emissions by 163 million tons.

Under a "middle case" scenario, which assumes plug-ins make up 62% of U.S. passenger vehicles by 2050 and utilities adopt more stringent pollution-control measures, emissions would be cut by 468 million tons a year.

That would be equal to removing 82.5 million vehicles, about a third of the light vehicles on the road today.

"The study clearly shows that the benefits from pluggable hybrids are greater if the power sector is cleaner," said Dan Lashof, science director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Climate Center.

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions would help combat global warming, and increasing the fuel efficiency of passenger vehicles would reduce the nation's dependence on petroleum, the nonprofit groups said.

The study estimated that a 60% market share for plug-in hybrids would tap only 7% to 8% of the electricity available nationwide in 2050. That finding jibes with a study released late last year by the Department of Energy that concluded that "the existing electric power system could generate most of the electricity consumed" by plug-ins. However, the DOE study noted that the power supply situation is tighter in California, a popular market for hybrids.
Now if we can only get people to think of building "FUNCTIONAL" plug-ins, we'd really be ahead of the game.  I certainly won't deny the car in the photo "looks good" but that "looking good" is part of the endless facade that has caused the problems we face.  We build our homes, cars, and buy clothing all as just a matter of show, and seem more interested in impressing the Jones' next door than of actually getting more out of life itself.  Micro and subcompact cars can be built very safe and yet offer just as much seating and cargo capacity as a mere stylish car twice their weight.  All that extra metal doens't just lower gas mileage, it also has to be mined, refined, and shipped...  It all adds up and if everyone watched the Science Channel special on the dire conditions of the ice caps, they'd want to be doing all that you can too.
"Why not just wait another year for the GM VOLT"

Anyone remember GM's last attempt at an electric car, the EV-1? They wouldn't sell them, only leased them, didn't promote them, and lobbied tooth and nail to get places like California to stop requiring them. American car manufacturers aren't known for being boldly innovative, and seek to stifle innovation that might threaten their profits at every turn.

I think that the more people who attempt to produce high-mileage, zero emission, etc. cars, the better. Just because GM has announced and shown a prototype doesn't mean we can all lie down and proclaim the Earth saved. Not by half. Competition *is* the American way.
Well, all I can say about that car is that it's BUTT-UGLY!! For $35000 I would expect something with a little more design, not this grotesque thing that looks like Buck Roger's Pontiac.
OK, Kerry keep holding your breath, I'm sure GM will have a VOLT available for public consumption under $100k next year... green smoke and mirrors...
As most of us know, hybrid cars are not the end-all panacea of automobile efficiency, however, these cars are the natural progression towards that goal.  At this time, I would like to see the introduction of the plug-in hybrid cars utilizing a solar-electric roof panel to augment the power system.  The next X-Prizes should then be committed to the creation and production of marketable high efficiency solar panels and batteries
I am a bit late posting to this one but has anyone heard of the Tesla? It is a 100% electric car that goes 0 to 60 in under 4 second and cost about 2 cents a mile to run. That would be like a standard car that would get 300 miles to the gallon. I think the main reason we do not see more cars like this is that the oil companies do not want them. I have not done a detailed study but I would guess major stock holder in every major auto company include oil companies or heads of oil companies. This is just how business is done and if we want to drive cars that cost less to drive we will have to push for it both at the dealerships and in the government. The California law requiring any company selling cars there to also sell a hybrid has done a lot.
Wow let's all have a comment war on plug in cars. Haha. Interesting and fantastic thought and all, but let's see how far this goes. In all these comments, everybody's right, but there's always more to it.

Oil companies will definately not like this idea because it will not benefit them. The government is supposedly fighting their ass off for this oil in other countries, therefore they will somehow be involved in this, hence, in the end, the government has a say in whether this is going to happen or not.
Yup my homies, this all leads to politics.

Surprise surprise.
Great idea though. Yea let's save the ecosystem! Haha. Not gonna happen.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=348494

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google