ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Alcohol claims go flat at NASA

Posted: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:36 PM by Alan Boyle

Insiders tell NBC News that NASA has found nothing in the past 20 years of spaceflight to back up last month's allegations that some astronauts used alcohol heavily just before flight - and one space pioneer says many of his colleagues are "pissed off" over what the original report has done to the reputation of the astronaut corps.

The space agency's safety chief, Bryan O'Connor, is due to release the results of his internal investigation into the alcohol claims at 11 a.m. ET Wednesday - then discuss those results at a 1:30 p.m. ET news conference that will be broadcast on NASA TV.

O'Connor's probe was sparked by an independent panel's claims of "heavy alcohol use" among astronauts before flight, which were contained in a wider report about shortcomings in NASA's medical screening procedures (PDF file). The independent panel was chaired by Air Force Col. Richard Bachmann Jr., and included medical and legal experts from other federal agencies.

NBC News' Jay Barbree passed along a preview of O'Connor's follow-up report today, based on interviews with knowledgeable sources who could not speak publicly because they lacked official authorization to do so:

"Former astronaut Bryan O'Connor, NASA's chief of safety and mission assurance, is set to tell a press conference tomorrow his investigation into allegations of improper alcohol use by astronauts found nothing.

"O'Connor sifted through the last 20 years of spaceflight and was unable to verify any of the drunken reports made by the NASA Astronaut Health Care System Review Committee stemming from astronaut Lisa Nowak's stalking and attacking a romantic rival during the unraveling of a love triangle with a fellow astronaut.

"The committee had reported rumors that some astronauts were allowed to fly intoxicated.

"O'Connor will say his investigation was unable to verify any of the rumors astronauts were drunk.

"Those involved with readying astronauts for flight say that, because of the many hours astronauts are under direct scrutiny and live television cameras before flight, it is most unlikely any astronaut could fly drunk.

"O'Connor's investigation suggests that if any astronaut ever boarded a spaceship intoxicated, it was a masterful deception and certainly a rarity."

Barbree told me that O'Connor's report could not absolutely deny astronauts used alcohol in the crucial hours before flight - only that no evidence could be found to back up the claims in the independent panel's report. Those claims were based on interviews with astronauts and flight surgeons, but the panel said it wasn't in a position to verify whether the claims were true.

The tales of drunken astronauts have sparked much levity on late-night talk shows and in editorial cartoons - but agency officials, lawmakers and the astronauts themselves aren't laughing. The House Science and Technology Committee has scheduled hearings on the issue as early as next week.

Before this month's flight of the shuttle Endeavour, mission commander Scott Kelly wrote a letter saying the idea of drinking before driving a spaceship was "utterly ridiculous":

"It is beyond my comprehension that anyone in the astronaut office would consider doing what is suggested in this report and exaggerated in the press - showing up on launch day under the influence of alcohol. This is serious business and we take it as such."

But Kelly's publicly expressed ire was nothing in comparison to the disbelief and outrage that Apollo 12 moonwalker Alan Bean expressed during an interview with me on Monday.

Most of our conversation was focused on the good old days depicted in an upcoming documentary, "In the Shadow of the Moon." Bean confirmed my initial impression that he was an "aw-shucks" kind of guy, more interested in his art than the ins and outs of space policy. But when the topic turned to NASA's image as it looks toward future exploration, Bean couldn't resist addressing a topic that was clearly close to his heart - and his gut:

"My hat’s off to NASA, it’s a good agency. And boy, one of the things that’s pissed me off lately has been this talk about astronauts drinking and flying with drink. I was in there 18 years, OK? I heard all the rumors.

"First of all, I never saw anything like that, ever. Never heard it even as a rumor. Whoever that guy is that was in charge of that group that released that information, which I think is wrong and a lie … he’s got to be held accountable for this kind of embarrassment – letting people on late-night TV make fun of these astronauts who are so dedicated.

"No astronaut would put up with that. Nobody would say, 'Oh, you've been drinking, huh? That’s OK. We're headed up there, our lives depend on it. But what the heck.' They would say, 'You've been drinking? We’re not going, and you’re not coming to work ever again here. You’re out of here, we’ll never see your ass again!' Nobody would put up with it.

"Every astronaut I've talked to has been pissed off about this. And not a single one of them would put up with it for one second. This is a terrible hurt to those people up there now. ..."

You can hear the hurt in Bean's voice in this audio clip, which includes the above excerpt and a little bit more.

He urged NASA to fight back vigorously to protect the image of the agency and its astronauts. "I don't think that when you're defending the people who work for you, you have to be politically correct. I think it's just the opposite," he said.

The exchange made clear that Alan Bean isn't just an "aw-shucks" guy who happened to find himself on the moon 38 years ago. He's someone who speaks his mind and lets the chips fall where they may.

"Now you know why I'm an artist," he said finally. "I wouldn’t have put up with that for 10 seconds."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Phew, glad that didn't take too long.

So Alan, think you can convince NBC to run a top story about the truth of all this?
I knew that 'report' was a pile of BS from the first second I heard of it. The astronauts are monitored for at least 24 hours, please correct me if I am wrong, prior to launch. There is no way any of them could be drunk before a flight. What an embarassment for the JA who compiled that 'report' I hope NASA drops the hammer on him.
Someone is always throwning eggs at greatness. i call it "crabs in a bucket". Carry on.
What I hate is that a rumor gets spread,and people read it and believe it. If it turns out wrong,after being repeated for weeks or months,there MIGHT be a retraction on page 7 next to the obituaries and an article on how a local kid helped raise money for a his classes ski trip. Years later,people are still repeating the false rumor as if it were true.
Since is not a peer reviewed article, why would MSNBC publish it?  I would love a VALID answer.  As your science editors well know.  Or do you not employ scientific editors?  Or just editors.  Bruce
Bruce, are you referring to the independent panel's report? That's a public record, it doesn't follow the rules of peer review. Even if we're talking about research reports (which this is not), we may publish something that has not been peer-reviewed, based on news value. My title may be science editor - but we're in the news business, not the academic journal business. Hope this helps.  :-)
That's the ticket, if NASA says so, it must be true.
Alan, just because someone produces a report does not mean that you are obliged to reprint it.  If something seems to be false or unlikely on cursory inspection then I think reports should attempt to verify first; spreading false information does have a bad side effect; you "can't unring the bell"!
I've always "heard" that once the O2 is ventilating the lungs, the effects of alcohol drops like a rock in the big blue sea. I remember see many a Red Flag aviator-type being literally poured into the cockpit and within in a few minutes of breathing "fresh air" they were sober as a Nun. Seems like a visit to the Doctor is in order on this one.
No need to peer-review. Only ethics. Facts make into news. If you do not have a fact you do not have news. If you create  news without facts, then you have a problem. This is the case.
Jos'e
Report 1 says, "they were drunk" and report 2 says, "We found no evidence that they were drunk".  Why believe either one?

Sadly, I fear the damage has been done.  People always remember the bad and will discount any follow-up truths as conspiracy or government lies.  In fact, lots of people will probably use this new report as "proof" that the astronauts were drunk. I hate conspiracy theorists.
My POV - even if it were true, who cares?  Flying those HAS to be scary and a little liquid courage wouldn't hurt if it was true.  However, I agree with Alan Bean - I don't think anyone would just not notice and let it slide.  I'm sorry that anyone found the foolish rumor hurtful.
If intelligence has anything, whatsoever, to do with the selection of astronauts, ask yourself - would you sit on top of a gozillion gallons of highly explosive fuel, and risk your life, and everyone else on board, by drinking before a mission.  Doesnt' make a hell of a lot of sense.  Personally, I would want to be on the very top of my game.
"we may publish something that has not been peer-reviewed, based on news value"

Slanderous, baseless propaganda is apparently no problem for the fact-free Fourth Estate. Publish nonsense - as long as it sells, it has "news value".
I woluld also encourage the astronaut corps to mention on shows like "The Tonight Show" and such show to first say that they have seen no drinking before a space flight.
Greatness? I remember watching Columbia take off, and then the initial reports of the wing strike. I told my girlfriend, "They better spacewalk out and check it, or they will burn up on re-entry". Then came the management denials. I again told my girlfriend that the ship would burn up on re-entry, because of a bad decision. We all know what happened next.

NASA is far from great. Like any large bureaucracy, the structure of NASA is littered with little fiefdoms... managed by people who I wouldn't let wash my car. It's time to cut NASA's budget. A better use of the money would be to get us to the point where we are energy independent, with a form of power that will not kill our planet. Once we can clean up OUR OWN BACKYARD... then we should reach for the stars. What is the point of reaching for the stars, when we will not have a world to live on, because we have killed it with abuses since the start of the industrial revolution?

NASA isn't great. They are a great diversion.
While it appears that drinking was not going on as originally reported, I think Alan Bean's response is pretty similar to what I would expect from an airline pilot or copilot, and we know there have been incidents of airline pilots flying under the influence.

For me, the term "peer-reviewed" relates to sending research to other scientists in the field. It's an academic term, and I was thrown by the use of the term in reference to a non-academic subject. We don't send our reports to, for example, an NYU media critic or CNN editors for review.

But if you're talking about "editor-reviewed" - that is, edited - yes, of course that's the case. Come on in to MSNBC's newsroom here in the Seattle area and I'll show you around and introduce you to my editors so you can see we're real people and not evil wraiths.  ;-)

I don't agree with the view that "slanderous, baseless propaganda is apparently no problem for the fact-free Fourth Estate." The truth is the most important thing, but nowadays the truth is not handed down like holy writ. Facts have to be brought out, examined and tested, as the report released today makes clear. And as with most stories, some of the facts in this case may never come to public light. We just have to do the best we can to get at the truth, often having to start with incomplete information.

To some extent, it is like the scientific process. But it's not usually like the peer-reviewed, months-long process that is the norm for scientific publishing (although sometimes it can seem that way).

Of course NASA said that they couldn't find any proof.  If any person had proof that this certain astronaut flew drunk,  that person would be fired and blacklisted for life.  They would never get a job in this industry again.  Do any of you trust ANYTHING that your management tells you?
the early guys were test pilots...they drank like rowdy guys drank in those days...hard, fast, and often...corvettes in the desert...untested jets...spaceships...what's the difference?...who else were they going to get to sit there in a tin can, over which they had no control, while guys on the ground lit the candle?
if astronauts got aboard drunk, every single support person on the ground knew...it's kinda hard to cover booze breath while someone is right in your face for hours before boarding...getting checklists ready, and suiting up...c'mon, Kids...who gives a damn?...
you get aboard one of those things sober!
nattering nabobs of negativity...
ol' Spiro T was good for some things...drunk as he was...they were all shitfaced every waking second of every single day.
And here this story was the lead on the nightly news.  I thought it didn't sound right and there were certainly other more important stories to cover.
"My POV - even if it were true, who cares?  Flying those HAS to be scary and a little liquid courage wouldn't hurt if it was true."

Well...if it was your spaceship and there was no one under you, that might be one thing. But as Maverick was reminded in the film 'Top Gun,' "It's not your airplane, it's the taxpayers' airplane!"

And sadly, the public has an endless appetite for scandals among the celebrated, in general.

Thus the concern, even if it was, as it seems, unfounded.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=337183

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google