ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The 'Wow' mystery turns 30

Posted: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 8:50 PM by Alan Boyle


Courtesy of Jerry Ehman / BigEar.org
The code "6EQUJ5" indicates a radio signal detected in 1977 at the Big Ear Radio
Observatory in Ohio - a signal so strong that astronomer Jerry Ehman wrote "Wow!"

Exactly 30 years ago today, astronomer Jerry Ehman was looking over a printout of radio data from Ohio State University's Big Ear Radio Observatory when he saw a string of code so remarkable that he had to circle it and scribble "Wow!" in the margin. The printout recorded an anomalous signal so strong that it had to come from an extraordinary source.

Was it a burst of human-made interference? Or an alien broadcast from the stars? No one knows. The source of the "Wow" signal has never been heard from again - even though astronomers have looked for it dozens of times.

Now the SETI Institute is gearing up to look for it one more time, using the latest tool for seeking signals from extraterrestrial civilizations: the Allen Telescope Array in California.

The array combines observations from dozens of separate 20-foot-wide (6-meter-wide) radio dishes to produce an instrument that will eventually become more sensitive than the world's largest single-dish telescope, the Arecibo Observatory.

"Once the Allen Telescope Array is up and running, and that should be later this year, there's going to be a small project in which we'll look at the same section where the 'Wow' signal was detected, and of course the same spot on the radio dial," Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the SETI Institute, told me today.

Although that area of the sky has been searched dozens of times before, the Allen Telescope Array will bring more sensitivity and wider spectral coverage to the quest, Shostak said.

The renewed search came as welcome news to Ehman, the man behind the "Wow."

"Back in 1977, of course, the computers weren't very powerful," he told me. "Nowadays, if you have the money, you can get excellent receivers, filter banks, computers - you can do much more now than you could in 1977."

But he cautioned that the search could well come up empty again.

"With the Big Ear Radio Telescope, we stayed on that same strip of sky for close to two months and didn't see anything," he said. "A few years later, we looked at that same area of sky and didn't see anything. That was frustrating."

After the single radio burst was detected, astronomers tried to track down a terrestrial cause. But they could find no glitch in the system, and no source that could have explained the strength and the frequency of the seconds-long signal. Since then, the "Wow" signal has stood as one of the central enigmas for alien-hunters, inspiring a scene in "The X-Files."

"The 'Wow' signal is the best evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence," says one character, who refers to Ehman as "my buddy."

Ehman said aliens weren't the first thing that came to his mind when he saw the Big Ear data and wrote his famous word.

"The 'Wow' was just an instantaneous response in writing," he said. "I had no expectations, other than 'here's something extremely interesting - and gee, let's try to find out what it is, or what it isn't.'"

Ehman recently updated his own report on the "Wow" signal for the 30th anniversary, but the report's conclusion hasn't changed over all this time.

"It's still an open question what the source of the signal was," he told me. "We just don't have enough information to determine that. ... We just can't draw any conclusion other than it still allows for the possibility that it was a signal from an extraterrestrial civilization."

Over the past three decades, signal searchers have developed strategies for dealing with "Wow"-type anomalies, Shostak said. For example, if an interesting signal happens to be on a precisely tuned frequency like 14.2700000 MHz, Shostak said it's safe to assume that "some earthly engineer" is responsible (unless E.T. also uses a decimal counting system and measures time in earthly seconds).

If astronomers pick up an interesting signal from one point in the sky, they'll shift their telescope's focus to aim at a different spot. If the signal doesn't go away, the astronomers assume that terrestrial interference is affecting the observations.

That kind of reality check will be much easier to do with the Allen Telescope Array, Shostak said. "You can very quickly switch the telescope to 'point' in a different direction without physically moving the antenna," he said.

For these reasons, the modern search for extraterrestrial intelligence hasn't produced a fresh crop of "Wow" signals, although every once in a while there's a false alarm that sets Shostak's heart racing.

It could well be that the "Wow" signal will remain in a class by itself for millennia to come: never repeated, but never eliminated as a potential alien transmission. I can easily imagine that a civilization might send out a one-shot broadcast rather than a continuous stream of signals. After all, that's what we did.

In 1974, scientists at the Arecibo Observatory sent a coded signal in the direction of the globular star cluster M13 for three minutes - and then just stopped. "It was really just a demo," Shostak said. It will take 25,000 years for the signal to reach M13, but once it arrives, the Arecibo signal might be as enigmatic for the aliens as the "Wow" signal is for us.

"If there is somebody on the other end, they're going to call it the 'Zork' signal, or whatever you want to call it," Shostak said. "They may puzzle over that for years."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I don't think we'll find extra terrestrial intelligences for the same reason that we haven't observed proton decay, or gravitons or magnetic monopoles or the Higgs boson, or for that matter haven't been able to fit string theory into only one time and three spatial dimensions.  It's really simple if one stops to think about it.
We have no way of knowing how alien time differs from ours. The WOW signal could be hundreds of  alien years worth of radio signals that may only last a few seconds here on Earth.
SAPIENCE, usually defined as wisdom or discernment, is the ability of an organism or entity to act with judgment. Judgment is a mental facility that is a particular form of intelligence or may be considered an additional facility, above intelligence, with its own properties. Robert Sternberg has segregated the capacity for judgment from ordinary meanings of intelligence, which is closer to the sense of clever than to wisdom. Good judgment in making decisions about complex life or social decisions is a hallmark of being wise.

The word sapience is derived from the Latin word for wisdom, sapientiae or sapientia. These are related to the verb sapere, which means 'to taste' but with the sense of tasting the meaning of life. It is generally interpreted in the English-speaking world as meaning to be wise, and the present participle forms part of Homo sapiens, the Latin binomial nomenclature created by Carolus Linnaeus to describe the human species. Linnaeus had originally given humans the species name of diurnis, meaning man of the day. But he later decided that the dominating feature of humans was wisdom, hence application of the name sapiens. Strangely, it seems that he did not consider the idea whether humans were just another kind of animal when choosing this name, instead basing his selection on contemporarily deep religious convictions that man was a product of special creation. Thus, his chosen biological name was intended to emphasize man's uniqueness and separation from the rest of the animal kingdom.

As a fundamentalist Christian I would like you to consider the possibility that God made the sound to display the foolishness of those who do not not seek Him for answers to what is beyond our mortal grasp and understanding. But then again it could also be satan doing this to lure the non-believer even further away from the only Truth in the universe, the Word of God (The Bible).
Was the "WOW" signal simply detected? Or was there something recorded? If the signal was recorded it should have been fully analysed by now. One hypothesis that scientists don't seem to be taking into consideration is "non-intelligent" lifeforms that might have naturally evolved the ability to communicate with radio waves. For example perhaps giant space whales that eat comets are belching out long distant radio mating calls. As funny as it may seem ... you can't deny the possibility.
It was me folks, ah huh. Peace out and all that.
Is this where all of our tax dollars are going?
Hmmm...I thought for a second it said "Alien Telescope Array..."
Gods, angels, magic, UFO's, aliens and other supernatural superstitic ideas are all the result of our human primal fears bubbling to the surface. Smart/cunning people use these fears to control entire populations. It's time to grow. We have real human problems that can be solved if we use our fertile minds together with our combined talents.
All very interesting stuff, I’d love to know if anyone was out there too…. But, don’t we have bigger problems on earth? Imagine if we spent more time/money looking for a way not to kill our planet and control overpopulation?  These two problems will be the end of us much sooner then when we find any sign of alien life in the universe…  cease killing each other, feed the hungry, stop over population and then worry if ET is trying to phone home.  What good is evidence of intelligent life if we kill ourselves off by the time we find it?
An answer, an observation and a question:

Answer: For Bill Walters, yes, people have considered and even accomplished putting radio telescopes in space. Satellites such as COBE (Cosmic Background Explorer) are exactly this. The completely protect a satellite from Earth based interferences, people have suggested putting a dish or array of antennae on the far side of the moon.

Observation: Skepticism is is supposed to be keeping an open mind and being willing to axamine all data and hypotheses regarding a phenomenon. Unfortunately people too often claim to be doing this, when they are in fact purposefully and deliberately disbelieving, and jumping to a conclusion as fast or faster than the most intent cultist believer. The fact that they jump to an trivial explanation does not make them correct, it makes them jump from question to answer without evidence to support their conclusion. To justify this, they claim to be applying "Occam's razor", the idea that the simplest explanation is the most likely true. In response, I say (1) scientifically, that's not true; compare Newton's and Einstein's theories of gravity, and (2) metaphorically (but based on reality) Willam of Ockam had a beard.

Question: What do radio telescopers mean by "channel" and how do they measure and calculate them? I know what I mean, and that comes from TV channels. These are frequency ranges with some arbitrary label (such as 'channel 3') attached. Radio telescopes can have millions of simultaneous channels. They can't have millions of little devices each chugging away at a piece of signal. The power, space and heat dissipation problem would require something else. How are they doing this in terms of hardware and analysis? I have suspicions (previously Fourier transform, now wavelet transform) but I can't find the answer defined, so I'm going to remain a skeptic about my hypotheses.
Most people who comment on this won't even take some time and read over Ehman's own report and then comment. The link is included above.  You can even skip the very technical stuff and still come away with a sense of the mystery. To me it's akin to "beyond a reasonable doubt" when ALL the facts are weighed.
The truth is out there-Elvis. Saw you on B5.
"WOW", ET do not use standard broadcast radio, they use Quantum Entanglement, the WOW part com's from the Front poarch, back poarch, of the standard radio modiglated Quantum signal, the Quantum part, can not be recorded, it is just a one shot deal, you trap it in your Quantum traps, or you lose it, the signal was ment for us and nowbody else. When we bild a Quantum radio the hole Galaxy wil light up with chatter.
Knowledge is gained by looking.  SETI may not be the right answer, but if they were not looking we'll never know one way or the other.  

As to the 'WoW', sooner or later it will either be Proven or Dis-Proven, however that can not be done either way by opinion without supporting fact and evidence.  It was 'something', but so far there as been nothing offered by either side that confirms or denies what it was.  Let us keep looking, investigating, and researching till we find an answer.

For the 'Graceland Crew' - I work with a guy who was born the same day that Elvis died... Re-incarnation anyone??
Don't trust any WOW over 30.
We sent only one signal and it was to an area way the heck off.  Totally non-productive, that one.  Why not send a signal every month right to the area where the Wow signal was detected?  Who's running the place, anyway?  Some politician?
We humans always grasp at straws because we have opposable thumbs operated by inquiring minds.  But the billions and billions of planets that Carl Sagan hoped would predict the existence of intelligent alien life can be there without supporting any kind of life at all.

The 'germs' of life may be hurtling around through space but may never find an hospitable place to land.  "Earth now" is not the cradle that "Earth then" was.  Less water, more oxygen, no moon, other differences.  Germination cannot take place under the circumstances of present existence,or it would be happening all the time.  Special conditions are required for life to form and other special conditions are necessary for life to evolve.  So, we are alone.  
"SETI is often criticized as being pseudoscience because it seems to have beliefs in it that are not testable hypotheses - famously, the Drake equation.

However, that is a superficial argument. "

 I guess it depends on your view of the universe. Certainly people who believe they are somehow "gods special people" or some such have a hard time dealing with the idea that maybe they are not so special. Personally,I think we are just a particularly clever animal that evolved from a soup of chemicals. As far as we know,the universe looks about the same in all directions and we know the same physics holds everywhere. It would therefore be surprising if life didn't crop up elsewhere. If that is in fact the case,why not intelligent life. As far as I know,there is no reason to think that our planet is unique or unusual. Therefore I expect to find similar things elsewhere.

It is in fact true that we don't KNOW that these assumptions are true. It could be that our planet is a really really odd one,the exception rather than the rule,but considering the similarity between mars and earth,and the fact that we do in fact know that there are lots of other stars out there that are very similar to ours,it seems a stretch.

Finally,as for the Drake equation,its structure is sound,what we don't know are the values of most the constants. As such,the error is very large.
could it be possible that the signal was lensed from a different direction
What really amazes me is the fact that we as human beings have a hard time believing that there's other intelligent life out there. We have been here for only thousands of years whereas the universe has existed for billions of earth years. People! wake up and smell the coffee, We've been watched since the beginning of our technology and even further. We are just beginning to undersatnd our own technology and haven't tapped into what type of technology is out there. we still live in the stone age.
We need to understand that we were never alone. Just not aware.  
Incoming message: Hodwrakai srreak zangra fils sil hennenai sulbaach grinkatal sidle haffa-sah xus pool hissy schranlana hei.
I fel very certain about two things related to this story. Firstly, life most certainly exists outside the Earth. It's probably in all different stages of development and may be very far away, if you are talking about intelligent, technological life. The probability of life not existing beyond the Earth is too small. Secondly, action always speaks louder than words. If we don't try to listen for signals then we most surely will never hear them. Therefore it is very important to keep scanning the skies, if only to help improve scientific techniques at the very least. If we keep trying then we will eventually be successful. There is nothing like intentional willpower to stay the course. I happen to strongly believe that the Wow signal might very well have been transmitted by an intelligent extraterrestiral source. Although I don't believe in any of the UFO reports made so far.
If we were able to advance in our video technology and capture a UFO on film, possibly of some advanced sort, that would be better than anything we have now.  there is so little concrete.  we need foolproof, concrete evidence.
Did anyone ever consider the strength of the many mega-watt signal that the HAARP project is sending out to who knows where?
Is there an entity who would be willing to do some basic research and check to see at what area of the sky HAARP was pointing at each time it has been turned on? Also what type of signals were sent and when..
I suspect that one of HAARPs' unmentioned duties may be to reply to a "wow' type signal.
HAARP homepage.
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
Its not a stupid waste of money! And please remember that the maestro who conducted a symphony of the forces of nature Nicola Tesla also reported receiving anomalous signals from an unknown source.
Laframboise, Edmonton.

He speaks of that in his own report...

http://www.bigear.org/Wow30th/wow30th.htm

One argument against that was posted here is subtle and strong. How can we think that an ET signal from a distant world would represent a time sequence exactly like ours??...72 seconds is exact and based solely on the earths travel around the sun. However, there are periodicities in natural elements such as cesium and I guess natural materials such as quartz (how does a quartze crystal watch keep time?) that vibrate the same where ever in the universe.  I suppose electronics works the same here as  "there" ..why wouldn't it? Electronics is indelible and behaves according to universal principles that even an ET can't get beyond.  
Perhaps looking in the same area of space is why we haven't heard from the source of the signal in question!  Given earths movement within our solar system, and our solar systems movement within our galaxy, and the movement of our galaxy and other stars in other galaxies as well, I'm wondering if all that movement has been considered in determining where the point of origin of the original signal is now in relation to us now.  Everything has moved considerably from where it was 30 years ago in the grand scheme of things, hasn't it?  And what if that original WOW signal in fact came from a craft that was just traveling through that area of space that we were focusing our attention on at that time?  It is pointless to be still looking for the same or similar signals from the same point in space as the original signal if it had in fact come from a transient source that just happened to be in our "sights" at that particular moment in time when we heard the original and only WOW signal!  It would be comprable to finding the same single grain of sand as one that you had thrown into the ocean thirty years ago!  If you had thrown that single grain of sand into the ocean from a ship in the middle of the ocean, would you begin your search for it 30 years later by going to that same spot in the ocean to begin looking for it?  Given the movement of all celestial bodies throughout the universe that is supposedly still moving and expanding outward, not to mention the movement of the celestial bodies within each galaxy, I'd think it would be virtually impossible to find that same signal again, especially if we are looking at the same relative area of the sky if we haven't taken into consideration all the movement that has taken place in the 30 years since that first signal was initially detected!
I'm not against looking for signals  - no harm in that
but meanwhile there is  beautiful artwork on Mars,
the Moon and Titan.  I know, you haven't "heard that" from a "credible" agency like NASA - so therefore I must be a nutcase.

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/
p/069/2P132498747EFF1800P2288L6M1.HTML
Hey, here's an original idea! Maybe it had something to do with Elvis dying that same day. Boy, am I smrt...I mean, smArt!
I remember visiting the Big Ear and talking to Dr. Krauss in the late 90's. To bad the site is now a golf course. Pretty sad...
It may be that we’ve been ‘quarantined’, so to speak, by some galactic magistrate and strictly OFF LIMITS to direct contact. Let’s face it, we ARE the kind of neighbors that others would build tall fences to isolate.  
Maybe there will never be a "moment of global disclosure or mass confirmation"...they are just letting us each know in many small ways that they are here until we all know inside our own mind even without a public discloser
Who has the time to read these comments?
Extraterrestrials?
Or those of us who have too much time
versus sense.
I'mjust thankful the sky is still there,
we've screwed up everything else.
jb
Seems strange that we would only send out a signal for 3 minutes but hope that an extraterrestrial race would send a steady signal for 30 years straight. Hopefully they are smarter and more considerate than we are.
I really wish I was able to participate in this thread but my home computer is totally bogged down with viruses (despite having protection).  Ug...

It's not a leap of faith to think there is other intelligent life out there as even moons and the moons of free floating planets are likely to harbor some kind of life as Titan, Enceladus, and Europa have shown it's at least possible.  Given what we know is possible with space based interferometer telescopes able to see the cloud cover and mountain ranges on other earthlike worlds around other suns, you can also assume that they certainly could know we are here.  Thus, this short simple ping could be like a tap on the shoulder.  Just enough to awaken us to the possibility yet not enough to challenge any religious views we might have.  I think it could be just such a proprietary message that allows those who believe to work harder without upsetting those who cannot stand the idea of other potentially intelligent life. Until life on earth has a clear winner, a race that has secured itself enough to be 99.99% beyond any chance of extinction or self-annhilation, they will remain silent towards us.  If they were to interfere now and give us technology it would be like interfering in evolution.  But if we can make it to a point where our survival over the eons is guarenteed, then I think they would be obligated to contact us as by that time any extra technology wouldn't make any difference.

Sorry for the late response!
I found and interesting report on "contact" and the societal implications in an adobe pdf from bellevue,wa based foundation for the future. A serious inquiry into "what happens when seti succeeds" - there's a link to the pdf  

http://blog.cognitivelabs.com/2007/08/when-seti-succeeds.html
Has any other cosmic event occurred in that general area since the Wow! incident other than via a "radio signal" and if so, when would we "see" it, if that were the case?  ie. A star exploading or some other burst of energy?
Why scan the aether for signals?  They've been here all along right under our noses.  Here is a pdf that sums up the entire case.

http://tinyurl.com/yp2usw
Maybe sooner or later they will get tired of all those wayward McDonalds', Gap, JC Penny, Sears, Apple Ipod Ad's from our inferior satillites..... And we'll get a giant.. "Shut the flark up!" Sent back to us in the form of a intergalactic ray beam!

Naturally we'd deserve it.  
Considering the Drake equation, I think we can say with a degree of confidence that there is in fact other life in the cosmos. The big question then is "do they taste like chicken?" The next question is, of course, "are they asking the same question?" -R

It is truly amazing that SETI specialists continue to ignore the enormous amount of evidence that aliens are visiting Earth  and proceed on the basis of no evidence at all that signals are being sent our way using techniques that we can predict and employ.See my challenge to SETI Specialists at
http://www.stantonfriedman.com
I see the snicker giggle factor, designed to trivialize, is alive and well here.  Exactly the sort of thing any TV news coverage would have slipped in at the end.  "OOOOO maybe it was Elvis, hee hee hee hee.  Now on to the weather."  What will it take to make it stop?
Return to sender...address unknown...no such number...no such phone...
"An infinite number of monkeys on an infinite number of typewritters..."

What's a typewriter???
What if it was a civilization from a planet that is eclipsed by its star for some 35 years. Perhaps in 5 years it will re-emerge and the signal will resume.....
Open your eyes and minds a little...

You folks accusing those who come on here presenting their ideas about intelligent design and the uniqueness of our planet, as being too narrowed-minded and ignorant of "scientific facts" are the same ones who are casting off any possibilty of the Bible being correct and factual regarding the uniqueness of earth and life on earth. You are more ready to believe that some mother ship is thousands of light years away planning a "first-encounter" resembling the likeness of "ET" to the extreme of "Independence Day" with the human race...

hypocrites!!

I, for one, am not ready to cast off ideas that other "earth-like" planets exists and there could be some kind of object/matter/energy out there sending us some signal or interference.  The Bible does not contradict these statements (actually, the Bible pioneered such ideas as there being other planets, with God, Himself talking about other "worlds" he created; and even the psalmist mentioning the "circle of the earth" far before Columbus travelled the atlantic!  

However, I am more of a pesimist regarding the issue of the WOW signal.  I think most of you have seen a few too many episodes on the Sci-fi channel and probably couldn't even derive the equation for relativity which you so religiously hold to fact!
The Wow signal was not your God, it was the Flying Spagetti Monster. He Farted.
Rob H - Mind if I steal that line? I love it!
It is arrogant of us to assume that we are the only ones worthy of God's notice in this universe. The diversity of life on Earth alone should attest to the myriad of possibilities of life in the universe. Every day, scientists are finding new life in the most hostile of environs here on this planet. So there is no doubt that there should be and is life beyond our petty little world.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=319127

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google