ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



An army of galaxy hunters

Posted: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 6:02 PM by Alan Boyle

More than 85,000 Internet users have signed up to become galaxy inspectors as part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey's "Galaxy Zoo" project - and you can, too. Inspectors go through a tutorial and click their way through an initial database of 1 million galaxies, classifying them by type. Since the project was launched, less than a month ago, each galaxy in the current database has been checked multiple times (for a total of 12 million checks), but the organizers say there’s much more work that this astronomical army can do.

For nine years, hundreds researchers from around the world have been using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey's telescope in New Mexico to create a three-dimensional map spanning a quarter of the sky. "We're a roadmap or an atlas of the universe," Sloan spokesman Gary Ruderman explained.


GalaxyZoo.org
Oxford astronomer Caroline Zunckel uses the Galaxy
Zoo Web site to classify a spiral galaxy.

The idea behind the Galaxy Zoo is to corral the sky survey's massive files of observations into categories using the wisdom of crowds - or "the wisdom of the public," as Ruderman prefers to put it.

The Galaxy Zoo draws upon the same kind of public interest that has fueled projects such as SETI @ home, which sifts through radio data for patterns suggestive of extraterrestrial intelligence; Einstein @ home, which looks for the signature of cosmic gravitational waves; and Stardust @ home, which has enlisted users to seek out interstellar dust trails.

Astronomers on the Galaxy Zoo team were floored by the response to their plea for help. On the first day the "Zoo" was open, the demand was so great that it overloaded a circuit breaker in the computer room circuit breaker, said Johns Hopkins University's Jan Vandenberg. 

"The traffic was 20 times higher than what we hoped for," Johns Hopkins astrophysicist Alex Szalay said in a news release. "This shows the public is really interested in science if they feel they can contribute in a meaningful way."

It's not hard to do: The tutorial guides would-be galaxy hunters through an assortment of objects, and you just have to decide whether each galaxy is elliptical (a fuzzy ball) or spiral (a starry whirl). If it's a spiral, you judge whether it whirls clockwise or counterclockwise. And there's always a "none of the above" category - say, for things that don't look like galaxies, or galaxies that are facing you head-on so you can't tell which way they twirl.

"Computers can do this classification automatically, but humans are far more accurate," said Portsmouth University astronomer Daniel Thomas. "It's like trying to distinguish male and female faces - no computer algorithm will do this as accurately as a person, because we are much better at identifying the most important cues."

Now the Sloan Digital Sky Survey has tens of thousands of eyeballs on the case, instead of mere hundreds. Nearly 7 million images have been checked, and 12.3 galaxy classifications have been registered.

"We now have the world's largest computer working for us, through the combined power of all these human brains," Thomas said.

Ruderman said the goal is to have each galaxy checked at least 20 times, just to make sure there's a consensus for each classification. Particularly interesting anomalies might be flagged for further review, but the main scientific aim is to get at the big picture for galaxy formation: What is the distribution of the different types of galaxies? What determines whether a galaxy becomes a spiral or an elliptical?

"We have theories for how this happens, but to test them we need to know what kinds of galaxies are found in different cosmic environments," Oxford astronomer Anze Slosar said. "The combination of SDSS-II and the Galaxy Zoo will give just the information we need."

But won't the zookeepers eventually run out of things to do? No worries there. Here are the answers to a couple of follow-up questions, e-mailed by Bob Nichol of the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at Portsmouth University:

Q: What happens after 20 people classify each of the 1 million galaxies? Is there a "next" project? Where does the Galaxy Zoo go from here?

A: Twenty classifications per galaxy is our first goal, but more classifications per galaxy will only help us more. So there is no formal cut-off, and the more, the merrier. After 20 classifications per galaxy, we really can start using the sample for detailed scientific research.

The project could be expanded in several ways. First, we could simply do the remaining 50 million galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey! We have only done the tip of the iceberg. These other galaxies are fainter and thus harder to classify. However, we could imagine looking for mergers/interactions in these fainter galaxies, which is easier than looking for spiral arms, for example.

Alternatively, we can use data from the Hubble Space Telescope, which has better resolution and can see distant galaxies better than ground-based telescopes.

Finally, there are many other astronomical data that could be presented to the public in this way - e.g., classification of the spectra of these Sloan galaxies!

Q: When do you think you'll have statistics on galaxy distribution (elliptical vs. spiral)?

A: We can expect the first published results within a year of taking the data. However, I think this database will be important for many years to come - a "famous" database in astronomy.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Since the title is "An Army of Galaxy Hunters", I recalled a post I made a while ago here:

http://www.transterrestrial.com/archives/009068.html

I wonder if a technique like the one described here could be used to find roadside bombs or similar bad stuff?
For the comment above for red... Where did that mindset come from!??!  How can you go from viewing galaxies in space to roadside bombs in Iraq?  What are you going to have people do, view pictures from Satellite feed to see desert and towns?  Im so confused where you put this logic together.
Pardon me for questioning the advancement of human knowledge, but exactly what do we gain by classifying all the galaxies?  Does that knowledge in turn lead to a greater knowledge of the workings of the universe?  Or is this project just the advancement of knowledge for its own sake?
Well! with the way we are treating our planet we had better be doing something to find a new home.
To Frank's comment. Knowledge about many different things sometimes leads researchers to make strange connections, and that's where breakthroughs come from. You may not see the need for galaxy classification now, but in future for instance, some new features of gravity may be uncovered that help to solve grand unified field theory.
Frank, Frank, Frank....good question, I think.   We do not know what part of discovery will make our understanding greater because to know that would make it so we already knew what to look for...and we don't.  We are just beginning to undertsnad the universe, especially in Cosmology.  I think it's a wonderful project.
I wish the Galaxy Zoo luck - they'll need it. A large number of the galaxies aren't clearly spirals or elliptical, and to decide which, you have to know something about galaxies. Unfortunately, this knowledge isn't part of their tutorial or anywhere else on their website. A large number of these galaxies are going to be mis-classified based on "majority rules". Anyone - anyone at all, regardless of knowledge - can simply wade in and start clicking buttons.

I was participating in this study until I realized all I was accomplishing was negating the bogus classifications of someone who knows less about galaxies than a goat. This would be ok except, there's thousands more of these guys and only one (now zero) of me.
The time element must be included somewhere in this project though it isn't specified.  The age at which we observe a particular galaxy will determine what we are seeing, and therefore what shape it is - or rather 'was' when it's light left it.  Since then, it might have changed shape, collided with or passed through another galaxy, and now be something else.  Correlating the results of the count with the age of the various galaxies observed might give us some idea of how creation has changed over time.
Frank... the benefits of this kind of project may not be immediately obvious, but thats the nature of statistical data. I imagine that the patch of sky being surveyed has been mapped out in a grid fashion and perhaps they have estimated the distance to each pictured galaxy. As more and more data is collected it's like fitting pieces into a 3D puzzle. Perhaps patterns will take shape in the distribution of galaxy types that are not so obvious as when you look at the area as a flat picture. Then again maybe there's no pattern. Either way it will give us a better understanding of things.

M Stanley... You are exactly the kind of person that this project needs most. This seems like a test of the interest of people in space and participation in this sort of project, as such I believe they have probably tried to cut to the lowest common denominator for the sake of getting the best response. Maybe you could suggest some training improvements or put up a companion website with more information for those interested.

And last but not least... Red..... I can understand your thinking that some form of distributed picture analysis to pick out changes in landscape and such might help war efforts, but the logistics would be a nightmare. If we take a picture of a galaxy now and someone takes a picture 100 years from now, it wont have changed much. On the ground in a war zone it could change hourly, and chances are that by the time a small change, like evidence of a buried bomb, was noted, it would already be too late to save lives. I dont think they would be very forthcoming in letting thousands of webizens scope out pictures that show their spy capabilities anyway. Especially since the "bad" guys could be looking too and modify their practices to avoid detection based on what could be seen.
Hi

Thanks for commenting on our project; and for the article. To respond to M Stanley's comment - we definitely do not want people to use other knowledge to classify the galaxies, we want them organised by their shape. No knowledge is required for this! In the past, astronomers have had to resort to proxies for shape, picking galaxies by colour, size, mass and a whole host of other things and hoping that they'd actually found spirals and ellipticals. On the whole these techniques are okay, but we want to be able to have a clean sample and then study their colours, sizes and masses. There is a huge wealth of information that can come from such a sample, which has the potential to sort out a lot of the problems with our theories of galaxy formation.

I hope that helps clear up the misunderstanding; it's the human ability to recognise patterns we're using, not its ability to learn astrophysics.
talke about the milky way are we part of it ?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=307632

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google