ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Sixty moons for Saturn

Posted: Thursday, July 19, 2007 10:04 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / JPL / SSI
This image from the Cassini spacecraft highlights several moons of Saturn,
including the new moon known as S/2007 S4, seen as a speck within the red box.

The scientists behind the Cassini orbiter have announced the discovery of Saturn's 60th moon, a little thing that showed up in time-lapse photography of the ringed planet. Jupiter still leads this moon race with 63 known satellites - but Saturn could soon pull ahead, at least temporarily.

Of course, astronomers don't focus on the mere numbers, which shift around every time a new batch of observations is made. They say they're more interested in what even the tiniest moons can tell us about the universe's biggest questions.

"The big questions are always about the formation," the University of Hawaii's David Jewitt, one of the leaders of the Hawaii Irregular Satellites Survey, told me today. "If you're not just butterfly-collecting, then you're answering questions about the way the solar system came to be."

This 60th Saturnian moon currently has the prosaic designation S/2007 S4, although the Cassini imaging team has nicknamed it "Frank" for the time being. It's up to the International Astronomical Union to approve an official name - traditionally, a figure from Greek mythology. (The Planetary Society's Emily Lakdawalla explains how names from Greek, Norse and Inuit lore are divvied up among Saturnian satellites. The mix also includes Gallic  mythological figures.)

Frank first showed up May 30 as a speck on a series of images from Cassini's wide-angle camera - in a region near the moons Methone and Pallene, which were discovered by the Cassini team back in 2004.

When the Cassini scientists looked back through their image database, they could track the tiny dot as it orbited the planet between the other two moonlets. This Web page includes an animated GIF image and a QuickTime video that flips through the most recent imagery.

"With these new data sets we were able to establish a good orbit for the new moon," Carl Murray, a member of the imaging team from Queen Mary, University of London, said in a NASA feature on the find. "Knowing where the moons are at all times is important to the Cassini mission for several reasons."

First of all, the scientists now know that there's another object they have to avoid as they plot Cassini's future trajectory. They estimate that Frank is about 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) wide and made of ice and rock.

But beyond that, studying Frank's course could shed additional light on the dynamics of the Saturnian system. "We've gone from two to three tiny little bodies all in a row," Carolyn Porco of the Space Science Institute, leader of the Cassini imaging team, told me today. "That's starting to suggest there may be more."

There could be a band of Frank-sized moonlets circling Saturn, and scientists might even be able to trace them back to a common origin - say, a protosatellite that broke into pieces long, long ago.

Those are the sorts of insights that raise the satellite search above the level of butterfly-collecting, Jewitt told me. Although Cassini is in a good location for spotting more Saturnian moons, Jewitt pointed out that ground-based programs such as HISS are even more prolific in the moon-spotting department.

In May, HISS reported three new irregular moons of Saturn (PDF file). Jewitt hinted that still more Saturnian satellites may be added to the list, if the HISS astronomers are able to verify what their observations seem to be telling them.

HISS is concentrating on irregular satellites, not only around Saturn but around the solar system's other giant planets as well. Unlike Frank and other regular satellites (including the solar system's marquee moons), irregular satellites tend to have wide, eccentric orbits. Most of them move in a retrograde fashion, opposite to their mother planet's direction of rotation. That's a tip-off that they weren't born in place when the planets coalesced, but were captured in orbit at a later time.

Thanks to advances in imaging technology, astronomers are getting much better at sizing up the solar system's irregular army. "The first irregular satellite was found about 100 years ago," Jewitt said. "In the whole of the 20th century, only eight were found, but now we have over a hundred."

So far, these multitudes of moons have raised more questions than they've answered. For example, how were the satellites captured in the first place? At one time, astronomers thought that an asteroid typically became a satellite when it passed through the upper layers of a planet's atmosphere and experienced drag, but Jewitt said that explanation is now falling out of favor.

"The one that looks most promising now is that capture might occur because two protosatellites either collide or scatter from each other in the vicinity of a planet," Jewitt said.

As more moons are added to the list, Jewitt and other planetary scientists could well close in on the answers to those big questions about the formation of planets and their satellites. "Each and every new discovery adds another piece to the puzzle and becomes another new world to explore," Murray said.

In coming years, Cassini could get an even closer look at Frank (or whatever it's eventually called): The spacecraft's current trajectory would put it within 7,300 miles (11,700 kilometers) of the moonlet in December 2009.

For now, Porco is tickled to think that Cassini is right in the middle of a bustling celestial neighborhood. "I like the idea that we're at 60 natural satellites and one artificial satellite," she said. "That is a great indication of where we are in the exploration of the solar system. We've come this far."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It makes me think of a cake in the oven.  If it is not observed until 30 minutes have gone by, the cake does look like the wet and sloppy batter it was, but now is brown topped, dry and bigger, perhaps overflowing its container.  If another 30 minutes elapses, the cake is now its original size, but black and crusty.  No single observation will tell what the cake is made of, nor how the ingredients were combined in the first place. Even multiple viewings will not reveal whether the cake is vanilla, almond, or white chocolate.  That can only be determined by tasting it.  Before it gets burned up.  A good enough reason for me to go to Saturn and his Moons.
And the oven used in the baking will also make a difference.
Awesome read, Alan.  We've come so very far with explorations of this type, yet we are still so very far away from many answers to many questions concerning our own solar system.  The artificial satellite really caught my interest as I recall Mars having some very peculiar moons as well, of which we might have in our sights to explore in the near future according to Space.com.  The number of bodies they have found is staggering!  With this "explosion" of newfound interest of the public with space Saturn is turning out to be quite a fascinating planet.  Even more so if you consider the recent public interest in the "hexagon" (that still has my head swimming!)...

I can’t wait for Cassini to get a little closer!

Thanks for the excellent coverage. :)
Frank's a nice name. They should keep it.
God certainly made a wonderful Cosmos, huh?
Is it certain these moons have been around a long time???  We keep turning up multi-moons, not seemingly all smaller, but not seen before.  Could some have been captured in orbit within the past few years of observation?  It's fascinating but like the Jupiter impacts years ago, a current event, could we be seeing some of these moons being accumulated?  I like Frank too - maybe not as romantic as the Greek names, but
What is the definition of a "moon". Obviously, bigger than a speck of dust, but how much bigger?

Fluxman
Matthew F. Clough wondered about the polar 'hexagonal' feature showing up in new photographs of Saturn.  Bees make hexagonal honeycomb cells the same way.  Movies show the bee making wax and building the walls of the cell by turning its body within the confines of a circle while it constructs the cell.  The wax is warm and pliable and automatically assumes the hexagonal shape by being pressed by other cells under or already constructed of the same size.  Squashing pliable circles makes them hexagonal.  The central circle is always going to be surrounded by eight other circles when they are identically sized as they are in a honeycomb.  By taking the hexagonal shape they eliminate empty space between them, an advantage for the bee when many of them are crawling around the hive.  That leaves the question, where are the other circles outside the Saturnian Hexagon?  It seems to be formed of clouds whipped by winds or planetary rotation, so perhaps there are other winds blowing steadily up from Saturn's equator and forcing the hexagonal shape to appear.
Yes, the *Flying Spaghetti Monster* did a FINE job, D Rasmussen...RAMEN!!

The definition of the term "moon" is the next looming "meaning of the term planet"-type crisis, Fluxman, just waiting to spring on us. Here's something not to be surprised by when that happens: WE COULD END UP WITHOUT A MOON! The term "double planet" fits the Earth-Moon quite well. I kid you not; the proposal will probably be made!
I was happier with Jupiter's 12 moons and Saturn's 9.
luddite? maybe
all retrograde moons were captured when the gas giants moved away from the sun. read sky and telescope magazine -- depleting outer asteroids, june '97.  contact dave powers, 3020 shawnee 8, winchester, va 22601 for answers to your questions.
Hey JC of Fairbanks, our Luna was acquired, not birthed in Earth orbit as a double planet would have had to be if we were partners in that conception so long ago.  The definition of 'moon' makes the body in question what it is in conjunction with the mass of the planetary unit.  If Luna were in orbit on its own around Sol it would be a 'planet' but it functions as a satellite orbiting Terra, not a partner revolving with our planet around a common focus somewhere in space, with the two of us orbiting Sol as a single unit.  Are they really going to re-define definitions to make Luna become Planet No. 9?  Can't they leave well enough alone?
Earth-Moon orbit their common center of mass, not Earth's center. This point lies not at Earth's center, but over 4000km toward the Moon (though still inside Earth). How really to *define* a double planet is an open question still, but the definition of the term "moon" is getting stretched alot the way the term "planet" has, and, at least for scientific purposes, may eventually need revising. As an example I give you    a tiny bit of ice in a huge, retrograde orbit about Saturn being put in the same bin with our Moon....
I missed the point of 'common centre of gravity' in my earlier response - thanks, JC.  I see your point about the relative sizes of our moon and that chip of ice around Saturn, but isn't the factor of 'orbit' the determining one, not the factor of 'mass' by itself?  Acquired satellites could be retrograde or otherwise, but satellites born at the same time as a planet would necessarily share the same direction of movement as the planet and as the star being formed from a nebula, no?
"but isn't the factor of 'orbit' the determining one, not the factor of 'mass' by itself?"
That's one of the things that will have to be resolved. In work I do I have already resorted to the term 'moonlet' for an object like this, rather than 'moon'. There are many, large differences between planetary satellites, and it will soon be neccessary to define terms for them. I hope this happens sooner rather than later, and is *done right*, and hopefully avoid allowing terms to get culturally embedded that will have to be changed later....

"Acquired satellites could be retrograde or otherwise"
This is one of the big factors which will have to go into categorizing these things. This will not be simple! Note that Triton is a huge 'moon' of Neptune and thus fits the 'large moon' category, but is *retrograde* in its orbit!

"satellites born at the same time as a planet would necessarily share the same direction of movement as the planet"
Definitely.
Has anyone considered the possibility that the rings of Saturn may have been created by a giagantic explosion or a series of huge volcanos on the 'surface' of Saturn that was powerful enough to spew material into orbit around Saturn?  It would have to be something unimaginable here on Earth, but on Saturn... who knows.
has any explored saturn man?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=279275

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google