ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Inside fusion's fortress

Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:54 PM by Alan Boyle


Alan Boyle / MSNBC.com

The entrance to Chateau de Cadarache
has a medieval look.


You can count on the French to add a little joie de vivre to the most unlikely of pursuits – for example, by bringing haute cuisine to the battlefield. So it shouldn't be surprising that France's nuclear industry has a bit of elan as well: Witness the Chateau de Cadarache, a medieval castle that serves as the home away from home for scientists and engineers working at the country’s top nuclear research site.

The setting is stunning: Far below the fortress, the Vordure River flows into the Durance, and on through Provence toward Marseille and the Mediterranean. The grounds boast plenty of walking paths, including a trail up to the stone chapel on a nearby hill. The chateau's rooms are spacious, and the restaurant menu offers glazed duck and other delicacies, plus a carefully thought-out selection of local wines. You might think you're at a resort, rather than at the site where the future of fusion power could well be forged.

Two years ago, Cadarache was selected as the site for the world’s biggest nuclear fusion experiment, a $13 billion international project known as ITER. The ground has not yet been fully cleared for the new reactor. Construction is expected to last until 2016. And ITER's partners don't expect to demonstrate commercially viable energy production until 2040 or so. Nevertheless, things are humming around Cadarache: The talk at the dinner table (yes, over a tangy glass of Chateau de Clapier Cuvee Soprano) was about how housing prices are going up, and how rooms at the chateau are getting scarcer.

ITER isn't the only reason for the influx: As my colleagues at MSNBC.com reported earlier this year, nuclear fission may be making a comeback, with Europe leading the pack. Some of the chateau's guests spend several nights a week here, working on fission-related projects during the day at the nearby facilities of the French Atomic Energy Commission. The commission, known here by the French acronym CEA, recently marked the 60th anniversary of its founding - and in 2009, Cadarache itself will be hitting the Big 5-0 as one of the agency's main research centers.


OECD / NEA

The Chateau de Cadarache, seen at the center of
this aerial photo, is surrounded by scenery.


One of the engineers commuting to Cadarache actually works for Areva, the agency's commercial spinoff. During dinner, we chatted about alternative technologies for separating out radioactive waste and eventually disposing of it deep underground, a la Yucca Mountain. It sounds as if the French are wrestling with the same kinds of issues Americans are facing when it comes to long-lasting nuclear waste.

In addition to its activities in France, Areva is angling for a share of the U.S. market for nuclear management - and generating political controversy in the process.

Nuclear research is rife with opportunities for political wrangling. For example, a standoff between Japan and Europe held up an agreement on the ITER project for three years. Both parties wanted to be the host for the reactor site, and neither would yield. Finally, negotiators (at times working here at the Chateau de Cadarache) came up with a Solomonic solution: Europe would get the ITER reactor site – and as a consolation prize, Japan would get favored status for procurement contracts and staff appointments, including the directorship.

The man who got the ITER concept going in the first place told me he's worried that such politics could hurt the fusion project before it really gets started. "That is my fear," said Robert Aymar, who went on from ITER's directorship in 2004 to become the director general of CERN, Europe's particle physics research center.

"It looks like now every decision, which should be purely technical, will become a political issue which is discussed by ambassadors and so on - and that is not something which is nice, for technical reasons," Aymar said last week at CERN, on the French-Swiss border. "ITER is a large experiment to build, and very complex and very difficult. To assume that you can solve that by splitting any decision by individuals from seven countries who are probably not competent for that role ... Bargaining that is not something which we should do."

Over the past week, we've seen how CERN is gearing up for its own big scientific challenge: next year's scheduled startup of the Large Hadron Collider. Next we'll delve into the challenges facing ITER as it starts toward its date with fusion’s fate.

Previously from the Big Science Tour: The science behind the tour ... Living in the Web's cradle ... Inside the big-bang machine ... Toiling in the fields of physics ... Inside the antimatter factory ... First, the Web ... now, the Grid ... Suspense on a subatomic scale.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hi, Alan -- Even Science has become beholden to Politics.  While one can't blame a government - like Europe's and Japan's - for desiring the prestige of hosting a special project, ITER, more's the pity the benefits of such a project have to be affected by that decision, or rather, indecision.  National pride is no more to be admired than the personal kind of pride, which Shakespeare knew 'o'er leaps itself, and falls on t'other side.'  Will that attitude prevent us from conquering Global Warming in time to save us all?
Hey now just wait a minute... Where is the home video of the castle?  I LOVE CASTLES!  Don't even get me started on the hold up over where to build the thing.  I knew it was long but would have only guessed two years not three.  Ug... Yeah, like we have all the time in the world just to figure that out.  We have to remember that the damn thing was ready to be built in something like 1995 but then was forced back to the drawing table for a less ambitious goal once congress saw the cost.  Then Japan and Russia went through a recession, which delayed it another four years or so...  I very much respect Europe for wanting to be the place for everything like that however.  They really push the envelope on science as I think they see the loop and payback of high technology and high tech jobs and how it benefits them overall.  Every member of ESA and other such organizations clamor for a piece of the action and the fact that individual investment pays off in a proportional amount of the work load makes giving more and more equally rewarding.  Think about it.  Few states even care about NASA but if each of them had a stake in the game I’d bet they’d all be trying to land more and more jobs in their state by pressing for more and more ambitious projects.

With all the delays I think a side issue to note is just how delicate our sciences really are.  I have to wonder how long it would take for an entire branch of science as complicated as this to just up and die when people are forced to find other jobs and forget what they once knew.  The people who have designed ITER probably are long gone into other fields by now.  By the time they call for the next follow on design for ITER it will be like trying to re-hire the engineers who designed Apollo.  These people have committed their entire life to their work and if given adequate funding could have kept thinking about better and better designs in the mean time.  

I'm personally leaning towards extremely deep geothermal which they say can provide 100,000 times the current energy the entire earth uses presently.  I have been a long time advocate of Fusion however and think it is well worth the effort.  Helium three from the moon could increase the power output of fusion while lowering the amount of low level radioactivity it generates.  Not only will full construction take until 2016, from what I remember of the timeline, it will take some five years after that to bring it up to full power if I'm not mistaken.  Personally, when people start to realize just how bad things have become with global warming, I think ITER will be side stepped by much more ambitious commercial-quality reactors long before ITER is even completed.

I heard that area of France was earthquake prone but that they would compensate for that in the design.
Even on Stargate it was all hidden and not shared with the world until the 2nd stargate was discovered in Russia and only then were the Russians invited in and they wanted to run it all at that point.
It never ceases to amaze be how we can blow close to a trillion dollars in a futile war and yet spend so little on a technology that promises virtually limitless cheap energy.  Maybe politicians will wake up to just how much protecting our oil interests is costing us.
Well, it seems acommodations for scientists have come a long way since the wooden shacks of Los Alamos!

Well it's fine by me, after all these people are trying to solve some of the most difficult problems Humanity face, they have all the right to be pampered with good wine and food to help keep their head wheels spinning.

Then again, Einstein developed his special relativity theory while working in a lousy office in Switzerland... althought the big Eureka moment seemed to have come while strolling the beautiful italian countryside when he was a teenager and was cast out of school.
I would agree with the angst in spending trillions on war over mere millions on fusion but fusion will never be 'cheap' energy.  All those dollars spend for R&D, development and operational maintenance must be passed on to the consumer.  Nuclear fission energy is not cheap and fusion energy won't be either.  Fusion's appeal is in the freedom from oil dependence; limited enviornmental impact and virtual limitless source of fuel - hydrogen - which is not free either but available in abundance from anywhere).  We're not likely to see any hydrogen cartel anytime soon.
Isn't the whole point of building a fusor just to boil water?  Boil the water, spin the turbines, drive the generators...  Surely we can find a more cost-effective way to boil water, yes?
Ultimately, global warming comes from people useing their cars,dishwashers, etc. And the more people, the more global warming[China & India,for example!]
More birth control for China and India the highest birthrate countries in the world. Maybe putting religion on the Incas and the Mayans was not such a great idea either. No birth control = global warming. Turning off the computer now!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=236575

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google