ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Suspense on a subatomic scale

Posted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 5:59 PM by Alan Boyle

Who will find the "God particle" first? Next year, CERN is due to start up its Large Hadron Collider on the French-Swiss border to hunt for the Higgs boson, the elusive subatomic particle that is thought to give rise to mass. But some scientists are wondering if Fermilab's Tevatron collider in Illinois might beat the LHC to the punch. For now, the wondering hasn't gone much beyond hints and rumors. Nevertheless, the Tevatron's operating life is likely to be extended to see if there's something real behind those rumors.

Over the past few weeks, the rumors have surfaced on physicists' Web logs as well as Wired's Web site, focusing on what's said to be a small amount of data from the Tevatron's DZero experiment. Just this month, the DZero team announced that they had identified a new type of "triple-scoop" baryon - but so far, nothing has been published relating to the purported Higgs results.

Bagging the Higgs boson would be a big deal because it's the only particle whose existence is predicted by the Standard Model but has not yet been found. The Standard Model, which some have called the "theory of almost everything," is a description of the subatomic world that has served exceedingly well as a guide for technologies ranging from microwave ovens to hydrogen bombs.

Over the past century the Standard Model has been repeatedly fleshed out and nailed down - but if it turns out that the theory is fundamentally wrong, that could force physicists to rewrite their cosmic rulebook. On the plus side, such rewritings typically lead to dramatic shifts in science and technology, as they did in the case of quantum theory and relativity.

Based on the reports that have emerged so far, including chats I've had with physicists at Europe's CERN research center over the past week, it appears safe to say that there's something intriguing about the DZero data, but not yet enough statistical significance to the results. More runs are required to determine whether what has been seen is just a crazy blip or true evidence of the Higgs boson.

The big question is, how much longer will the Tevatron be around for those future runs? The traditional expectation has been that the collider would be shut down in 2008, and that particle physicists from the United States as well as other parts of the world would turn their attention to the more powerful Large Hadron Collider.

But Fermilab spokeswoman Judy Jackson told me that an advisory panel appears likely to recommend keeping the Tevatron around through 2009. "It is far from a done deal, but it looks as if that is going to be what they will recommend," she said Monday.

That recommendation would have to be pushed up the chain, through the Department of Energy and on to Congress, Jackson said. But the prospects look good, based on what the scientists are seeing. "It does illustrate the fact that there is a possibility that people could find something interesting," she said.

There are a couple of other factors at work: The schedule for starting up the Large Hadron Collider has faced some setbacks, and this means the particle physicists involved in the Tevatron collaborations (DZero as well as CDF) might be more willing to stick around. And Jackson said that the Tevatron has been working better than ever.

"The Tevatron is exceeding everyone's expectations. ... The experiments are getting, I think the technical term is, a boatload of data," she said jokingly.

Jackson said the Tevatron was in top form primarily because scientists had found some "really clever ways of getting more collisions per second out of the machine." If the machine is working well, and there’s not yet another game in town, and the promise of a big scientific payoff is out there – why not keep it going?

"The whole thing is obviously about the science," Jackson said.

During my visit to Europe's research center, one of the top scientists behind the Large Hadron Collider acknowledged that the Tevatron was still in the hunt for the Higgs.

"There is a possibility, there is a window for Fermilab still at this moment for Higgs physics," said Jos Engelen, CERN’s chief scientific officer and deputy director general. "The longer we wait, the higher the probability that Fermilab discovers something that we wouldn't mind discovering ourselves here."

But what exactly might Fermilab have discovered? On one hand, some of the rumors indicate that the results match up with the Standard Model’s predictions for the Higgs boson’s characteristics. On the other hand, particle physicist Ian Hinchliffe told me the Higgs results just might be, well, non-Standard.

"If the result is right, then it’s not the Standard Model Higgs," said Hinchliffe, who is a theorist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory as well as the physics coordinator for the U.S. Atlas collaboration at the LHC. The rate of particle production appeared to be too high, a result that could suggest there’s a family of at least five Higgs particles out there, he said.

No matter what the result turns out to be, the last word will likely go to the LHC rather than the Tevatron - just because the LHC is capable of producing collision energies several times as high. Fermilab is heavily involved in the LHC project as well as the Tevatron, so the lab has all its bets covered.

On Friday, as a matter of fact, Fermilab conducted the first tests on LHC magnets that had to be modified in the wake of an untimely failure in March, Jackson said."We did a test of the retrofit that people had to do, and the retrofitted magnet performed like a champ," she said.

For Jackson and the rest of the Fermilab team, that was a real day-brightener. And for the rest of us, there's this cover art from the May issue of Symmetry magazine. Thanks to cartoonist Roz Chast, the elusive Higgs boson never looked so good.

While you're paging through Symmetry, don't miss the picture story about Katie and Adam Yurkewicz. As the U.S. communications representative for the LHC, Katie Yurkewicz was our main host for last week's visit to CERN - and deserves thanks for putting the "big" in the Big Science Tour.

Previously from the Big Science Tour: The science behind the tour ... Living in the Web's cradle ... Inside the big-bang machine ... Toiling in the fields of physics ... Inside the antimatter factory ... First, the Web ... now, the Grid.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I, for one, hope the Standard Model is off by at least a little bit. That would keep things more interesting.
I never cease to be amazed at how much performance scientists can coax out of even older equipment.  We've had satellites stranded in the wrong orbit that were recovered...  Countless probe glitches that were fixed or worked around... The sensitivity of exoplanet hunting detectors continues to increase... they continuously come up with new and ingenious ways to test things... Heck, even the planetary society converted one of the oldest 3m telescopes so that it too could look for exoplanets (one of the few projects that I thought had the most promice).  Thus, I'd suspect that even long after LHC is turned on, the Tevatron will continues to be at least of some use to someone especially if LHC does not find higgs right away or does find it but reveals something else that has to be researched and confirmed.
Alan, good that you started a thread on Higgs but please do me a favor - stop referring the Higgs as 'God particle'. It's oxymoronic, certainly unscientific.

Tevatron interest in finding the Higgs is a sign of desperation. They need to justify their existence when there's little Tevatron low energy can discover in the future.

The Standard Model is of course flawed. These flaws are very major and are well-known on theoretical grounds. Just that no Earth-bound experiments have been able to provide evidence to confirm where it is flawed. Astronomers have discovered dark matter decades ago and the Standard Model provides no clue of its existence - currently the only direct evidence of  SM's incompleteness. Physicists today agree we are missing something absolutely fundamental in our basic knowledge of the composition of the universe. And that something is not the Higgs particle nor dark matter.
As the Caveman in the Geico commercial so aptly responded to the therapist's goggledegook, "What?"
What they will find, once this particle is found...maybe not once it's found but with some intesnive testing and studying is that this particle carries a blueprint for everything including communication, they will find that the human brain does not in fact store thoughts or memories per se but what it does is constantly imprint these particles with thoughts and/or memories, and every other sensation the human brain experiences and when you have a thought or a memory, your brain scans for the particle with that information. I will go further in depth with my hypothesis if anyone has any interest in it, but basically your brain does sort through other people's thoughts and every bit of information ever recorded, sounds, thoughts, everything but it only recognizes and can decipher things in which your brain has experienced on its own and set the "code" for that information....remote viewing is an example of this, there are many other examples some of which people experience in every day life.
Scientific investigation offers hope to those of us who see a world with grave problems and insurrmountable challanges.The people mentioned are true heroes.
I bask in the sunshine of this stellar endeavor hoping it is not too late to make a brighter future for us all.
Men's obstination to become God!

Isn't the beginning of our ordeal on earth? of what brought us the disgrace,the separation with the Presence of our Creator?

The quest is still the same...we still want to eat of this forbidden fruit.

What will be this time the catastrophe related to our pursuit of the unobtainable Graal?

God only knows what we're running after but I personally think that one day scientists will alter the genes of the race and send us to an unreversible catastrophe that will erase civilisation as it is known from the face of the earth !
If history is any indicator, then scientists are yet again on another wild goose chase. The term 'atom' (indestructible elementary particle) was first proposed by Democritus and Leucippus (500 BC), but throughout most of history Aristotelian science ruled, which excluded atoms as unobservable, and hence, meaningless mental objects. By the early 19th century the field of chemistry was advancing, and the notion of discrete elementary particles arose as a "convenient mathematical fiction" for nearly a century until Max Planck and Einstein overturned conventional wisdom. Behold! Atoms are real. However, no sooner were they proven to exist than 'sub-atomic' elements were discovered, which amounted to a self-contradiction.

So, is there such a thing as a discrete indestructible elementary particle (God particle)? Those who understand Aristotelian science in its proper context, as a student of Plato and Socrates and teacher to Alexander The Great also know that ultimately all objects (once named) are mental objects first and foremost. Convenient mathematical fictions have always pre-saged social and political realities. Aristotle's physics spoke at once of the fall of a stone and the growth of a child to adulthood.
I read and I read and could find no hard fact. If you have something to report, report it. Don't beat around the bush with mush :(
The advancement of science is the most important endeavor of humanity and should be treated as such.  R & D spending each year should come in right behind entitlements and defense.
Hi Alan,

nice post, it is good to see the press handling these issues better as time goes by. We started the year in a suboptimal way with New Scientist and the Economist portraying inaccurately the situation, and then things got better with Physics World, Slate, Wired, and now your site (I missed a dozen headings in between).

I guess the moral is: keep talking about science, and people will start getting the story right. It is the very reason why I blog about particle physics.

Cheers,
T.
"Alan, good that you started a thread on Higgs but please do me a favor - stop referring the Higgs as 'God particle'. It's oxymoronic, certainly unscientific."

Perhaps, but Alan didn't invent the term, it's been around for some time now. There's even another particle whose unofficial name is a take-off of it...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-high-energy_cosmic_ray



SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=235099

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google