ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Inside the antimatter factory

Posted: Friday, June 22, 2007 4:44 PM by Alan Boyle


Colin Hicks / MSNBC.com

Professor Joel Fajans of the University of California at
Berkeley, a member of the ALPHA antimatter
research team, looks over equipment at the
Antiproton Decelerator facility on the CERN campus.


It's not often that a scientific experiment gets written up as a front-page news story, as well as a science-fiction twist in a best-selling thriller and a can't-miss movie script - but that's what's been happening to CERN's Antiproton Decelerator facility, the only place in the world where whole atoms of antimatter are built.

This summer, physicists at the facility are engaged in their own real-life thriller: Two teams of researchers are racing each other to be the first to trap atoms of antihydrogen in a magnetic cage. The researchers who do it first will grab the headlines once again. And the other team? "Being second is last in this game," said Jeffrey Hangst, a physicist at the University of Aarhus who is the spokesman for the ALPHA antimatter collaboration.

The race illustrates how competition kicks the science up a notch - and how hard it is to turn science fiction into science fact.

Today, Hangst showed us around the Antiproton Decelerator's digs, down one of the less-traveled streets on CERN's campus straddling the French-Swiss border.

"This is the hall mentioned in the Dan Brown book 'Angels and Demons,'" Hangst told us. "This is what inspired the book."

The first scenes in "Angels and Demons" - the book Brown wrote before "The Da Vinci Code" - focus on crimes of catastrophic proportions at CERN. An international conspiracy steals a quarter of a gram of antimatter, intending to use it to blow up the Vatican. And from there, Brown's protagonists and villains are off and running.

In the wake of the splash over "The Da Vinci Code," Hollywood is doing up a movie version of "Angels and Demons," with Tom Hanks returning to his "Da Vinci" starring role.

Of course, there's far less than a quarter of a gram of real-life science in the antimatter plot. (And despite what it says in the book, there's no evidence that CERN has a supersonic jet or an indoor skydiving facility, either.) So Hangst is pretty sure the world is safe from an antimatter Armageddon.

"To make a milligram of antihydrogen would take more than the age of the universe," he told me. "It's just not a useful weapons technology by any stretch of the imagination."

I guess that also means we won't be seeing a "Star Trek" matter-antimatter drive anytime soon.

Even if you set aside the science fiction, the reality at the Antiproton Decelerator is dramatic enough: Back in 2002, Hangst coordinated the ATHENA collaboration, which assembled antiprotons and positrons to create antihydrogen atoms. The achievement earned acclaim from scientific journals as well as the popular press.

ATHENA's rival, the Harvard-led ATRAP collaboration, accomplished the same feat using different equipment months later - and published its own set of scientific papers. The acclaim, however, was somewhat less.

Now ALPHA, the successor to ATHENA, is once again in competition with ATRAP. The funny thing is that the two teams both use the same Antiproton Decelerator, setting up shop in nearby sections of the laboratory floor. "The only two experiments that can do this are 5 meters apart," Hangst noted.


Colin Hicks / MSNBC.com

A yellow radiation sticker is pasted on the
lead-shielded box where positrons are
kept for the ALPHA antimatter experiment.
The antimatter trap itself is farther back,
in a welter of cryogenic plumbing.


ALPHA and ATRAP have divvied up access to the facility with the Japanese-European ASACUSA collaboration, which is conducting a totally different type of antimatter research. Each of the three teams gets a daily eight-hour shift, which means the Antiproton Decelerator can be in a 24-hour usage mode.

This week, we've been talking mostly about CERN's Large Hadron Collider, which will become the world's biggest particle collider when it starts up next year. The Antiproton Decelerator is a very different part of CERN's research portfolio. The LHC will be focused on revving particles up to bust things apart at high energy, but the AD specializes in slowing antiparticles down so that they can be put together at low energy. The LHC involves thousands of researchers. In contrast, mere dozens are working on antimatter research.

ALPHA and ATRAP get their antiprotons from the same source, a ring tunnel in which negatively charged antiprotons are filtered out and cooled down to become manageable pulses of particles (hence the term "decelerator").

Although the two teams use different equipment and procedures, they follow a similar recipe to make antihydrogen. The antiprotons have to be slowed down and chilled down even further, to the point that they're just sitting in one section of a receptacle. Positively charged antielectrons (that is, positrons) are chilled down in another section.

The physicists working at CERN came up with clever electromagnetic traps to keep all those particles contained - almost like a Roach Motel for antimatter. "You can get in, but you can't get out," Hangst joked.

The next step was to blend the two ingredients carefully so that some of the positrons start dancing around the cold antiprotons, becoming atoms of antihydrogen. That's basically the state of the art up to now.

So far, physicists haven't been able to keep the neutral anti-atoms from drifting out of their electromagnetic cages - which means they quickly come in contact with ordinary matter and blow up. The only way to tell that anti-atoms were created in the first place is to detect the tiny, characteristic bursts of energy when they go away.

"Our critics will tell you that we haven't done any physics yet, and in some ways they're right, because we have yet to really measure something about antihydrogen, something fundamental about it," Hangst said. "Obviously if you want to do that, having the atoms disappear as soon as you make them is not a good idea. So the next step is to try to stop that from happening."

The challenge for ALPHA as well as ATRAP is to develop another type of cage that will still allow the mixing of antiparticles, but keep the resulting atom from drifting away. The two teams have designed different magnet systems that could theoretically "steer" the anti-atoms into a stable position.

Which system will do the trick first? "As usual, it's a race here - it's a race hour to hour," Hangst said.

Being able to keep antihydrogen in a cage is just one more step in a grander endeavor. Once physicists start storing up those anti-atoms, the next step would be to find ways to study them - in ALPHA's case, by using laser light to analyze the spectral signature of antihydrogen.

The conventional assumption has been that antihydrogen's signature would be identical to hydrogen's. But in recent years, scientists have found slight asymmetry between matter and antimatter. A close inspection of stable antihydrogen could help explain that asymmetry - and perhaps explain why there is almost no antimatter out there in the cosmos, even though theory dictates that matter and antimatter were made in equal proportions when the universe was born.

The antimatter factory at CERN could eventually blaze a whole new trail for physics, but for now, Hangst is focusing on the road in front of his feet - and the prize that's waiting at the finish line.

"When something like this comes out, you see it in newspapers all over the world," he said. "It's a big deal. ... It's not like anything I've ever been through before. And that's the atmosphere here."

CERN update: We reported Thursday that CERN was setting next May as the new target for the start of operations at the Large Hadron Collider, and today CERN issued the official news release mentioning May as the current goal. That time frame is in line with what was expected in the wake of a magnet mishap this March. Of course, the schedule could change again between now and next May, depending on how quickly the final phase of construction is completed. CERN's chief scientific officer, Jos Engelen, provided some extra wiggle room by referring to the beginning of June as well as May.

The release also refers to the additional financial support for upgrades at the Large Hadron Collider - yet another angle we reported Thursday.

Previously from the Big Science Tour: The science behind the tour ... Living in the Web's cradle ... Inside the big-bang machine ... Toiling in the fields of physics.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

So no indoor skydive at CERN, huh? :-(

Then again, maybe THEY didn't show it to you, because you are NOT an Illuminatus! ;-)
I thought there were theories of entire galaxies consisting of antimatter?
In today's item, I once again mentioned the magnet break in the LHC tunnel ... and if you're interested in more about that issue, you should really review Thursday's item, where it's addressed in more depth. Pay particular attention to the comment from "E. in Geneve" that is appended to the item:

http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/06/21/232604.aspx

"using laser light to analyze the spectral signature of antihydrogen" makes me wonder....wouldn't the laser need to use anti-photons (or some similar anti-boson thingie) to avoid unpleasant interactions with antimatter?
why not instead of traping them ---obsorbe them ---you cannot control them with yoour magnets ---obsorb them in ------something like --liquid nitrogen -----then try adding stuff like Cl or Fl as an attractor to their negitivity
Awesome story!! Did you see a old guy in a wheel chair with all kinds of electronics strapped to it at CERN?  

The next war will be over antimatter, not these archaic fossil fuels.....
Nate in Seattle:The photon is its own anti-particle.

Jerry in La.:Any thing other than an anti-matter element would annihilate on contact.
coolest job ever. aside from being a "mythbuster".
To: Jerry West-

Wouldn't it have to be Liquid Anti-Nitrogen?
Wo ist der fatter und wo ist de mutter von anti-matter?  Und hast Antie Matter ein mensch, Uncle Matter?
Alan - good show, where are we going? You'll get enough stuff over there to last the summer, fer shure.  I don't get that they're looking for a substitute power source, but satisfying their thirst for knowledge.  Granted, satisfying that thirst could reveal new sources of power but that's not likely. Otherwise that power, like all the others we know about, gravity (I include water, and wind, tidal and related subjects in gravity), nuclear, oxidation (fossil fuels on fire - could Global Warming be blamed on reducing Oxygen instead of increasing CO2?), and electromagnetics, should be common in the universe.  So far, matter and anti-matter merely annihilate each other; if that releases whatever energy is bound up in matter, the anti-energy bound up in anti-matter cancels it out.  Which just elevates the level of mystery of why it formerly existed, but does not now, unless we invent it in things like the LHC.

We know that gravity exists in far-away galaxies.  We know that nuclear forces operate the radiation we photograph in them.  And we know electromagnetics control individual stars within them. We do not detect anti-matter evidence anywhere in the entire universe, in spite of theories that say we should.  The LHC going full blast will be very interesting, indeed.    
Holy Cow, Alan!   I know I shouldn't type with my laptop on my chest while I'm in bed.  That's Des Emery, not Eert, who sent you that email.  Goodness gracious!
to: Jerry West-

Since anti-matter causes mutual destruction with ANY matter it comes into contact with, the ONLY way to control antimatter is using an electomagnetic field that matches the harmonics of the antimatter in question.

The hard part is finding the right configuration to capture the particle in stasis rather than launching it across the room. :-D
Mabey someone can answer this.  If normal matter causes normal gravity, could anti-matter cause anti-gravity.  Or atleast gravity that would oppose normal gravity?  I've never seen any info about the possible properties of anti-matter gravity.  Would the gravity produced by anti-matter be any different?
Dear Fellow Scientist,

NASA's rocket technology is not for real space exploration but here is one.

Sir, don't be dismayed to see how little information there is on the internet.  Despite that, I hope you totally understand my need for anonymity.  Assuming that the technology is as effective as I say it is, releasing it to the public in all its splendor could make the world think that a) I am off my rocker, b) that I'm completely wrong or c) just some sci-fi aficionado who's gone a bit too far.

Sad state of affairs, but hey, that's the price of true innovation right?

Regards,
The Inventor
This is the biggest scientific breakthrough ive ever seen in my lifetime. I may only be 21 but these are the things i live for. how do i get into a field like that where i can change the world??
Jabs(I'm just a by stander).I luv new science.
Mr Russell:

Antimatter should generate normal gravity just like normal matter. Sometimes people use the words "matter" and "mass" interchangablly. This impression leads them to conclude that antimatter must of antimass.. negative mass. Antimatter has normal mass just like normal matter. This is clear when you think about the fact that it takes alot of energy to create antimatter. By the equivalence of matter and energy, if it takes a positive amount of energy to create both matter and antimatter, they must both have positive mass. And positive mass means positive gravity.
Inventor and Nick Demakes  --  

1.) The ability to constantly increase speed is 'acceleration.'  That ability currently involves converting mass (propellant) into directed energy. Unless you have a way to gather more mass from your surroundings as your vehicle passes through that mass (even a near vacuum contains some mass) the vehicle will lose mass the longer it undergoes acceleration and therefore require less propellant as it moves in order to maintain the constant 1-g, until all the propellant mass is used up, at which moment the speed will stabilize and there will be no propellant to effect slow-down when the destination is reached.  

2.) If I'm not mistaken there is also a problem with the entire unit.  As I recall it, mass itself must increase in tandem with speed, becoming infinite at lightspeed, and is therefore impossible.  That self-limiting nature of speed is common in all physical processes - think of evaporation; evaporation produces cooling, and cooling restricts evaporation.  With speed, the faster you go, the harder it is to go even faster.  Or am I missing something you know and I don't?
To "The Inventor". Why are you worried than people might think you're completely off your rocker? Maybe just a fry or two short of a happy meal, but not completely unrapped. Don't be shy. Show us what you've got and we'll be grateful for the entertainment if nothing else.
So what is the outcome of this?? Fame? Fortune?  Any ways how does this bennifit mankind?
I did a bit of "Big Science" tourism of my own. I was searching for large open land that we could use for amateur rocketry flights, and decided to look at the old Supercollider site near Dallas. I found that all that what would have been the tunnel is under land that is, and would still have been, used for cattle grazing. All the remained of the above ground section was a few buildings and a parking lot. All it was being used for was parking for some old police cars apparently beyond repair, rusting away like the rest of the facility. It was a very sad sight.
*** how do i get into a field like that where i can change the world?? ***

Uh, just a wild guess, but get a Ph.D. in physics maybe?
really...

i guess no indoor skydiving is allowed at CERN....
How can a magnet affect a sub-atomic particle? I'm way out of my league here but, I thought the only worked on ferrous metals. Are the magnets just THAT powerful of do these particles operate by a different set of rules when alone?
Barry, magnetic fields can indeed influence charged subatomic particles. In fact, you may be taking advantage of that fact right now:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/atom-smasher2.htm
Alan, I think the point the Barry was trying to make is that magnetic fields influence charged particles but will not influence anti-hydrogen which has a neutral charge.

I assume a strong fluctuating magnetic field might have some influence on a anti-hydrogen atom due to the fact that it is not perfectly neutral but comprises of a negative anti-proton core and a positive positron "shell". At very close ranges in an intense magnetic field there might be a slight assymetry in the charge distribution that can utilised.... maybe...
I just wanted to add my 1 and a half cents on the practicality of anti-matter. If it can ever be manufactured and stored efficiently there could be multiple applications. Take, for instance, the lowly match stick. It takes a decent amount of energy to make and about two seconds to burn. Do you call that impractical? Well, yes but we do find a use for it every day. If anti-matter discharges its energy upon release and can be compressed to give us a energy source that outweighs the rest then, that could be our next match stick for things like plains, trains, cars, and of course space ships. Even though we may not see it in our life time just imagine what our kids can do with an energy source that is say the size of a brick and can fuel your car for years or even a week. We all know what is science fiction today can always be science fact tomorrow if we want it bad enough.
to: Traci K. Milwaukee

Possibly a gravity trap, rather than electromagnetic. Gravity itself (as per Einstein) is not a particle, but spacetime itself. Therefore in a gravity trap, they would not have a risk of losing the panti-article to matter. However, I guess this would be known as a black hole, and would require matter so dense, or energy so great, that no only would we not be able to stabalize a black hole, but also we would not be able to study the anti-particle because it would be bound within the event horizon, and cannot be seen...
think about this if regular radioactive atoms can cause cancer what will the anti matter version of radioactivty do possibly give u internal life or a cure for cancer dont belive me the laws of Phisics have been rewritten many times think about it
They are missing on prime ingredient. A very simple one to keep the atoms from wandering. Of course I am not going to list it in here. If they want the item, all need would be to contact me, but I want the credit. This has been a life long study and I am surprised those scientist have not found it.
Bobby. The results of anti matter, on the human cellular body would not be any different. The human body is made up with cells in a genetic structure. to rearrange those cells, in the human body, would be the same results as radiation over consuming them. Hope this helps.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=233534

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google