ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Obsolete chips in space

Posted: Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:27 PM by Alan Boyle

How many people are still cranking along with a 12-year-old computer at work? If that's your situation, you might have a bit more sympathy for the astronauts trying to cope with the computer problems on the international space station. The system that controls the station's orientation as well as other key functions on the Russian side of the outpost basically uses 12-year-old chips that were designed using a 21-year-old architecture and sent into orbit seven years ago.

NBC News space analyst James Oberg pointed out today that the Russian computers were actually built in Germany under contract with the European Space Agency. And if you delve further into the origins of the system, you'll find that the computers use radiation-hardened ERC32 three-chip processors that came from the factory in 1995 or so. The chips had to go through a grueling round of tests, during which some serious floating-point glitches were identified and fixed (PDF file). Then they were incorporated into the DMS-R computers that went up with the Russian-built Zvezda module in 2000.

Go another level deeper, and you'll find that the ERC32 chips are based on the SPARC V7 chip architecture, which was pioneered by Sun Microsystems and came out in 1986. The chips are way obsolete by now - even the European Space Agency acknowledges that - and the company that made them was absorbed long ago by Atmel Corp., based in San Jose, Calif.

The software running on those chips has a California connection as well: It's written on top of the VxWorks operating system, produced by Wind River Systems in Alameda, Calif. VxWorks, a Unix-like real-time programming platform, is a popular choice for spacecraft software: It was used on the 1997 Mars Pathfinder mission as well as NASA's Stardust probe and the still-operating Mars Exploration Rovers.

So there are at least three lessons to be learned from digging into the genealogy of space station gadgetry: One is that it takes a long lead time to get hardware into space, at least the way governmental space agencies do it. Another is that space technology is becoming increasingly international. And the third lesson is that you shouldn't be so quick to make fun of Russian space technology. If you follow the trail  far enough, you just might end up back in Silicon Valley.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Shielding the chips with a thicker case means MORE WEIGHT, remember that the cost to send one pound of stuff to the ISS is US$10,000... then again, old chips are BULKIER and take out MORE SPACE. It is definitely a conundrum, but it is also an interesting opening for a new market that will grow to be worth billions in the years to come: Develop computer hardware and software for the new line of commercial space vehicles that can do the job efficiently, consume as little energy as possible, can withstand the stress of the vaccuum radiation, and be easily upgraded.

NASA should definitely fund some contest like the Millenium projects so outside companies can help it come up with the solution for this. How about funding research into diamond-based chips? Intel is not interested because they already have too much cash at stake developing silicon. Only an outside underdog could come up with a new solution that would benefit not only the average consumer but also the high-end needs of space exploration.
I typed this message on my Commodore 128
Most everyone above (the author included) has focused on the overly-sensationalized fact that the processors are older (yet tried and true) technology.  When they were flown, the chips were about 5 years old ... not old by the standards of flight readiness testing and certification.  

I find it hard to believe that no one has commented on the fact that the computers in question have been restored to operation by bypassing the power switch that supplies them with power.  This begs the question: Why does this discussion appear to imply that the processors are the cause of the current "computer problems on the international space station" ...?  

We should applaud the fact that the computers are back up and running.  That is the true testament to their design.  Changing hardware or software wouldn't have fixed the problem.  

How many people do you know who would replace or upgrade their computer because the circuit breaker in their home was faulty or a fuse was blown ...?  
Our governments priorities are messed up. Space,military, war on terror all come before we the people,they can not find the time to fix Social Security, which is what a lot of people have as a retirement to live on the rest of their lives, and they could fix it really easily if our government would pay back the i o u's it owes to s/s not all at once they could not afford that but at least so much each year until it is done and also pass a law that no one can use s/s money for anything but s/s ....
yes i worked on the self powering chip in the 1970's but entered the millitary in 1971.  the 1970 chip got 7 volt's 3.5 amp's. the new stuff at 46 volt's 23.5 amp's. it the technology that powered telstar. but the Army figured i would not survive the vallie of death, vet-nam, but I did.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=226502

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google