ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Scares in space

Posted: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:45 PM by Alan Boyle

Did you hear the one about the astronaut who threw up in his spacesuit? Or about the cosmonaut who had to get medical treatment in space after walking into a floating glob of antifreeze? Or the astronaut who became so despondent after his orbital experiment failed that his colleagues feared he would blow the hatch on the space shuttle?

Former NASA flight surgeon Jon Clark has heard them all, and he says the adverse experiences from nearly a half-century of spaceflight hold lessons for a new generation of private-sector space fliers.

Clark, a former NASA flight surgeon, set out an overview of virtually everything that could go wrong healthwise in space this week during the International Space Development Conference in Dallas. Although he no longer works for the space agency, he's the space medicine liaison for the National Space Biomedical Research Institute and serves as an adviser for a number of space ventures, including Orbital Outfitters.

When it comes to those space ventures, Clark's bottom line is that going to space is by no means a walk in the park. "Even in well-funded government programs, where they pay a ton of money in, stuff happens," he said. (Clark knows all too well the worst that could happen: His wife, Laurel Clark, was one of the astronauts who died in the Columbia tragedy - but that's another story.)

Clark laid out a long list of "stuff" that could happen in space, with copious examples from the U.S. and Russian space programs. Only a few names were dropped, however, because Clark said many of the astronauts told their stories in confidence, either in the course of doctor-patient conferences or social conversations.  "I generally don't attribute those kinds of comments unless they specifically tell me to," Clark told me.

The wrong stuff in space includes some out-of-this-world health trends, such as a seemingly higher incidence of urinary infections ("In space, there's no gravity to help you pee," Clark explained) and kidney stones (which may have to do with calcium loss in zero-G).

There are also some weird hazards you could face only in space. For instance, during the latter years of Russia's Mir space station, a leak developed in the thermal control system, and globs of ethylene glycol liquid (yes, antifreeze) would occasionally blurp out and float around the cabin. One cosmonaut ran right into one of the globs, developing a bad case of contact dermatitis as a result. Fortunately, NASA physician/astronaut Norman Thagard was on board and could treat the cosmonaut with steroids.

The isolation and insularity of life on a spaceship brings psychological hazards as well: Clark remembered the case of a shuttle payload specialist who became so distraught over the failure of his experiment that his colleagues "thought he was going to blow the hatch." (He didn't.) Clark said the commander on Thagard's Mir mission, Russian cosmonaut Vladimir Dezhurov, went into a funk for several days when he learned that his mother had died while he was in orbit. (Russian controllers had tried to hide the truth from him for several weeks.)

You're not likely to face those kinds of problems during a suborbital spaceflight, which would last just a couple of hours at most. But Clark said even short space jaunts could bring heightened hazards. The big concern is space sickness - the type of nausea that two-thirds of astronauts feel during spaceflight. One case was so bad that an astronaut vomited right in the spacesuit, Clark said.

"It's really the G-transitions that get to you," Clark said. For suborbital flights, passengers may experience 3 G's of acceleration going up and as many as 5 G's coming down, contributing to that sinking feeling. Even a quick up-and-down could leave you vulnerable to Earth readaptation syndrome, the sense that you've lost your "land legs."

"After short-duration flights, it's not unexpected for people to be unable to get out" of their spaceship, Clark said.

Even if you don't get literally sick to your stomach, you may feel a less dramatic motion-sickness effect known as sopite syndrome, characterized by lethargy, mental dullness and disorientation. Many astronauts have noticed this effect - which they call "mental viscosity" or "the space stupids." (Sopite syndrome is also thought to be what's behind rocking a baby to sleep, as well as virtual-reality cybersickness and simulator syndrome.)

"This sopite syndrome could occur in suborbital flights," Clark said. And that would be a bummer for people who have paid $200,000 or more for what they hoped would be the ride of a lifetime.

When those paying passengers line up for spaceflights, they'll have to sign an informed-consent form required by the Federal Aviation Administration. To be truly informed, they'll have to know a little something about spaceflight in general as well as about the safety record of the particular spaceship they're boarding, Clark said. And that means a half-century of spaceflight medical study - including the wrong stuff - will have to be compressed into a digestible form. 

"I don't think people truly have an understanding of the risks involved," Clark said.

So how do you prepare for a spaceflight? How do you know how the ups-and-downs will feel? Virgin Galactic, the suborbital space tourism venture backed by British billionaire Richard Branson, is already setting up a medical information and screening system to get its first fliers ready to launch.

Virgin Galactic is on the verge of offering centrifuge spins to its customers as a way of acclimating them to the accelerations they'll face during spaceflight (and finding out whether they can actually take the G's). During the ISDC meeting, the company's vice president of operations, Alex Tai, told me he wasn't quite ready to reveal where the centrifuge sessions would be offered - but he said the space medical services would be handled through a collaboration.

It's worth noting that Virgin Galactic is already working on medical issues with Wyle Laboratories, which provides medical services for NASA and operates a commercial spaceflight training facility (including a centrifuge) in San Antonio. Coincidentally, Wyle just announced the establishment of a "collaborative space medicine program." Stay tuned. ...

Earlier posts from the ISDC: Mars drama takes new turns ... Space diving and other coming attractions in space ... Space tourism gets down-to-earth ... Dude, where's my spaceship?

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Geez Alan you sure come up with some amazing stuff. What a topic! The recent love triangle debacle at NASA, which incidently would have made a great soap-opera, drives your idea here home. It doesn't matter if you have X number of degrees in science and engineering and the mental/physical acumen for space travel, you are still human. Remember that the late Gus Grissom was pretty much accused of "blowing the hatch" on his Mercury capsule in the Atlantic ocean due to an alleged hysteria upon returning to earth? The capsule sunk but was recovered a few years ago.
This was depicted in the movie "The Right Stuff".

The next big frontier in space travel and the human psyche is dealing with sex! Don't be afraid NASA!!
The space stupids. THAT'S HILARIOUS!!! Is that what the stalker astronaut had when she drove half-way across the US, in diapers, to threaten her rival in a love triangle trist? Or maybe that is what NASA administrators had when they allowed a crippled shuttle to re-enter the atmosphere and it disintegrated over Texas in 2003. Or is it the way our governmetn "half-asses" its support of our space program in the first place. I dunno. Apologies for the blunt profanity.
Surprised after all the years the combined space programs have been around that we're hearing some of this. Makes you kind of wonder that they're not telling us.
I rode on the Disney Mission:Space (TM) ride, before they toned it down recently.  It was said to be the closest simulation of a space flight next to the NASA simulators.  Two people died on that ride, although Disney played it down.  The good news is, Disney kindly provided barf bags with each seat. I, as well as several others coming off the ride could barely walk.  After that experience, I could easily see how most people would be very sick and disoriented on a real space flight.  It definitely cured me of ever wanting to be an astronaut.  If anyone wants to see if they have "The Right Stuff",  the untamed version of that ride should be all they need to decide.
Obviously, security could be an issue in future spacecraft, space stations, space bases. The greater number and longer-serving the staff/crewmembers, the more so.... Do terrestrial analogs (Navies and Antarctic research facilities) have experieces to learn from?
I agree, The Space Stupids is friggin awesome! Sounds dangerous though.

Marc, don't go too hard on the administrators for Columbia, after all spaceflight is a very risky business.

In any case, good call on this article Alan, one of your recent best.
Actually, I'm surprised there aren't a lot more incidents of this nature, considering the large number of people involved over the years.
That must have been terrible, barfing in your space suit! All of those would be terrible if it was happening to you, but totally hilarious to hear about!

And I had forgotten about that insane woman who crossed the country w/ the NASA love triangle until someone else mentioned it.  

On a more serious note, I don't know if space tourism is a good idea. Rather idealistic and a fascinating idea, but as the article says, it could be potentially very hazardous.
This is why we should only send probes, and eventually our evolutionary successors intelligent robots, into space
Kurdt,

Cause its not like probes haven't ever had any problems, have they?  They've never had the wrong units used

The reason we send humans into space is for colonization (or at least it should be the reason).  Things like sub-orbital tourism helps move in that direction.  Nasa could do more to help this as well, but with their current plan, don't bet on it.
I am a high school science teacher. I feel that students should be made aware of these types of issues. The life discussed in this article will be theirs in the future. I plan on sharing this information with them when school opens this fall.
I think this is not an issue. Think about how much the air flight change from its firsts attempts. Space flight will also improve a lot.
Space sickness is one of those things that's "worth it" for the experience! I don't relish the thought of barfing in a space suit, but I would do it and risk life and limb without a second thought. It's the only frontier left and by the looks of it, the only long-term hope.
Kurdt, give me a robotic break. What good is it to explore the solar system with robots if we have no intention of going there ourselves. What do we gain in knowledge or resources by simply staring through telescopes "out there" if we don't explore what we find?
That's kind of like sending robots to the bahamas so we can enjoy their hijinks and pictures but not understanding why we sent them in the first place or using the knowledge we gained from them.
We will as a race perish if we don't move outward, that's not a blind statement, the Earth has limited resources and we will deplete them eventually.
Though the rovers on Mars have turned up some great stuff, what they've done in three years could have been done in three weeks with humans. The price for sending humans will be much, much higher, but so too will be the rewards for going.
We are human, we have frailties and we have weaknesses. We will learn how to overcome them on long voyages and we will have problems. That is a fact. We gain nothing by staying on our planet and dying, we gain everything by going and growing. Robots are awesome scouts, they teach us wonderful things and they better prepare us for the challenges that lay ahead.
If no one ever sailed west from Europe; America would not exist. I believe they called it exploration and I believe they took the risk to do so. If they never left the shore line, what would we have gained or learned?
minx loves ya all big and small.  thnx for all ur hard work and for making an effort to insure peace and safety for the world.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=210084

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google