ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Mars drama takes new turns

Posted: Sunday, May 27, 2007 11:15 PM by Alan Boyle

More than three years into its mission on Mars, NASA's Opportunity rover is gearing up for what could be the journey's climax: a descent into 230-foot-deep Victoria Crater to read the pages of what the mission's top scientist calls "a geologic history book." The update from Cornell University astronomer Steven Squyres, principal investigator for NASA's Mars rover missions, was just one of several new turns in the saga of Red Planet exploration.


NASA / JPL

A photo from NASA's Opportunity rover looks back
at its tracks on the rim of Victoria Crater.


During Saturday's awards banquet at the International Space Development Conference in Dallas, the National Space Society recognized Squyres' work with one of its highest honors, the Von Braun Award. The award takes its name from Wernher von Braun, the German rocket scientist who helped lead NASA's effort to land humans on the moon in the 1960s. As he accepted the trophy, Squyres evoked the legacy of those earlier days, saying that the Mars rover project would rank along with Apollo as "one of NASA's finest hours."

"I take some comfort in the fact that the same agency that put Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon almost 40 years ago put Spirit and Opportunity on Mars less than four years ago," he told the audience. "That gives me a lot of hope for the future."

Squyres has a lot of hope for Opportunity's future as well. Not that long ago, he was saying that Opportunity was likely to end its mission by surveying the quarter-mile-wide Victoria Crater, then rolling down into the crater for a closer look at its bedrock cliffs. But on Saturday, he hinted that there might yet be life after Victoria.

He noted that the probe, which has spent the last couple of months making a clockwise trip around the crater's rim, has now reversed course and is heading back to the place where it started its survey: a breach in the rim called Duck Bay.

"Our adventure continues," he said. "We hope to travel to Duck Bay. If a careful safety review indicates that it's safe to go in, we're going to go in. We're going to do a lot of good science, and then we're going to come out again and keep going forward."

In the crater-pocked plains where Opportunity has been operating, much of the science has focused on the layers in the rock exposed by ancient impacts. Back in January 2004, the rover happened to land in a small crater within sight of layered bedrock - the first ever seen from the ground on Mars. A close analysis of the layers in that crater provided evidence that the planet once had enough liquid water to sustain life. Later, layered rock in a larger crater, dubbed Endurance, told a more complex story about Mars' past.

Victoria Crater is an even bigger geological laboratory, measuring a half-mile (800 meters) wide.  The layered rocks lining the walls of the crater are likely to yield deep insights about Mars' geologic ages, just as layered rocks on Earth reveal the epochs of our own planet's development.


JPL / NASA / Cornell

NASA's Opportunity rover gets a good look at the
layered rock of Victoria Crater's Cape St. Mary.


During his talk, Squyres flashed a picture that was sent down just a day earlier, showing a promontory known as Cape St. Mary. Previous images have picked up fine layers in the cliff face, but the latest view shows the details in sharp relief.

"Absolutely spectacular geology," Squyres said. "If I told you this was the Navajo sandstone in Zion National Park, you'd probably believe me."

Fortunately, the Opportunity rover seems to be benefiting from solid spacecraft engineering - and a bit of luck as well. Just recently, a strong Martian wind swept the dust off the rover's solar panels, boosting its power-generating capability back to levels not seen for more than three years.

Opportunity isn't the only game in town, of course. On the other side of the planet, the Spirit rover is plugging away as well, more than 1,200 Martian days into a mission that was built with a 90-day duration in mind. Squyres touched upon last week's revelation that Spirit's dragging wheel turned up a patch of almost pure silica - one more line of evidence that Mars once had liquid water. Squyres joked that the area where Spirit found the paydirt has been nicknamed "Silica Valley."

He also pointed out that the rover readings are increasingly being supplemented by views from above, courtesy of NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. MRO provided the overhead view of Victoria Crater that the rover team is using to map Opportunity's progress, and it's also watching Spirit's home base in Gusev Crater for coordinated observations of Martian dust devils.

"We're using these vehicles in tandem now," Squyres said.

With that in mind, here are a few additional nuggets from the International Space Development Conference, mostly playing off the twists and turns of Martian exploration:


  • NASA / JPL / Univ. of Ariz.

    MRO's Martian black hole.


    This week MRO sent back a high-resolution look at one of the Martian black holes previously spotted by NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter. The latest view, like the earlier ones, hints that such holes were created when ground collapsed into underground caverns. "This is quite exciting," said the University of Arizona's Peter Smith, the principal investigator for NASA's upcoming Mars Phoenix mission. He speculated that the holes might even be venting water vapor from subsurface reservoirs. A future orbiter could check out that hypothesis, using a "smart" spectroscopic imager that was programmed to recognize and observe such holes, he said.

  • Robert Zubrin, president of the Mars Society, laid out his case for going to Mars directly rather than following NASA's vision of creating an outpost on the moon first. He said his updated Mars Direct concept could put people on the Red Planet by 2019 - assuming that the next president gave the go-ahead in 2009. Zubrin argued that using the moon as a staging ground for Mars missions would use up far more energy than the direct route - creating a "lunar tollbooth" to other destinations. But doesn't NASA need to prepare for Martian exploration by sending folks to live and work on the moon? "We can do that in the Arctic at one-thousandth of the cost," Zubrin said. Even now, the Mars Society is in the midst of a four-month-long Mars mission simulation in the Canadian Arctic.

  • Former senator-astronaut Harrison Schmitt received the National Space Society's first-ever Gerard K. O'Neill Space Settlement Award at a Sunday night banquet, and took the opportunity to detail his own vision for developing the moon and bringing back lunar helium-3 as a future fuel for fusion reactors. Helium-3 is a big issue for Schmitt, a trained geologist who became the first scientist to walk on the moon during 1972's Apollo 17 mission. For more on helium-3, check out these archived articles or Schmitt's book, "Return to the Moon." He speculated that one day we'll "have another free society develop on the moon," and perhaps Mars as well - and that they eventually might declare independence from Mother Earth, a la Jefferson or Heinlein.

  • Closer to home, a gaggle of space bloggers (including yours truly) assembled in Dallas for what was billed as a Saturday "summit." It was actually more of an informal sitdown with colleagues, topped off by a panel discussion. Some of our colleagues - including HobbySpace's Clark Lindsey and NASA Watch's Keith Cowing - were sorely missed. But to get a glimpse of the scene, check out Glenn Reynolds' report on Instapundit. Want to join the club? Check out SpaceBloggers.com

Earlier posts from the ISDC: Space diving and other coming attractions in space ... Space tourism gets down-to-earth ... Dude, where's my spaceship?

Update for 2:30 a.m. ET May 30: I neglected to mention the gratitude that Squyres heaped on the team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., for saving the rover missions at multiple do-or-die moments. Thanks to Roger Crowe for reminding me of JPL's contribution. It's worth noting that in the appendix of his book, "Roving Mars," Squyres lists the names of more than 4,000 people who contributed to the rover missions' success. Squyres is a class act, and the failure to recognize JPL in the original version of this item is my fault, not his.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Remember that the launcher does not have to accelerate the payload to escape velocity -- just fast enough so that a much smaller rocket is needed to finish the job.

Consider the Space Shuttle, the three-humped camel.  During the early stages of flight, the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) lift the External Fuel Tank (EFT), while the EFT fuels the rockets that lift the Orbiter.  After the SRBs are jettisoned, the Orbiter rockets lift the EFT and the Orbiter.  After the EFT is jettisoned, the Orbiter's internal fuel tanks finish the job.  All this extra weight in fuel and solid rockets is needed to lift more fuel.  It would be nicer if we only needed the fuel in the internal tanks.

The MagLev Launch system is more akin to White Knight that launched SpaceShipOne, except it can't quite get it up to 50,000 feet, but probably can make the payload go faster than White Knight.  I'm not sure of WK's maximum speed, but I think it's subsonic.  Anybody know for sure?
The Equator is not a reasonably level roadway.  A MagLev system that long would be prohibitively expensive to build and just as expensive to operate. A projectile on it would have to be constructed to withstand collision with a variety of wildlife and travel through many  different weather regions.  A much shorter MagLev track would be preferable and timing would be much easier.

Thomas Ashby - Mars had water once upon a time, and therefore it also had oxygen.  Most of both left quite a while ago.  The silicon exposed recently was tested and was reported as 'pure.'  I guess that diatoms never had the 'opportunity' or the 'spirit' to develop during the comparatively short time that water sloshed around on Mars.
I can't help but to forsee the first resturanut on the moon being a darn Mc Donalds, admitting this as I lower my head in shame...
Des- I asked if Mars had an oxygen atmosphere. The presence of water doesn't necessarily mean it did. I believe diatomacious "shells" are pure silicon but I will have to look into that more closely. That was just something I through out.

This article about Mars' core http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18968673/  makes me wonder how they can possibly know anything about the real state of the presence of sulphur in the interior.

I hope one day they do real geophysical mapping of Mars. Set up a network of geophones around the planet then slam a high explosive (maybe even low yield nuclear) into the planet to make it "ring" like they have done on the moon.
Guys:

-While the evidence that Mars once had a lot more water is quite strong, free oxygen is a totally different matter. *Earth* itself would have none without plants! We could not even have lived on the atmosphere of ~ 1 billion years ago...  Mars never had significant amounts of free oxygen.

-What SPIRIT found is *silica* (SiO2) NOT *silicon* folks! The 2 are TOTALLY different things....

-Diatom shells (like nearly all such shells) are composed of Calcium Carbonate, no Si involved. About zero carbonates have been found on Mars.

-Exactly how the Fe/Ni/S contents of planetary cores are constrained is, I'm afraid, something far beyond the scope of the e-article quoted...

-Only veery small explosives have been used on the Moon. The seismic detectors there sensed far more (1) moonquakes and (2) impacts. These produced FAR more useful data, as well...

-As for using a nuke to seismic-survey Mars, the problems I have with that are to numerous to mention. Besides, Mars gets hit with plenty of small meteoroids  whose impacts can be used for this purpose.
JC, Fairbanks,AK

Diatomacious shells not silica you say??  Nada Nada! You should read this about diatoms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom

Also, the frequency with which Mars gets hit by large
meteorites isn't known. What you see now in terms of cratering happened eons ago. But it does get hit.
Yup, looks like you're right, diatoms are one of the few exceptions. However Si02 occurs much more commonly in several other, geologically produced forms, on Earth. SiO2 on Mars is not considered significant evidence of life.

What is meant by "large" has to be defined. If by "large" one means "large enough to register on a seismograph, then the Apollo Passive Seismic Experiments detected hundreds of impacts by meteoroids from cm to ~1m across (capable of forming impact craters ~1-20 m in diameter. PSE data gave us alot of info about the lunar interior...in addition, observation of impact flashes on the moon has become a   hot new field, and many have been video-ed, some that should have formed craters over 100m across.

The impact rate on Mars is not at all zero and is in fact estimated at 2-3 times that on the moon. More than 20 impact craters up to nearly 200m in diameter (plenty big to have resulted in big seismic signals) have 'appeared' in just the 7 years of MGS imagery we have. Since these are just the ones that've been noticed, in imagery of a small fraction of mars' surface, this is only a small fraction of such impacts in this time frame. Impact rates calculated from this are roughly consistent with the quoted 2-3x estimate.

In point of fact a martian surface bare of craters *cannot* be even close to eons old, and may be only a few tens of ky old....
Dude..I didn't bother to look into the geologic ages of cratering. But there are 3 distinct epochs on Mars. Go here

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10715&page=28

and scroll down to Cratering Chronology...billions of years are mentioned. Which for lack of a better term I used "eons ago". It is linked to the time of massive cratering of the moon.

I also said the rate of impacting of large ones isn't known..I didn't say zero.
Thomas: 

  Yup, the Noachian, Hesperian, and Amazonian, based almost totally on 'crater counts' on different surfaces. Personally I would add a 4th, the 'modern' for the (many) areas that have zero detectable impacts.... Are you a scientist, Thom? If not, maybe you SHOULD be; thanks for the call on diatoms....I'd lost that in the mists of time....

ps. Sorry the TB Lightning swiped a Cup from your hometown Flames a couple years ago, guy. Maybe they shouldn't'a let go of Martin St.Louis....

JC..I'm not a scientist and never will be. Was educated in it and I like this stuff. I think of myself in terms of a generalist.

Ya Calgary and all Canadian NHL SUCKS!!
Dr. Levin,
Regarding your "three-humped camel" analogy, note that the oribiter carries no fuel for its main engines; it is all contained in the ET. The OV OMS engines of the shuttle are nowhere near the capacity of a "third stage" system--they aren't even sufficient to raise the vehicle, with any major payload, out of a rather low orbit. Their primary purpose is for the correction of orbit or de-orbit.

While your general analogy is correct (strike up another for those who argue against big-launch, one-time shot spaceflight, since von Braun lost the last argument), the devil is in the details, and the people of this country already have a poor enough understanding of science and engineering.

By all means, I love your enthusiasm and desire to ask questions, but a little research goes a long way.

Thanks!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=205298

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google