ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Dude, where's my spaceship?

Posted: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:42 PM by Alan Boyle

When it comes to private spaceflight, the future always seems to be two years away. In 1997, suborbital space trips were due to start in 1999. In 2005, it was 2007. Now 2009 (or maybe 2010) is the start date for commercial space tours. As space entrepreneurs converge on Dallas for the annual International Space Development Conference, here are the latest timetables offered by four players in the suborbital space tourism game:

• Virgin Galactic leads the list of suborbital space favorites, for a couple of reasons: On the technical side, the venture draws upon the expertise of the only folks to actually put a privately developed craft into outer space: California-based Scaled Composites, led by aerospace iconoclast Burt Rutan. On the financial and marketing side, Virgin is the progeny of Sir Richard Branson - a British billionaire with flair who was recently the subject of a New Yorker profile.

Although Rutan likes to work behind closed doors, Branson and his team have released a lot of information about their timetable: SpaceShipTwo is to be rolled out late this year, go into flight testing next year and begin commercial service in late 2009. First flights would be from California's Mojave Spaceport, with the main operation eventually relocating to New Mexico's Spaceport America.

That's the plan, anyway. Schedules have been known to slip, and last month, Virgin Galactic's Stephen Attenborough told me that "Burt's not going to hand this vehicle over to us until he would be happy to fly his children in it."

In the meantime, at least three other companies are angling to beat Virgin Galactic to the marketplace - even though they don't have quite as much clout as Branson and Rutan. In alphabetical order, they are:

• Benson Space Co.: Eight months ago, start-up veteran Jim Benson split off from SpaceDev, the company he himself founded back in 1997, and set up a new company to market suborbital trips on a spaceship built by his old company. Since then, Benson has been heavily involved in raising capital as well as reviewing the Dream Chaser design - which is based on a lifting-body concept pioneered in the 1980s.

SpaceDev has now completed that design review, which raised a few red flags. As a result, Benson's team is rethinking elements of the Dream Chaser concept. "We went back to the drawing board and looked at improvements since then," he told me.

For now, Benson is setting aside his long-term vision of orbital flight.

"We've decided that we really need to focus on the business at hand, and that's suborbital," he said. "We believe that we can still be first to market and provide the safest and best experience ... If we're successful at that, which we firmly believe we will be, then that success will give us the credit and the financing to look at orbital spaceflight when appropriate. I guess you could say we're simplifying the design and we're simplifying the business plan."

Benson said that, "as of today, we're still on schedule to meet our early 2009 commercial spaceflight initiation." He's still recruiting investors, and he hasn't yet decided where the spaceship will be launched from.

"We really want to nail down the financing and get started on the fabrication of the vehicle, and at that point, we'll still have a year and a half or maybe two years before we have to have a spaceport," Benson said.

It's a safe bet that he'll have more to announce at the Dallas conference this week.

• PlanetSpace: Indian-American entrepreneur Chirinjeev Kathuria joined forces with Canadian rocketeer Geoff Sheerin two years ago to build a suborbital spaceship based on the World War II-era V-2 design. Both partners had been involved previously in spaceflight ventures that fell short - Kathuria as a backer of MirCorp, the company that tried to keep Russia's Mir space station afloat, and Sheerin as an entrant in the space race for the $10 million Ansari X Prize.

If their venture had followed its planned trajectory, they would be flying tourists into space by now. But they've changed direction, and are now setting their sights on a spaceflight system that is something of a departure from the V-2 design - comprising a rocket that looks more like Russia's Soyuz and a space glider called the Silver Dart.

PlanetSpace's current plan calls for suborbital space flights to begin in mid-2009, with operations based at Rickenbacker International Airport in Columbus, Ohio. A few months ago, the state of Ohio offered PlanetSpace a package of financial incentives, and Kathuria said he expected a deal to be concluded by mid-July.

PlanetSpace is also working with NASA to develop an orbital-capable version of its Nova rocket that could be used with the Silver Dart to launch cargo to the international space station. Although NASA is not providing funding for PlanetSpace's effort, the schedule calls for an orbital demonstration flight by December 2009. Kathuria said that the effort was on track, and that PlanetSpace would soon follow up on an agreement with Nova Scotia by selecting an orbital launch site there.

But what about the money? Kathuria, who has run successful businesses in the telecommunications and medical-equipment industries, said he expected the company to draw upon financial backing to the tune of about $130 million. He declined to name the backers, but he did list the categories of investment. The sum would include roughly $30 million from PlanetSpace shareholders, $50 million in financing from Canadian and U.S. governmental entities, and a $50 million combination of equity and debt that "we're in the process of finalizing," he said..

"It's sufficient to complete the cargo demonstration and complete the suborbital vehicle," Kathuria said.

• Rocketplane Kistler: The Oklahoma-based company is working on two tracks: a suborbital spaceship called the Rocketplane XP, which is essentially a commercial jet that has been modified to have a rocket engine as well for the ascent to space; and an orbital launch vehicle called the Kistler K-1, which is being groomed for possible service as a carrier of cargo and crew to the space station.

At one time, Rocketplane was aiming to start suborbital passenger service this year. However, Chuck Lauer, the company's vice president of business development, says the current plan is for the Rocketplane XP will begin test flights in 2009. Tests of the vehicle's engine are scheduled for this summer. "That'll probably be the big dramatic TV moment of the summer," he told me.

Eventually, the plan calls for a "distributed fleet" of the XP rocket-jet hybrids to fly from spaceports not only in Oklahoma, but on Japan's Hokkaido Island and other locations, he said. That variety of locales will give repeat customers something different to look at.

Meanwhile, NASA has agreed to give Rocketplane Kistler as much as $207 million through 2010 for the development of the K-1 - with an orbital demonstration flight due late next year. The K-1 could enter commercial service in the 2010-2011 time frame.

These four companies have been the most forthcoming about their plans for suborbital tourist flights, at prices ranging from $150,000 to $300,000 per seat. But there are plenty of other companies in the commercial space race: Armadillo Aerospace, Bigelow Aerospace, Blue Origin, Da Vinci Project / DreamSpace, Interorbital SystemsSpace AdventuresSpaceX, Starchaser Industries, t/Space and XCOR Aerospace, to name just a few.

T/Space, also known as Transformational Space, is among the companies focusing on piloted orbital spaceflight in hopes of winning NASA contracts for cargo and crew transport to the space station after the shuttles are retired in 2010. "We are hoping to do our demonstration flight at the end of 2010," David Gump, t/Space's president, told me today.

Like most other space ventures, t/Space is having to deal with the challenges of raising funds as well as creating a new spaceflight system. And like most other space entrepreneurs, Gump knows more than he's telling.

"There are good things happening that we can't talk about at the moment," he said. Maybe we'll hear more in the hallways at the Dallas conference.

For a detailed rundown on most of the commercial spaceflight ventures out there, check out our "New Space Race" section - and especially our guide to the new space landscape. And for updates, check back here for reports from the International Space Development Conference and beyond.

Update for 10:30 a.m. ET May 24: Lauer's comments were added to correct and expand what I had written about Rocketplane Kistler.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hi, Alan -- It's good to read of all the companies that are involved in the current "space race," but I have to hope that they are not aiming just to be the first to produce the highest, longest, noisiest and most expensive roller-coaster ride in history.  

I hope the juvenile attitude of going for the "thrill" is just the baby-steps we must take before we actually lift-off for the final frontier waiting in front of us.
There is also life outside the USA: Project Enterprise! http://www.talisinstitut.de/project_enterprise_engl_ie.htm
Very accurate and interesting article. I am in training since 1999 and still wait for my flight.
Hey Alan, You forgot one...SmythSpace...Fall into Space with Gaia Two...Earth's first Personal Spacecraft...you fly it...I've been at this longer than any of those mentioned, and I still have the chance to be first with a paying customer...with no incessant speculation, which does nothing but put the public off...ready when you are...Folks!

http://smythspace.blogspot.com/2007/01/smythspace.html

Oh, yeah...no agenda other than Human Expansion...check out the wheeling and dealing among those mentioned in your piece...TIN MEN...as in the Danny Devito/Aluminum siding salesmen flic...peddle anything...the product may show up...or not...but, we'll get tons of press for our other ventures...BOGUS!
Starting to sound like the dot bomb era!  Promises, promises.

Someone needs to explain oribital mechanics to Kathuria.  Launching from NS loses a great deal of rotational velocity (That's why everyone else wants to launch from as far South as possible.) and gets you a heck of an oribital inclination to change later.  Otherwise you get an interception, not a rendezvous!  If they are going to use V-2 technology, they have a heck of a way to go to catch up with even the Soyuz.

By the by, anybody looked at the age of our launch technology?  Anybody seen anything other than minor incremental improvements in the last 25 years?
This is the beginning of a new chapter of history, one day to be looked upon with as much awe. To finally be able to bypass the government and making space profitable is going to change our whole world in a profound sense.

When we have affordable commercial access to space we will go from being energy and resource poor to having unlimited access. To see what I mean take a look at www.permanent.com .

We will finally be able to move our nasty industrial processes out into space where they cannot damage the world we live on any more. Space is where everything will be produced because there is no EPA in space. Kick all the garbage towards the sun.

Wheel habitats, spinning circular tubes about 1-2 kilometers across. One of our biggest problems in space is that lack of gravity will kill us after a while. We cannot control gravity but we can create centrifugal gravity, which functions just as well.

The possibilities are endless, exciting it will be companies like these that pull it all together, making themselves incredibly rich(er) in the process.
Is all of this because the Air Force won't sell anyone a Delta-4? I tell you, when Bill Gates decides to get into space, THEN I'll belive that it will happen.
I agree Alan, where indeed?

I suspect they are in that other universe. You know, where there exist fusion power, nuclear energy so cheap we won't even need to meter it. Low cost supersonic flight.Oh let's see, solar power stations in orbit, space   travel so cheap and routine, that your average Joe six-pack can go for a ride into orbit.

All of these things were promised decades ago.

So where are they? Simple, they live only in the minds  of starry-eyed dreamers. People who have fallen in love with romantic visions. Techno-geeks who believe anything is possible, if we only try hard enough.

Remember that most visionaries get it wrong.

Just because something is possible in principle does not mean it is going to happen. The future most conform to economic as well as physical law.

These private space efforts are going to fail, because they do not have the capital to make them work. Without massive government support they are doomed to wither on the vine. And sadly there will be some loss of human life. And then, perhaps the spaceniks will grow-up and quit this foolish quest.  
At least the amount of time they're quoting for their first flights is consistently less than the time passing. We;ll catch up sooner or later. It's not like sustained fusion, which has consistently been 40 years away for 60 years now. Also, the prices aren't changing much from the original quotes, whereas sustained fusion research has so far cost 100 times more.
One more thing to keep in mind...after reading the info from Virgin Galactic...Whitehorn spouts excitedly about having 200 'paying customers'

Society Expeditions ( via Collette Bevis ) informed me, while touting their program...in 1985, that they had collected 5000 $5000 deposits based on a few cartoon images used as promo in major newspapers, and one little pic of a Gary Hudson fantasy in Esquire...where are they now?...where's the $25mil?
Virgin has re-created the entire Society Expeditions format...sell...sell...sell.
I truly hope they fare better.

I don't know how I'd go on if any of the celebs due to fly were to suffer a bad end via Virgin Galactic...what would life be without Sigourney Weaver, et al?
Alan, I recently read a link from your website that talked about mining the Asteroid Belt.  I liked the article and I'm convinced that the only thing that will truly revolutionize the space industry is "profit" (so we can leave NASA out).  I don't see where there will be much profit from space tourism, as least not enough to generate breakthrough technology.  However, if there are asteroids made up of mostly heavy metals (gold especially), then it might be worth a company's investment of time and money to develop new technology.  

Now, don't get me wrong, I think space tourism is a great idea.  But when the first space tourist gets killed, it will be difficult for the small niche industry of space tourism to survive.
Hi, Alan- I wish I were with you and the others in Dallas.

I believe that many of the others mentioned may never get off the ground. If they do it will only be after Rutan and Branson prove their vehicles and fly passengers.

Last year, Mr. Rutan at ISDC warned that some of these concepts were bound to fail- especially if hurried. After seeing some of these close up- I believe he could be correct.

I pray he is not.
bah!

over half the X-prize entries were nothing more than wishfull thinking, and the list above even looks worse. the comment about tin men is a good one.

now, I am working on a space project, and as far as i can tell i've gone further than 80% of the yahoos listed. I've done test flights with scaled down prototypes, have full data and test records of test flights of the same system that NASA used over 30 years ago. And I just might be able to bring the price down to under 200k per SHIP, maybe under 10k per flight.

I've got plenty of rants about how all the above engineering firms are doing things wrong, but i'll leave that up to people who rant on the net, i've got spaceships to fly
I think Wayne is right on the money (excuse the pun) about profit being the primary motivator. I’m in Dallas at the conference and yesterday attended the opening day Space Venture Finance Symposium. It was interesting to see VPs from Microsoft and Cisco making presentations, disecting the space market into the hundreds of profit-making sectors. Richard Sanford, Dirctor of Space Initiatives at Cisco Systems mentioned that Cisco is only interested in developing those space-related commercial ventures where there is potential in the “multiples of billions of dollars.” I think that’s a motivator. Not sure how that translates into getting people into space, but it certainly pushes the whole industry.
The "NASA is the problem, unleash private enterprise!" meme has a while to run yet: see the current WIRED cover (although the article itself is somewhat more realistic). For those who are impatient and frustrated, it's tempting to believe that space doesn't have to be hard and expensive -- we've just been going at it wrong! But sooner or later it will sink in that most of the challenges are the same whether the effort is public or private. Neither the rocket equation nor the balance sheet cares whether you're a NASA fan or a steely-eyed libertarian entrepreneur.
Monte...just can the rocket equation part...see Alan's post RE Elon Musk, and my comment...rockets were what they had...we're still at 'finish the stuff from drawing boards of the fifties'...not in spirit...that's what's actually happening...the investors must be paid long term...the only reason Nuclear Power Plants ever got built is because the investments were so huge, and were made by Rockefellers, and the like...same ol', same ol'...trow da bums out! love it, or leave it...but, we can't...Space is closed...all the weaponry points back this way.
Nice article but you don't talk about near light speed travel so here is one.

Near Light Speed Space Ship is Man's Future

google the title above an see the article.

NLS Propulsion is the company


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=201976

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google