ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Robots that make you think

Posted: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:10 PM by Alan Boyle

The latest additions to the Robot Hall of Fame don't fit the usual industrial mold for mechanical manipulators - and one of them would strongly object to being included in the club. Nevertheless, there he is: Lieutenant Commander Data from "Star Trek: The Next Generation," a fictional character who said, "I am an android, not a robot."


CBS Paramount
Commander Data was
portrayed by Brent Spiner
in "Star Trek: The Next
Generation." Photo
courtesy of CBS
Paramount Network
Television, a division of
CBS Studios.

The other inductees, announced today at the RoboBusiness Conference and Exposition in Boston, include the Raibert Hopper, a one-legged research robot; the NavLab 5 self-steering minivan; and the LEGO Mindstorms robotic toy kit.

The four fictional and real-life creations join an august group ranging from R2-D2 and C-3PO of "Star Wars" to the Mars Pathfinder robot and Sony's Aibo robotic dog. The program was created at Carnegie Mellon University in 2003 and has continued with fresh inductees in 2004 and 2006.

Every addition to the Hall of Fame has sparked discussions over what exactly it means to be a robot. Is a robot any gizmo that can move things around? Do vacuum cleaners, computers and cars count? Could some machines become too humanlike to be called robots?

In today's news release, Matt Mason, director of Carnegie Mellon's Robotics Institute, says this year's crop is notable because the real machines outnumber the fictional creations for the first time. "As much as we love fictional robots such as Data, those of us in the robotics field take heart when the real accomplishments of our colleagues get this well-deserved recognition," Mason said.

Not one of the real robots, however, conforms to the usual image of an assembly-line carmaker or even a life-size android:


  • Leg Lab / Marc Raibert
    The Raibert Hopper, developed by roboticist Marc Raibert in the 1980s, was an experimental contraption that shed light on the mechanics of dynamic balance. Unlike your typical robot, the Hopper had to keep moving to stay upright - just like humans. "The Raibert Hopper was the visionary effort that set the entire field of robotic locomotion in motion," Mason said. Researchers are still working on robots that walk like humans, but the payoffs from the Raibert Hopper aren't just limited to the robotic tribe: Just last week, a former colleague of Raibert's announced the creation of the first powered robotic ankle, which could make life a whole lot easier for people with prosthetic legs.


  • CMU
    NavLab 5 was one of a series of autonomous vehicles developed at Carnegie Mellon, and had its turn in the spotlight during the "No Hands Across America" cross-country tour in 1995. NavLab, a modified GM minivan, did 98 percent of the driving itself while the human driver sat idle. "This was the first time that any autonomous vehicle had traversed so much different terrain," said Hall of Fame juror Chuck Thorpe, a NavLab pioneer who is now dean of Carnegie Mellon's Qatar campus. NavLab's heirs include the autonomous vehicles that competed in the DARPA Grand Challenge and will compete in this fall's DARPA Urban Challenge. Just this week, the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency announced that it has narrowed down the Urban Challenge field to 53 teams (PDF file).


  • LEGO
    LEGO Mindstorms kits first went on sale in 1998, and since then, legions of robot fans have geeked out by combining the LEGO bricks with motors, sensors and other structures. "This kit did more to take creative robotics to the masses than just about any other retail product," said juror Illah Nourbakhsh, a robotics professor at Carnegie Mellon. The next-generation LEGO Mindstorms NXT was released last year, complete with dovetailing curriculum packages. And just this week, some of the researchers who pioneered Mindstorms released a free software tool for kids, called Scratch, which aims to make multimedia programming as easy as playing with LEGO blocks.

Now, back to Data: Every time we've considered potential nominees to the Robot Hall of Fame, someone brings up the "Star Trek" character's famous "not a robot" quote. This year, the jurors felt that Data's robot-or-not dilemma was part of his (its?) appeal.

"The great robots of science fiction, such as Gort, have a powerful hold on people's imaginations, which is why we honor them and their creators," said Don Marinelli, executive producer of Carnegie Mellon's Entertainment Technology Center. "It's precisely because Data was not confined by real-world limitations that he could address philosophical questions, such as whether a machine can have rights."

In fact, in the fictional "Star Trek" universe, Data won the legal right to self-determination and the freedom to veto his own disassembly. His long, Pinocchio-style struggle to indulge in human emotion,  humor (and even sex) was a running theme in the TV show and movies. Today, the issues that troubled the fictional Data still trouble real-life philosophers - in the form of the "zombie problem" and the debate over the roots of true consciousness.

Marinelli told me the Hall of Fame jurors didn't agonize too much over the "android vs. robot" distinction. "There is currently no Android Hall of Fame, so he's either going to get recognized in the Robot Hall of Fame or he's going to have to wait," he joked.

Speaking seriously, Marinelli felt Data richly deserved the honor because he "spurred on the philosophical dynamic of artificial life making us reflect upon what life is in general." And we're not just talking about science fiction. Marinelli pointed out that the effort to have an Austrian chimpanzee declared a person covers much of the same philosophical ground.

"That's a pretty damn good discussion to have. ... And if anything, Data led the way," Marinelli told me.

Even Brent Spiner, the actor who played Data, weighed in on the subject during a "Star Trek" chat:

[Question:] "What is your opinion on artificial consciousness? Is Data a robot, or is every human some kind of robot? Is consciousness something special ... or are we all robots with consciousness?"

Brent: "Uh, let me give that a sort of blanket yes."

Here's your chance to give a blanket yes or no to this year's additions to the Robot Hall of Fame. In the comments section, weigh in on the robot-or-not question - and feel free to discuss which contraptions should or shouldn't be on the list.

We've traditionally held a "People's Choice" contest to vote on the most deserving robot that hasn't yet entered the Hall of Fame - so be sure to add your nominations and your votes in the comments section below. To refresh your memory, the honorees already include the Mars Pathfinder robot, R2-D2 and C-3PO, HAL 9000, Unimate, Asimo, Shakey, Astro Boy, Robby the Robot, Gort, Aibo, SCARA, David (from "A.I.") and Maria (from "Metropolis").

I'll tally up the votes and ordain a "People's Choice" winner later this week.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hmmmm.... Spirit and Opportunity! Haha, that was easy.
Since the word robot seems to be derived from the Czech word 'robota' which means "work", I think all the nominees are justified in one form or fashion in that they provide (provided) some form of called upon action or function, even if it was just for our entertainment.  As far as a People's Choice, I'd like to see 'Robot' from the original Lost in Space series make the list.

I'm glad to see DARPA heavily involved in vehicle transportation robotics.  Unfortunately, I don't see how we can ever develop and implement a usable nationwide robotic transportation system without the influence, and eventual control, of the current energy (oil) companies.
How can a robot hall of fame not have a robot from the company that has/will do the most robotic research about the rules of robotics, Asimov's US Robotics. I vote for R. Daniel, the robot detective.

Is Data a robot? I would think so.

My nomination for a fictional robot is my personal favorite, Bender, from the animated TV series 'Futurama'. He's self centered, immoral, alcoholic, foul-mouthed and completely funny - the exact opposite of Data.

Does anyone else remember the programmable robot toy from the late 70's or early 80's that was a six wheeled tank-like toy sized vehicle called Big Trak? It could be programmed to move forward, backward and turn and dump a trailer with a set of buttons on the top of the toy. For a long time that was my favorite robot.

I agree with Joseph.
Wayne makes a good point here. Maybe private companies should strive to release robotic public transportation systems that run off of alternative energies. Even the continual development of personal vehicles with alternative means of propulsion would be a good way to fight the oil companies who will continue to squeeze as much cash out of us as they can before running out of fossil fuels. We can fight them with technology!
  The Robot Hall of Fame?  A century from now, after the First Great Robot Uprising has wiped humanity from the face of the earth, we may laugh at the naivete of popular movie robots like Gort, the Terminator series, Artoo and, yes, that product of Gene Roddenberry's utopian vision, Lt. Commander Data. 

   An android wanting to be human is rather like a Ferrari 599 Fiorano wanting to be a pogo stick. 

   I'm not surprised that Lt. Tasha Yar (Denise Crosby) found their relationship both inappropriate and regrettable.   

    My vote goes to the Cylon played by Grace Park on "Battlestar Galactica."
 However, if she's not eligible, then Optimus Prime.
Over a decade ago a Bio-Engineering project at UC-Berkeley produced a full-sized, fully-articulated human torso from the hips to the feet. This robot was capable of fully duplicating the human walk. Today it is fitted with a giant chess-piece horse head and hauls a taxi cart around the campus. This mechanical object may not be much in the philosophical department but certainly needs mention in the world of robotics.
I'm not sure that the word 'robota' is derived from Czech, seeing as that same word/verb also means "to work" in Russian, Ukranian, and other Eastern Eurpoean languages.
Isn't this the difference between artificial life and artificial intelligence? I'm a student at UAT in Arizona and I'm considering changing majors to the artificial life program.
What about No. 5 from the movie Short Circuit?
I think all of the inductees this year are great. I'd also like to see Tweeky & Dr. Theopolis from the Buck Rogers in the 25th century series make it in.
There should be two lists - one for fictional robots and one for real ones.  To have them all on one list cheapens both.

Asking whether Data is a robot or an android is like asking whether the Enterprise is a starship or a spaceship - it doesn't matter because the point of Data was for television viewers to explore the meaning of humanity.

And HAL 9000 wasn't a robot at all - it was a computer.
The "squiddy" search & destroy centinels from "The Matrix" movie!
Robots are the future of space exploration. This is because we can send them to places no human can ever go. Oh, and they cost much less than sending humans.
Jon, Robots are important for space travel, but by god they are boring compared to sending real people! I feel that the sense of adventure will soon overwhelm our fear of sending humans on space missions and we ourselves will go. Where else will we go? I hope we don't intend to overcrowd the Earth for centuries and wait for our extinction. Theres only one direction left for us to migrate.... up!
Joseph,

Would you say that the Mars rovers, (still working)are boring? What about Voyager,MRO etc.?

I have never found thse missions boring. Also, we get lot's more data back per Dollar spent. At present there is no real need to send humans into space. They are simply too costly. And this cost will not be coming down any time soon, despite what some space cadet's would have you believe.

So, for decades to come, it's our robots that will explore space. And the humans will stay home.
Seems a little obvious to me that the "Lost in Space" tv series robot, B9, should be in the front of the pack along with the Mars rover Sojourner. Maybe there should be categories for working robots and literary creations?
i want some information on making simple remotes controlled robots. information like-

1.parts/material required
2.how we assemble it
3.budget,size,weight etc
Jon, I know im a bit late chronologically, but...

Notice the very first comment on this story? Yea that was me. Spirit and Opportunity are AMAZING machines conceived by brilliant minds. But it would sadden me to think that they were not the precursors to manned missions.

There's 35.7 billion free acres of land on Mars. And thats just one small planet! There's so much out there to explore, and I for one would rather experience it first hand - or at least know that someone else is - rather than though television and computer screens.
Joseph,

Thanks for your thoughtful reply. Yes Joe, I understand the desire in most humans to go, to be there. But we must also face the reality of the situation.

Our technology is not ready to send humans to other worlds. It is simply not robust or reliable enough to take the chance.

There are many hurdles to overcome first. Along with a few problems that might not be possible to solve.

First the problem of zero-g. Exposure to the weightless conditions of space are very un-healthy over the long term. There are some who say, oh no problem, will spin the spacecraft and create gravity. The problem with this is, nobody really knows how to do such a thing. The forces might tear a spacecraft apart. Or how do you stay on course while tumbling end over end?

Second, and this could be the showstopper. The radiation in deep space could be very dangerous to the crew. And I don't just mean solar radiation. I mean the background radiation coming from deep space from elsewhere in are galaxy. This is know as High-Z particle radiation. Little is know about this form of radiation. It is unlike anything found on Earth. Few studies have been done, however there is reason to believe it's effects will be harmful. And not just by causing cancer, which is a long term worry. But serious damage to the human nervous system.

Now some might say. Oh just add shielding to the ship. Problem is it would make the ship too heavy, and cost would rise. And as for the idea of generating a magnetic field around the spacecraft. It is science-fiction. Nobody has any idea how to do such a thing.

So you see Joe, that is why I feel it will be a very long time, if ever before humans go to these other worlds.

Which is fine with me. I've been there in a virtual sense.

Best regards, Jon
Jon,

By steering the ship along the axis of its spin and designing it as a hoop rather than a dumbell, you eliminate the tumbling issue.  In fact, the spin imparts stability, much like a properly thrown football.

Secondly, it may soon be possible for spacecraft to generate a plasma bubble with which to deflect radiation, creating a virtually weightless sheild.

I do believe robots and transhumans are the real future of space exploration, but it may become necessary for humanity to colonize Mars as an eggs-in-two-baskets insurance policy.  So any advances in manned spaceflight should be encouraged.
Hey, ya better include ( sorry kitt)
The KNIGHT AUTOMATED ROVING ROBOT....!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=191654

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google