ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The next steps to space

Posted: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:54 AM by Alan Boyle


Zero Gravity Corp.
Physicist Stephen Hawking floats free during a parabolic airplane flight Thursday,
while Zero Gravity Corp.'s Peter Diamandis looks on at right. The weightless apple
is a tribute to Isaac Newton, who was famous for his theory of gravitation.

Is Stephen Hawking's excellent adventure over, or is it just getting started? In the wake of his unprecedented weightless flight, the focus is shifting to the theoretical physicist's goal of actually flying to outer space. There's no other interpretation you can put on his latest one-liner: "Space, here I come!"

Hawking won't be going to space all that quickly, and the trip won't be as easy as Thursday's flight turned out to be.

By all reports, the paralyzed Briton weathered acceleration forces 1.5 times as strong as normal Earth gravity on Thursday and still felt hale enough to go out to dinner after the post-flight champagne party. But the G-forces that space fliers are expected to endure on Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo - the rocket plane that Hawking someday hopes to ride - may be four times stronger than what he felt Thursday. That will give the physicians on Hawking's team and the Virgin Galactic team plenty to think about between now and the 2009-2010 time frame, which is the earliest Hawking could fly.

There's more to consider here, beyond whether or not a high-profile professor gets to fulfill his personal space dreams three years from now. Even if Hawking never goes up himself, he just might have a big effect on the future of spaceflight.

Some of the things Hawking has been saying are music to the ears of those in the vanguard of the personal spaceflight revolution. On one level, his message is about opening up elements of the space experience to people who don't fit the "Right Stuff" profile. In fact, space columnist/consultant Taylor Dinerman writes in The Wall Street Journal that providing a friendlier environment for gravity-challenged people such as Hawking could be "one of the greatest potential virtues of creating a spacefaring civilization."

On another level, Hawking spent the most time during his preflight interview with NBC News talking about how the space effort needed to engage "the entrepreneurial engine that has reduced the cost of everything from airline tickets to personal computers." Only then, he said, could the cost of space travel fall to the point that we could start thinking about expanding our living space beyond Earth, as an insurance policy in case the unthinkable happened on our home planet.

That same impulse - the drive to make humanity a multiplanet species - is what's beneath the fascination with outer space you find in people like SpaceX's Elon Musk, Amazon.com/Blue Origin's Jeff Bezos, Bigelow Aerospace's Robert Bigelow, Scaled Composites' Burt Rutan, and so on. They're definitely not just interested in getting a 62-mile-high view of Earth and feeling a few minutes of weightlessness.

Neither is Charles Lurio, an independent space consultant who was particularly taken by Hawking's comments to NBC. In an e-mailed response, Lurio writes that Hawking "gets it" and adds:

"The problems we've had in creating practical spaceflight are not due to something inherent in spaceflight; they're due to a legacy that hasn't allowed the commercial sector to develop new mass markets and solve those problems."

There is an undertone in the "New Space" movement - reflected in Hawking's comments as well as Lurio's - that the NASA model for government-funded human spaceflight isn't working. For example, Lurio and like-minded observers are particularly worried that NASA may undercut its biggest enterpreneurial initiative to date - the $500 million Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program, or COTS - by forging long-term deals for spacecraft from the Russians and the Europeans.

But COTS illustrates that NASA can lend a hand to entrepreneurs. So does the fact that Hawking's flight took off and landed from the space agency's Shuttle Landing Facility under the terms of a commercial arrangement with Zero Gravity Corp., which organized Thursday's flight. Zero Gravity is reportedly at an important stage in talks with NASA over providing weightless flights for the space agency on a similarly commercial basis.

Someday, commercial suborbital spaceflights as well as zero-gravity planes may well be making use of the Shuttle Landing Facility. In fact, the first test runs to check the potential noise levels for suborbital craft were conducted just this month.

These developments may sound like industry-insider nuts and bolts, but they're the small sparks that could rev up the entrepreneurial engine that Hawking has been talking about.

If you want to get your own up-close and personal look at how the engine is being developed, several opportunities are coming up in the next few months. Click on over to the Web sites listed below and see what strikes your fancy. Who knows? Maybe even Stephen Hawking could learn a thing or two:

  • The International Space Development Conference brings together "New Space" and "Old Space" in Dallas from May 25 to 28.
  • NewSpace 2007 definitely caters to the entrepreneurial set, although you'll also find fellow travelers from NASA and the other traditional space players. This year the meeting is in Washington from July 18 to 21.
  • The Mars Society has its annual convention in Los Angeles from Aug. 30 to Sept. 2. You'll find plenty of space heavyweights and Red Planet researchers, as well as grass-roots advocates who would love to say "Mars, here we come!"
  • The big event in my book is the Wirefly X Prize Cup, which will take place from Oct. 24 to 28 at locations in southern New Mexico. The announcement of the dates and venues was issued just this week. There's a symposium as well as weekend shows featuring rockets that really blast off (or perhaps blow up, but in a safe and sane way). The X Prize Foundation is setting its sights on attendance in the range of 100,000 visitors this year.   

It's been a challenging couple of days here in Florida - with so much scrambling around from one place to another, and so much writing off the cuff, that one reader felt compelled to file a protest. "You would think Alan Boyle would know how to write a complete sentence," Jim West wrote.

But if I ever felt like whining over a 17-hour workday, one look at how Hawking triumphed over far greater adversity shut me up right quick. I think his perseverance, even more than his perspicacity, is what makes him so endearing. If you haven't read the scores of comments about Hawking that I've just gotten around to approving, take a spin through the feedback and add your own.

Next week, I promise to write in complete sentences. Mostly.

Update for 4:20 p.m. ET April 27: In the wake of Hawking's zero-G flight, the well-wishers include Alan Stern, NASA's associate administrator for the science mission directorate:

"Stephen Hawking's flight to experience zero gravity is exciting. I can say from flying hundreds of parabolas aboard NASA KC-135s myself that the experience is eye-opening, exhilarating and personally fulfilling. My own experiences primarily were participating in research in space motion sickness and later, low-gravity accretion. But it's the 21st century now, and I expect more and more scientists to be conducting research in zero gravity, and even in space, as new vehicles and venues for such research open.

"Space is as much a place for scientists, I believe, as the arctic, Antarctic, and the deep ocean. And Dr. Hawking is showing the way.

"I want to extend my congratulations to him on his first taste of zero gravity and offer my best wishes for the realization of his dream of launching into space itself."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hi, I saw his auction he had in Ebay.com... It's great that he is doing this.. I am disabled with MS and at times in a wheelchair so I can understand the feeling of freedom... I wish him the very best... A first for all of wheelies... God Bless him. A.Torres
Great coverage, great story....Tom Costello professional as usual, I wish I could email him to try and get an intership.
What's out there...in the nearby starsysems, what we cannot find on our home planet Earth???

What habitable planet will become our next VICTIM to be plundered + poluted + destroyed???

Space & time will (hopefully) prolong, but will our home planet or any other planet we conquer???

So be friendly + nice + CAREFUL with this planet, so that we PEACEFULLY can inhabit others...
I find it strange that there are more people working on commercial space travel than there are working on solar power. The recient development of a new type of solar cell is the first significant advancement in the 30 years since I was in graduate school.
CONGRATULATIONS Dr. Hawking, Peter and the entire ZERO-G Team!  This is a wonderful experience for our world's expert in Gravity and kind of you to share it with us all.
Great for him...Stephen Hawking is an inspiration to ALL of us!!!
I have just seen the piece where Stephen Hawking took flight in zero g's...WAY TO GO......where do i sign up? Being mostly in a wheelchair mostly, from birth i have come to sek adventure and freedom...that was the ultimate!!!!
I can honestly say I've admired Hawking since I first knew of him. I've read a few of his books and in 1989 I had the privilege of attending a seminar he gave. That he has accomplished so much in the face of severe adversity raises his stature even further. Now he is an inspiration even to people that don't follow theoretical physicists. Godspeed, Stephen.
i think its cool that he can experiance weightlessness!!!

keep up the great work, alan, we all appreciate what you are doing...  and mark up another home-run for peter diamandis, and his marketing/commercialization genius!

Between being a founder of... 
  International Space University, 
  Students for the Exploration and Development of Space, 
  X-Prize, 
  X-Cup, 
  Rocket Racing League,
  Space Adventures (not 100% sure of this one, but i think so) and, 
  Zero-G Corp
...peter has been pretty busy...

I think the real story here is not just that Hawking did it, but that Diamandis made it possible.  So, for my money, there were 2 really smart guys flying up there.  I wish the best for both of them!

We Humans, or human beings, We are bipedal primates belonging to the mammalian species, simply Homo sapiens, We live on the third planet of the SOL System, the one we call home, unexplored vastly with immense resources.

Out little planet by divine intervention or luck has the right orbit, not to hot, not to cold, mysteriously, any mass extinction events, haven’t occurred in the last 100 million years?, Ice Age’s, natural disasters, then we came, took the advantage of the universal blessing of stability, evolved, migrated, segmented, segregated, divided, we defined our surroundings bases in theories by our so call educated, conglomerated and form political super powers around common sense, racial ethnicity, wage wars, dead, famine, diseases still more separation on a egocentrically way. Exploiting the delicate balance of our natural resources, and now, after so much denial - the truth of our real impact.

There you have it out little blue planet, particle accelerators, nuclear bombs, flowers, people, oceans, energy crisis, still a little dot in the infinite space that we are barely beginning to comprehend. Alpha Centauri is the closest star system to our own solar system at 4.37 light-years, go figure how long will take to reach there?, We don’t have the technology to even scratch sub light speeds, or to even genetically improve our fragile genetic code to be able to survive such long trip or explore out immediate solar system.

We have to fix our problems first, to be ready, to survive out there.
Finally someone people will listen to is saying that we need to get out in space and become a space faring civilization. We need orbital habitats now, and once people are living in space, they will find ways to make it pay and work in ways we cannot imagine now. Get some eggs in other baskets before it is too late.
To Guy S. Newell:

Do you really know that there are more people working on commercial space than solar power? Or is it that it's simply a lower profile activity? As one with other technological interests, I learned long ago that some things are headliners, and some things are less 'sexy,' and you have to dig (and bless the Internet for making that easier) to find them. But they are often there.

To David Sanchez:

We're the only example we know, at the moment. We don't know just how dependent life in general, and intelligent life in particular, is on the particular path that led to us. How much were absolute requirements, and how much were just incidental details. It's never safe to extrapolate or assume too much from one data point.

If we don't look, we'll never know.

If we don't take the first steps, however long the path may be to being a spacefaring (even, eventually, interstellar) civilization, it'll never happen.

All of us just happen to live at the beginning of this particular history, seeing the first steps.
The photo of Dr. Hawking is beautiful! :)

Alan, I am so happy to hear that being a two-planet species for the safety of humanity (and all that we care about) is indeed the underpinning of all of these endeavors!  That was one thing Carl spoke of as being so critical!  The focus on ‘survivability’ is often played down as mere doomsay here on earth, but in essence we are still colonizing this planet too.  Why do we take things so haphazardly here and plan so methodically everywhere else?  If we were to move into space would we choose to build our communities on the slopes of a volcano on Io like we do in Italy and near other major volcanoes here on earth?  Would we map out the most active fault lines in the solar system as a place for our largest off-world colonies?  Of course not!  Yet we do that here without a second thought.  If we reinvent ourselves here and go about things FAR more deliberately than we do, we would gain the momentum we need to expand faster out there.  The cost of Katrina was about the equivalent of 10-years worth of NASA budgets and yet was avoidable to anyone with 2/3rds of half a brain.  We need to shore ourselves up here as well as secure more safe footings out there!
Chris E. --  you're right on about humans always being ready to go off half-cocked in setting up residence in dangerous places.  In the past, we looked to other aspects for reasons to risk our lives - the view, the convenience of mountain passes or riverboat connections, et al. By the time we recognized the dangerousness of a place, we had already established ourselves there.

Space will be different.  We know now what we will face there, and we are prepared to accommodate those problems.  People like Stephen Hawking can only serve to make more of us aware of what awaits us in space and to try to solve those problems ahead of time. I hope that an international problem such as Global Warming will find its solution in co-operation and teach us to take that stairway to the stars, hand-in-hand as homo sapiens all.

Alan --  don't be concerned about writing in 'complete sentences.' You 'think' in complete ideas.  That is the more important construct.
I'm curious why Hawking with his smarts doesn't mention the concept of space colonies ie L5. Why bother to climb off one rock and jump to another? Many huge rotating habitats in a stable orbit between the earth and moon would satisify the human race for quite some time. We would then not be sitting ducks for a major catastrophy. Many habitats would give us safety in numbers.
Great point Dave! The surface of the moon or Mars would actually serve to transmit the shockwave of an asteroid impact even if it was a thousand miles away from our surface colony. A near miss of a space city has no ill-effects. If people argue that being on the surface is necessary for mining and for using the dirt as a radiation shield, than why not mine an asteroid and use the left overs as a radiation shield as well? Plus you'd gain the vital extra gravity with a cylindrical spinning city! Once you get out of a gravity well and into the freedom of space, we must avoid it. Asteroids have very little gravity and many should have significant water ice!
Dave: Some people *like* living on rocks. Gravity wells only matter to civilizations that don't have the energy to easily leave them (and we'll go *nowhere* until we're easily able to get in and out of the one we already live in), and planets with atmospheres do tend to give you certain protections that a metal shell doesn't...
Hi Frank!  Certainly not impossible to live on a planetary body like Mars.  I’d recommend we develop a reusable shuttle specifically designed for running errands to and from orbit though.  We just can’t keep sending entire space ships to and from the surface.

The one other thing I'd be concerned about for moon and planetary bases other than gravity and the shockwave effect would be quakes.  According to Wiki "Shallow moonquakes can register up to 5.5 on the Richter scale.  Between 1972 and 1977, twenty-eight shallow moonquakes were observed. On Earth, quakes of magnitude 4.5 and above can cause damage to buildings...  Moonquakes [also] tend to reverberate many minutes longer than earthquakes." I'd suppose a nice size asteroid hit would cause the whole darn moon to shake.  In Cosmos, they said it still ever so slightly wobbles from an impact back in the 16th century...  An L2 orbit would be pretty darn ideal for astronomical observations and yet is close enough for routine commutes.  I honestly feel that the Mars society really needs to come around to a lunar or station-type mission profile as Mars is just way too far.  We’ll get there… but let our first outposts be easier to build and far larger for the cost.
To Frank Glover, RIGHT ON MAN!!!!!

I have heard so many pro and con arguments about space, but here is one FACT; we live on a planet that has FINITE resources. We either move outward or we die. It may not be in our lifetime, but it will occur if we don't expand our resources if not our minds.

Fight, argue about it, protest it, tree-hugger it, do whatever, be realize the truth.
Human space flight is a white elephant. There is nowhere to go that we can resonably survive. For example, look up what happens to the human body in a zero g environment. A lot of wasted money that could be better used elsewhere.

Not quite the space oddity just yet, Stephen Hawking took his first step yesterday.  There are so many cool aspects to this situation I don’t even know where to start.  So, I don’t think I will.  This is just very cool,
All of our loftiest goals in the past have resulted in catastrophe because of our human nature getting in the way and yet, we are more interested in changing our location than in changing our nature. The problems we have here on earth will simply follow us where we go. If folks think that space exploration will do anything to solve any real problems, they are mistaken. Our achievements are merely used in self deception that the real problems we face as human beings can be ignored without consequences.
Chris E. -- I heard a radio interview on the program "Quirks and Quarks" on CBC Radio One, with one of the California scientists who will be stationed at the Mars base in arctic Canada this summer. Among the interesting things she said were two points: 1) the human necessity for personal exploration and observation to expand the robotic point of view well beyond the dry statistics they can provide, and 2) she can hardly wait until the practice they get up north becomes the real thing on Mars. Perhaps we would be better off with several different bases in space, self-sufficient stations in solar orbit, but I'll bet that people like her (and Stephen Hawking) will always be ahead of the pack, leaving the rest of us choking on the dust of their passage.
If we don't get out there, we will be like all those salmon that don't make it upstream.

We must get off of this hot spinning planet.

Let us do this together. We can fund it easily by outlawing war and locking up those who foment them. Space elevators and moving out to the stars are lofier goals than world domination on Sagan's mote of dust.
It was a pleasure to see the picture of Professor Hawking experience weightlessness, and to know steps are being taken to promote humanity's emigration into space. It seems to me that rocket trips for the masses alone will not achieve much without a fully maintained full scale space station at Lagrange point L5 open to everyone. When does humanity truly begin its trek to the stars?
Frank: Who are these people that like living on rocks?They might be people who complain about earthquakes, temps,starvation,volcanoes and an occasional asteroid hit. O'Neil had it right. Problem is we don't do anything that is not of immediate concern because election time is always around the corner.
I would imagine Hawking struggles against gravity more than most humans and, perhaps, unfettered, his agile mind could be even more productive. Perhaps many of us would be more productive in such a state, especially if supported by investment in space colonization- no longer tugged by gravity, pressed by finances, squeezed by publishing or tenure requirements- free to invent and create. The first step is to get the fabulously wealthy to the space resort, there to sell them on space technology investment. Sort of a trip to the Bahamas followed by the time-share sell. It would have been nice if NASA had managed to develop some spectacular products over the last twenty years of Shuttle and ISS. Maybe they have and we regular folks just aren't aware.
I think many of you have missed an important factor. Whatever we, as a species, decide to do with space travel and colonization cost is the most difficult hurdle. It is hard to ignore that world changing technologies occurred due to a need by the consumer. Civilizations flourished when things like better food storage and writing were known. The industrial revolution occurred because the consumer decided it wanted Railroads, Automobiles, Airplanes, Refridgerators, Radios, Electricity, etc. Our world history is full of influential people saying things like "There will only ever be a need for 4 or 5 personal computers", "If man were meant to fly...".

What I'm getting at is that Space travel is progressing faster now because it has become big business. There is a consumer need for this product and as such more money will be invested to develop better technologies. This will fuel the space industry for all the fantastic ideas that have been dreamed of since man first looked to the skies.
One of the great things about Hawking's flight is it moved us one step further away from the "perfect astronaut" paradigm that people need to be in perfect shape (or near perfect) and train for endless hours to go into space. Anyone who can safely ride a roller coaster or tilt-a-whirl can go into space, and nobody asks for a physical before you get on either.
I am so tired of the 'money could be used elsewhere' argument, We've tried throwing money at social issues for years and have not gotten very far in many regards. The money spent on space as a whole is minuscule compared to the amount of money floating in all the varius budgets in the world. As it is money shouldn't be that big of a factor, I hate to bring up an old cliche but even Columbus needed financing and it took him a while to get it. Exploration is practically in our blood, we have explored pretty much all the above water land on our planet. As it is it would cost just as much to fully explore the ocean if not more then it costs to put people into space. I think this is a worthy endeavor no matter the cost. Even in preliminary stages, zero G research has shown very interesting results in medical and other research.
Any of the Lagrange points would work, not just L5.  There is a considerable downside to them vs the moon or mars - no natural resources outside of solar power.  The moon is covered in helium-3 and might have water (ice) at its south pole.  Mars has minerals of all sorts.

And a space station would not have to precisely be at any of the Lagrange points, it could actually be in an orbit around a Lagrange point.

But I think Hawking, with all his smarts, is on the right track - go for a space station in a place where you have two valuable resources already - gravity and minerals.  Moonquakes or Marsquakes are risks that have not been well considered, but do they really outweigh the loss of resources?  A more in-depth study is called for.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=171453

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google