ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Solar-power sunrise

Posted: Monday, April 23, 2007 7:40 PM by Alan Boyle

Sun-generated electricity may not be America's salvation in the short term, but the public-TV documentary "Saved by the Sun," premiering Tuesday in the wake of Earth Day, shows how technology and savvy marketing tactics are brightening the outlook for solar power.

Solar cells generally come in at the bottom of the list of U.S. energy sources, producing less than 1 percent of the nation's electricity. The main reason is the bottom line: The cost for solar is currently pegged in the neighborhood of at least 20 cents per kilowatt hour, compared with the national average rate of 10 cents.

All is not lost, however. "Saved by the Sun," produced by the "Nova" documentary team, shows how the growing concern about carbon-dioxide emissions and the growing popularity of renewable energy are change the equation. And if you add in the effect of less expensive, more efficient photovoltaic technologies, you can begin to sense the solar winds of change:

  • In Germany, solar-energy subsidies have brought the goal of generating 20 percent or more of that country's electricity through photovoltaics well within reach. The program tells the story of one farmer who has invested $5 million to put solar arrays in one of his fields - and is making around $60,000 a year selling the power back to the grid. There is a downside, in the form of higher electric rates for all Germans - and "Saved by the Sun" tells that side of the story as well.
  • In California's Mojave Desert, a 310-megawatt network of electricity-generating facilities is on the rise, powered completely by arrays of more than 900,000 sunlight-collecting mirrors that set steam turbines spinning. It's the world's largest solar-energy site. Taken together, the 1,500-acre Kramer Junction mirror farms can put out enough power to supply more than 230,000 homes - and the setup is designed for optimal use during Southern California's power-draining peaks in the summertime. (PDF factsheet). But again, there's a downside: How many other places are suited for such facilities, and how many other places would be willing to host hundreds of thousands of mirrors?
  • In Ridgewood, N.J., a Whole Foods store struck a deal with Sun Edison to have the store's roof outfitted with solar-electric panels. Sun Edison pays the cost of putting in the equipment; in return, Whole Foods agrees to buy the power from Sun Edison for 20 years. Sun Edison thus has a reliable market for its electricity, while Whole Foods comes out ahead as well - that is, if electric rates from other providers turn out to be more expensive over the long haul.
  • Around the country, homeowners are coming up with their own systems to take advantage of the sun. The TV show profiles several solar converts - including power users in areas you wouldn't expect to be sun-drenched. Maine's Bill and Debbi Lord have been adding innovations to their Solar House for more than a decade. Colorado's Amory Lovins, co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, raves about the power boost (and the bananas) produced at his solar-optimized home base. Yet another solar-centered family traces how they did it on the "Nova" Web site. The upfront cost can be high - potentially $50,000 or more - but the idea is that the money is earned back through lower utility bills (and, I suppose, higher house values).

To me, the most interesting aspect of the show was the research being conducted into cheaper, better solar cells. Right now, the typical solar cell achieves energy efficiencies of 12 to 20 percent - and the cells will have to become about twice as efficient to be competitive with coal-fired electricity.

"Saved by the Sun" focused on two technological paths: multijunction cells, which are setting fresh records every year for efficiency, even though they're relatively expensive; and dye-based cells, which aren't nearly as efficient but are likely to be cheaper. The dye-based technology could conceivably open the way to "paint-on" or plastic-film solar cells you could apply to the roof of your house (or your car, for that matter).

Despite their high cost, multijunction cells are already having their day in the sun. Such cells were used on NASA's Mars Exploration Rovers, which have lasted three years longer than their expected three-month operating life and are still going strong. And researchers say the cells are now ready for prime time on Earth as well as Mars.

"There's a sense that we have already reached the point where the multijunction cell makes commercial sense," said Sarah Kurtz, a researcher at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory who recently won a share of the $1 million Dan David Prize for future-oriented research.

The best multifunction cells have already achieved more than 40 percent efficiency, and Kurtz noted that the efficiency rates have been improving by 1 percentage point every year. "We have no reason to think that is going to stop now," she told me today.

It will take a while for the market to catch up with the leading edge of innovation, she said.

"The development of the concentrator systems take more time than most people would think, and therefore we need to allow time for the prototype to be tested in the field," she said. "You want to first make sure you've got a reliable product."

But the technology seems certain to take hold eventually. In fact, some companies are talking about solar-cell applications in the range of "tens of megawatts," she said.

Multijunction cells won't be the only products out there, she stressed. "Like the battery industry has many different technologies for different applications, there will also be many different solar-cell technologies for different applications," she said.

And that brings up another sore point for solar: Once you've generated that power, how do you store it? "Saved by the Sun" touches upon the point that power-storing technologies will have to keep pace with power-generating technologies - particularly when you're talking about a variable power source like sunlight.

To learn more about the state of the art in power storage, check out this report about a next-generation battery-ultracapacitor hybrid  (which is already quite familiar to some Cosmic Log readers) and this discussion of Russia's "star batteries." Wikipedia and Gizmag have still more about ultracapacitors.

We haven't even gotten into way-out technologies such as space solar power, but if you can think of additional ways we can be "saved by the sun," feel free to add your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Going green is great for more reasons than people realize. The head of the Union of Atomic Scientists (the keepers of the Doomsday Clock) only gave the world a 50% chance of survival this century due to war, ecological collapse, climate change, and terrorism as rampant as computer viruses. With this in mind, we CANNOT afford to only address one of these potential problems at a time. Preparations for any disaster are often good for any other type of disaster and living efficiently and SELF-SUFFICIENCY on a very local level (where solar fits in) are the most important keys TO ALL of them!
Storing solar power is rather beside the point.  Maximum US energy demand occurs in the summer between 11 am and 4 pm when the air conditioners kick in, which happens to be when solar power is most effective.  Solar would seem to do well at peak shaving because demand from industry and offices is high right when it's most effective.

A healthy mix of energy sources would include solar, wind, tide, perhaps some gas turbines for peak loads, and nuclear for baseline demand.  
You wrote, "In Ridgewood, N.J., a Whole Foods store struck a deal with Sun Edison . . . Sun Edison pays the cost of putting in the equipment; in return, Whole Foods agrees to buy the power from Sun Edison for 20 years."

The day when 50 major cities across the USA have similar offerings for residential customers is the day when solar power takes its rightful place.  Until then we will be subjected to subsidized lower cost energy from countries and companies whose only goal is the enrichment of shareholders and the executives that run those companies.
Just wait until Nanosolar makes it way out. www.nanosolar.com
"In Germany, solar-energy subsidies have..."

Subsidies are not the answer. Government subsidies always have unintended consequences. We are in the mess we are in because of subsidies.
I have been pricing tie-in systems. The cost of power here has gotten so crazi, I figure a system would pay for itself in about nine years. Another great aspect of these systems is that they can provide a much safer back-up source during power outages than generators.
Glad you mentioned other related technologies such as storage cells that will also be needed to develop a well rounded solution. Another interesting tech that could augment solar systems are thermo-electric semiconductors. Imagine having a secondary layer underneath of a rooftop solar array which generates electricity in the morning and at night due to temperature differential. This technology could double the efficiency of home solar systems.
The sun generates enough electricity to power the world many times over each day in the form of heat energy transformed into thunderstorms. And there is no thunder without lightning. Each lightning stroke has enough energy to power my hometown of Cleveland, Ohio, USA for a couple of days. There are approximately 10,000 thunderstorms in progress at any given moment worldwide. How do we capture and store this and then diseminate it into the power grid? I think that is an avenue definitely worth exploring. Kansas on a hot summer day could supply the entire country with power. All we need to do is capture it.
I really like the array of sunlight collectors in California that focus the sunlight on a tower that produces boiling water to run a generator. That technology is amazing and should be as wide spread as possible.
Forget about energy storing for the moment. Francois is right on. Back in the late 90's i was involved in Y2k testing software applications at Wisconsin Electric (SE Wisconsin). One was basically a dashboard that displayed usage history and energy production cost by plant. The thing that struck me was that fully one third of the Peak demand by hour was for only 50 hours a year. as i recall for peak was 6,000 megawatts per hour. The other 8,710 hours of the year electric demand was between 2,000 and 4,000 megawatts. WE has two nuclear power plants that are rated at 500 meg each. So for 50 hours a year we need to ramp up and deliver, transmit, 4 nuclear power plants worth of electricity. 50 hours! What is the true cost of that 50 hours of electricity. Things would change rather quickly if the "true" cost of a kw were charged during that time. But instead we average it all out so it is less painful. Think how many power plants of any kind would be avoided even being built. This is where solar power could help us the most.
Hi, Keith, I should have provided a bit more detail on the German farmer's solar-power operation. That $60,000 is profit after covering debt service, etc. I believe the total annual revenue from the system is in the neighborhood of $500,000, if I recall the show correctly.
Power sources must operate on a continuous timeline, even though power use fluctuates by the minute overall. We need sources -- wind, water, tide, solar, etc. -- which produce electricity sporadically for local use, and nuclear plants producing electricity continuously, established in an international grid. The use of fire is the first sign of civilisation. Let us hope its imminent extinguishing will mark our next step into the future.
If you can't afford to put solar panels on your roof, there are many other more affordable things you can do around your house. Other than the most obvious of keeping your shades down during the day in summer and reverse in winter (Many people ignore this obvious fact!) You can easliy construct a "solar cooker" out of household materials. Also, if I know I am cooking pasta for dinner, I put my black pot with water and a glass lid on my deck before I leave for work in the morning. When I get home, it is very close to boiling! There are very cheap portable solar energy panels that you can put out in the sun and then plug small appliances into (as little as $49) There are even cheaper ones you can suction-cup to your car window that will recharge you car batteries. If you just google "solar energy" or "solar cookers" or "solar electricity" you will be astonished at the ideas and/or products available to take advantage of the free solar energy! I am learning more every day how to maximize it until someday I will put solar panels on my roof!
An excellent article by Prof G.K. O'Neill of Priinceton, arguing that the best solution for energy supply to the Earth is Satellite Solar Power, is reprinted on the Space Studies Institute's website: ssi.org.

Interestingly, at the Space Investment Summit last Tuesday in New York, John Vornle made the case that Satellite Solar Power would be competitive with ground based solar under the ground rules governing purchase of alternative electricity sources in Germany. Under those rules electricity is purchased at the price of about $0.85 per kilowatt hour. That is about ten times the price that consumers in the U.S. pay now. So, it is not really an economic proposition with present-day launch costs.

It is interesting that Wall Street is thinking about SSP. I expect real excitement when
fully reusable launchers appear. The annual worldwide market for electrical power stations is $400 billion. Much of that demand could be handled by SSP stations. When people with real money to invest realize the magnitude of the opportunity, power satellites could appear quickly.

This is one export market that the U.S. is well positioned to compete for.
The talk of harnessing the Sun is something I think about every day when I pay my electric bill. It can be done and should be done.

However, if I may, I would like to share some other thoughts on the Sun's energy not entirely related to paying our electric bill.  The Sun is the great master of our lives.  Many past cultures worshipped it because it was so masterful. It will help us or it will kill us.  

At this time, we are at the mercy of conditions we have just started to understand.  The Milky Way Galaxy has been found being magnetically pulled towards another giant galaxy creating a shock wave like a bullet going through air. This shock wave is radiation flowing around our Milky Way like a stream around a rock.  Our solar system actually resonates up and down from the plane of our Milky Way while it is hurtling toward this giant. Our solar system comes in contact with this shock wave of radiation every 500,000 or so years. This cycle corresponds to many of the major events on our planet, like two recent extinctions. There is an article on this on the web today and is interesting reading.  Our solar system is rising above the plane of the Milky Way now.  So in effect it will be going into the radiation shock wave.
The next solar cycle of our own Sun (from article on the Web today) is starting now and scheduled to peak in 2012.  By what chance is it that 2012 is the same time that the Mayan Calendar ends its cycle on December 21st of that year?

If you are as old as I am, you will remember the guy we've all seen in cartoons that walk the streets with the sign that says, "Repent, the end is near".

If what all this could lead up to is actually happening today and we find out for sure in 2012, we won't need to worry about Mr. Gore's carbon credits anymore, the sun itself will make a lot of carbon on Earth.
I am sorry for the misquote above. I put in 500,000 years as a cycle in my post above, while it is a 64 million year cycle.
funny, the issue that most all people fail to realize is that it takes more energy (in the from of oil) to product a solar cell than that said solar will ever product in it's life time. Thus creating more dependency on oil.
The Province of Ontario has just announced the forthcoming installation of a Solar Energy Farm near Sarnia,ON, which is across the border from Port Huron, Michigan, north of Detroit.  It will take a few years to establish and is slated to produce enough magawatts to power about 8,000 homes.  That, and the awarding of the Benjamin Franklin medal to the Canadian facility at Sudbury which has succeeded in measuring the mass of neutrinos, an award previously won by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison, and Albert Einstein, gives me hope that we may yet escape from the End of the World which Stephen Hawking worries about.  Continuous carping on the part of us, the people, does influence government after all.

By the way, the fact that neutrinos have measurable mass fills in a gaping hole in the theory of quantum energy.
Using solar power is not about $$, it is about giving us a chance to topple emissions. Emissions that will ultimately cost us very dearly - in any dimension conceivable.
It is unfortunate that all action items that lower CO2 emissions will prove unpopular, like driving a car with a small engine, building up public transport, raising the temperature in AC controlled accommodation, converting to non-fossil energy sources etc.

Giving up conveniences is hard and can only be achieved, if the entire society were ready to embrace this change (e.g. ride the bicycle to work). This is a huge challenge because the only rival present in this dispute resides within ourselves.

Is it worth it ?

Make no mistake - it'll bite us in our backsides if we waited a second longer. We need to change and solar power is one (there are many others) of the channels to embrace the adjustments we need to make in order to support life on the this planet as we know and cherish it.              
Mark Massey step away from the key board...at least until you do your home work.
Energy Payback 3-4 years for current technology... in the near future the nanosolar guys are claiming < 1 month.

Producing electricity with photovoltaics (PV) emits no pollution, produces no greenhouse gases and uses no finite fossil fuel resources. These are great environmental benefits, but just as we say that it takes money to make money, it also takes energy to save energy. This concept is captured by the term “energy payback,” or how long a PV system must operate to recover the energy-and associated generation of pollution and CO2-that went into making the system in the first place.

Energy payback estimates for rooftop PV systems boil down to 4, 3, 2, and 1 years: 4 years for systems using current multicrystalline-silicon PV modules, 3 years for current thin-film modules, 2 years for future multicrystalline modules, and 1 year for future thin-film modules. With energy paybacks of 1–4 years and assumed life expectancies of 30 years, 87% to 97% of the energy that PV systems generate will be free of pollution, greenhouse gases, and depletion of resources. Let’s take a look at how the 4-3-2-1 paybacks were estimated for current and future PV systems.

http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1119
As soon as government gets out of the oil industries pockets, you will see an invention that will make all others seem antique.I happen to know all about this field that will replace all forms of energy exept for storing and distributing it.It falls against deaf ears in a country as "in crowd oriented as ours"


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=165659

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google