ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Will LiftPort rise again?

Posted: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 9:59 PM by Alan Boyle

It's been a grim week for Michael Laine, who founded the LiftPort Group four years ago in hopes of someday building a space elevator to send payloads on a vertical railroad to space. How grim is it? "It's grim to the point that I'm over at my mom's, scoping out the garage and trying to figure out if I can move in," the 39-year-old entrepreneur told me today.

Grim to the point that Laine lost his company's building in a foreclosure last week. But not grim to the point that he's shutting down LiftPort, although that's the way it looked to space-elevator bloggers. In fact, Laine told me that his 14-employee company - which will have to set up shop in new, more expensive digs - today decided to refocus its efforts on balloon-borne platforms in hopes of turning a profit by this fall.

Laine said his crisis came to a head late last week when he needed $450,000 from investors to cover the payments for the office building he's owned for years in Bremerton, Wash. He wound up $50,000 short when the foreclosure deadline passed. "The building went to auction Friday morning," he said.

Laine used the building not only for his business (rent-free) but for his living quarters as well. "I don't even have a place to put my cat," the Space Elevator Journal quoted him as telling attendees at the Conference of World Affairs in Boulder, Colo.

Over at the Space Elevator Reference, Marc Boucher eulogized LiftPort and pointed out that there were still other players in the space-elevator game, including Black Line Ascension and the Spaceward Foundation. But today, Laine told me the reports of LiftPort's demise were greatly exaggerated - and greatly irritating.

"There has been a conversation about whether we should close or not," he admitted. But in the end, he and the LiftPort team decided to move to offices in Port Orchard, Wash., and soldier on for at least a few months more.

"We have enough in the checkbook to last until Sept. 1, so I'm drawing a line in the sand that says if we're not making 25 grand a month by September, then we will close," he told me. "But we don't have to close as a result of me losing the building. That my personal money ran out does not mean that the project is over. What it means is that we have to find another sources of capital."

Laine's strategy has been to focus on developing the technologies that could someday be used to power climbing robots up a ribbon of super-strong carbon nanotubes, extending 62,000 miles (100,000 kilometers) above Earth's surface. If such a system could be devised, boosters of the idea say the price of transferring payloads to orbit would come down dramatically.

LiftPort was structured to commercialize a whole range of technologies - carbon nanotubes, advanced lasers and photocells, robotic climbers and balloon-borne platforms for power generation, aerial observation and wide-area communication. The company even arranged to take over factory space in Millville, N.J., for nanotube fabrication. Laine took all this on in hopes of finding a "cash cow" that would fuel progress toward the grand space-elevator goal.

So far, the nanotube operation has not turned into the hoped-for cash cow. In fact, Millville has filed a lawsuit seeking back payments from LiftPort.

Laine told me the New Jersey operation would have to be put on hold for now. "We are not going to try to commercialize nanotubes in the next four months," he said. "We will come back to it. It's just not going to happen until after we hit the September deadline."

As of today, Laine said LiftPort will "shift 100 percent into commercialization of balloons." He said the plan would be to test balloons that could loft observation or communication platforms up as high as 150 feet for three- to 10-day windows, and extend that capability to monthlong stints at an altitude of 1,000 feet - depending on the regulatory go-ahead from the Federal Aviation Administration.

If LiftPort can develop the balloon-borne platforms, perhaps with support from the U.S. Air Force and Navy, the technology could be used to provide instant communications for disaster response - or an observation post for search and rescue, crop monitoring or border security, he said.

"Then it comes down to selling the damn product," Laine said.

Laine is not proud of losing what he said was a multimillion-dollar building due to the missed payment - but he insisted that LiftPort would hang on even if he ends up living in his mom's garage. The LiftPort blog is still cooking, and Laine is still soliciting e-mail feedback on his ups and downs.

"It's a body blow to me as a human being," Laine said of his latest reversal. "But this isn't an accident. I've been in foreclosure seven times in five years. It's not clumsy, it's by design. I made a very conscious decision: Did I want to build an elevator in space, or did I want to own an office building? So I siphoned out the equity to build this thing. ... I successfully gambled six out of seven times, and I got really, really close the seventh time."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Great article, Alan - the most comprehensive so far.  I've posted a link to it on my blog.

Let's hope that Michael can pull a rabbit out of the hat - LiftPort is too valuable to lose...
I hope Liftport's balloon venture can turn things around long enough to reinvigorate developement of the space elevator. Like the communication satellite, the space elevator is a nutty cause championed by AC Clarke - just nutty enough to work.
thanks for talking yesterday. posted my first of many blog entries this morning, and will post progress as it happens. take care. mjl
Dude's tenacious, I'll give him that.

LiftPort has been one of the very few bright spots for getting humans into space in a big way and soon.   Thank you LiftPort and Michael Laine;  You have brought me hope in a hopeless situation.

I was born in 1944 and brought up during the heyday of the American space program.  During the 60s and 70s I felt we were truly on the verge of getting significant human presence in space.  In fact it was not unreasonable for me to dream of making into space in my life time.

There is no need to go into the litany of reasons why we as Americans and even as humans have turned our back on space.  Suffice it to say we have.  During the 80s I had hopes that my children could go out to space.  But during the 90s and continuing today I have no hopes for them (both in their 20s).  Now I don't even have any remaining hopes for my grandchildren (when we have them).   If you follow NASA's tentative schedule for landing Astronauts on Mars, the target date moves out two years for every year that passes.  We will never get there at this rate.  It is scheduled to take longer for NASA to return to the Moon than it took to go there in the first place.

The key problem is launch cost to orbit. It is and has been way to high many orders of magnitude.  Space Elevators had been a nice dream but the material to build one had been 'Un-obtain-ium".  Finally with carbon Nano-tubes we have the right material, even if currently it is just millimeter lengths grown in small batches in lab.  

I have no hope that our politicians (of either party) will ever get behind development of space elevators, it is too much of a challenge to their vested interests.   So we are stuck on this rock.  

LiftPort was and is trying to make the dream, of inexpensive access to space, come true and in the near term.  For that they need to be encouraged.
I sure hope LiftPort rises again!

Despite what their SE (space elevator) competition has to say, LiftPort has done an awesome PR job regarding public awareness of the SE in general.

They also seem to actually have a detailed business plan for the SE (which I can not say for the other competitors at this time).

Even people I know who think the SE is ridiculous are impressed that LiftPort actually has a business plan in the short term, even if they think the whole idea is silly.

I hope LiftPort is able to make it through "these hard times." A setback here could send ripples throughout the SE community.
The Space Elevator is something I’ve been fascinated with since I read Arthur C.’s (non-fiction) account of it in “Ascent to Orbit”, probably 30 years ago, now. For my part, I see zero hope of humans moving into space in any meaningful way using super-expensive, miniscule carrying-capacity, rockets. Those are “old-think” to me, and while fine for launching satellites (for now), we are wasting our time trying to squeeze 1% more efficiency out of them for purposes of sending PEOPLE into space. The 100G$ spent (so far) on the space station would have been *much better* spent on the Science needed to someday build a space elevator, instead of on a ‘pink elephant’ wearing out LEO.

I could literally write pages on this subject, but I’ll restrain myself, and wait to see what others have to say  . . .
I profoundly admire a person who values his dreams more than a building.

I imagine that balloon-borne platforms have a compelling value proposition given the price of oil combined with our growing environmental awareness.   More compelling now, than if proposed five or 10 years ago.

I wish LiftPort Luck and Success.
Nothing could use low cost lift more than power satellites.  I worked out the numbers for them and it would take lift capacity upwards of 2000 tons a day.

2000 tons a day takes about .7 Gw at 100% efficiency.  (Actually half the lift energy is extracted from the earth's rotation.)

If you are thinking space elevators and this market, you should think on this scale.  I have doubts about climbers being up to this much traffic.

Keith Henson  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=157110

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google