ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Our galaxy's sexier cousin

Posted: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 6:40 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / STScI / AURA
The galaxy NGC 1672 sparkles in a new image from the Hubble Space Telescope.

Using the Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have produced a sparkling new picture of a spiral galaxy called NGC 1672 - a distant relative of our own Milky Way, only sexier.

When I say "distant," I'm talking in terms of literal distance: NGC 1672 is 60 million light-years away, in the southern constellation Dorado. And when it comes to the galaxy's relationship to our home galaxy, astronomers see some interesting similarities as well as differences.

Like the Milky Way, NGC 1672 has four major spiral arms that are linked to a straight "bar" of stars and dust. NGC 1672 is just a little smaller than the Milky Way, and both galaxies are apparently anchored at their cores by supermassive black holes. All this leads Joe Liske, a German astronomer at the European Southern Observatory, to call NGC 1672 a "sister galaxy" in a video podcast presented by the European Space Agency's Hubble Information Center.

But unlike the relatively mild-mannered Milky Way, NGC 1672's nucleus is thought to be ablaze with activity, although that blaze is muted by veils of dust.

Might our galaxy light up in the same way, or is it finished with its hot-blooded phase? That’s one of the big questions - and one of the reasons why astronomers are interested in active galaxies like NGC 1672 (which is technically classified as a Seyfert galaxy).

They're also curious about the distinction between barred and non-barred spiral galaxies. The central galactic bars may help channel gas from the outlying disk into the nucleus, sparking new waves of star formation - but what are the dynamics of that process? Scientists believe that the bars are relatively short-lived, recurring phenomena - but where do they fit in the cycle of galactic evolution? These are more questions waiting to be answered.

There's no question that NGC 1672 is a stunner: In Hubble's image, based on data collected by the Advanced Camera for Surveys in 2005, young hot stars show up as flashes of blue and violet sparkling around the edges of the spiral arms. Stars and galaxies far beyond NGC 1672 take on a reddened hue, due to the galaxy's intervening veils of dust. Foreground stars in the Milky Way pump up the bling as well.

The ESA's main Web site and its Hubble Information Center offer plenty of stills and videos focusing on NGC 1672, including the aforementioned "Hubblecast" video podcast. The Space Telescope Science Institute's Hubblesite provides yet another perspective on today's image release.

To keep up with the latest from Hubble, you can sign up for the institute's "Inbox Astronomy" e-mail bulletins - and to revel in the telescope's past glories, check out our Space Gallery for Hubble's greatest hits. Our latest "Month in Space" collection includes a galaxy portrait that's literally smashing.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Your right! This galexy is even sexier!Man I wish the milky-way could look as hot!
After viewing the photograph:

If you DO believe we are alone in this universe, then we'd better start geting along with each other on this speck of dust, else LIFE won't ever stand a chance.

If you DON'T believe we are alone in this universe, then we'd better start geting along with each other on this speck of dust, else WE won't ever stand a chance.

Either way, it would be a terrible thing to screw up.
This is a grand reminder of the utility of the HST. I believe that the HST should be serviced as long as it possibly can with no timelines. Granted, the pictures we see such as this are actually extending reality and really wouldn't appear that way. Our eyes can only perceive HII regions (reddish star forming regions)and dust lanes in longer exposed images. So, the HST opens up the universe to us in ways we can all relate to and wonder about.
Actually, the view of your galaxy from the outside is quite nice.
That galaxy sure has a pretty mouth.
Your "sexier" comment is somewhat innapropriate.
The grass is always greener...On the other side of the universe.
Is it my imagination (or too much coffee), but doesn't this "sexy" galaxy look like it's giving us the cosmic finger? :(
Alan,
Sexier?  I'll go with "stunner" or "active"  but sexier?  Why shouldn't our galaxy crank up?  It almost assuredly has done, so why not again?

However, would you want to be in such an active location?  Radiation and particles and shock waves, Oh My!

Thanks for another Cosmic picture!
this article really strikes my interests...i was wondering if you had an idea as to whether or not intelligent life is possible in this said galaxy. 

      thank you in advance.
How is the NGC 1672 sexier and what does that mean?
Simply amazing. I don't think people realize how insignificant life on Earth really is compared to the rest of the cosmos.
Looks as if there may be life in that galaxy as well, Amazing!
To Ruben: Actually, the grass on our side of the universe is purple. That's because our grass contains a photon accepter similar to the purple chlorophyll that some of your bacteria contain, and which is better at getting energy from our class M star. (Remember, I'm a botanist.)
The European Southern Observatory (ESO) said several years ago that it was working on some kind of new super-conduction CCD optical chip for telescopes that would be able to detect and categorize individual photons of light as they came in, not just one big bucket in other words. With such technology, couldn't they just look for specific colors emblematic of life and water such as blue-green worlds? I mean if they could tell the difference, that would be like a filter.
Re A Marin's comment about "the finger", now that you mention it, I see it too. It must be an optical illusion due to the outer arm in the lower left corner is brighter instead of duller than the one just inward of it, which is unusal, making it look like it sticks out instead of being on the same plane as the other arms. But to me it more looks like it's pointing with its inedex finger, not the middle finger, to the bright star in the upper left, like it's an extremely important one. Does anyone know which star that is?
There is nothing sexy about a galaxy. Are we males feminizing deep space? The writer sure took a leap in using that word, but, I guess it worked.
OK, I guess I should be sorry for thinking that a galaxy can be "sexy," but being male, the word came to mind when I heard Dr. J's comment that this was a "sister galaxy" to the Milky Way. The difference is that NGC 1672 is an active Seyfert galaxy, in contrast to our relatively quiescent, "wallflower" galaxy. As a sister, NGC 1672 is sparklier. Better-looking. More dangerous. Yes, totally hot. Sorry if my mind wandered.
:)
Well Alan since you put it that way, I see your point.
This is truly a beautiful galaxy. However, several comments have been made asking if it's possible there are life-bearing planets there. The thing is, we as humans expect all life to be similar to what is found on our own planet. There could be other life forms out there that have no resemblance to life on Earth. And I think it's entirely probable that life exists in NGC 1672, and in other galaxies across the universe.
can you imagine how far into space we could be if we had the funding that the war has? We would go from just images to perhaps travel outside of our solar system and collecting data that may contain actual evidence of "life". I hope that amazing pictures are just the beginning not just the best that can be done in the future.
sexier.. hmm, well keep in mind that was 60 million years ago the photo is way out of date many blue giants the O class stars that last only 1 to 10 million years are long since dead *cry*, maybe not even be active today??, some of the aliens from one of the planet around one of the stars of NGC 1672 maybe looking at the milky way(which they call gluboishythnoppsth 92a3 or gyh-92a3 for short) might be thinking WOW I wish our galaxy looked as sexy and wondering if it might have life? and when is Jesus ever coming back? ok just kidding on that last one ;-)
our chance to shapeshift, London developing POSITIVE ''I fell and know how to learn quick'' to rebalance ...Im a bRAVE current''  Asteroids are 'Real Hard' to 'rock and flow through'..atmosphere SOS..im paclady eating my way through your invisible carnage...dangerous is'nt fair.. MURDERERS US LOT,EARTH'S GOT DEAD...TIRED. real freind...im taking actual care with my feeling.We must move im gona enjoy what ever Im being,killed for evil to live....A rocket my next car!!!I risk it 4 you lot unconditionally..hard to do trust...anything is poss...no thing is cirtain. SHARE is rare to be evolving!!!!!!!!masters at work


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=110657

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google