ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Is Martian life on ice?

Posted: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:54 PM by Alan Boyle

Scientists have long known that Mars' polar regions contain huge reservoirs of frozen water, but today's findings on the depth and purity of that ice have raised the regions' profile as a place to search for evidence of life - as well as a destination for future human missions.

The splashiest fact coming out from today's research, published online by the journal Science, is that there's enough water in the south polar region's layered deposits to cover the entire Red Planet in a liquid layer about 36 feet (11 meters) deep.

That may sound like a lot - but the lead researcher behind the study, Jeffrey Plaut of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told me today that Mars must have had lots more when it was a warmer, wetter planet, perhaps billions of years ago. That conclusion is based on the erosional patterns seen on Mars today.

"You probably need 10 times as much water as we've identified in order to do all that erosion," Plaut said.

What's more surprising about today's result, at least for the experts, is the purity of the ice. Radar readings from the MARSIS instrument on Europe's Mars Express showed that the ice was at least 90 percent pure water. Those ice layers go down as far as 2.3 miles (3.7 kilometers) beneath the surface - and are topped by a mixture of ice and dust that may be only a yard (meter) or so thick.

All this makes the little-explored polar deposits more tantalizing for Mars mission planners, Plaut said. NASA's Mars Polar Lander would have touched down amid such deposits if it hadn't crashed back in 1999. The Mars Phoenix lander, due for launch in August, will study the planet's high northern latitudes.


NASA
An artist's conception shows a "Cryobot" melting
its way through the Martian ice beneath a lander.

Plaut said more ambitious missions to the layered deposits are already in the works. "There have been some proposals to use some clever ways to drill into these deposits from a lander or a rover," he said. "There are some devices that would melt through the material, and they would have to manage the liquid they produce. That's one way some of the new information we're getting could be fed through."

Some schemes call for sending "Cryobots" capable of melting their way through a few hundred yards (meters) of ice - then analyzing the water for signs of life using miniaturized lab equipment.

All this is music to the ears of Richard Hoover, who heads the astrobiology group at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. He and his colleagues have reported not only that the layered deposits contain abundant water ice, but also that the ice is subject to thawing and refreezing.

"The existence of water ice, and from time to time liquid water on Mars, is profoundly important to the existence of life on Mars," he told me today.

A couple of years ago, Hoover found 32,000-year-old bacteria in samples taken from Alaskan permafrost - and when the ice thawed, the organisms came back to life.

"What that means about the layered deposits of ice in the polar regions of Mars is that any microorganisms that were living when the ice melted would have been frozen into the polar cap, and would have been preserved intact, and may be even still alive," Hoover said. "You've got there a frozen record not only of life that may have inhabited the cap itself, but also may have been contained in cometary debris from elsewhere. All of this would have been put into deep-freeze cryopreservation, and could still be alive."

Even if microbes couldn't be reanimated, the ice could conceivably preserve the genes, the DNA or the biochemistry of Martian life. "Even a dead microorganism from Mars would be a great treasure," Hoover said. Assuming that the signs of life are preserved in the ice, scientists could learn whether or not life on Mars followed the same patterns seen on Earth.

"I have to say it could well be that life on Mars is exactly the same as life on Earth," Hoover said. Cosmic impacts could have blasted debris containing microbes into space - transferring the stuff of life from Earth to Mars, or vice versa, he said.

"We could easily have transferred Earth biology into space, where it could have been picked up by comets and transferred then to other regions of the solar system," he said.

Martian water ice could serve as an important resource for future life on the Red Planet as well, said Robert Zubrin, president of the Mars Society. For years, Zubrin has pressed for humans to settle on Mars sooner rather than later - and he said today's findings serve as just one more sign that Mars is a far better destination than the moon.

"All this defines Mars as the appropriate goal for human settlement as well as the search for life," Zubrin said.

Zubrin said the layered deposits might not be the best place to plunk down a settlement: At 70 degrees south latitude, the edges of the region are still not quite close enough to the equator for Zubrin's tastes. Nevertheless, he's heartened by the latest findings about frozen water.

"If  it's everywhere at 70 degrees, then you may have it at isolated locations at 60. ... Looking at the data more closely, you may find places that not only have the water but also have interesting geological features," he said.

Zubrin isn't so heartened, however, by NASA's current focus on going back to the moon, and only then maybe moving on to Mars. He pointed to a 50-year outlook that NASA Administrator Michael Griffin wrote for Aviation Week, speculating that the space agency just might be able to send humans to Mars by the year 2037.

"When you say you're going to do something 30 years from now, you're basically saying you're not going to do it," Zubrin complained. "If you wanted to go to Mars in 2037, you could shut NASA down now, reopen it in 2020 and start from scratch. ... We really shouldn't be seeking to delay for a generation taking on the challenge of Mars."

NASA's take on the moon-vs.-Mars debate is that the moon has to serve as a close-at-hand test bed for eventual Mars missions - but Zubrin argued that many of those activities could take place on Earth, in the Arctic or Antarctic.  "The goal should be Mars, and maybe for one of the early test flights we send people to the moon with some of the test hardware for Mars," he said.

In any case, Earth's polar regions are already being used as test beds in the scientific search for life in the deep freeze - whether on Mars, Europa or Enceladus. For example, Hoover is working on a U.S.-Russian expedition to Antarctica's subsurface lakes. A research group led by Stone Aerospace is also planning an Antarctic warmup for a mission to Europa.

Taken in this context, today's findings may seem to represent just one small step in the grand search for extraterrestrial life - but Plaut said that's the way giant leaps are done.

"This is more like science as it actually works, rather than science as people think it works," he said. "It's not one major discovery after another, but you build upon what people did before."

Update for 2:38 p.m. March 16: The Mars Express findings were a big topic of discussion at this week's Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, said the University of Arizona's William Boynton.

"People are excited about this. ... Five years ago, we didn't know there was any ice there, other than what was in the residual ice cap," he told me.

Then NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter came along and detected the wide-ranging deposits of frozen water in the south polar region. Boynton is the principal investigator for the instrument that made the detection, Odyssey's gamma-ray spectrometer. He said the latest results move the ball forward by determining just how deep the deposits go.

Now Boynton is finishing up work on an instrument for the Mars Phoenix lander that could take the scientific ball even closer to the goal. The Thermal and Evolved-Gas Analyzer, or TEGA, could analyze the composition of dirt and ice samples from the Martian far north.

Phoenix's robotic arm should be able to dig through the first few inches of the Martian surface to the ice beneath, he said. Then it could either scrape up or grind off some of that ice to feed into the TEGA.

"One of the instrument's objectives is to look for organic chemistry. ... There's at least the chance we're going to find organic chemistry there," Boynton said. If Phoenix finds organics at work, that would become a bigger focus for future Mars missions, he said.

Other researchers already have designed a nuclear-powered probe system, called Multi-MICE, that could melt its way through Martian ice and analyze the water during its descent. "You can go many kilometers through the ice," James Powell of Plus Ultra Technologies told me.

The ice channels could lay bare millions of years of climate history on Mars - and perhaps the record of ancient life as well. Last year, Plus Ultra completed a Phase 1 study of the proposed mission for the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts - here's a PDF file of its presentation on Multi-MICE.

Powell told me that the melt probes could represent just a first step toward turning the ice deposits into a base for human operations on Mars. "Basically, we feel it's an ideal place for the first landings," he said.

Plus Ultra's grand plan would be to melt tunnels into the ice, creating cavities where the water and other Martian materials could be robotically processed into fuel, oxygen and other necessities. "You can stockpile hundreds of tons of supplies under the ice," Powell said. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

please dont send us to mars....lol. If God wanted us to live there he would've put us there!!
Good article!  I’ve heard that microbes can be dormant for as long as 250 – 500 million years, which is more than enough time for a chunk of bacteria-ladened rock – blasted into space by a large meteor impact -- to make the journey all the way from Earth to Mars, where it could land safely with microscopic life.  Life can very well exist on Mars right now.  I’d be surprised if it wasn’t.  

I always ALWAYS love Robert Zubrin's tenacity and enthusiasm, but I do disagree that “Mars is a far better destination than the moon.”  Unfortunately, neither Mars nor the moon has the proper gravity for our bodies or an atmosphere able to shield us from solar radiations.  A FAR better off-world colonization plan would be to find a near-earth asteroid that also contains high amounts of water ice.  Land on it, mine it for water, oxygen, fuel, and raw meterials, and simply build a spinning space city right there.  

What makes this easier to do than Mars is the low gravity of the asteroid allows us to come and go as we choose, while the space outpost is under construction.  Heck, the NEO’s orbit may even take us out towards the asteroid belt so we can just hitch a ride and further explore!

A spinning space city ... 

http://www.starlarvae.org/SL_graphics/space_colony_1.jpg

... can simulate proper earth gravity and can be covered with the remaining debris from the asteroid into a thick radiation shield.  It’s all about avoiding gravity wells once you get into space.  A space city also avoids the vulnerability of a surface outpost to the shockwave of a meteor impact, which could be hundreds of miles away and still affect a surface base.  A near miss of a space station would not have any such effect.
My brain tells me the moon but my heart tells me Mars. I have dreamed about going to Mars since the Viking landers in the "70's". Either one...but just do it. We need the re-assurance that when and if we destroy ourselves and our environment here that we might survive there.
aaawwwwe!!!  we all kmow there is life out there somewhere, it's just whether or not if we find them, or they find us first!!!  
I was in the 5th Grade when the Russians put up Sputnik 1.  Wow, was I amazed.  Too bad I will not be around to see us explore Mars on a more detailed level.  In 1969 we went to the Moon with computer technology less than an 8088 Intel processor.

We really did a lot of advancements, from the late 50s to the late 60s.  John Kennedy had vision, since his assassination, the country has lost its Futurist View.  China will probably take over in Space Exploration, we have lost our way. Too bad.
Meko - If God didn't want us to go to Mars period, he wouldn't have allowed us the ingenuity to develop the science and technology to get there.
In respone to Eldridge's space city theory, I must say it is a valid idea. If Disney made a movie and Roddenberry made a series on it, it is a proposition definitely worth considering. The real moral dilemma is whether we should continue studying and maybe some day developing Mars for human civilization or to leave it be and obey Trek's "Prime Directive". Personally, I believe that we should cultivate Mars; why not? Kirk violated it countless times.
Hi, Alan  --  welcome back!  This is a good one, and I'm happy to see Chris E. dreaming big.  And reviving the idea of a wheel in space for a habitat.  Goes with the territory, eh, Chris?  Josh and Meko can argue God's purpose for us but shouldn't ignore our prime human attribute which we share with no-one else around here, and that is our free will; we will go to Mars (and everywhere) if and only if we choose to.  We can choose to stay home too, more's the pity.

But back to the ice at Mars' polar region.  I have my doubts about it supporting life.  They are saying 'pure' H2O, aren't they? And 'old.'  And no other life is obvious anywhere we've looked for it on the surface of Mars, which says to me that life has never developed anywhere on the planet or it would have covered the place with algae or moss or Martian grass of some kind, because life is so adaptive to any condition, but requires very specific conditions in order to be formed out of mere chemicals.
Sooooo...if there is that much water ice on Mars, then it is time for a neighborhood sized.....Marstini, shaken but not stirred. Three fuel tanks which are filled respectively (and respectfully) with the best earth-sourced vodka, gin, and vermouth...and the cargo bay bursting with Spanish olives and cocktail onions. Thank you very mush for taking ush to spasche.
Oh how I wish I could be around when humans finally go to Mars. Better yet, I'd give anything to be one of those that get to go, even with understanding that there was a good chance I would never return.
Technology is advancing at an enormous rate - across all disciplines. There's no reason to wait until 2037 to make a Mars trip, or earlier to build a science station on the Moon - just ridiculous. Let's get some leadership in this country, get our Chinese, Russian, Japanese, European, Asian, and Latin American colleagues fired up and get to work ! We can develop technologies to mitigate Earth's climate problems and still agressively work an international space effort. By 2011 we will have Nuclear Fusion working in the USA and France. Practical Fusion energy will take another two decades, but could be accelerated. Trips beyond Mars will use Fusion power.
Enough water to cover the entire planet to a depth of 30ft should be plenty to terraform it with oxygen producing plants. Work should begin immediately on genetically engineering plants able to withstand and thrive in this harsh climate. I say go directly to Mars. The moon isn't that essential as a staging platform. We could just as easily assemble the craft in low earth orbit with zero gravity as opposed to the Moons 1/6th Gravity. Why build on the moon only to have to escape gravity one more time? Please visit my website for more technology stories: http://www.omninews.com
Does everyone here seriously think this is a better use of our resources than something else... let's say... CARING FOR OUR FELLOW MAN! Why is it so darn important to get to Mars, when we can't solve our own problems at home? Ridiculous... just plain ridiculous.
Beam me up, Scotty. I've always wanted to go, at least into orbit. I agree, we need a new world available if or when this one becomes uninhabitable. Between global warming, pollution, etc., etc. we should plan ahead. And people have exploration in their DNA, so figure out how to do it and the volunteers will be eager to go. How amazing to be able to see first-hand what the rovers & landers & fly-by mission cameras send back to us now.
So what.If there is what are you going to do?Have a glass of ice tea?I don't believe life is there.I think it is just a way to keep our imaginatons going.
Meko - We'll have to go there one day anyways. Mars will be in a somewhat better zone as the sun slowly evolves to its red giant status and melts the earth.
if we destroy our selves here, then why would we want to be on mars, wouldn't we just destroy ourselves there too?
And so God looked down upon the Earth and decided He was  saddened and tired of what He saw there. So He sent a great comet crashing down upon the Earth and destroyed all the life He had created. When all the despairing souls went to their judgement, many cried, "Oh God, great and powerful, we have led a good life. We have tried to follow your Word! Why have you destroyed the only place in your Universe where we could live?"

And God thundered, "The only place where you could live? Fools! I created another planet in your own solar system that is covered with iron and rocket fuel! It was there for you to pluck like an apple from a tree. You needed only to build the ladder to reach it.  Yet you were too concerned with your own petty lives and vanities to move there. So now you deserve your fate and the fourth planet will remain barren forever!"
Maybe Martian life is being preserved in the polar cap waiting for a better time after a calamity on that planet. Did they all but destroy themselves?
Meko, Meko...Based on your statement, if we go to Mars one could argue that "God" did want us to go. It's always strange when a person of faith tries to use logic to explain a religious view. Please...save it for church!

I say we need to move quickly, but cautiously to get to Mars. It would seem that we need to build some new technologies to get our people there safely. Lots of back-ups and redundency built in to make sure the mission would be safe and successful. This all may be a natural progression for intelligent beings to spread throughout a solar system and eventually beyond to other solar systems. We must learn to do these things and act as quickly as the technology can be developed. Also, the things we will learn on other planets will help us right here on earth. It is a big win for everybody if we go!
Please don't listen to Meko up there. If "God" didn't want us to go to Mars, he wouldn't have "given" us these massive brains that would eventually allow us to develop the sophisticated technology that would make a trip to Mars even conceivable. What is there to be lost by exploring Mars? I don't imagine that I'll ever make the trip, but I love reading and hearing about it - learning about it - which is what I think gives a lot of people a hard time.

[...]

We should go to the moon as well. Why couldn't we build a base up there and turn it into a fueling station? It looks to me like taking off from Earth burns a lot of fuel - hence the huge tanks that drop off shortly after the shuttles reach space. Make it so more of those tanks can be added to the shuttle on the moon, then take off from there. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but it sounds like a good idea to me. Have an imagination. "Explore your world."

While our finest astronauts are up there I hope they stop in on that thing that looks like a face. What is that? Is it real? If so, I'd be seriously interested in knowing pretty much anything about it.
Sorry - just read the "PLEASE READ" information above. Didn't mean to attack comments of others. Hope the same person reads this...
Let's forget about manned missions to the moon and Mars. We can get 50x more bang for the buck by sending robotic spacecraft. I want to know if life is on Mars or Europa in my lifetime, not my next lifetime.
Love the article. Very encouraging stuff. I think going to Mars is not only a great idea, but an important step for humankind.

I don't imagine that I will make the trip in my lifetime, but I love learning about it. I can't imagine why we wouldn't make exploring Mars a top priority if we have the means to do so. If we as a people can technologically make it happen, I think it would be a great step toward making more of the unknown, known. Even if just a little bit at a time. It may even end up helping humankind in our long-time struggle to figure out where we came from, and who are we? Who knows?

I'm definitely pro-exploration. The basis of science and exploration is pretty much the same - discovery of the unknown, and ruling out the impossible. You cannot accomplish either feat with closed minds.

We should go to the moon as well. Why couldn't we build a base up there and turn it into a fueling station? It looks to me like taking off from Earth burns a lot of fuel - hence the huge tanks that drop off shortly after the shuttles reach space. Make it so more of those tanks can be added to the shuttle on the moon, then take off from there. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but it sounds like a good idea to me. Have an imagination. "Explore your world."

While our finest astronauts are up there I hope they stop in on that thing that looks like a face. What is that? Is it real? If so, I'd be seriously interested in knowing pretty much anything new about it.
of course there is life out there but you will never receive it to touch until the after life you know there is GOD who will choose who does what connect with him receive the truth and you will live forever to explore the universe do not deny him any longer and be ready to receive your disipline if you are a true child of the Creator
I have to say - I read Meko's comments and scrolled straight down to post a message. After going back and reading all of the other responses, I'm stoked about the general attitude. Granted, the population that goes to MSNBC.com and clicks on an article about Mars is probably pretty biased...

To add to earlier comments - caring for our fellow man is quite possibly the biggest reason we're heading toward the position of having to seek other inhabitable environments that could serve as an alternative to life on Earth. Any survival of the fittest fans out there?

To Des - I see what you're saying about covering the place with algae, moss, whatever - if life had ever existed on the red planet, but at the same you mention that the surface has been explored. Exactly. It's what's below the surface that counts. To us, from here on Earth, or from our unmanned vehicles in space, Mars appears to be a "dead" planet, but on our own planet - although it is teeming with life on the surface - we still have to dig to find our past. Whether it's for saber toothed cats, dinosaurs, "the missing link," or artifacts from Jamestown, we have to dig. If life ever did exist on Mars, we could be talking hundreds of millions to billions of years ago.

And finally to James - robots can take pictures, samples, compile and send data, and perform analysis - among other things - but, they will never be able to capture and describe the human experience involved in such an experience.
God did intend for us to go to Mars...we did....or at least our ancestors did....finding a planet covered with large lizards and casual distruption of an asteroid....then....a new home when the dust clears....but this may just be theory....or will we find our own footprints frozen in the Mars polar ice....
Chaz, compared to the amount of money spent on welfare (food, money, housing, etc), health welfare, eliminating poverty... the amount government has spent on space is pathetic.
James - the reason we need manned spaceflight is some of us want to know that there will be life on Mars or the Moon into the future. Its much better that way.
All this speculation about this potential or that potential on other planeets may make for interesting headlines.  But as long as we are dependent on chemical rockets for space travel, then it will remain nothing more than a very, very expensive research tool for scientists.  Look at maritime history.  Until the late 18th century when steam power began to replace sail power, intercontinental travel was also relatively long, dangerous, and expensive.  I think that instead of spending huge amounts of money on small interplanetary experiments, NASA should be concentrating on perfecting a better form of propulsion that will make interplanetary travel truly practical and profitable.
"Space, The final frontier, these are the voyages of the Human Race, their life long ambition to find a new place to live, to seek out new ways to exist, TO BOLDLY GO, despite themselves" I do believe that Gene Roddenberry had the vision and we SHOULD without hesitation continue our quest into the final frontier.  No we are not going to blow up this planet or use up all its resoures, because there is plenty here for us to BEGIN and thrive.  The only sad part I believe is that I won't be around when we really BEGIN our exploration of other planets.  I just wish people who are religious would mind thier own various religions and leave the other folks alone.  But like I was told one time, the reason that religions do not want us to explore is they are scared of what the explorers WILL find.
WITH THOSE FROZEN MICROBES THAT CAN POSSIBLY REVIVE ITSELF AFTER LONG PERIODS OF TIME. WHAT IF THOSE MICROBES ARE DANGEROUS TO HUMANS AS WELL AS ALL LIFE ON EARTH.  I AM SURE PRIOR TO COLONIZING MARS WE WILL BRING BACK SAMPLES OF FROZEN MICROBES. WHICH MAY POSSIBLY KILL US ALL AND WE WON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT COLONIZING MARS. FOR THOSE WHO SAY WE HAVE SAFE GUARDS AGAINST THAT OCCURING REMEMBER WHEN THE MOON ROCK WAS STOLEN FROM THE LAB, THEY SAID THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN. I THINK HUMANS OVERSTEP THEIR BOUNDARIES WITHOUT THINKING OF OUTCOMES.
Chaz... If we solved all our earthly problems, and created a harmonious global society where everyone was equally looked after, I would imagine, depending on when the endeavour was undertaken (say 100 years ago, or 20... today even, take your pick of what you would like in an ideal global society... it's a big question, depending on many different points of view and ideas), if it was ever achieved, we all would most likely have very little, other than the perception that we are all equally flat in our knowledge and possibility. If we tried to do this before striving to tackle future goals, we would most likely never progress to anything close to our potential (which might even include a type of Utopia). I don't know anyone who thinks the world is 'fair' and not full of seemingly unnecessary suffering. I’m sure most rational people think the distribution of wealth is insane – even the wealthy. The best hope for our self-imposed, close to disastrous situation here on Earth, is further advancement in science & technology. While exploration of Mars seems unrelated to the good of ‘Man-Kind’ on Earth, it is the achievements in these apparently unrelated directions, that will provide the answers to the problems we have here on our planet… well, that’s my rational. You obviously enjoy your technology Chaz… how big do you see the picture? Peace.
I am so sick of people thinking this is only planet in universe that we can stay on. u forgetting that in this galaxy theres so many solar systems like ours, i am sure out of all millions of solar systems out there i am sure they have 3rd planet from the sun as well that can sustain life. we dont have ability to look way too far to see that we cant even see close to other solar systems in great detail ... theres so much out there and still we sit here and say we have the only planet that can have life. What experience do these scientists have? seriously we never made it past the moon ... we cant sit here and say we only planet unless somone actually visit it i dont see how we can sit there and say all planets out in this galaxy alone is not like earth. Thats like someone back in the 9th century saying there is no new world. how can he know that? he cant see north america or south america from europe at that time. so its same thing ... u dont say theres no planets out there unless u seen them all.
many countries spend millions/billions on the space race and the race to POSSIBLY populate another planet,it now seems that after doing a good job of buggering this planet we as humans wish to do the same to mars, WHY??????
To me saying "If God wanted us to live there he would've put us there" makes as much sense as it did when people said it 400 years ago talking about "the new world" And personally, i'm glad that unlike us they didn't let their sense of exploration be shot down by monetary constraints. Face it, NASA is a government funded organization. And as such, it will never get the funding it needs. I for one cannot wait for Richard Branson to fully create his vision. And, if people were smart they'd try to get Bill Gates and Microsoft to get into the space business. With their resources, we could be there in 5 years. Finally, the best reason for a moon base refueling station/construction yard is that zero energy is required to stay orbiting the earth. The moon can do that one on its own. So a bigger more efficient station could be built
Finding life on another planet would be the single most important thing for all humanity. Human have the tendency to think we are different and unique, finding life on other plants will bring the world together in a way we have not even begun to fathom.
hey i'll go maybe god is there meko, i'll ask him for you what he thinks about it. I don't know though being that he gave us a mind to freely think and i use the word freely very strong why not try to explore our "world" meaning world not just earth.
Well said, Shocker, Fort Worth. Well said.
What's all this GOD with a " ". Let me tell you something Meko - most of these cats on here have no faith based belief system. you people really think that we are just spinning in space because of some scientific blah-blah? While God has given us the ability to reason, we as humans have also proven, through the creation of some completely stupid items, like nuc's and assault weapons, that we do not always make the right desicion. Exploring for signs of life and development is acceptable, but we were placed on Earth at this particular time for a reason. Instead of looking for a new planet to destroy, we should concentrate on fixing the one we already messed up. God is Love, even for you skeptic believers!!!
Ted - Hawkings has been saying it best himself in that in order for the human race to ensure its survival we MUST eventually be able to leave Earth and estabolish colonies elsewhere.  What better place to get a start than Mars?  We can't just pack up and go though.  It's going to take years and years of research and new discoveries and finding out if life presently exists, has existed, or could exist in some way shape or form on Mars is an incredibly important step.
Anyone want to buy or claim some prime real estate on the Moon's North edge, like in Shackleton Crater, for posterity's sake? I read or I might have heard that there is frozen H2O in those dark unlit craters! I'm going to tell me son to become a private astro-nut and to take a pitch-fork with him on his way to Sister Moon and Brother Mars in order to stake his claim. Holy Moses, Jesus, Mohammad, Krishna, Budda and the other Pre-Apocolyptic religious freaks. Note: The UNIVERSE is my real Constitution and the Laws of IT (G-d is neither a He nor a She. G-d IT a/k/a ECLAT: It is the Flash first and big Bang second not the other way around. And TIME is Temperature not Space time) in Nature are the Clauses within ALL thing animate and inanimate. We live in transfinity (Reality) and we never die. just be good in this world, strive for Healing of the Nations, World Peace in pesuant to our Spaceforth Activity's (See The Book Of Transfinity and what to do next). Behold, Life is a miracle and there is zero sin about it!        
Interesting article on the amount of water stored as ice in the polar regions of Mars and the potential that life exist.  Last year, scientist discovered that methane gas concentrations were in the atmosphere, there could be methogenic bacteria in some of the regions on Mars.   With the potential of life existing on Mars, why not add new strains of micro-flora and fauna into the ecosystem from Earth's more extreme environments?

If Mars is to eventually be terraformed, or at least in some regions, soil bacteria concentration would have to increase and also the amounts of organic material would have to increase in some of the areas.  
One might also consider the possibility that beneath the 2.3 miles of subsurface ice, a 'slushy' mixture or even liquid layer might exist, raising the possibility that life may exist there today (if it ever took a foothold in the first place). Much like the current theory that a subsurface ocean exists on Europa, the same principle might hold true to our neighboring red planet. Although Mars isn't subject to the same tidal forces that exist within the Jovian-Europan system, enough evidence exists to support some significant manner of recent volcanism/radioactive decay deep within the planet. The subsurface ice should be close enough to be afforded some measure of warmth from the active interior, perhaps enough to melt the ice and create a 'habitable' zone for even the most rudimentary of lifeforms. One only need think about how hot it gets for the South African diamond miners, when they are a mere mile beneath the Earth's surface, in order to better grasp this concept. The prospect of life is also slightly elevated when you consider that Mars isn't bombarded with the same level of radiation that pummels Europa...
Honestly for me there would be NOTHING BETTER THEN TO SEE THE GALAXY, i know that sounds corny but i know that im not the only one like this, for me theres nothing more thrilling then not knowing what is out there and its really killing me to see how weve been progressing all theses years and we really dont have alot of anwsers. In this case i think that mars would be a good choice but i was allready conviced with the moon.
This life on Mars is just hype to receive funding.

How do you get life from water?

Any life on Mars, came from Earth.

It's ironic scientists are so sure Mars was covered by water, but
deny the Earth was once covered by water.

What about risk 29:

http://www.rxpgnews.com/research/article_4980.shtml

Among the gravest risks of a manned flight to Mars ranks the possibility that massive amounts of solar and cosmic radiation will decimate the brains of astronauts, leaving them in a vegetative state, if they survive at all.

Dubbed "Risk 29" by NASA's Mars scientists, the cosmic radiation risk remains a show-stopper because shielding a spacecraft from all radiation could make it too heavy to reach Mars, which, at its closest, is 38 million miles from earth.

Now, medical scientists have been tasked to determine the human brain's maximum safe cosmic radiation dose and to decipher precisely how radiation causes cognitive impairment, part of a quest for biological countermeasures to reduce radiation-related cognitive impairment.
Establishing a Mars base may just be one of the best ways of "caring for our fellow man". I worked for a number of years in the Peace Corps doing just that at my own expense, but I am sure that exploration is also essential. If we hadn't taken the initiative to colonize Australia, the Americas, etc. (even as original inhabitants ~40k years ago) would the world be better?

People need hope, vision and, actually, a challenge in addition to food and water; ..otherwise we devolve into squabbling amongst ourselves which is just what is happenning now. It turns out, as I learned in the Peace Corps, most of the world's problems are because of our squabbling not because of our higher aspirations. By learning about life on Mars we may learn better how to nurture it here.
Mars today. Pluto tomorrow. Why, you ask? The answer is "why not?" Ladders are composed of rungs that alternate between reach and grasp, are we are forever blessed and cursed with ladders. And who let the dogs out?
Why leave Earth and check out the rest of our solar system? It has been put eloquently in Star Trek re-runs for decades. "To boldly go where no one has gone before". For the same reason people decide to risk life and limb to climb Everest, or the same reason people bungee-jump or sky-dive.

I for one would love the challenge of colonizing Mars, making a new life, and being millions of miles away from the infighting and strife that dominate our current planet.
Chaz, regarding your comments on helping your fellow man: "Ridiculous... just plain ridiculous."...  the only thing I find ridiculous is thinking that humanity has the resources to defeat GREED.  There's more than enough time, brains, energy, food, money, whatever, to fix every problem on Earth and still sail the stars -- but only if some folks learn to sacrifice.  Since those folks won't sacrifice, I'll just go to Mars instead.

But to give you some credit, I'll leave you with a saying that a bunch of ladies at Mary Kay Cosmetics are fond of repeating: "Aim for the stars.  If you miss, you'll still end up hitting the Moon."


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=91663

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google