ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



UFOs in the clouds

Posted: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:55 PM by Alan Boyle

More than 3,000 reports of unidentified flying objects were sent to the National UFO Reporting Center over the past year - but not one has generated as much buzz as November's sighting at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. Was it a metallic-looking, saucer-shaped object rising through the clouds, or nothing more than a meteorological oddity? It's hard to figure out whether the truth is really out there, but one thing is for sure: Clouds can do some positively alien-looking things.

Peter Davenport, the UFO center's director, says the buzz over the O'Hare sighting is fully justified.

"In my opinion, because I know the quality of the witnesses, and because I know the nature of the documents that were generated, it is one of the most dramatic cases of the year 2006 that this center has handled," Davenport told me today from the center's headquarters in Washington state.

On the other side, NBC News space analyst James Oberg - a longtime UFO skeptic - says the evidence that's come to light so far isn't all that compelling.

"It's just sad that we keep getting these reports which are of zero evidential value," he told me. "It's sad because there's a lot of strange stuff in the air that we do need to know."

Davenport's center put out the first reports on the O'Hare sighting weeks ago, but the report really picked up traction over the past weekend, when The Associated Press picked up a Chicago Tribune story about the case (free registration required).

Here are the basics: Employees at O'Hare reported seeing a dark gray, seemingly spinning disc hovering above Concourse C - at an estimated altitude of hundreds of feet, close to the cloud cover. The disc appeared to fly up at a rapid rate, leaving behind a hole in the clouds.

The Federal Aviation Administration acknowledged that it received a sighting report, but agency spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said no further follow-up was planned.

"Our theory on this is that it was a weather phenomenon," she told the Tribune. "That night was a perfect atmospheric condition in terms of low ceiling and a lot of airport lights. When the lights shine up into the clouds, sometimes you can see funny things."

Case closed? Not so fast, Davenport said.

"I am certain that the airline and the FAA are now attempting to conceal the true nature of the incident," Davenport said.

So far, about a dozen witnesses - all affiliated with the airport or airlines - have surfaced, according to the Tribune. Davenport said he's not yet aware of any reports from outsiders.

"Trying to find the actual eyewitnesses is very difficult," he said. "My suspicion is that there are a great many more. ... You ask, are there other witnesses? My response is, almost certainly. How do we find them, and how do we get them to come forward?"

One of the airport witnesses did take a photo of the phenomenon, but is reluctant to make it public out of concern for his job, Davenport said. "So far, over almost two months, we've been unable to get that," he said.

I have a feeling that even photographic evidence wouldn't settle the case. There are so many weird atmospheric phenomena out there that even crystal-clear pictures could be interpreted either as UFOs or as cloud patterns. For example, check out this roundup of lenticular clouds (offered with a big tip o' the Log to Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy Blog). Even knowing what they are, you'd be hard-pressed not to see them as flying saucers worthy of a Steven Spielberg blockbuster.

The idea that the disk left a hole in the clouds might sound like an atmospheric vortex phenomenon - perhaps like the vortices created when airplanes zoom through clouds. This Web page includes a video of an airplane leaving a dark, indistinct vortex in its wake. Other weird phenomena are reminiscent of smoke rings.

When I suggested that the O'Hare incident might have been a vortex created by an airplane rising through the clouds, Davenport shot me right down.

"You can conjecture all day long on that point if you wish to do so, but it's futile in this case," he said. "First of all, airplanes don't fly over [terminal] gates, they fly over runways. So your surmise, I think, is not appropriate in this case. ... This object was seen by many people to accelerate so fast and go straight up in the clouds that their eyes were unable to follow it."

To be fair, Davenport's center has been taking such cases seriously for 32 years - longer than I've been a professional journalist. So who am I to question the reports, particularly when they seem so authoritative?

The O'Hare incident is being taken more seriously than most sightings because the reports are coming from aviation professionals rather than untrained onlookers. But Oberg argues that the professionals don't always make the best eyewitnesses because they tend to favor flight-related explanations for what they see.

"NTSB investigators say that the worst observers of an aviation accident are aviation personnel," Oberg said. "It's because a pilot will usually want to understand what happened, and in his initial perceptions and later retellings will stress the facts that support his initial interpretation."

Oberg pointed to a couple of case studies in pilot misperception, investigated in detail years ago. And just for good measure, he passed along Web links to a Russian UFO report from 2001 that sounds similar to the O'Hare incident, plus the solution to a UFO mystery that came up just last week in Europe.

Oberg said the European case was particularly instructive, because the specifics about the mysterious glow in the sky helped investigators quickly figure out that it was most likely a cloud trail left behind by a Russian rocket launch. Without such specifics, the O'Hare incident may turn out to be little more than another "missed opportunity," Oberg said.

In any case, the incident is making for an interesting tale, and that has led Cosmic Log correspondents to add more UFO tales to a posting I published back in June. Feel free to offer up your own story right here in the comments section, even if it's decades old. If you've got a recent sighting, you might want to let Davenport know as well - you can find the contact details at his Web site.

Even if you've never seen a UFO, you can weigh in with your opinion on extraterrestrial life by adding a click to our unscientific Live Vote - and gauge your UFO IQ by taking our trivia quiz.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hold still.

<holding up neuralizer>

<FLASH!>

The thing over O'Hare airport was just the planet Venus reflecting off of swamp gas.

I see nothing unusual about a UFO at O'Hare Airport. I don't know where it came from, and I don't know where it's going to, nor do I really care all that much. It probably just had to go thru Chicago to get there. Who hasn't? Good thing it wasn't Denver!
do some research on the galactic federation and the mayan calender. time to wake up people!
I think it was a flock of seaguls in a strong headwind going nowhere fast - than oh my god, they got sucked up into the clouds. Get with it folks- big brother controls everything- even this website :)
Lenticular clouds? Lenticular clouds are formed over mountain peaks. Where is there a mountain peak at O'Hare field?
to bob c we have the best weather in usa

Thanks, John Doe: I don't mean to use lenticular clouds as an explanation for the O'Hare incident ... I bring that up only to illustrate that clouds can do very weird things (and in fact, some of the examples on that page are of other types of clouds ... believe me, they don't have mountain peaks in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, either).

Personally, I favor the vortex explanation, with a positive-negative perceptual image reversal explaining why people saw a rounded disk rather than a dark depression in the cloud cover. But of course I'm basing that purely on secondhand descriptions of the phenomenon. The fact that the phenomenon is very much tied up with the cloud ceiling (at first, the disk was perceived as hovering just below the cloud cover, then ascending through it, leaving a hole behind) really makes me suspect that there's an atmospheric cause.

Of course, that's the establishment view ... which would be expected if I were part of the "conspiracy."

http://www.enterprisemission.com/tension.htm

By the way, here's a link to a page about polar vortices on Saturn and Venus:

http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/
Venus_Express/SEMDGJC4VUE_0.html

I did it. I did it just like those guys that did all the crop circle hoax's. I just used some boards strapped to my feet when I was flying my invisible stealth ultralight through O'Hare's airspace.

I'm sorry ... I promise not to do it again this week.

Where's the pictures? Of all the people there, visitors, tourists etc., no-one had the foresight to photograph this phenomenon?
MAYBE THEY CAME FOR BRITTNEY, ROSEY, TRUMP, T.O. AND EVERY OTHER IDIOT THAT MADE NEWS THIS YEAR FOR ABSOLUTELY NOTHING SPECIAL. HOPE THEY COME BACK... THEY FORGOT SOME PEOPLE
who wouldn't want to get as far away from O'Hare as possible ? It's become a nightmare and the city wants to annex land and make it larger.
Is there a UFO hub. I heard they have some great prices coming up on 1-way tickets
What if it was just a UFO? And why is the Gov't still trying to cover it up?
I am a believer in UFO's etc, but what occurs to me is with the technology we have and all of the "real-time" videos we see from cell phones or cams, why is it that there are NO real-time photos or videos of these many so called Sightings? I would love more then anyone to see some sort of proof but you sure see live plane crashes, murders, police brutality but WHY NO UFO's?? come on.
50 years ago, my family was driving home on a rather deserted highway in northern California and we saw what appeared to be 3 large, bright stars in a triangle formation. Knowing there was no such thing, we watched. They soon spread out and became 6 craft. We stopped and watched them. One of them came close enough to see "windows" with light coming inside. It was noiseless, so, even though it hovered over us, we knew it wasn't a helicopter. Then, they all made right-angle turns and shot away, quickly disappearing. For years I thought it was a UFO. Still do, though as defined, "UNIDENTIFIED" but not other-worldly. I think the government tests aircraft all the time that they don't want us to know about for whatever reason. Example, my dad saw the stealth bomber over the Nevada desert 20 years before the military unveiled it. No, maw, it ain't Martians, it's US.
one never really knows..do you??
  Well, it must be that none of you are familiar with circular wing plasma drive airships.. Wake up people...
What if there really is something out there that we cannot explain? Are we prepared for the worst?
Well said, Agent J. 
     I consider myself a "skeptic" when it comes to individual UFO reports. Many are false, perpetrated by morons, and some are the result of honest witnesses fooled by an optical illusion. But there are a select few that defy every explanation other than the most simple one - that we are being visited.
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU GUYS ARE ACTUALLY LAUGHING ABOUT THIS. I FOR ONE DO BELIEVE THERE IS SOMETHING GREATER IN OUR UNIVERSE.  I DO HOPE THERE IS OTHER INTELLIGENT LIFE OUT THERE. WE HAVE ONLY TWO OPTIONS FOR ESCAPE FROM THIS PLANET. ONE IS RESTING WITH WORMS THROUGH ETERNITY OR POSSIBLE PEACE WITHIN THIS UNIVERSE OF OURS. SO WHICH IS IT, BOYS.  WORMS OR STARS.
Clouds? maybe, maybe not.  If they were visitors from elsewhere they probably left because their connecting flight from Denver was cancelled, or the airport food in O'Hare is way over-priced.  I have some great stills of something over the Rockies that is very convincing as a U.F.O. and still don't know what it was.  One frame it was there the next 2 it was not.

(Look just above hills near the center of the pic)

http://www.dripnot.net/redskies/whatisthat.jpg


As far as counter-rotating wake vortices from aircraft, they do not go straight up into the clouds, they spin off the tips of the wings and travel out and downwards, not up.   Most pilots and aircraft personnel do not like to report anything they see related to you-know-what as they fear for their jobs. Can you blame them?
I hope they come back since my aluminum foil sales have skyrocketed. Remember to not only make a space commander hat but also wrap your wrists and ankles.
At least they probably had food on their flights !!
It makes sense to me that an alien spacecraft would travel across the galaxy, slip into Earth's atmosphere unobserved, hover over an airport for 10 minutes or so and then accelerate violently. I mean, if you travelled that far, you'd want to show off a little, right? What else is there to do on this planet... watch the glaciers melt?
Any journalist that can use The Google can find out in 30 minutes that some UFOs can only be alien spacecraft. That is, is you are a REAL journalist. Listening to the likes of James Oberg immediately disqualifies you from that category Alan  :)  but seriously, you need to read 'Stupid Skeptic Trics' http://tinyurl.com/y4bely and The ETH by Brian Zeiler: http://tinyurl.com/y7lsed . James Oberg is very familiar with Brian Zeiler, from running battles on USENET in the mid 1990's where all UFO Skeptic arguemts were finally put to rest. Sadly, asking a busy journalist to track down these seminal writings is like asking water to flow up Niagara; they are just too busy with other more important stuff. You can start with Brian's ETH, and then search in Google Groups yourself.


Finally, it is worth your while to look at The COMETA report, which was produced by the French government and widely published and read in France. If you can't take that rather disturbing and well produced report seriously, then really, go back to sleep.


The fact of the matter is the UFOs are real, some of them are alien spacecraft, and neither of those facts means anything to anyone, because there is nothing that we can do about them on any level. We never have been able to do anything about them and probably won't be able to for a very very long time.
Cool !!!
“If a visitor arrived from another world, what excuse would we give for our poor stewardship of the world (Dr. Carl Sagan)…?”  Although I believe that other intelligent life exist in our galaxy, I definitely draw the line at UFOs.  You have to ask yourself “for what reason would such advanced beings be “hot-rodding” around our suburban skies?”  Almost anything they would need to know can be learned from orbit.  I also find all the talk about butchered cattle and human experiments hard to swallow.  A mere skin cell would be all they need to read or clone from.
 

As always, the lack of physical evidence is not evidence and I don’t think the government could suppress the supposed “wealth” of evidence in ALL countries.  Conspiracy is one thing but that’s just not realistic!  If aliens really wanted to make themselves known, why they just don’t land on the Washington mall?  Such possibilities also create inconsistencies in a conspiracy argument.  


Personnally, I’d rather think of the "hows" and "whys" a real contact would occure rather than just assume its being surpressed.  Since it is possible to detect earth-like planets from great distances, I would buy an argument that alien races have known about Earth for millions of years and that they may have even visited us.  Learning is a pre-requisite of intelligent life and I don’t think they could just ignore a world as beautiful as our own.  


Science fiction writers have long speculated about “non-interference” directives, which I do think holds merit, but why?  If you think about it, interfering (even just a little with a technology transfer, we’ll say) would disrupt evolution.  In essence, there is no guarantee that humans will survive.  Not only do we pollute and fight wars, we have no asteroid defenses and are still vulnerable to disease.  Who’s to say what new and better life forms would emerge if we were to die off.  However, with a little effort, we might become just advanced enough that we are no longer vulnerable to extinction.  If this were to really happen, we would (in essence) become “those who speak for Earth:” an advanced race that is in control of its own destiny.  At this point, why not initiate contact?  It no longer would do any harm from the natural course of events.
Lenticular clouds, an airplane's wake, smoke rings--3 different things that do not combine into one. Quit throwing up whatever you think will stick. And why can't the FAA ever simply say, "We weren't there, so we don't know?" How can they always have an answer even though they're not present?
How can so many people believe in aliens but not God?  We can believe in little green men in space ships but not the Bible...that's so sad.
I enjoy reading your blog. I agree the best natural explanation would be a dark vapor cloud lifted by an updraft or vortex (which might give it spin and shape). But I also believe the observers didn't think it was a cloud, since several watched it for an extended duration, before it moved up at a rapid rate.
Maybe UFOS do exist, my wife and I were traveling in New Mexico 4 years ago and at 10:30 am on Hwy 25 there was a small hill top that started to haze up with some type of smoke and all of a sudden a beam of light shot straight to the Sky, my wife has always believed in UFOS and I always had my doubts but after that event and this I'm kinda convinced......

Eldridge: this is exactly the sort of drivel that Skeptics roll out when they are confronted by facts that they dont like. You have to deal with the FACTS of this sighting, and all other irrefutable sightings (like the Wallonia Triangle sightings confirmed by the Belgian Air force to be inexplicable, and certainly not man made cract: http://tinyurl.com/ygvx4w ) instead of dancing a jig around the subject.


Opinions are interesting, but they are compelling when you address the FACTS and give us insights into what these things might be. Anything else is just adhering to the tired and discredited dogma of the Skeptics. [...]

Buttonboy, your description reminds me of how astronomers use laser guide stars to "focus" adaptive optics telescopes. Here's a link to some information about the guide-star system for the National Solar Observatory's Vacuum Tower Telescope on Sacramento Peak in New Mexico:

http://astro.uchicago.edu/chaos/sac_peak_laser.html  

... And here's a watermarked pic of the Starfire Optical Range at Kirtland AFB in Albuquerque, N.M.:

http://content.barewalls.com/closeup/n110624897c.jpg

If it was aliens in a UFO, I wish they would take me. I want off this violent, hate-filled, war-plagued planet. Beam me up Scotty!
the police dept can afford real time video,considering the amount of passengers who fly,lets see the near misses and other safety related issues brought to light,as a bonus, maybe we can finally have a answer to who or what is sharing are airspace with us.
My personal take on the whole "UFO" phenomenon:

Our government is perfectly happy to have people believe that all of the UFOs out there are "alien spacecraft" - and NOT our own.  That is, our own experimental devices.  Gee, I'm just certain that no earthly aerospace engineer has EVER thought of a saucer-shaped aircraft, perhaps powered by a central turbofan engine, and CERTAINLY not powered by a nuclear reactor (or some other exotic technology developed by the Lockheed Skunk Works, etc.).  Can you say DARPA?  Your average citizen would pay far less attention to a bunch of fringe-types harping on about aliens than someone who says, "Hey, I just saw an experimental military aircraft!"


C'mon, people, the military was testing saucer-shaped aircraft way back in World War II (I've seen official footage on the History Channel's "Secret Aircraft of WWII").  And the reason that they have tested a LOT of them at "Area 51" (at the Nevada Test Site, where over 900 nuclear weapons were detonated) is so they don't crash in an area where civilians would get poisoned by radioactive debris from the nuclear reactor powering the craft.


Anyone out there care to argue with me?
Carrie,


Perhaps many people believe only what they see.  That is why so many people believe in UFOs - because they have seen them.  It is sad that so many people do not believe in God, but that is a poor comparison.  It's possible that little green men and God are BOTH real!!!  
No one wants to believe in alien travelers as much as I do. However, it comes down to this: If somehow some intelligence were able to overcome the off-the-charts distance problem then, well, I think they would have nothing to fear from us and their presence would be obvious and there would be ZERO doubt. Right now UFO's are pure conjecture.
I'm a pilot of a light twin and live just North of Chicago area. What I can't figure out is how an alien could figure out the FAA's arrival reservation system at ORD. Maybe they realized too late thay were in class B airspace and made a quick exit before needing a lawyer!
Practically everyone here seemingly subscribes to the Illuminati theory, only now they have simply added UFOs from another planet.  Perhaps it's an Alien Illuminati, eh?  This is the reason that the "gods" were thought to exist for untold millenia, for anything which our ancestors could not explain must be of God.
 

Now of course, in our advanced technological age, "Simplistico" simply replaces God with aliens to make sense of his or her world.  "God can't possibly exist," says Simplistico, patting himself on the back for being so much more intellectual and enlightened than his forebearers, "therefore it must be aliens."


Give me a break.  Where has rationality and reason fled?  There are no aliens among us.  Jung would find your shared experiences very enlightening...
Chris Eldridge makes a very good point. If alien beings have the technological ability to travel interstellar distances - which I don't think most people are aware how HUGE they are (1 light-year = about 6,000,000,000,000 miles) - why would we be able to see them AT ALL? After all, we use blinds and scents to conceal us for observation of birds and hunting game animals. If they can travel TRILLIONS of miles to come visit us, wouldn't they have the technology to remain COMPLETELY INVISIBLE while they observe us??? Or do we assume that their only technological advance is cosmic speed, and otherwise they're just like us, their spacecraft break down and crash or run out of gas or their stealth shield is on the fritz and oooops, we can see them...?
My My So Much Knowledge yet so little intelligence. To think man is so intelligent yet so little knowledge. My My.
The Government keeps on denying UFOs are real.  They know as long as they say "oh it was simply a weird weather phenomena" the media will lose interest and believe that's all it was.  True, some UFOs are weather phenomena, but not when trained pilots see a UFO hovering over an airport then it shoots up into the clouds.  Wake up people!  And I'm glad MSNBC is covering this subject.  That takes guts these days.  Perhaps people are starting to wake up to the reality that the Government has been covering all of this up for the past 50+ years...
To produce evidence of UFO existence we must use detection devices that measure spectrums of radiations that are beyond normal radio and radar frequency ranges.  "Stealthing" technologies are common, by other extra-technologies... recommend scanning for quantum signatures, e.g. gravitational ripples...
Johnathan: your ideas about distance are Euclidean and ratther backwards. In the days of the early exploration of the Americas, no one could understand how it would be possible to cross the Atlantic in 5 hours, let alone in a heavier than air machine, and yet, you and everyone else on earht accepts it as totally 'normal'. Your ideas about space are simply wrong, and UFOs prove that. As for their being able to travel invisibly, they can actually do that, as can be seen in the infrared footage in this lecture: http://tinyurl.com/yhbd37.


My advice to you is to use The Google, and to not waste your time asking childish rhetorical questions. It's just a suggestion.


Johnathon: UFOs the size of football fields can hover silently, and manouvre like jet aircraft using the same method of propulsion. There is nothing that man can make that can do this; to understand this is to get to grips with the thinking that forces honest people to come to the conclusion that some UFOs are of non human manufacture. The Hudson Valley chevron cases are of this nature; huge objects hovering silently in a way that no man made craft can.


Of course, there are the ignorant who say that the B1 Spirit is chevron shaped, so, these must be misidentified Stealth Bombers. Even journalists dare to print this. What they fail to understand is that the Stealth Bomber is a VERY LOUD JET AIRCRAFT, that CANNOT HOVER. Once again, all of this becomes very interesting when you take the facts into account, and try and come up with an explanation that fits the evidence. Everything else, is just tiresome nonsense.


You have to explain what trained professionals, like those at O'Hare and those in the Belgian Air Force saw, without embellishment, without deviation and without fear. That's a hard thing to do, and as you can see from all the jokey ostrich posturing comments here, it's a very disturbing prospect.


What if Aliens really ARE able to observe us anywhere and at any time? It means that the illusion of security you have is just that; an ILLUSION, and it also means that many of the other things you believe are simply not true.


Thats a bitter pill to swallow, and its why people laugh nervously and tell jokes about serious sightings like this, whose implications are obvious and terrifying.
Great point, Jonathon DeNike.
 

Additionally, if aliens (lol) even could travel at the blink of an eye across the galaxy and visited one planet per second, it would take millions of years just to visit all of the estimated planets in our galaxy alone.  This assumes, of course, that they could also stop for a 1-second visit and fully analyze all of the planet's biodiversity, etc, before moving on to the next world.


What, then, are the odds of them having just discovered our species which has evolved over the last 200,000 years and to have known in that 1-second observation that we were worth coming back to visit?


Think about this, all the Simplisticos out here, what are the mathematical odds of another advanced alien species ever finding us just as we evolved.  All of the technological and cultural advances in the Universe would not have prepared any alien species to visit every planet in our galaxy in just a few million years.  Aren't the odds astronomical that they would have just happened upon our planet just in time to find us?


Believe me, the source of these sightings smack more of Pentagon than anything else.
Having followed the sporadic and ephemeral news reporting of these UFO sightings over many years, I am reminded of the Star Trek Next Generation episode "First Contact" wherein the government leader Durken comments that the tales of alien visitation would be told over the years and be accompanied by "charges of a government cover-up...some of the witnesses will tell their tales and most people will laugh at them and go back and watch more interesting fiction on the daily broadcasts. It will pass."
get this story on the news and cable talk shows and leave it there as if it were o.j. hovering over hangar c . the overall health and well being of the viewing public can only improve, after being bombarded with bushes and hangings and drive by shootings and iraq and the rest . give us a break , even if it is just a good laugh !!
Why can't these things happen over my house?
personally, I lean toward travellers from a different time rather than place - a raison d'etre for repeated visits, though some intervention might be nice to help us, y'know, not totally destroy the place for future generations...


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=25212

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google