ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Polonium for sale

Posted: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:27 PM by Alan Boyle

The real-life spy thriller surrounding the poisoning of Russian defector Alexander Litvinenko makes the apparent poison, radioactive polonium-210, sound like a supersecret killer ingredient. It's rare to find it in lethal concentrations, to be sure - but actually not so rare to find it in everyday life.

In minute quantities, polonium-210 has been used over the years to spark up spark plugs and banish static cling. Polonium is one of the carcinogens in tobacco smoke, and you can buy a smidgen of it over the Internet at $69 a pop, as more than one news report has noted. Heck, there's even radioactive polonium in plain old dirt.

"It's present in all of us, in trace amounts - say, in nanocuries," said Keith Eckerman, a senior research scientist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

The amount is key. We might notice no ill results from billionths of a curie (which serves as a measure of activity). In contrast, Litvinenko is thought to have been exposed to something around 5 millicuries (thousandths of a curie), said Kelly Classic, associate editor for media relations at the Health Physics Society.

That's a minute amount - a speck of polonium that active would weigh less than a millionth of a gram, according to the Health Physics Society's information sheet on polonium (PDF file). But getting that much polonium together would probably require going to the source, which usually involves a nuclear reactor. This is why investigators are thinking the hit on Litvinenko was a high-level spy-vs.-spy job.

The amounts used in industrial applications - yes, including those $69 polonium samples, which are typically used to calibrate radiation detection devices - are far more minute: a speck of a speck of a speck.

Polonium is notable among radioactive substances because its radioactivity comes exclusively in the form of alpha particles - positively charged clumps comprising two protons and two neutrons. Such radiation poses a negligible external hazard, because it penetrates only a few cells deep. That's why it's useful for calibrating radiation detectors, Eckerman said.

But if enough polonium-210 is ingested or breathed in, it causes big trouble - as the death of Alexander Litvinenko has demonstrated. Within days, the spy-turned-whistleblower succumbed to radiation poisoning.

So should the authorities shut down the $69 polonium operation? Hardly.

The radioactive samples that United Nuclear is selling over its Web site are encased in disks of inert material, or planchettes, as a safety measure, and thus aren't considered all that hazardous, Eckerman told me. "It's physically bound to that substrate, so it's not possible to mechanically remove it," he said. "You'd have to dissolve the whole planchette."

United Nuclear does have an extra measure of intrigue because it was founded by Bob Lazar, who has claimed that he helped the U.S. government reverse-engineer alien UFO technology. But even if Lazar is a "UFO nut," there doesn't seem to be much mystery surrounding United Nuclear's scientific supply operation.

Polonium-210 also is contained within protective sheathing in the modern-day materials and devices used to cancel out static electricity - which would again make it difficult to turn the tiny radioactive mini-specks into something dangerous. "You would have to break the device open and scrape off the polonium," Classic told me.

Even if you could somehow isolate the polonium from hundreds of $69 disks, or thousands of static-neutralizing brushes, you wouldn't have nearly enough to create the Litvinenko effect. Theoretically, the best you might be able to do is elevate a person's cancer risk, years down the line.

The fact that polonium-210 isn't as well-known as plutonium or uranium is probably a big factor behind the interest in an incident that is sounding more and more like a "science-fiction spy thriller," Classic said.

"They happen to be using something that most of the population hasn't heard about before," she observed, "which makes it even more mysterious."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

The poster above who mentioned that "no radioactive materials should be put into consumer products" is disturbingly misinformed.  You can kill someone 1000 times cheaper with cleaning products or pointy things.  This reaction to "evil" consumer radioactive products is one spawned clearly out of fear and ignorance.

The fact is that alpha particles are only harmful if ingested.  It's rather handy that they only penetrate a few cell-layers deep, because, hey, the first few cell-layers of your skin are already dead.  What are you gonna do, kill em again?

Get informed before you start banning radioactive products.  One example out of many: smoke alarms help a hell of a lot more people than they hurt.  Good luck getting those banned.

To R R in Fort Lauderdale:

What you are saying is that we shouldn't have radioactive materials because we can't trust our fellow man?  When, in the history of man, could you ever trust all your fellow men?  Perhaps we should just shed our clothes and head back to the caves?  

The notion of "creating a world law to outlaw nuclear powered submarines" is a bit flawed in my opinion.  Who would enforce this "world law," especially if we also enforce the "Let's lose the 'WE ARE BUILDING AN EMPIRE' attitude"!!!

And regarding "Imagine if there is a nuclear accident in one of our oceans. This poison would spread around the world and there is no way to clean it up."....how many nuclear subs do you think are lying around on the ocean floor?  Last time I was in the ocean I saw fish swimming around.  By what mechanism is this poison to be spread around the world?  I must have missed that memo.

Can people please have a conversation without rhetoric? Foma Distrustful, whoever you are, you should not use a scientific discussion to air your personal biases.

Trust me on this...  talk to any halfway decent chemist, especially someone who does inorganic analysis, and you'll find that even gold and platinum can be dissolved.  The process is trivial, but does take time, patience, the right reagents, and usually a bit of heat.

DaveK

Radiation downwind form our 50's nuke testing, Nevada, killed 10's of thousands of children (see PSR (physicians for social responsibility) publication in, think it was 1999) from Iodine 131.  The Department of "Defense" lied about the downwind risk.  It would be, in my opinion, more germane to world's problems to expose this and related crimes of "war games" than the likes of what people are concerned about here.  Why does our "government" allow the tobacco companies to modify tobacco to increase addictive power, and kill half million people a year, many non smokers, and many birth defects caused by tobacco.  enuf of my bs
Regarding the Staticmasters, getting the polonium out shouldn't present too much of a problem to anyone who paid attention in chemistry class. You'll notice that it says the gold foil is insoluble in most chemicals, not all. An easily available mixture of nitric and hydrochloric acids commonly called aqua regia will do the job. You'd end up with a mixture of acid, gold chloride and polonium chloride and polonium nitrate, in a small enough volume to disguise in someone's drink. There would certainly be a hazard to anyone attempting this, but I think if one took reasonable precautions it would be doable. However I don't think this makes these anti-static devices unreasonably dangerous. Lots of household things will kill you if misused. There is enough nicotine in a pack of cigarettes to kill five men. A big bottle of Extra Strength Tylenol could do in ten. Er, please don't try any of this at home.

For that matter, if you're looking for a radioactive source, Fiestaware might be a better place to start than Staticmasters. Here's a story I did a couple of years ago about one man's crusade against uranium tiles in old bathrooms and schools:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3077213/

Dear Sick of Conflicts!

Unfortunately you misread me.

It is an irony, not a bias.

Life is too dangerous to take it seriously, guys. :-)

As to the root of the matter I am almost sure we will never know who killed Litvinenko, but it is almost certainly an FSB/KGB serviceman. We will definitely know if somebody directly involved defects as in good old 'Soviet' days (it is an irony again, not a bias)

Thomas (Foma) Distrustful

Years after the three mile island incident I relocated to Florida. But the outflow of radioactive agents did touch my family. We lost our second dad, his son to cancer. Two of my sisters & myself were pregnant at the time w/our 1st child of which we each saw some unusual complications in birth & the child up to adulthood. We are praying no more cancer will show up. Suddenly they are trying to install nuclear power plant close to my home in Florida because it will draw jobs. THEY NEVER LEARN. The HORROR of the hours after the three mile island release had us all crying & terribly scared, even the bosses @ our workplaces! We hear too there were untold emissions years before of nuclear gas too. No wonder the fish & birds died in the river area around  the incident! Not a believer in Nuclear ability until  it can be truely determined as safe, not a smoke screen by those wishing to fill their wallets!@
"the only solution to polution is dilution" Cut the current 6,528,089,562 population in half! That should do the trick.

I usually don't respond because it is difficult to cover all of your bases when writing in here, so here it goes.

BG...When the sub is compromised it will poison the oceans...maybe not in our life time, but maybe your grandsons. As for, "WE ARE BUILDING AN EMPIRE' attitude"!!! Empires do what they want without regard for what their friends think or say. That is why we are in Iraq and our friends hate us...Thanks GWB. Try to think United Nations and NATO. All of us acting together for the good of the planet's people...this is not an Empire mentality, it is a socially acceptable way for the worlds majority to deal with issues that threaten the good of most. GWB had to finish daddy's work and take control of the oil and , hey let's charge outrageous gas prices so my buddies can get rich and we can pay for the Iraq situation. Oh, Exxon has posted record profits the last 2 quarters and you did notice that gas prices went down just before the elections and back up after the Republicans (I happen to be one) lost...welcome to the empire. I believe people before parties! To sum it up, I'm a US guy not an Empire guy.

Most people have a problem thinking in future terms. This could maybe be considered a "Cave Man" mentality because it is simple thought to only think in the here and now. That is why I say get rid of radioactive material as much as possible now and continue to move forward with new safe technologies like solar and wind...read "not back to the caves, but to the future." Why do you think that we have excelled in some technologies like computers and medicine, but we are still dependent on oil? it is a political cash based issue. All the good ole boys in the government have their pockets lined with our money that was used to pay the electricity and fuel bills you have every month. This includes oil, gas and nuclear. if every house that is built from this day forward had some form of alternative energy in it, the losses to these companies and the government in their present form would be drastic. None are willing to make the change really happen, so i guess it is up to us. The benefits to us and the builders and solar/alternative energy product manufacturers would be hugely beneficial. Germany is building factories with their own solar grids. China is investing tons of money in solar and other technologies. Australia has invested money in a design that will use huge mirrors to reflect light on to a solar tower enabling a small town in the middle of the outback to be self sufficient. Brazil is mixing 60%plus ethanol in to there fuel to reduce dependency on foreign oil. Eventually, this may lead to a cleaner burning form of energy.

Ben ... I see you believe in being informed, so the link to Wikipedia will help you understand Gamma Rays and their ability to pass through dense material which includes the human skull (no insult to you).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray

As far as the smoke thing goes, get a dog. They are all natural and will also warn you of intruders and the only thing they emit is occasional natural gas and body odor(mostly when they get wet). None of it is harmful to your health. The benefit of a happy face when you come home is always a pleasure too.

By the way, there seems to be a major rise in cancers. My step father died from it and I know so many who have gotten it. I wonder if that smoke detector is one of the culprits. There is an option to the radioactive type detector and it is considered generally better. Check out the link below.

http://www.iicph.org/docs/radioactive_fire_detectors.htm

Please see the paragraph below which is also located on the site link above. It was written by Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH and posted on the International Institute of Concern for Public Health's website.

Dr. Bartell states, "The main hazard of the ionizing type detector is the radioactive component, usually Americium 241, which has a half-life of 458 years. Radium 226 has a half-life of 1600 years. Americium is a waste product from nuclear reactors; it is encapsulated inside of the detector, but may become available for ingestion or inhalation through the gradual deterioration of its packaging when discarded in a landfill or after its release during an actual fire. It is easily absorbed into the body from the lungs or intestines, and can cause cancer and genetic injury or can have general negative effects on health. This will inevitably be a greater hazard to future generations rather than our own, since it is encapsulated on a ceiling fixture for our short period of use." (Dr. Bartell)

Heh, looks like we can poison our ancestors for many centuries to come...leave our mark as "The Most Irresponsible Age". I can just hear it now, "Hey Mom, do you know that people in "The Most Irresponsible Age" dumped trillions of batteries on a small island in the Pacific Ocean and it poisoned the water with Mercury". "It says that the largest consumer of the worlds resources, bullied the leadership of the island so they could continue dumping the batteries even after they were told that the island was uninhabitable and it was poisoning the ocean." "The American response was that you will take the batteries along with the big fat check we've been giving you every month because it is the American way and Americans expect no less." "And at the same time Americans were doing this, they started eating more fish because they thought it was healthy." "Mom, I think they were idiots or maybe they were poisoned and they couldn't think straight." "It also says that they left weapons of mass destruction in nuclear powered submarines on the ocean floor." "Yes honey, but there is no longer life in the oceans so we don't have to worry about that."

By the way, I went to college to become a Radiation Therapist and after research and observation hours, I dropped out. You have to walk around with a badge that adds up your exposure and when it gets to a certain level, you can't work anymore for a determined amount of time. You also don't get paid in most cases. This happens even though there is 10 feet of concrete and other materials between you and the patient getting the treatment. Also, most people that receive radiation treatment do not live anyway. If I remember correctly, about 67% of people that receive it, die anyway (Please don't take this as fact...I've been exposed). I wonder if they would have had a better chance without it.

Don't get me wrong, I think there are some cases where radiation is being used for the greater good, but we do have technologies that are safe or safer and they are not being tapped because of political interests and the availability of raw and waste radioactive material. That's one reason why Alexander Litvinenko was killed and as of today, it seems another person connected to him was poisoned. If all of this is connected to the Russian government, than it likely will be traced back as was stated by Richard Miller above.

Final word, "I'M ON YOUR SIDE!"

The answer to all of the power problems is COAL!
It's amazing to me that so many intelligent personae have responded in the above letters. It made for extremely interesting reading. It's just so sad that people with such intelligence have such spelling problems. (And me an immigrant...)

Here's a note from my good friend Richard Miller, one of our CLUB Club authors:

"Alan,

"You're the best science writer on the planet, but a lot of people get confused about curies (including the writers of my favorite show, 'Heroes').  Curies is a measure not of intensity but of *activity* . . . that is, how often in a given time period does the material in question produce a unit of radiation.  A nano Curie of activity means that 32 'events' occur per second -- each producing a radiation specific to the isotope.  Now, the radiation may be a weak beta particle (as with strontium-90) or it may be a powerful gamma ray (as with cobalt 60). Or, as in the case of polonium-210 (and americium-241, curium-242, etc) an alpha particle. The greater the nanocuries (or picocuries, etc) the greater the activity -- which usually translates to the greater amount of isotope present.  As an example, 100 nanocuries of Sr-90, produces only weak betas, so no big deal. But being exposed to 100 nanocuries of Po-210 IS a big deal because it produces alpha particles, which are WAY more damaging that run-of-the-mill betas.

"Yeah, I'm the guy who wrote the 'Dreamer' book, but I also wrote 5 books on nuclear fallout. Trust me on this one.

"Best Regards (as always), Richard Miller"

http://www.260press.com
http://www.legis.com

Of course I've changed the errant word to "activity." To learn more about "Dreamer," check this out:

http://groups.msn.com/AlanBoylesCosmicLog/clubclub.msnw?
action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=571

Well, baudizzle.  I guess the ruskies have gotten smart over the years.  It was a tigold smart move to poison the ex-spy with Polonium because it will never be able to be traced to origin.  Once inside the body, it turns a person's insides to a kind of goo until it decays and is not longer a threat.  Only problem is that with trace elements in the airplanes, it will be easy to track the probable destination.  More later. [...]
Is it possible to use a solar plant to despose of nuclear waste? If so, a plant that can generate the sun's power would be a clean, efficient, and a more environmentally friendly way to do so. Not to mention that it would probably be cheaper in the long run.
The End of Days are coming soon. This is unacceptable secrecy.
Forget this polonium stuff. This article here -- http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radscout.html -- tells me exactly how to convert lantern mantles and smoke detectors into Uranium 233, which can be made several types of usable weapons.
Sit back. Close your eyes. Good. You are getting sleepy very sleeeeepy. Radiation is good...so very good for you...

To Shannon of LX, KY, Bill Brant, and Sick of Conflict, USA:
Hear, hear!!!

To Amy R. of my home state:
Definitely! But things related to radiation have become so politicized and polarized that *very few* people get a real education on the subject, without accompanying 'indoctrination'. At VTs biggest U, we used radioactives in at least 2 different lab experiments for undergrads, where I hope we taught many students the realities of such. When I taught them, I used to take the class up the hall to the room we stored the sources in, where we would meet the professor responsible for radiation safety, and they'd watch as we each put our key in the door and turned it. They couldn't come inside, but the point was that *this* time we were dealing with something that really  IS dangerous (though it was just In113, if I remember right). But then learned that if handled intelligently and knowledgebly could be dealt with safely. The reality is that in the course of E&M lab they dealt with things (electricity, liquid N2, very strong magnets...) much more dangerous.

To Joe of Mass.: If 3-4 miles from an H-bomb explosion, your problems are bigger than radiation...but technically C.E. is correct.

To Dana King: Tom Clancy and Michael Crichton are not credible sources of scientific information.

To RScottHowe: "remember the Exxon Valdez?" Indeed I do. Yet, to-date, no one damaged by it has been compensated. Look it up.

To Axel: ...and the method smacks of cold war Warsaw Pact tactics....

To RR of Florida: "putting it in products that almost anybody can buy seems unbelievable to me". If you have smoke detectors in your house, you probably have Americium241 too. Radon 'outgasses' naturally from concrete. The point being that for some applications radioactivity isn't avoidable. But if you lived in a mountain state, you'd get far more radiation from the "background" than from your smoke detector.

"Let's lose the "WE ARE BUILDING AN EMPIRE" attitude"  I would add the "we are the world police" attitude to this....

Just a guess, but Kiril sounds like he might now what he's talking about. From his basic website, it looks like he's interested in a fascinating possible source of energy. For more look up "Casimir Effect" and "Zero  Point Energy"....

To BG of Scottsdale: "Who would enforce this "world law,""    Presumably those who HAVE nuclear submarines ...

To Peace Corps: "enuf of my bs"   Why? Hearing what other people think is mainly why I read CosmicLog.

To Alan Boyle: Neat article; I'd never heard of this. Here's one for you: ever heard of the N-sub reactor shielding that got made into tableware when it was scrapped?

To Thomas Distrustful: "almost certainly an FSB/KGB serviceman"   or ex-such, gone mercenary. Some people I knew in the US service did this. Can't stand the amoral m****-f*****s.

To Bill Knowle: Ah, the "Kodos" solution (sorry, I *am* a Trekkie...).

"How dare you interrupt public hysteria with facts!"

- J Erickson

Flippancy aside, J.E. makes a very important point. Despite many scientist's wishes to the contrary, science doesn't exist in a vacuum. In my view, communication with everyone else is a MAJOR failing of science. Misconceptions about radiation are a classic example....

Very informative article, I appreciate the unbiased information the author has presented here. I am very interested in the events that will unfold with this tragedy, if they ever do publicize the truth.

I wondered how long it would take for the people who are afraid of anything nuclear to freak out and start thinking about radioactive things available to the public and start pointing fingers about American nuclear responsibility.

I tend to agree with the "people kill people attitude", and not to get caught up in the "our government needs to ban this or that". I am tired of hearing about how our American government needs to do anything frankly. I think they need to back off, and let citizens take care of and be responsible for themselves. I don't want to live in a nation where we don't regulate our own personal actions. I think that's called socialism.

Alexander Litvinenko was eliminated by someone who ordered his death. That was the topic at hand, wasn't it? I doubt that someone went to much trouble of buying consumer-based radioactive product and processed it down to do it. It would have been easier to stab him in a crowd, and leave a note calling him a traitor.

He was killed by ingesting a high purity grade of Polonium 210. Easily obtained, (if you are government-related military such as KGB), as a nuclear warhead trigger, or satellite battery material. Since we are talking about a defecting KGB spy, wouldn't it be pretty feasible to connect the dots back to the KGB and military grade stuff here? Think about it.

Also, he could have spread this material in his sweat, or any other bodily fluid or solid, and contaminated those planes and locations. I doubt he was smuggling it, although that is a pretty good theory. But it's not like this is nuclear grade yellow cake, or anything very useful to smuggle.

Polonium 210 is pretty harmless unless ingested because Alpha particles put off by it are what harm your internal organs that don't have epidermis layers to protect them, like mentioned before. Even a thin layer of cellophane plastic can stop alpha particles from hurting you.

I work at a Nuclear Power Plant, and I am a licensed radiographer so I have a pretty good understanding of sources of radiation. Believe me, if ordinary people wanted to get ahold of a strong source of radiation to harm others, there are better ways than to melt down brushes with Polonium 210.

Let's leave aside the political nuclear power and waste-bashing banter for another day since this discussion doesn't have anything to do with that. The author was poking fun at the idea that the same type of material that killed Alexander Litvinenko is available on the Internet. Kind of like saying that the same caliber of rifle ammunition that killed JFK can be bought at your local hardware store.

Alan: Just a correction, a nanocurie is 37, not 32 events per second. A curie is 37 gigabecquerels, which is where he's getting the nanocurie figure. As far as alpha particles being more damaging, that's only true if they are ingested or inhaled. Outside the body it should be blocked by the skin. The eyes of course are an exception.
Aloha from So Cali~~I'm just a kinda surfer dude but I liked everyones Ideas and Information~~my Thoughts would Include INFORMATION/MONEY/POWER or Dare I say Perhaps a WOMAN might be Involved!!~~Its either the Work of a WELL-ORGANIZED OPERATION trying to give the Apperance of "Bumbling Fools" Yet KNOWING! Their "MESSAGE" would be "UNDERSTOOD" by 'All Interested Parties'~~or just the work of a perhaps 'JILTED ' Lover Holding a Powerful Position in a "God knows Where>?" Place or Organization. One can certainly View these 'Events' as a Very CUNNING or CARELESS~~ADVENTURE!(hope i didnt misspell to many words! lol)
Public hysteria over radiation isn't as far fetched as you think. In the 1960's an H-Bomb trigger exploded at Medina Base in San Antonio TX, breaking windows all over town. The USAF sent air sampling planes up, but the data was classified. How many people down wind got cancer in later years? We'll never know because our own government doesn't want us to know. Based on past experience, the public has a right to be hysterical, and our own government is no better than Russia.
From 1943 to 1947 the U.S. Government injected incurable patients in Rochester, NY with Polonium. The Russians have no monopoly on the misuse of science and the public has a right to be hysterical.

Did someone actually suggest this whole situation was created by the British government to deflect attention from it's relatively minor role in Iraq? Wow. That's just... wow.

Clearly, the old Soviet power structure is still functioning quite nicely, thank you. They've just decided to use all that knowledge they gathered on organized crime--which they originally compiled as anti-Western propaganda. They're freakin' scholars on the abuse of free-markets AND political opression.

Frankly, Putin is one of the scariest beings on the planet. And he's probably not the worst of the bunch (He just has that "dark, kinky streak of Mick Jagger" a front man needs; with thanks to Hunter S. Thompson for appropriate verbiage).

These souless monsters are probably playing a game of geopolitical 'chess' far more intricate than anyone in the West can bring themselves to imagine.

Keep in mind- 
  All these "atrocities" we have done; Radiation being just one of the more publicized things, were done 40 to 70 years ago. Now days you can't "burp" as one writer has put it, a single millirem into the environment on American soil without having to report it not only to the government, but also the general public immediately. 
  So yes, I still consider it silly to be hysterical about something when we have it pretty well under control, and well in the public's eye. 
  I liken it to being hysterical about the Dyson vacuum, because I don't understand exactly how it works, someday it might kill me  :)

RR in Fort Lauderdale:
"Try to think United Nations and NATO. All of us acting together for the good of the planet's people...this is not an Empire mentality, it is a socially acceptable way for the worlds majority to deal with issues that threaten the good of most."

I'm sorry, did you just use United Nations and NATO in the same paragraph as "acting"?  I think we've all learned quite painfully that the last things that these big quasi-global alliances do is act on anything other than personal profit.  Sure, NATO had its place - 57 years ago - but it's now a dinosaur.  The United Nations is less a global savior and more a gathering of misfits looking to line their pockets, à la the cantina full of aliens in the original Star Wars movie.  Just solicit the opinions of any of the millions of people out there who are either getting gassed, hacked with machetes, or shot in the back of the skull while kneeling on the edge of a mass grave.  NATO has absolutely nothing to do with that, but where's the UN?

You do paint a nice utopian picture, RR, and the idealist in me hears what you're saying but unfortunately I'm stuck here in the real world.  In this world nuclear power offers an acceptable ROI with acceptable risks and acceptable contamination.  If the US proclaims, in the interests of environmentalism, to abandon nuclear power and oil and coal and all things dirty, and take up solar and wind and fuel cell and whatnot, then the rest of the world will laugh as we crumble into nothing.  You see, the world is full of opportunists, not idealists.  If you decide to be an idealist, then you need to get over into the right lane so the rest of the world can pass.  There's no getting around that fact.

If they poisoned his food with radiation wouldn't he have seen that his food was glowing green.
Some moderator you guys have. I didn't know there were two of me, and that one thinks polonium causes food to glow green? The incident in San Antonio was on November 13th, 1963 (I was there). Those who mock history are doomed to repeat it even if the conservative right doesn't think so. Try looking for more "recent" incidents, and I assure you--you'll find them. As to the other "me"--why don't you use your own identity, instead of trying to make me look foolish?

"How much better our environment would be today if more of our energy needs were met by nuclear power instead of gas or coal, and maybe even hydro (dams destroy fish)".  Nyle, Boise ID

You might like to consider the problem of Peak Uranium like Peak Oil, our supplies of energy efficiently extracted Uranium seem to be dwindling.

Here a link to a site that describes some of the issues, sadly though the interesting details of Peak Uranium are in the subscriber only section.

"The Uranium Crisis, By Carlton Meyer, Nov/30/2006"  
http://www.sandersresearch.com

So although there is plenty of uranium remaining in the ground the commercial economics of mining transport and extracting are now being called into questioned since the military requirements for uranium and associated economics have been drastically reduced.

Now, that's an interesting thought for our future!?

William Oliver, Yes... I too have heard about Peak Uranium. Last summer, National Geographic ran an article (called "After Oil" I believe) where they briefly said that Uranium supplies are likely to dwindle by 2050. They gave no further information or references and only said that the only way to get around this is with so called Breeder Reactors, which produce weapons grade materials. Similarly, Scientific America just ran a single subject issue on Energy beyond carbon where (on page 105) they also mention Uranium running out. Ironically the same issue seemed to argue that Uranium could still be mined afterwards in another article but at greater and greater cost... To me it is a temporary solution that can be safe in limited form but will certainly be replaced as a viable energy source as technology in Fusion and in Solar, Wind, and Geothermal progress. Why risk anything if you don't have to? Even under ideal situations modern and safe reactors still pose a threat if attacked or "abandoned" during some debilitating economic strife. New Ideas into geothermal seem to be quite promising... Nuclear energy just seems like a cop-out (a temporary band aid)... It seems to suggest that we can tackle something as potentially extreme as global warming just by switching over. I tend to think that it will take everything humanity has up its sleeves. Working at home in sub-industrial-scale shops and making and growing most products and food for ourselves is at the very heart of what we need to do. It makes sense for many reasons so it isn't like if global warming never pans out it would be a waste. My recommendation has always been to live communally with highly skilled residents to become near self-sufficient, but even Las Angeles has a good plan of making a small community more independent with work and recreation areas right in the same 2-mile-wide area to help reduce ungodly traffic.

Chris Eldridge,

Again this off the topic of the thread, but.... 
Your thoughts are noble, and fairly well thought out and received.
Call me a pessimist if you will, but our "Western civilization", will always go for commercialized living.
Saying we need to use geothermal, or electric cars is as naïve as saying starting tomorrow we will instate world peace.
Yes it makes perfect sense, but it will likely never happen. It takes America 5 years to mandate the increased fuel economy of 3 miles-per-gallon to auto manufacturers. And the government shouldn’t have to mandate it!
If people are taken by the idea of communal living, a change of climate to say China, or a third world country like Africa might be an option. Although Africa is where the world is testing new breeds of reactors that the rest of the world doesn't want tested on their soil.
There are a lot of things in this world that should happen based on our morals and beliefs, but getting them instated and used sometimes takes many generations, if at all. Also keep in mind the world is always looking to travel away from their destinations of origin. From the aboriginal Indians to space explorers, mankind has always expanded out. Perhaps because of his search for the proverbial greener grass. Ahhhh, Utopia.
By the way, I for one, would love to live and work locally, and use geothermal and solar/wind energies. So, do not think that I am disagreeing with your ideas.

Thanks Anti-Liberal-Hysteria-Person! :) I don't blame people for being hesitant to adopt every new innovation that comes along. In fact, not going full tilt into solar energy in the 1970s, for example, may have actaully been pretty smart as it was not only very expensive, it also had very low efficiency back then. It is only with all the latest tech that it is becoming cost effective. I do think people would respond to the right technology or innovation when they see it. A society's general complacency forces engineers and environmentalists to offer solutions that not only lower our overall impact but actually improve our quality of life in the process. We are so advanced as a culture that there is no reason to think that we can't do both. Look at how people took to home computers and air-travel. When the right idea comes along it will just be the natural thing to do for all of us. Our current live/work arrangements certainly leave a lot of room for improvememt! I've typically not been too thrilled about geothermal on a home level. However, some group recently noted how ultra-deep oil wells use some injection process and by using this ultra deep (30,000+ ft I'll assume) method for geothermal, it could yield something like 100,000 times more energy than the entire earth currently uses... That--to me--seems like just a wee bit of progress. It is those types of break-throughs that will eventually become a no-brainer over all other forms of energy and there seem to be more than a few such potential sources.
I thought the American Elements website would be a useful resource. It provides details on Polonium 210 and 100s of other isotopes, nanomaterials, fuel cell materials, etc. (Disclaimer: I'm an engineer with the company!)
Oh forgot to mention its at www.americanelements.com Cheers!!
Polonium-210 - who is going to clean London, help the people to die decently as the polonium has traced the terrorists inside the nhs but who cares.

Invisible destruction not covered by any insurance,
the best weapon to kill but Allaah has decided to
trace criminals with polonium-233, His Hand will destroy them in a way to turn off the sun and all life on this beautiful earth.

AXA, Van Breda : Ant - werpen.
The statue of the Liberty - He will cut its hand.

Greetings.

shaahnaah
How much exactly IS a unit of polonium? I have searched everywhere one the internet and all people can seem to say is that it is sixty-nine dollars a unit. But how much is that?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=16270

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google