ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Stem cell scorecard

Posted: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 6:28 PM by Alan Boyle

Tuesday's election results certainly sent a powerful message to President Bush about his policy on Iraq - but on the scientific front, there was also a strong message sent in support of embryonic stem cell research. And Gail Pressberg, one of the authors of an upcoming book on the stem cell debate, says that message just might reverberate in the Oval Office as well.

"One has to wonder what his attitude will be now," Pressberg told me today.

Pressberg and Pam Solo, the authors of "Stem Cell Research: Promise and Politics,"  tracked 25 races where the issue played a role - ranging from Missouri's constitutional amendment on embryonic stem cell research to congressional and gubernatorial matchups across the country. The outcomes were sometimes close, but the supporters of such research had something to cheer about in at least 16 of the 25 contests: 

  • Missouri delivered narrow victories for Amendment 2 as well as a Senate bid by Democrat Claire McCaskill, a supporter of the stem cell measure.
  • Five of six other Senate candidates who made their support of the research into a prominent campaign issue are apparent winners, including Maryland's Ben Cardin, Minnesota's Amy Klobuchar, New Jersey's Bob Menendez, Ohio's Sherrod Brown and Montana's Jon Tester. The Virginia race is still too close to call, although pro-research Democrat Jim Webb has claimed victory.
  • In three gubernatorial races where stem cells were a prominent issue, the pro-research Democrats all won: Wisconsin's Jim Doyle, Iowa's Chet Culver and Michigan's Jennifer Granholm.
  • Solo and Pressberg also followed 15 House races where the issue was prominent. The pro-research candidates won seven races and lost four, with four considered too close to call as of Wednesday morning.

So what's next? "There are different 'next steps' in different states," Pressberg told me. Iowa and Michigan might ease legislative limits on research, and Missouri might provide a friendlier environment for privately funded research.

On the federal level, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who's likely to become House speaker, has promised that legislation to expand federal funding of embryonic stem cell research will be reintroduced, even though Bush vetoed such a measure earlier this year.

Then there's 2008: Pressberg noted that pro-research activists in Florida are already working on their own stem cell amendment for the next election cycle, and there are plans for ballot measures in Georgia and Kentucky as well. On the national level, the issue will be just as prominent, if not more so, as the presidential campaign heats up.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

how nice it would be if a scientist would step up and tell the truth about stem cell research - or one of the drug companies - adult stem cell research shows some promise - embryonic stem cell research does not - but why should that bother the people who want to explore it and have you pay the bill? To Canadians, this is not a foreign concept - buy why should America adopt Canada's socialist medical program? Good grief!
Stem cell research is our big hope. It has so much promise that it cannot be ignored. What George Bush has done is to return us to "the old days" and now we have to play "catch up". It will be interesting to see what political spins that the White House will put on this issue.
IN THE WORDS OF COMMANDER WILLIAM RIKER OF THE STAR SHIP ENTERPRISE. "SPEAK FOR YOURSELF. I INTEND TO LIVE FOREVER."
It's all about big government money. Funding pet projects and keeping free loading scientists working. Stem cell research of both types has been going on and will always go on. It doesn't need government funding. Private funding is doing fine. Private funding is also an incentive to produce or get out. Government handouts produces waste and complacency. But the selfish people in the field think only of themselves while mouthing off about how it's for the benefit of mankind. Yeah, right! For once, would you think of the people paying for it. Especially the people who are forced to pay for the embryonic research which goes completely against everything they stand for. Mankind will get along just fine without goverment funding.
Livers & kidneys have been created, heart attacks 'cured'- blindness, too ... and diabetes ... all using stem cells NOT from embryos, but not a peep from the media about this ... or the fact that 100% of mice treated for Parkinson's w/embryonic stem cells received tumors ... and all this happened SINCE MJ Fox's ad. Embryonic stems can be patented, your won can't ... and that's why they are so coveted.
There is promise in adult stem cell research but still more promise in embryonic. Adult stem cells loss some characteristics that allows them to take on any cell where as embryonic can become anything.
Religious propaganda should not be confused with fact.
Who will benefit from stem cell research? Even if embryonic stem cell research is eventually federally funded, it will be too expensive for the average american. Only the wealthy will benefit.
You're RIGHT religious propaganda should not be confused with FACT, Fact #1 embryonic stem cells have no viable chance of creating a cure, Fact #2 Adult stem cells have been used to create cures. Atheism ( the belief that all life came from a rock a long time ago) with its belief that an embryo is not alive is the religion that needs to taken out of our labs and schools. The only reason to push embryonic stem cell research is to help keep abortion legal. The real Fiends are those that KNOWINGLY lie to spread their Religion of death.
Scientific Humanist propaganda should not be confused with fact.
I am a bit saddened when Amendment 2 is passed in MO. A lot of people seemed not to realize that embryonic stem cell has been going on for a while with private funding without any promise for cure while adult stem cell had.However,I am a bit relieved to know almost 50% of Missourians voted no for it.I think most people did not really care what it is really about.
Congress can re-enact legislation to fund embryonic stem cell research. But, unless there are enough votes to override another veto, it won't more than a Bronx cheer to the president. Eventually, history will view embryonic stem cell research opponents in the same way it sees religious authorities who insisted the earth was the center of the universe.

rob s: "Fact #1 embryonic stem cells have no viable chance of creating a cure" 

Claims are not facts.  Most actual scientists disagree.  I'll get my facts from NIH scientists ... 

http://stemcells.nih.gov/StemCells/Templates/
StemCellContentPage.aspx?NRMODE=Published&
NRNODEGUID=%7bA604DCCE-2E5F-
4395-8954-FCE1C05BECED%7d&
NRORIGINALURL=%2finfo%2ffaqs%
2easp&NRCACHEHINT=NoModifyGuest#excited

... who have informed opinions rather than anonymous netizens who are a lot better at talking about science than practicing it.

rob s: "Fact #2 Adult stem cells have been used to create cures."

Which is irrelevant to whether embryonic stem cells may be useful.  Again with the NIH:

http://stemcells.nih.gov/news/newsArchives/stemfactsheet.asp

rob s: "Atheism ( the belief that all life came from a rock a long time ago)"

That is not the definition of atheism.

rob s: with its belief that an embryo is not alive is the religion that needs to taken out of our labs and schools.

Not all atheists support abortion.  Not all religionists oppose it.  You are either not aware of this, or you deliberately misrepresent it.  Religion doesn't have anything intelligent to contribute to science.  It has some limited usefulness in the realm of ethics, but religionists aren't the only ones with ethics.

rob s: "The only reason to push embryonic stem cell research is to help keep abortion legal. The real Fiends are those that KNOWINGLY lie to spread their Religion of death.

The real heroes, I suppose, read some junk science issued by the Vatican and try to pass it off as informed opinion.  

It seems odd to me that we should crow about the lack of progress with embryonic stem cells when for the past several years, the highest levels of the U.S. Government have been actively trying to sabatage the efforts of researchers in that field.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=13688

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google