ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



NASA to buy suborbital rides

Posted: Thursday, October 19, 2006 2:15 PM by Alan Boyle

NASA is a potential customer for trips aboard privately developed suborbital spaceships, the agency's chief told entrepreneurs building those spaceships today during the Wirefly X Prize Cup Executive Summit in Las Cruces, N.M.

NASA Administrator Mike Griffin said his agency would be in the market for quick trips to the edge of space, if the entrepreneurs deliver on their promises to create new passenger services. He drew a parallel between the current prospects for suborbital space travel and the government-supported airmail service that blossomed in the wake of World War I.

"Using the airmail paradigm, NASA will purchase seats on these suborbital flights for experiments and possibly astronaut candidates for mission proficiency, if and when they become available," Griffin said.

He noted that such suborbital flights, which could provide as much as four minutes of weightlessness at a time, would be superior to the zero-gravity parabolic flights now used for microgravity experiments and astronaut training.

At the same time, he indicated that NASA was interested in further privatization of its parabolic-flight operation. The space agency already has contracted for such flights through Zero Gravity Corp.

During his summit speech, Griffin also talked up NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program, or COTS, which is currently providing almost $500 million to SpaceX and Rocketplane Kistler to aid in the development of new orbital launch vehicles for resupplying the international space station.

New orbital as well as suborbital spaceships are expected to appear on the scene in the 2008-2010 time frame. For now, Griffin said the agency's COTS commitment was as far as he could go in terms of supporting space entrepreneurs. 

"I've probably right now gambled about as much on commercial space as I'm going to be allowed to do until somebody makes it look like it was a good idea," he said.

SpaceX founder Elon Musk and George French, Rocketplane Kistler's chief executive officer, were among the executives attending the summit. Their remarks, unlike Griffin's, were considered off the record under the summit's ground rules - but suffice it to say that the leaders of the "New Space" industry were not displeased by Griffin's remarks.

Here are other points from Griffin's talk:

  • Griffin said the space agency expected its commercial partners to have "skin in the game" - that is, to show they're bringing additional private investment to NASA-related ventures. "Partnership with NASA is not an synonym for helping NASA spend its money."
  • NASA is considering a revision of its human rating requirements - the standards that must be met for space vehicles that carry humans. "The definition of human rating is not simply how much paper and process you can buy," Griffin said.
  • Griffin acknowledged that the current schedule leaves a gap between the scheduled retirement of the space shuttle fleet in 2010 and the first manned flight of the Orion crew exploration vehicle in 2014. He said he'd like to shrink that gap but was constrained by congressional funding limits. "We're not technically paced; we're funding-paced," he said.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

All I know is that if Virgin Galactic has 60,000+ people interested in such flights that is JAW DROPPINGLY AMAZING... Can that possibly be right? Ten years we might be asking NASA who? I have absolutely no problem with space tourists and one might draw a similarity between those who admired the Concord so much that they saved their whole lives just to fly on it regardless of where it went of how fast it actually got there. It's an affection for aviation and a symbolic pride in our enthusiasm and wish to truly "navigating the seas of the sun (Bruce Dickinson)!" One can assume upon landing we'd at least have 60,000 more environmental and peace advocates having seen the true scope and grandure of our world. Last I knew The Planetary Society was promoting very high alt. flights to try and find Vulcanoids (asteroids orbiting closer to the sun than Venus.
No to NASA. THey have their own toys and will not make them available to us. Leave this commercialization to the public. Next thing you know, they, with Uncle Sam's clout, will muscle all of us out. As long as there are private citizens, NASA should stand aside. Later, if there are no customers, NASA can have turn. Dave
Dave, to the contrary, this should be welcomed. In any other form of transportation, when there are more customers (and plenty of people fly commercial airlines on the government dime already), it's a reason to buy more vehicles, schedule more flights (and increased flight rate is one of the keys to lower-cost operations) and make more profit for those manufacturers and operators in this still-fledgeling business. This isn't like the shuttle, nowhere is it written that there can be only four or five SpaceShipTwos (or whatever vhicle) at a time. Increased demand from any direction is just what one wants, government included (how much air cargo is the US Mail, for example? No carrier turns away those contracts if they can help it, or make other customers 'stand aside,' they increase their capacity to handle it all). And it's likely cheaper for NASA (and thus, taxpayers) to buy the launch service, than for them to pay for the development of some additional sounding rocket of the same capability, if, indeed, they could justify doing it at all.
Maybe NASA being in the suborbital human space flight business will help lower launch facility costs --- like at Wallops Island on the east coast. It would be quite good if Dr. Griffin and Rex Geveden took the next step in this regard rapildy, e.g. a RFP for about a dozen suborbital flights with NASA astronauts in say 2009 or 2010. Launch contracts would help the fledgling space firms build capital 'skin' to build the game board, so-to-speak.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=7979

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google