ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Space elevator scriptures

Posted: Friday, October 06, 2006 3:45 PM by Alan Boyle

With just two weeks left before the Space Elevator Games in New Mexico, advocates of the space elevator concept have come out with two publications outlining their ideas and the challenges ahead. One is a revised road map for building what is basically a railway to outer space, while the other provides fresh words of encouragement from the concept’s most famous advocate: science-fiction author Arthur C. Clarke.

First, the road map: That came out this week from the LiftPort Group, a venture based in Bremerton, Wash. LiftPort recently concluded a weeks-long test of a balloon-borne platform that represents a baby step toward a space elevator system. Such a system calls for robotic climbers to carry payloads up a super-strong ribbon of carbon nanotubes extending tens of thousands of miles into orbit.

At one time, LiftPort was counting down toward the deployment of the first space elevator in 2018 – but the company has acknowledged that date is way too ambitious. In its road map, LiftPort says it will take that long, or longer, just to develop nanotubes that might be strong enough for the job. The revised date for finishing that first elevator is 2031 – and LiftPort has set up a public online database for technical questions that will need to be answered between now and then.

The other publication is “Leaving the Planet by Space Elevator,” a book written by Brad Edwards and Philip Ragan. Edwards is one of the engineering gurus behind the concept’s current configuration, and Ragan has proposed building the elevator somewhere around his own Australian hometown, Perth.

“Leaving the Planet” lays out the space elevator vision in plain English, starting out with a foreword from Clarke. The science-fiction great, best-known for “2001: A Space Odyssey,” didn’t come up with the idea of building a railway in the sky, but he enlarged upon the idea in a 1979 novel, “The Fountains of Paradise.” That book, and Clarke’s other writings about the space elevator, have made him into a prophet of sorts for folks like Edwards and Ragan.

Here are excerpts from the foreword, provided by Ragan:

“For years, I used to say: ‘The Space Elevator will be built 50 years after everyone has stopped laughing.’ Well, the laughing stopped a few years ago, and the idea has advanced rapidly during the past decade. …

“Dr Brad Edwards, the co-author of this book, is a physicist who was drawn to this challenge. Having studied the problem in great depth and detail, Brad has made it his life’s mission to construct a Space Elevator. Indeed, the Arthur C. Clarke Foundation  recognised his efforts when he was presented the Arthur C. Clarke Innovator Award 2005. …

“Edwards and Ragan are confident that the first Space Elevator could be built and operational by 2029.That’s an appropriate year as it marks 60 years since the first Moon landing and 50 years after ‘Fountains’ was published.”

The folks at LiftPort already have put together an anthology of writings as well, titled “LiftPort.” (How on earth did they come up with that title?) And as climber and tether teams get ready for this month’s games, you can keep up with the latest via the Space Elevator Reference and the Space Elevator Blog.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

"How on earth did they come up with that title?" It should be noted the full title is "Liftport: Opening Space to Everyone".
More information on the book is at www.leavingtheplanet.com
I'm sure Edwards and Ragan have already dealt with this question, but what about thermal expansion and contraction as the elevator passes into and out of the Earth's shadow? Is the amount of thermal stress insignificant compared with the tension already in the tower? Or would it cause the tower to bounce up and down, in a kind of geosynchronous ellipse?
I'm sure Muzak would love to be a corporate sponsor...
This is a structure that I have a hard time imagining. Would this be a structure like a tower? I keep reading about tethers. Please don't laugh at me but is the tether droped from above all the way to the ground? I also don't understand the high altitude balloons as an intermediate step. Someone please draw us laymans a picture.... Also would these sturctures be built at the equator? I've read Isac Asimov but in one of the books the space elevator was like an extremely tall building with people occupying the space in the structure and seemed like something atleast hundreds of years beyond what we could engineer today. So please explain what this would look like if we could look 60 years into the future.
A layman would assume, without any authorative evidence, that the further any stationery object protudes into space, the more it is sensitive to the rotation of the earth and to cosmic bombardments from micro to macro sized objects travelling through space.
To a well educated but a science clueless person like myself, the space elevator race is just fascinating. Can someone explain to me however, why it is not possible to a) ride up a laser or b) tap into the earth's magnetic / gravitational forces ? As previously mentioned, Scientifically Clueless.
A. Bell: re your 1st question... you could ride a laser up, but it would have to be really big to have enough thrust to lift you. It works along the same lines of an ion thruster -- each second of thrust is really small, but you can thrust a really long time to compensate. However, you need to overcome gravity and inertial 1st. As for your 2nd question -- we don't know how yet. We can use gravity as a method to change course, but we don't know how to create it or modify its effects yet.
For a good intro to what's involved, see http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/aug05/1690 it's got a picture, too. To Kelleigh: The structure would be a very big rock in geosynch orbit. Attached to the rock is a long ribbon (the tether) stretching from the rock to the ground. it is not a tower, rather a ribbon hanging from the rock to the ground, where it would be anchored. you climb the ribbon to get to the rock.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=6051

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google