ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The physics of fizz

Posted: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:44 PM by Alan Boyle

Here's a prime example of better living through physics: A recently published study lays out the best strategy for getting the most bubbles from your bubbly. The research paper, titled "Champagne Experiences Various Rhythmical Bubbling Regimes in a Flute," goes into depth about the factors that make the difference between orderly and irregular streams of bubbles running up the sides of your champagne flute.

The University of Reims' Gerard Liger-Belair, the lead author of the paper appearing in Wednesday's issue of the American Chemical Society's Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, is no stranger to the physics of fizz: In 2003, for example, he published a paper explaining why smaller bubbles make sparkling wine tastier.

This time around, he and his colleagues took an up-close look at how champagne bubbles are created. The research team confirmed that most of the bubbles begin with minute cylindrical cellulose fibers deposited on the glasses by air currents, or by towel-drying. That brings us to the advice on strategy:

  • If you want bubblier champagne, wipe the inside of the glasses vigorously with a towel before pouring.
  • If you want to tone down the bubbles, wash your glasses, then let them air-dry upside down on a rack, without using a towel.


ACS
Trains of bubbles rise
from microscratches 
on a champagne flute.

Minute scratches on the glass also promote bubble nucleation - with the implication that wine may be bubblier in older glasses than in newer ones. In fact, some glassmakers intentionally make microscratches in their champagne flutes to create bubbly special effects.

The focus of this most recent research has to do with why some "bubble trains" in champagne move gracefully, with bubbles popping up at regular intervals, while other bubble trains stream less evenly.

The researchers' microscopic examination found that it had to do with precisely how the carbon dioxide is trapped within those tiny fibers, and how the gas bubbles interact with each other. Variations in the properties of the fibers - such as size, irregularities in the fiber's inner wall and the diameter of the fiber's "sleeve" - can introduce instability in the bubble trains, they said.

Liger-Belair works right in France's Champagne region - in fact, Champagne Möet & Chandon and Pommery supplied the wines for the experiments. The research was also supported by ARC International, a French company that makes glassware for wines.

But the researchers said the implications of their findings weren't limited to champagne - or even to other carbonated drinks, where similar bubble behavior was observed:

"Bubbling instabilities are observed in a huge quantity of everyday situations, from the food industry (effervescence and foaming) to biological systems (embolism in plants). Even human beings may be concerned by the formation of bubbles. Actually, nitrogen bubbles may arise and grow in the bloodstream of divers who have breathed high-pressure air if they resurface too quickly. These observations conducted in a simple flute poured with champagne may therefore extend to the more general field of heterogeneous bubble nucleation and could eventually contribute to the unlocking of some of the mysteries hidden behind bubble formation from gas cavities."

Sounds like this kind of research could be a perfect candidate for a future Ig Nobel award. This year's Ig Nobels were announced just tonight, and the not-quite-serious annual prizes recognize scientific achievements "that first make people laugh, and then make them think."

As Ig Nobel impresario Marc Abrahams says, "If you didn't win an Ig Nobel prize tonight - and especially if you did - better luck next year."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

And how much did this cost us taxpayers ?
Good greif. This research didnot cost you anything it was done at the University of Reims. That is in France in case you skipped geography. However, even if we did spend "tax payer" dollars I would think that it is money well spent. Understanding fundamental processes often leads to a greater understanding of and control over more complex processes as noted in quote.
"even if we did spend "tax payer" dollars I would think that it is money well spent."...No it wouldnt. It is attitudes like that that end up wasting taxpayer money. People forget that money used for one purpose can't be used for another. Money spent to study "fizz" can't be used for vaccinations or building roads, etc.
Ok, so it only took 3 messages to get off topic, but since we are there: "Money spent to study "fizz" can't be used for vaccinations or building roads, etc." Uh, yes it can. In fact, a very short line can be drawn between the article about "fizz" and your vaccination suggestion. Understanding how the bubbles form (or what impedes them from forming) could most certainly help in developing faster acting vaccines or entirely new delivery methods for vaccines. The bottom line is that you'll never know how knowledge can be applied to every day experience until you get some knowledge. And, if all scientists and researchers always took the path to knowlede that seemed like the safe road, we wouldn't have many of toady's most important technologies. And, since this was not funded with tax dollars in the first place, relax and enjoy your bubbles!
But money spent studying "fizz" could be used to improve chemical engineering processes that involve bubble formation as part of the reaction process. If bubbling changes the taste, then it changes the diffusion properties and the way the chemicals mix and react.
You miss the point.  It is our understanding of fundamental processes that allow us to build better roads and vaccines.  Without this type of research we will maintain the status quo for a long time.  Businesses typically invest in research that will show a return in 5 to 15 years.  For more fundamental research the payoff may be several decades.  A balance needs to exist.  Characterizing this as research into "fizz" is akin to characterizing Einstein's 1905 work on statistical mechanics as the study of "dust."  It is attitudes like this that are the result of the poor education system.
I wounder how drunk they got doing this? Sign me up!
I think the bubbles have gotten to all of your heads. HA HA.
The physics of bubble nucleation also underlies other important physics, and in many respects is very general. The benefit of scientific research is not always direct and obvious. For instance, a scientist reading this article with his morning coffee might get a bright idea that could help out in another field, that to the layperson (which I assume most commentators here are) wouldn't have the background to understand. That's the true value; intellectual cross-polination. For instance, bubble physics could help someone come up with a way to prevent disease, or maybe inspire an idea for more efficient chemical processing, etc. Learn something about science before you take the time to criticize!


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=5861

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google