ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hubble finds galactic gems

Posted: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:53 PM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / UC-Santa Cruz

This portion of an image from the Hubble Space Telescope shows a sprinkling of
barely detectable reddish galaxies among closer, more discernable galaxies.


The Hubble Space Telescope has found hundreds of celestial rubies that literally shed new light on how galaxies formed when the universe was young. The discovery of 500 ultra-distant, ultra-active galaxies demonstrates once again what a gem Hubble is - and today's successful conclusion of the Atlantis shuttle mission represents another step toward the space telescope's revival.

The galactic gold mine was found by analyzing imagery from the Hubble Ultra Deep Field as well as the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey. "Ruby mine" might be a more apt term, because the signatures of the galaxies look like red jewels in the rough, sprinkled among the closer galaxies seen in the picture.

The finds are the focus of a paper to be published in the Nov. 20 issue of the Astrophysical Journal, as well as an image advisory issued today by the Space Telescope Science Institute as well as the European Space Agency's Hubble Information Center. This graphic from the institute and this cool ESA video help put the galaxies in proper perspective.

Although the fuzzy specks look ruby red in the Hubble pictures, that's just because the galaxies are so far away that their light has been redshifted by the expansion of the universe over billions of years. Their light signatures, or spectra, led astronomers to conclude that the galaxies date back to a time when the universe was less than 7 percent of its present age of 13.7 billion years - that is, about a billion years after the Big Bang.

When the researchers compensated for the redshift effect, they found that the galaxies would actually look very blue if you could see them at short range. In fact, they'd be blazing with the birth of hot, blue stars.

The characteristics of the light tell astronomers that these galaxies are predominantly dwarfs rather than giants. The study team's leader, Rychard Bouwens of the University of California at Santa Cruz, said this provides "evidence for galaxies building up from small pieces - merging together as predicted by the hierarchical theory of galaxy formation."

The spectral analysis also shows that starbirth was proceeding at a rate 10 times faster than what we see in galaxies that are closer in time and space. These stellar sparks could have fueled the reheating of hydrogen gas surrounding the first galaxies - a key transition time in the history of the universe, according to current theory.

"Seeing all these starburst galaxies provides evidence that there were enough galaxies 1 billion years after the Big Bang to finish reheating the universe," said Garth Illingworth of UC-
Santa Cruz. "It highlights a period of fundamental change in the universe, and we are seeing the galaxy population that brought about that change."

Other members of the research team include John Blakeslee of Washington State University and Marijn Franx of Leiden University in the Netherlands.

These observations were made possible by the installation of Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys during a 2002 space shuttle mission, and further revelations about the universe's early days could be made once Hubble gets its brand-new Wide Field Planetary Camera 3. That's just one of the instruments that would be added during a future space shuttle mission aimed at extending and bettering the space telescope's life.

And this is where Atlantis' mission plays a role: NASA mission managers wanted to make sure they wrapped up this successful flight before giving the go-ahead for the Hubble servicing mission.

As shuttle program manager Wayne Hale told me back in June, some preparations for that mission are already under way. With Atlantis' safe return, NASA is likely to be far more open about their planning for a Hubble visit in April 2008, if not earlier. Now let's hope that the telescope's guidance system and science instruments can hold out that long.

For more about Hubble and its gems, check out our space gallery as well as our interactive look at the space telescope's innards.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I think it insane for NASA not to service Hubble.  Hubble has and will continue to provide more insight into the Universe for the dollar spent that most programs I have watched from afar.  I can only hope NASA will use common sense.
i am not a scientist just a big reader of astronomy, if time and space is seen only in past just as this article says, why can't we see in future light as well? just a thought, all my life i have always read from astronomers light seen in past only ?
just a thought !
Hubble (and those mars rovers) continues to amaze me with the quality and quanitiy of the science being returned. This is a great example of science done right.
I guess I just always wondered if the light from these galaxies takes 15 billion years to get here than wouldn't the universe be 60 billion light years across by now...  We look one way its 15.  We look the other way its 15.  Then we have to add an additional 15 (each side) for how far the galaxies have moved since they emitted this light, right?  Maybe this infinite/curved space thing has me warped…  

If there is a flood of these background newly forming galaxies, could they account for the supposed background radiation of the big bang?  I know they used to think there was an X-ray background radiation until they saw individual sources of x-ray light, right?

Hey, we’re going to figure all this out yet…
This is neat!  Just another reason that Hubble should stay in orbit and be maintained.  It's the Rosetta Stone of astronomy.
NASA should do everything in it's power to prolong the life of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). HST has opened our eyes to the very begining of the universe and the true beauty that is in nature. No other telescope has such a perfect platform in which to study space than HST. The cost of maintaining the telescope is fractional compared to the cost of the Defense Budget, Campeign Fund Raising and other mega government expenditures. I can think of few other things that I would want my tax dollars to fund other than the exploration and understanding of our universe. May NASA return to HST and may it continue to unlock the mysteries of our universe.
Once more Hubble gives new views!  Glorius!  This is truly what the much misused word "Awesome" was ment for!  The Rovers and Hubble have given more bang for the buck than anything NASA has done since the so-called Golden age.  I'm not forgetting Spitzer or Chandra.  They just don't get the play that HST does, though.

Is there any way to get the image without the boxes and numbers?

What a wonderful thing to look at when I get too disgusted with bush-league wars, incompetent space agencies and general human nonsense!
It's nice to see science in the forefront of american and gloabl advancement, sceince has been and will always be a leading factor in the advancement of the human race; space exploration undoubtedly will always be the frontier we strive to understand and learn from and hubble is paving the way. Great job NASA!!!
Wade, Yes, I believe you can get the uncluttered image just by doing an image find on Hubble deep field.  There were to deep fields and one really super deep field where Hubble just stared at a patch of sky for a week or two.  

Oh, and don't for get the Europeans XXM Newton X-ray telescope!  Its mirror has the surface area of a tennis court and is a lot more powerful (from what I know) than Chandra.  It's hard to keep up but Europe is also building a very large Hubble like telescope for the near infrared.
I too was very upset at the proposal to abandon the Hubble, probably the single most important scientific tool ever built to study space.  That is until I read that it takes up to $900 million to launch the shuttle for just one flight.  If it costs nearly a billion to fix the Hubble, maybe it would be cheaper to build a new Hubble and send it to orbit on a Russian or European rocket.  

Plus, NASA plans up to 20 more shuttle missions to complete the ISS space station.  Uh, that's about $18 billion dollars.  Can you imagine how many unmanned robotic missions to every corner of the solar system we could build with that much money?   How about robotic missions to Mars to land and bring back samples?   How about exploring what's under the ice on Europa? What a waste of money the space station and shuttle have been.
This magnificent tool is lasting far longer and giving more insights than it's creators ever thought it would.  I am glad that they are actually pushing to extend it's life expectancy.  Now, if they'll just get the next generation space telescope designed while learning from the mistakes we made with Hubble... think of what we would learn with it!!!!
It would be tragic if NASA abandons Hubble. It's been a watershed. Stay tuned for GLAST - Gamma ray Large Array Space Telescope, due to be launched next year. http://glast.stanford.edu/
Well put Briggem Yount! If someone told me it would cost $9,000 to repair my 15-year-old car (which I could replace entirely for $12,000) I think I'd rather buy a new one than fix the old! Hubble's great guys but lets keep some perspective. There is an even more powerful hubble being built and I am affraid (knowing how our congress is) that they'll say "well, we just fixed the hubble. You guys don't need a new telescope." Hey, it happens!
The more we see from Hubble, the more it seems that the scope of space and the universe is undefinable, truly infinite and may well have always been. Space itself is a bigger mystery than our near universe. The deep space images from Hubble may be other universes not galaxies. Please don't abandon Hubble. Let's keep looking.
The Hubble mission is on the list to fly now, tenatively pencilled in sometime in 2008. Its going to be the last one, so its going to be a busy one, they've got a LOT of work to do.
I encourage everyone to write to Mike Griffin and/or Edward J. Weiler at NASA to encourage a Hubble mission. In 2003 Weiler responded to my letter supporting further Hubble servicing saying, "HST has indeed revolutionized our view of the cosmos . . ." I also agree with Mr. Yount regarding the ISS, the world's first low-earth-orbit white elephant. And the magnificent space ship/glider we call a 'shuttle' was over sold and has under performed. The 'shuttle' and ISS are incredible technical achievements; unfortuntely, they're less than useless.
yes keep hubble going so it can scan for space rock hiting the earth i dont want one to hit me in the head
Every time I see images from the HST and read about the science we have been able to obtain from it, I am thoroughly amazed and awestruck. If NASA were to make good on their plans to revitalize the HST It would be capable of performing for many years yet to come. Think of this... NASA puts the HST replacement in space with it's advanced features and then turns the HST over to Universities to help advance educational research in physics and astronomy. The potential impact on our educational institutions would be boggling. Hey, it's already bought and paid for, why not use it to help train the next generation of scientists? Food for thought!
The images I've seen come back from Hubble leave me awestruck, amazed, and even humbled. The beauty and violence of the universe is captured brilliantly and open us up to new possibilites, new questions about our place in this vast blackness. I eagerly await each new set of pictures. And the insane plan to abandon the Hubble is just that - insane. Imagine how many young minds have been inspired with the images we have received!!! Whether we fix the old Hubble or build a new one, we MUST keep up this aspect of space exploration!!! The Hubble proves daily the oddities of the universe, and continues to show the universe is queerer than even the most brilliant minds can suppose!!!!! So either fix it or build a new, just DON'T eliminate our "eye on the universe"!!!! If the powers that be want to scrap anything it should be the ISS and the shuttle program!!!!!
Thanks to Chris Eldridge! I had already done a side trip to the Hubble site and turned up the image with a short search. Before you all pile onto the STS (Shuttle) too hard, do you think they could put the Hubble up with the latest spam in a can, excuse me "The Crew Exploration Vehicle", or do a repair mission with it? Not too bloody likely! There has always been an argument about having somebody somewhere. The military version is having aircraft, or ships, perform everything and claim to control the ground. Any infantry soldier or Marine (I am one) will tell you that you don't have the objective until somebody puts his boots on it and stays there. Apollo was only a reconnaissance mission or 6. We can send all the robots we want, but they can do only what they are designed to do and can't be driven directly even as far away as the moon. Try driving your car with a three second delay built into the control system! People are, unfortunately, delicate. They are demanding special conditions and mountains of consumables. They are also adaptable and great observers. On top of that, we can't claim anything but good old Terra, because that is the only place in the whole damned solar system with boots on it! So, until we can say somebody is currently there to stay we have exactly one basket for our eggs (and sperm!). At least pending an Effram Cockran!
Hey, Where did all this stuff in space originally come from?
Keep making them bigger till you find the farthest galaxy...or maybe you wont ...you might just keep finding galaxies farther and farther away...and keep kicking the age of the universe up every time you find a farther galaxy.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=4548

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google