ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Moonrock unearthed

Posted: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:30 PM by Alan Boyle


CWRU
The new lunar meteorite is shown here cracked open to reveal a pinkish-tan
interior. The cube, used for calibration, is 1 centimeter (a half-inch) on each side.

Meteorite hunters have found a rock in Antarctica that they’ve traced to the moon – but it's a type of lunar rock that is virtually a geological terra incognita (or should that be luna incognita)? Experts say there’s only one other sample like it in the world.

Of course, there are plenty of moon rocks from the Apollo missions, but scientists say those rocks may actually be the exception in the big picture of lunar composition. So they’re anxious to start analyzing this handball-sized piece of the moon, known as MIL 05035.

Word of the find came today in a report from Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, headquarters for the U.S. Antarctic Search for Meteorites, or ANSMET. The lunar rock was found during ANSMET's outing last December, on an icefield in the Miller Range of the Transantarctic Mountains about three-fifths of a mile (600 meters) from the team's camp (and about 470 miles from the south pole).

The rock hunters found 238 meteorites in all during the six-week field season - a relatively small return, due to heavy snows that limited the team's search area. For that reason, MIL 05035 was a "particularly welcome find," the ANSMET team said.

Because what happens in Antarctica tends to stay in Antarctica, relatively undisturbed, the polar icefields are a good place to look for extraterrestrial rockfalls. The world's most famous Mars meteorite, ALH 84001, was found in Antarctica's Allan Hills region - and sparked a debate over whether the rock held evidence of Martian "nanofossils."

Like ALH 84001, the newfound lunar specimen was brought to classification experts at NASA's Johnson Space Center, as well as at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History.

The meteorite's composition led the experts to conclude that MIL 05035 was of lunar origin. In fact, the rock appeared to have cooled slowly deep within the moon's crust, and then was subjected to extreme shock - perhaps by the impact event that knocked the rock loose from the moon and sent it earthward.

Experts say the rock resembles only one other Antarctic meteorite - Asuka 881757, which was found 18 years ago and represents one of the earliest specimens to be identified as lunar basalt. ANSMET's report emphasizes that MIL 05035 isn't your run-of-the-mill space rock:

"Like the other lunar meteorites,  MIL 05035 is a piece of the moon that can be studied in detail in the laboratory, providing new specimens from a part of the lunar surface not sampled by the U.S. Apollo program.  Many researchers believe that Apollo visited some of the most unusual and geochemically anomalous regions of the moon, and lunar meteorites, knocked off the surface of the moon by random impacts, give us samples that are more representative of the moon as a whole. The highly shocked nature of MIL 05035 suggests an old age and may provide new constraints on the early intense bombardment of the Earth-moon system, improving our understanding of the history of the Earth's nearest neighbor and aiding NASA's efforts toward a return to the moon."

Scientists around the world are invited to request chips of the new specimen for their own research. For further details about NASA's Antarctic meteorite program, consult the Antarctic Meteorite Newsletter. For more about lunar meteorites in particular, and check out this Web page for more about lunar meteorites in particular. And if you're a rockhound who's thinking it might be fun to hunt for meteorites during the next Antarctic field season, think again ... then check out this FAQ file from ANSMET.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

.

About the Orion moon missions SAFETY ...and the quantity of moon-rocks they can bring back to earth...

I think that the NASA/ESAS/LockMart Orion's Service Module design has a GIANT mistake built-in!

I explain my opinion in my latest article here: www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/013orionSM.html

The new Orion's SM design is different from Apollo since (now) it can't perform (both) the Lunar Orbit Insertion and Trans Earth Injection with MANY safety and operational problems for the astronauts and moon missions.

The most dangerous issue of this (bad!) choice is that, if the LSAM engines will fail in LOI, the Orion will have not sufficient propellant to enter the lunar orbit or ONLY the propellant for that operation (without the LSAM docked) but NOT for TEI to come back to earth!

.
I'm a little confused on this one. Per current theory the moon is made from earth rock after a planetary impact. How can you distinguish earth rock from the moon from earth rock from the earth? Is the origin not identical?
For what it's worth, Ed, here's more on how lunar meteorites are identified:

http://epsc.wustl.edu/admin/
resources/moon/howdoweknow.html


The distribution of elements in the rock and the way the rock is formed can be analyzed to determine whether the darn thing came from the moon.

I didn't include this information in the posting, but you can read it in the linked news release:

"The main constituents of the rock [are] the mineral pyroxene (brightly colored and mosaicized) and maskelynite (dark dull gray), a material formed when the mineral feldspar is converted to glass by high levels of shock. The mineralogy is typical of a planetary basalt; but the relatively coarse grain size and the presence of maskelynite are unusual for lunar specimens, suggesting this rock represents a time period in the moon's history poorly recorded by other lunar samples."

Hope this helps....
I'm with Ed on this one, if the moon is made from earth rock, there has to be similarities even after millions of years apart.
Tell you what,after they lost the original tape of the trip to the moon,how do they prove they been there for sure and why they never went back?? So if they never been there how do they know what kind of rocks the moon has? Well this sounds like another hoaks if you ask me .Have a nice down to earth day.
This is all wrong.  The moon is made of cheese...
A footnote to Mr. Marano's comments.  L-M got a contract to upgrade Coast Guard cutters and assigned the job to software engineers.  Fills me with confidence, it does!  The Loughheed (yes, that is how they spelled their name (Scotish), it was anglicized to make it easier for the sales staff) Brothers and Mr. Martin must be doing about 900 RPM!

Ideally, the new spam can will be used to establish the permanent settlement that should have been put there in the 1970's.  Perhaps we can build a "fleet" of purpose-built craft to do the transorbital and surface to orbit work on each end.  Actually more efficient since they could be optimized for the task.

Maybe I'd be happier if I just kept to reading the Onion, but it does seem to be getting more realistic.
Red Oxygen, hmm?  The concept of 900 GIGA Pascals defeats me, diamond anvils or not.  There was a theory that Jupiter had a core of metallic hydrogen and diamond a while back.  Maybe things would be even more colorful, if we could get lights and a camera in there.

I still do not understand how we know this is from the moon.  Could you explain it in lay person's language...and are you sure or is it just postulation?
we will never really know the composition of the moon. we have bits and pieces.  it's like going into a gravel pit in brooklyn and proclaiming the rocks found there are what the earth is composed of. I do in fact believe the moon to be molten at the core. and water is present.  a deep excavation needs to be sent to the moon.  
This Web page might help explain in more depth this idea that we can tell moonrock from earthrock by doing a chemical analysis:

http://www.permanent.com/l-compos.htm

In fact, you can sometimes determine more exactly where on the moon a particular meteorite came from:

http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=2341
Ed,

The Moon is indeed a chip off the old block (created by debris an impact of a large asteroid with the Earth).  The material that coalesced to become the Moon went through a very rough ride: it reached a very high temperature that drove off volatiles (like water, for example).  The Moon had a molten lava ocean, which cooled and hardened to form its anothosite crust.  The Earth, meanwhile, had a very different history, plate tectonics, weathering, lots of water.  These different histories have led to different chemistries in the rocks of the two bodies.
Thank You. John's answer and the articles that you linked make it a whole lot clearer. May I assume that the material from the intruder is also fairly equally mixed on both Earth and Moon as well so that any difference between a piece of the intruder can not be distinguished from an original piece of earth rock?
I have allways been interested in meteorites and was wondering if there is any place in ohio that would be good to look for them. Thank You Jim
Jim Flanigan:

Ice caps and deserts are the best places to find M's because they're bare of vegetation and other things that can hide them, because there are few other rocks lying around, and because geo-processes there tend to expose them. They're found just about everywhere, but very hard to find and identify. I've never found one, and not for lack of trying....   keep looking, well.. down.

ps. metal detectors can find iron-type meteorites...


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=3839

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google