ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Robots that moonwalk

Posted: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:48 PM by Alan Boyle

Who will leave the first footsteps of the 21st century on the moon? Strictly speaking, those not-so-small steps will likely be taken by a "what," not a "who." This week, NASA is testing a six-legged rover that can wheel across lunar terrain at a fast clip or step over obstacles like a giant spider.

The rover - named the All-Terrain, Hex-Legged Extra-Terrestrial Explorer, or Athlete for short - is due for a tryout on Tuesday in Arizona's Meteor Crater and Cinder Lake area, with 100 scientists and engineers from six NASA centers in attendance. The Athlete is just one of the advanced prototypes to be tested in the desert proving ground.


NASA / JPL-Caltech

Robotics expert Brian Wilcox with the Athlete
prototype rover at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.


Athlete was designed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory to roll across flat lunar terrain at speeds of up to 6 mph (10 kilometers per hour) - more than 100 times the top speed of the Mars Exploration Rovers - or climb up rocky steps that are more than a yard (meter) high. It's supposed to be capable of carrying payloads of up to 1,000 pounds (450 kilograms), and even more when multiple Athletes are joined together.

NASA says Athlete could be used during all-robotic or human missions to the moon, to dock with other vehicles, transport astronauts and deliver supplies.

"The design is quite adaptive," Rich Volpe, manager of the mobility and robotic systems section at JPL, said in a news release issued via e-mail by the lab. "Athlete can drive quickly over undulating terrain, or use some of its legs as robotic manipulators for grasping, digging and drilling."

During this week's tests, crews in mock spacesuits will simulate a day in the life of a crew on the moon, according to a NASA advisory. Athlete is supposed to blaze a trail through rough desert terrain to establish a "mock-up way station that would provide respite for the weary crew," NASA says.

In the future, Athlete's designers hope to enhance the robot so that it's able to make its way up a vertical rock face with the aid of a grappling hook ... respond to voice commands radioed from astronauts in the field ... and stay in operation for up to 10 years.

You could almost imagine a crew of Athletes setting up a habitat in preparation for the arrival of humans. Which raises a question: If these robots are so good, why send in the humans at all?

Check out NASA's roundup of rad robots, and stay tuned for the results of this week's tests.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Excellent.

Nearly 40 years ago, we had men walking on the moon.

Now we're sending robots.  That's progress!

Well done, NASA.  Thanks for turning the Saturn V into a lawn ornament.
Wow!  Now THAT’S a ROVER!  Talk about a giant leap forward.  Comparisons to the Mars rovers sort of equals the 747/Wright Flyer analogies, doesn’t it?  It also reminds me of a six-legged Swedish logging vehicle that walks across bogs to cut down trees:  

http://garfieldridge.typepad.com/
photos/uncategorized/6x6_02.jpg


On earth, such a vehicle still seems a bit cumbersome but on the moon one can assume the lower gravity would make it agile and fast.  The multi-functions sounds like a lot of solid planning, too.

I didn't catch how it is to be powered for a ten-year mission but I'd assume it is something that is refueled, as it is not meant for completely independent operations.  I personally don't mind nuclear powered missions like this but usually they stay away from that if they don't have to.    

Perhaps instead of extensive PV panels a more compact “parabolic” solar collector could be used for autonomous missions.  I have to wonder if dust would affect a parabolic collector as much as PV panels since it is dealing more with heat than with light.
NASA Watch's Keith Cowing (http://www.nasawatch.com) is linking to a way cool blog that chronicles this year's desert tests. You have *got* to see these pictures!

http://robonaut.jsc.nasa.gov/desert06.htm
Well, even if the first moon landing was faked, these robots would not need oxygen, water, etc to operate, just a solar array to repower batteries.
Unfortunately, the author's name escapes me, but read "With Folded Hands" if you can get it.

Why just send the super rover?  Hands + Brains = adaptability.  The problem with machines is that they can only do what they are built to do.

A problem with photo-voltaic panels is that they need cleaning in the presence of dust.  No dust devils on the moon (I think!).  A parabolic collector driving a sterling engine driving a generator with a SNAP back-up for shadows would be a good thing if it doesn't play hob with the center of gravity.  The reflectivity would no doubt degrade as dust accumulated.  A way to induce a reversed charge periodically to repel the dust...?

Grappeling hooks for an umpteen billion dollar probe?  I somehow doubt it.
Not continuing human Lunar exploration wasn't NASA's decision. It can only do what Congress will approve and fund, just like any other government agency.

But we'll be back...

(Though the current archetecture really is not the best, most sustainable way to do it.)

This is what I have been talking about for more than 20 years.  A combination of robotic and human presence on the Moon will help us to create the first colony off this planet. In addition, it will help us to learn exactly what we need to survive in a variety of environments.  Get this stuff ready so I can retire to the Moon, in about 30 years.  Mars next!
Frank, Congressional Subcommittees are also very much to blame for NASA’s apparent ineptitude.  They cut, cancel, scale-back, and force a redesign of virtually everything NASA proposes.  All of which makes me wonder if a set annual budget that NASA decides how to spend might not be a whole lot better.  The Shuttle-derived heavy lift rocket comes most to mind as a critical/cost effective project that was axed by a subcommittee.

Alan, That was a heck of a payload on Athletes back!  The other human-like robot seemed a bit too corny at first until I realized it probably would be IDEAL for helping out with construction and manual chores!  Could they not give it a superhero-like head though?  
In regards of NASA'S ongoing problems with fuel tanks, I suggested long ago after watching the successful flawless launches of Russian rockets to change the shuttles engines to burn kerosene or to buy Russian engines to install on the shuttle.
Is that too difficult to implement?
I don't think so.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=3547

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google