ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Traffic jam on Mars

Posted: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 7:15 PM by Alan Boyle

When NASA launched a pair of rovers to Mars more than three years ago, no one ever thought the darn things would still be working by now, says Cornell astronomer Steve Squyres, the top scientist for the Red Planet rover missions. The proof of that lies in the fix that the Mars program finds itself in today, with two separate missions transmitting on exactly the same frequency.

The data traffic jam isn't insurmountable, Squyres says, but it just goes to show that even a smashing success can carry complications.


NASA / JPL-Caltech / Cornell
A true-color image from NASA's Opportunity rover
shows the "Baltra" outcrop in Beagle Crater, with
a shallow hole drilled in the rock by the rover's
rock abrasion tool. Click on the image for more.

The Spirit and Opportunity rovers were launched in the summer of 2003, and landed on opposite sides of the Red Planet in January 2004. Since then, the machines have had their glitches, but they're still producing piles of imagery and other scientific data.

"I never dreamed it was going to last this long," Squyres said.

Squyres admits that some of his colleagues have wondered whether he was really all that surprised. He must have known the rovers' ride was going to last more than the originally planned 90 days, right?

"When you look now, 940 days into what was supposed to be a 90-day mission, it'd be easy to convince yourself that we knew all along that it was going to be successful," he told me Monday. "And in fact, it was nothing like that. We lurched from disaster, to disaster, to disaster."

The evidence of that can be seen in "Mars Dead or Alive," a TV documentary being re-aired on PBS stations tonight. The program traces the preparations for the Mars missions, showing that at several points even before launch, Squyres and his team weren't sure whether the rovers would get off the ground.

In a backhanded way, the current data traffic jam provides still more evidence, Squyres said.

When Spirit was being prepared for flight, engineers built an extra X-band communications transponder as a spare. It turned out that the spare transponder wasn't needed for the Spirit rover - and instead, the equipment was put to use on another probe, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, or MRO, which was launched to Mars last year.

At the time, the arrangement was seen as a clever money-saver. "The things cost a million bucks apiece," Squyres explained.

But there's a slight downside: The frequency settings are hard-wired into the transponders and can't be changed on the fly. "It turns out - and this is causing us all kinds of headaches now - that Spirit and MRO communicate with Earth at exactly the same frequency," Squyres said.

In this respect, the fact that Spirit is still alive and kicking is just a tad inconvenient.

"What it meant was the unthinkable occurrence that both spacecraft were alive at the same time," Squyres said. "Nobody expected that to be an issue, because everybody knew that Spirit would be dead by the time MRO got to Mars. And now it's come around to bite us."

Not that anyone resents Spirit's long life. Squyres said the mission teams for the rover and the orbiter "can work around the problem operationally," by orchestrating the interplanetary conversation so that Spirit's X-band is quiet when MRO is talking, and vice versa. Spirit also can use an alternate UHF antenna for communications with Earth through a Mars Odyssey relay.

Eventually, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter could serve as a data relay as well for Spirit as well as Opportunity.

So just how long can Spirit and Opportunity last? Obviously Squyres can't answer that question. But he does say both rovers are on the verge of a new spurt of exploration.

For now, Spirit is staying put in the Columbia Hills, with its solar panels oriented to make the most of the winter's wan sunlight. It recently weathered the southern hemisphere's winter solstice, and is conducting surveys of its surroundings while it waits for spring.

"The power will start very slowly creeping upwards before long, and boy, it's going to be good to see that," Squyres said. In six weeks or so, Spirit should be able to start rolling again.

Opportunity, meanwhile, is about 220 meters - a little more than twice the length of a football field - away from the rim of a half-mile-wide (750-meter-wide) Victoria Crater, which could serve as the stage for the rover's climactic scenes.

"Chances are that Victoria Crater is going to be Opportunity's final resting place," he said. "I don't expect we're ever going to leave the vicinity of Victoria Crater."

There are at least two reasons for that:

One is that the deep crater is likely to contain the best record of Mars' geological history ever found, and that it's likely to take more than a year (an Earth year, that is) to unravel that history. Even before Opportunity reaches Victoria's rim, NASA scientists want to check out a couple of smaller craters that could give them a foretaste of what Victoria itself will reveal.

"If we find that it's just like stuff that we've seen elsewhere, then we can move on," Squyres said. "But if we find that it's different, then we've got to take a little more time."

The other reason is that once you've seen Victoria, there's not much left to see, Squyres said: "You look around, and the next crater onward that's as big or bigger than Victoria is 25 kilometers (16 miles) away. ... This is it. Around us in every direction is a whole bunch of nothing."

But Squyres doesn't intend to end this adventure early, even if all that's left to see is a whole bunch of nothing. He's already had plenty of opportunities to immerse himself in other space missions. But as long as Spirit and Opportunity are willing, Sqyures intends to make them his first scientific priority.

"I've got to stay with these rovers," Squyres said. "Until the day they die, I'm going to be working with these rovers."

Keep posted on future chapters by checking out our "Return to the Red Planet" coverage as well as NASA's Web site for the Mars Exploration Rovers, Cornell's news archive and Squyres' own "Mission Update" page.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I just finished watching this program he was talking about.  And although I only came in at half time, it immersed me into a great lord only knows how long of minutes.  I sat stunned, and felt the anxiousness as they did when it launched.  I feel very proud to live in this great country, and I am also very proud of those who make it possible.  Great documentary, and thank you for the headline!
Here's an opportunity for Opportunity to do more science post-Victoria Crater, assuming the rover remains operable.

Backtrack to the landing site to study how terrestrial materials stand up to the Martian environment over time.  Given the eventuality of humans exploring the Red Planet, it wouldn't be a bad idea to have some in-the-field data to compare against engineer's predictions.  Opportunity could "sojourn" there and do as little wandering as necessary...might last for years more.

Somebody kindly pat me on the back for coming up with this one!
I know MRO has an amazing new communications system that allows it to transmit 10 X the data than all past mission combined.  Thus, I'll assume this improvement with MRO has more to do with its software and other hardware than with the older transponder also used on Spirit...  

The Little rovers that could, eh?  Never felt there would be any problem getting beyond the 90-day mission "mechanically" but to last this long... It's amazing!  Perhaps MRO will notice something interesting for Oppy to explore a bit closer than 16 miles once Victory creater is all explored.  Don't give up if it doesn't though.  A good ol Genesis rock may be sitting right there along that 16 miles trek to the next creater, right?  Heck, the rover may out live us at this point...    
I believe that they were so worried that these Rover's wouldn't make it that they built two super Rover's.If the sand or any other material doesn't corrode anything they might go on forever so to speak.
                 Frank
Please give all measurements in inches, yards, miles, feet, etc.  It is your job to translate the measurements, not mine.  This is the United States, not Japan.

Mike
Would that the rest of our space program were as successful as those two Mars rovers.
These results show the clear superiority of robotic space missions over manned missions. If half the money wasted on manned missions had been placed into robotic explorations of space, we would now have robots exploring every niche of our solar system, and beyond. We should abandon the costly and dangerous manned missions until we can do them safely and cost effectively, if indeed that time ever comes.
This is a golden oppertunity to discover all we can about our neighbor without the normal risk, and sacrifice of space travel. There is nothing to say but WELL DONE even if the rovers "die" today.
Mike Bernardo:
The worldwide scientific community is practically united in using the metric system. Don't be lazy.
Why should we go to Mars?  Because we can! GO USA! On to the Stars!!
Perhaps Mike should research the history of the Mars Climate Orbiter...
Imperial distance in an astronomic forum/thread?  How quaint.  It is nice to know that a regular guy can take an interest in science though :)

G. Phillip,

The exploration of Mars has come at a considerable financial cost with roughly two-thirds of all spacecraft destined for Mars failing before completing or even beginning their missions. This high failure rate can be ascribed to the large number of things that can go wrong, but enough have either failed or lost communications for no apparent reason that some researchers half-jokingly speak of The Great Galactic Ghoul which subsists on a diet of Mars probes. This phenomenon is also known widely as the Mars Curse.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_Ghoul
Mechanically the Rover's are already breaking down, one has lost a wheel already. (The hubcap was missing the next day)  The US Govt. tried to implement a metric system since the 70's , but the simple couch potato's found it too hard to shout from their chair's that they wanted another liter of brew! As for retreating to see weathering effect's, ask an owner of an '04 pickup in AZ. to send you a photo of his truck now, you'll see very little change, best bet is to ask him to send you a photo of his nearest Stop sign. and see how centered the bullit holes are in the P and O.  The marksmen go for the center of the P.
Yes, the robotic missions do great work without risking anyone's life, but that is not what the general population signed on for. We did not get all excited to spend billions of dollars to add another fact to a text book. We did it because we believed, and still hope, that our children or grandchildren would have the opportunity to live and explore off this planet in person.
Everyone that goes into space is a volunteer. They know and accept the risks this entails. Let's stop being a nanny and accept that every frontier will take its toll in blood and treasure as we push into it.
And nothing is ever completely safe. If that is to be the standard, we need to abolish automobiles until they are "safe and cost effective."
These things are just absolutely amazing.  Its no surprise, really.  Sojourner, the first rover on Mars, lasted several times its projected lifespan when it set out.

As far as manned exploration, lets get real, there's ZERO sense in sending robots out to places we won't be going ourselves.  We will follow these probes. While we may not step foot on Mars for another 50-100 years, the developments we take now will lead to the eventual spacecraft that will take us there.  There's no immediate need to rush humans to Mars, but it does not hurt to parallel develop the technology and techniques for us to survive out there.

Consider this.  In 900+ Martian days, these rovers have travelled an amount of distance which astronauts could cover, on foot, in a couple HOURS, with sampling time included.   No fears about sand bogged wheels, no headaches over inclines, no fear of a walk into a crater being a "final destination".  The 900 day missions of Spirit and Opportunity, which have primarily been travel and sample analysis, could have been done on site by humans in a little over a week, and that's a RELAXING pace.
Mike Bernardo:
Imperial units - used by Liberia, Myanmar, United States
Metric units - used by Everyone else
Well I hope Nasa continue to pursue Manned and Robotic missions ine Solar System and beyond.
James, Laurel, Md..

"Consider this.  In 900+ Martian days, these rovers have travelled an amount of distance which astronauts could cover, on foot, in a couple HOURS, with sampling time included.   No fears about sand bogged wheels, no headaches over inclines, no fear of a walk into a crater being a "final destination".  The 900 day missions of Spirit and Opportunity, which have primarily been travel and sample analysis, could have been done on site by humans in a little over a week, and that's a RELAXING pace."

Give them some sense of acheivement, please!!!!

Gotta crawl before you can walk...
1. All NASA's REAL explorers are enjoying tremendous success: Cassini, Deep Impact, Stardust Mars Global Surveyor, to name a few others. Yet this is being brought to a halt in favor of manned missions that're simply wearing out low Earth orbit. Consider: the entire Mars Rover program, from planning stage to yesterday, cost about the same as a single (1) shuttle mission.

2. NASA's directorates need to be renamed  "Science => "Exploration&Science"; "Exploration" => "Human Spaceflight". We should stop pretending that astronauts have a viable role as explorers and focus on them as future colonists. For this to happen we HAVE to have a better way of getting lots of people and materials off Earth and into orbit. But we DO have to send people someday, but James is right: we need to take our time and do it right, not start sending "Hail Mary" missions to Mars.

3. Much of the reason Mars has this reputation for many disastrous missions is that the Soviets padded this number. They sent several spacecraft there, all of which shared the same flaw! After the early failures they did little post-failure analysis, they simply fired more spacecraft on the theory that if they fired enough, one would HAVE to succeed. None did. Only 2 or 3 US and one ESA mission add to the Soviets record.

4. Know how many grains are in a pound? How about square inches in a hectare? No? Welcome to English- units-world! My students get a "-5pts" if they use them on a quiz or test. No scientists I know of use them. I hope the MCO fiasco caused NASA to specify in  all contracts that ONLY metric units be used!

5. For the cost of a human mission to Mars we could send ~100-200 twin-rover missions; the comparison of a rover to a whole human geologist is in-apt. In addition, the rovers carry several instruments a geologist would not carry in the field.

6. Both rovers need only look at themselves to observe how manufactured materials react to Mars, and they already do this . . .
I am curious what method is being used and the specifics of the required bandwidth necessary to transmit the data necessary for operations and additional data bandwidth for "info".

Someone had mentioned about the 10x available or what about the possibilities of data compression?



Cp
I am for continued robotic missions within our solar system until the problem of propulsion is better solved.  The various Mars missions can cut the path for humans to follow in a latter century.  A three month ride to Mars for humans is unacceptable in my eyes.  We can gan valuable Mars colony insight/experience by bulding and continuously manning a science lab on the moon.
We should have these things literally crawling and detail exploring the entire surface of the Moon. We can have the whole Moon-scape totally explored in detail within 5 years. With some capitalist venture money we could broadcast the whole process, via the Lunar Exploration Channel. Yes, we need something like that to get our minds fixed back into exploration and the discoveries of the great beyond. The Moon, fellas...its right there...we can almost touch it. Lets go take a closer look....how about it, it'll be fun and who knows what we'll find in our own backyard if we dig...dig deep enough.
Will someone please build an Arecibo sized radio telescope or VLA radio telescope network on the far side of the moon to shield against radio noise from earth and the sun's influence?
Would it make sense to delay manned moon colony until a small, safe and ultra reliable nuclear power unit has been developed for use on moon. The same power unit would be extremly useful for use on earth to power trains, trucks, ships, etc. and the economical benefits from it will pay for the moon mission.
I believe these probes are just the leading edge of humanity's push off this planet. It's in our nature to explore. To be the first to go where no one else has gone.
The moon contains a high concentration of H3 which is a potential resource for energy. A single space shuttle load could power the US for a year. A fusion reactor on the moon wouldn't be to far fetched.
These rovers have done very well, and the whole world is watching them.
The space shuttle can't get anywhere near the Moon, Chris Erichson. It barely makes low-earth-orbit. Remember Apollo? That little tiny capsule on top of one of the biggest rockets ever made? That's what it takes just to send 3 people to the Moon and get them back . . . . .     Now, you were saying something about a space shuttle-load of Helium-3 ?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2646

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google