ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Martian mystery solved?

Posted: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:55 PM by Alan Boyle


Ron Miller / ASU
Sand-laden jets shoot into the south polar sky in this artist's conception.

Newly published findings suggest a solution to the mystery of the Martian trees – those dark, bristly spots on aerial photography of the Red Planet that some have compared to fans or forests. Even Arthur C. Clarke, the author of "2001: A Space Odyssey" and other science-fiction classics, has wondered whether Mars' seemingly branching "banyan trees" represent signs of biological activity.

But now researchers propose that the spots are of geological origin: They say the marks are left behind every spring when gas and dark sand blast through rumbling fissures in the ice. "If I was ever going to go to Mars, I'd want to observe this," said Arizona State University's Phil Christensen, one of the authors of the research, which appears in Thursday's issue of Nature.

The key observations behind the latest claims were made with the Thermal Emission Imaging System, or THEMIS, an infrared camera aboard NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter.

Previous imagery, gathered by another orbiter called Mars Global Surveyor, provided ample documentation of the mystery spots, particularly in Mars' south polar region. That imagery led scientists to suggest the spots were the result of a defrosting process that exposed the darker ground beneath the carbon dioxide ice.

However, thermal readings from THEMIS indicated that the dark spots were about the same temperature as the ice. That led Christensen and his colleagues - Hugh Kieffer and Timothy Titus of the U.S. Geological Survey - to conclude that the dark material was actually sitting on top of the ice layer, rather than exposed below the ice.


NASA / JPL / MSSS
Dark spots (left image) and fans (right image) cover
the icy landscape near Mars' south pole in two
images taken by Mars Global Surveyor during spring.
Each image is about 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) wide.
Click on the image to see a larger version.

So how did the stuff get up there? Here's the scenario sketched out in this week's research paper, based on about 200 days' worth of THEMIS surveillance:

The process starts during the Martian winter with the buildup of carbon dioxide ice over a layer of dark sand and dust. That dark material is thus sandwiched between a couple of feet of CO2 ice on top, and the permanent polar cap of water ice below.

As spring approaches, sunlight shines through the CO2 ice and warms the dirt enough to make the ice just above it sublimate - that is, turn directly from a solid into a gas. Pressure builds up beneath the remaining CO2 ice, eroding the dirt layer in the process. Eventually, that pressure becomes so great that a blast of gas, sand and dust breaks through fissures in the ice - spewing out at speeds of 100 mph (160 kilometers per hour) or more.

The activity leaves behind a dark burst of dirt, surrounding the vent on the ice sheet. Wind may blow the dust into a fanlike pattern. But as the CO2 ice fades to nothingness, so does the burst pattern. All that's left is a spidery pattern of erosion carved into the underlying water ice. Those "spiders" provide a template for the process to begin all over again during the following winter.


NASA / JPL / MSSS
Spiders trace a pattern on top of the residual polar
cap after the seasonal CO2 ice slab has disappeared.
This image is about 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) wide.
Click on the image to see a larger version.

"Once a spider becomes established, it affects the surface so that a vent will form in the same place the following year," Christensen said in today's ASU news release.

Christensen told me that "it was that day-to-day-to-day imaging that really allowed us to unravel what's going on." A companion paper, yet to be published, will go into the detailed physics behind the phenomenon, he said.

"There isn't anything like it on Earth," Christensen said. "On Earth, this doesn't happen."

However, some researchers have suggested that a similar process may be at work on Triton, a moon of Neptune that also is speckled with mysterious dark spots.

As for those Martian banyan trees, Christensen said the phenomenon probably has its roots in a process similar to the one he and his colleagues have sketched out.

"It's a geologically sound explanation," he said.

Do you agree? Feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I heard there are weapons of mass destruction on Mars.  Maybe we need to spread democracy there too.
We have had similar sand geysers here in the US. In the early 1800’s a major earthquake hit a sparsely populated region near the Mississippi River and modern day Memphis. The quake produced enough energy to send sand spewing into the air like a geyser. It is very conceivable that sand geysers can be produced no matter what planetary system given the right conditions.  
 Leave it to mankinds luck to actually get a photograph just at that moment, such an interesting phenomenon. I've always wondered why it is that man has always thought there to be life on mars, even in this high tech world, we're still searching for life on a barren planet. Now, lets say we do find intelligent life and are able to communicate with them, theoretically. Wouldent we either try to exploit them for technologies/amneties, or convert them to our various religions? Obviously people have a way to happy picture as to what we'd probably do.
those are tripods, getting ready to invade earth. Only Tom Cruise can stop them! Were doomed!.
After reading some of the comments sent in, I suggest that NASA should look for intelligent life on earth!
Why do we assume that all life is three dimensional and visible to the human eye?
Many of the comments refer to life in this solar system. Well, may be yes, may be not. That's for us to find out. We have the curiosity necessary to go and look. No life in this system, that's OK. But if there is no life in this galaxy of 100 billions stars with untold planetary systems, well, somebody or something is playing a bad joke on us. And that's not to mention the billions of galaxies that we will probably never reach.

The sad truth regarding theoretical science is this history reflects mans mistakes regarding his interpretation of the mechanics of the universe and his surroundings. The upside is this history allows us to learn from our mistakes such as the world isn't flat, the sun doesn't revolve around the earth, life can thrive in boiling water and subzero temperatures. These were once all controversial topics, now they go undisputed due to empirical evidence. We are making unbelievable progress in technological advances daily. If these advances are measured on a scale reviewed in decades the progress is almost unbelievable when compared to our forefathers. The plain truth is this to make progress man has to make mistakes and learn from them there really is no other way. That is the purpose of explorers they know they are going into the unknown and may be the first to actually go in that direction so there can be mishaps but whatever the outcome they chose that descision with full consciousness of the possibility things could go wrong. Thats Discovery. Baby steps in the big picture piece together what Mankind refers to as Technological Advancement of Mankind. He is brave and strong when teamed with the right people it has proven he can accomplish some of the most incredible things possible, but when left alone with complacency and indifference and lack of support towards a desired goal he can become unreasonable rigid and difficult to work with. The best  minds need nurturing and encouragement to get along. If we can't get along on this planet what makes people think we can populate another planet for the good of Mankind. It seems we can't even get along on this one so until we can live in peace on this planet I don't think we should be joyriding around the galaxy looking for new real estate. If we can take control of our own house maybe we can look for an upgrade. It just seems to me for lack of a better analogy, we seem like a wealthy teen who found the keys to his parents sports car we don't have a license and decided we want to take a ride with nobody in the car. Who cares if its wrong we just want to go because we can. I am not saying the voyage of our pursuit of the Universe is wrong all I'm saying is Mankind has a history of war and problems and we should be careful in our pursuit of new lands. Simple history of people going to new continents and declaring it home and eliminating the indigenous peoples through many methods is part of our history. We should remember the past to let it influence our future. Responsible descisions are best. I guess what I'm trying to say is we need to get our house in order before making a concerted effort to find another one. Hypothetical situation your in space and meet another sentient being and they meet you on a different planet with no knowledge of your origin at first glance. They ask you with a line of questioning that evolves into a language you eventually become to understand Where are you from? Your reply is planet earth. They understand you and ask why do we stay in a state of war? What would you reply? I don't know either but it seems if we were to go exploring the universe we wouldn't want to be interpretted as someone who constantly eliminates their own kind. It is interpretted as completely hostile. I think its better to have the ability to do it and not have to than to be known for it and not known for anything else. Bad first impressions are hard to break. Now this is inferring we aren't alone and I don't know if we are or not. But ponder this if we aren't then who is out there and what would they think of our policies of how we handle ourselves would it have a large effect on how we were greeted or not. Just a thought. Anyway I love exploration of space and am as anxious as the next guy to see it grow in leaps and bounds but just feel we need to be careful how we do it........
Trees?  Who cares? Where's the ocean front property?
Looks like Martian hair plugs to me.
Alan, this theory is the biggest bunch of crap I've ever heard, and I'm having trouble believing you printed it.

Christiansen starts out trying to explain the anomaly as an upwelling gas, then when the temperature is proved equal (removing his imagined catalyst for evaporation) he 'switches up' the theory to say, OH NO, it wasn't gas at all, just darker material on top of lighter material.

I'm not sure how Christiansen thinks this explains the 3Dimensional aspects of this 'dark material'.

I'm certainly not sure how he thinks he's explained the SHADOWS caused by these SOLID ABOVE GROUND OBJECTS.

Nor has he even attempted to 'explain away' the liquid water found on the surface of Mars by the Recon Orbiter at the same time Clarke discovered his macro banyans.

This guy is a joke, and not a funny one Alan.  I'm not impressed.
Is this a sign of globel warming?
Mars is boring I'm off to Europa in the morning.
It's a little presumptive to entitle this "Martian Mystery Solved" - with or without the question mark.  And it causes me to some degree to question the validity of your journalism as well as the science involved in this.  Just as there's probably no real way to prove there is life on Mars from photos and speculation - it's equally difficult to prove there isn't... as can be seen from the comments above which range widely from humorous to well thought out to somewhat incredulous.

Here's a thought - head up your articles to reflect another "Theory" has been presented instead of inflecting that a "solution" to a mystery has been presented.  I see nothing in this work that lends me to give it any more credence than the diatribes of Richard Hoagland.  They're taking some facts and some conjecture - and making assumptions.

Better to put our dollars, time and effort to actually getting us there where we can prove or disprove the theories beyond speculations.

I applaud this vision presented in that - it's certainly something that needs to be given consideration as a possibility - and yes, it would be amazing (although somewhat dangerous I suspect) to witness.
I think we might have finally found the Weapons of Mass Destruction!!
I think NASA should spend some time on genuine science instead of  conducting  a campaign to justify its own the existence and to encourage continued funding ! The writer of Flash Gordon comics was doing  this well and without any help from a space agency. The artist rendering of the sand expulsion looks just like something that our hero Flash would have encountered on some alien planet, except for the color, which was then monochrome.  
Clearly there is more intelligence on Mars than betwween the ears of many of the comments seen here!
The Martians are messing with us! They keep sending us images that we can't decipher or look like something else to throw us off. They've probably been observing us for years and determined we are so messed up they don't want us to visit.
Well, The sand-geyser idea strikes me as untrue.  The dark spots are just too close together for this to be a credible solution.  For one, it Takes a lot of pressure to blast through dry-ice.  Secondly As evaporation occurs from the ice it would only evaporate from the upper layer unless there was an underlying heat source- but if there was an underlying heat source the dry-ice would not have been able to form.  
 If they had explained this as dust blown into craters in the ice, I would have found it more believable.  However it just doesn't ring true under scrutiny.
The conspiracy theorists and the ones who take themselves too seriously are funny.  I agree with the first guy, Mikem.  They're shrubs.  Ones that look nice, in layers.  Designed by Roger the Shrubber.
Why not go there and find out?  Obviously there is a limit to what robots can do.  Here it is 40 years after we put a man on the moon and we have yet to make it to Mars.  Hubba hubba, let's get going.  At this rate, the Klingons have us beat.  
This article is highly deceptive. The "banyan trees" Clark referred to aren't pictured here at all! Check the link below and see for yourself. Even skeptical space.com seems to think they're biological.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/
solarsystem/clarke_mars_banyon_010709-2.html
I think they are caused by dung beetles blowing dirt out the entrance to their homes.  :)  Or it could be more spider traps like Saddam Hussein had...  Perhaps we should pre empt their attack and nuke them first.  That's where all the WMD are...

Peace out - after reading several comments there are quite a few of you that really would do well to get a job to occupy your time.
Its quite obvious that these are the stumps of trees.  Weyerhauser cut them down.  Poor Martian owls.
Fascinating images to be sure! I am glad that our "space dollars" are providing us with such images and information.  Perhaps we need to re-visit this "intelligent design" theory. (One only needs to look at the current occupant of the White House or the NASA engineers that determined that a piece of foam hitting the shuttle couldn't do any harm to it to know that this theory doesn't hold water or martian ice or sand.)  Let's get some real space pioneers up there to bring back some of it so we'll know "Who shot John".
Another example of "Intelligent Design"; just like our species. That said, I think the most "Intelligent Design" would be to put Dubya and his Administration on the next rocket to the planet to explore the place. Oh wait, that's way too much dead weight; the rocket would NEVER get off the ground.
you mean they're "Bush'es"  
(case solved, no intelligent life on Mars  :D )

I vote for Martian Sand Lions, watch your step, they're BIG puppies!
Who are we to define something so mysterious as Life?
None of the above.

Flocks of pigeons keep crapping on the camera lenses.

Pigeons are from Mars.  They are here for our popcorn!
I'm pretty convinced now that it's a society of extremely advanced, underground people systematically turning on a planetary sprinkler system periodically proving, once and for all, that Mars is indeed inhabited.
After reading the above messages, I'd like to just remind a few folks that the search for life on Mars or Titan or anywhere else in the solar system is not a search for intelligent life- that we know isn't there. (in other star systems, maybe so- will we ever know? I doubt it). But- if even the most rudimentary microbial life can be found elsewhere in this solar system, the implications are very profound. I strongly support our space program- it's a shame it has to be so political. Back in 1969, when we landed on the moon, I never would have believed it if someone then had told me 37 years later we would have not yet put a man on Mars.
The photos with this article don't even bear a remote resemblance to the features described by Arthur Clarke as "banyan trees". As a side note, I don't understand why the US scores so poorly in science education. It's obvious from several of the posts here that this is a popular site for 12 year olds!
How do we spend billions of dollars to do this type of research only to end up with grainy B&W pictures?  Someone needs to tells NASA to spend an extra few bucks on a color camera with a bigger lens.

I've linked to the "banyan tree" story on Space.com from the item. But if you're interested in the original imagery, you can check the MSSS site at:

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/
m07_m12/images/M08/M0804688.html


In this picture, you can see the forest *and* the trees:

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/
m07_m12/nonmaps/M08/M0804688.gif


As far as I can tell, the "shadows" seen here are more likely interpreted as wind tails of the dark underlying material (based on my reading of the sun azimuth, the seeming shadows aren't where they should be). Also, the branchlike structure seen in the higher-resolution GIF of the "banyan trees" tracks pretty well with the "spidery" appearance of the ice in the picture I've included in this item. It would make sense (to me) that this is dark material covering the underlying spider ice.

When I asked Christensen about Clarke's observation of the banyan-tree effect, he said, "I'm aware of the stuff that he was talking about." Might the trees be a manifestation of the dirt-geyser phenomenon? "They probably are, indeed," he said.

The more closely I look at the banyan-tree picture, the more similarities I see to the phenomena shown in the Nature paper. But who am I to argue with Arthur C. Clarke? Nobody, that's who. That's why I sent a message through Sir Arthur's associates to be forwarded to him early this week.

If I hear back from him, I'll definitely post an update.

P.S.: The camera aboard the Mars Global Surveyor is actually pretty good by 1997 standards. At the time, NASA said that some parts of Mars would be imaged in more detail than some parts of Earth. But technology doesn't stand still. I was just talking with the folks from MSSS, who said that they'll have a color imager aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (for the moon, which unfortunately isn't as colorful as Mars), as well as two other canted cameras.

Since the MGS images are in black and white, the "dark" material looks like a dark gray, but in reality it's probably a dark brick red. If you look at the "true-color" pictures on the Mars rover Web site (http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov), you'll find that a lot of the soil on Mars is very, very dark.

If we are really interested in knowing the answers as to the origins of phenomena on Mars, all we have to do is create some prestigious society and offer a monetary incentive - then let the Rutan brothers in on the action and we'll have the answers in no time flat! Those guys have to be the most awesome thinkers in the US of A!
That is some serious in-grown facial hair.  Hey Mars, try the new Schick Quattro.
Who "On Earth" cares about what the dickens is on or in (so called) Mars?  I don't see any life on this Planet - or in it; maybe at the American Legion after a few beers.  Ca'mon you self geniuses - these are ornaments made by God: he plays with them - the Universes are his Laboratory - The Master Scientist who creates new elements with a wave of his hand.  Pay attention to your purpose as an Entity and follor the Commandments and stop trying to figure out Why or What; it will paralyse you; keep you from producing your 16 tons of number nine coal - and hope your soul is blessed; so you may dwell in the House of The Lord to watch His Creating Machines - Two Hands.  Now get back to work and maybe pay off the mortgage for a house that the Governments owns - It lets you use it as long as you pay the Piper - Government.  Research and photo that from a Satellite - print pictures of it; then say; Bless my soul; I loaded sixteen ton of No. Nine Coal.  Many don't make it - they don't drink enough Budweiser - probably Puritans.
To the guy who thinks that the heating and evaporation would take place at the top:  I think they are saying that the sun would shine through the transparent ice and heat would be trapped underneath with the overlying ice providing insulation.  Kind of a mini-greenhouse effect.  Bear in mind also that the Martian gravity is lower and the atmospheric pressure is VERY low.  It would not take an enormous amount of pressure under the ice to project material quite a large distance.  My question is: could this process be repeated over time long enough for the ejected material to accumulate to the point of casting a shadow?
Very interesting. But "Who cares?" Why r u guys looking for something that we have here? We are fighting for oil here, so why do you want star wars? We are tearing our own planet up (with life on it), so why go splitting the heavens apart for greed? You know that is what will happen if it seems to be anything that we can use here on earth. Just leave it alone, and there seems to be enough funds to share for cleaning up after the 9-11. Look, lets just use the funds to do what is neccessary here and leave the cosmic to itself to clean up for now. Transfere some to the money to another fund and get this planet cleaned up. Thanks.
Liberals are hoping they are pot plants so they have something to smoke when they move there.
Whrn I try to slake my martian thirst for the info on this site, I am thwarted by overprinting and large blacked out areas that cover the left third of the page almost everywhere, from top to bottom. This seems not a good design scientificly.It is very irritating and disappointing. What can be done? I am very interested in these subjects.
Hell for spammers and viral hackers is on Mars.
Those are the vents.
The smartest one on this site is Mike Ro...I see that he truly has let his intelligence SHINE!  Stay strong my brother, they shall find out soon enough!, soon enough!  Shalom!
Mike Ro, you don't think that God is an evil being. then explain the hell he inflicts on us upon earth. Why do little children suffer and die from horrible diseases? Why does he inflict natural disasters upon us? And you sure as hell better hope he builds the next world better than the half-assed job he did on this one. Hurricanes, tornados, volcanos, earthquakes,etc. What a mean being! Or maybe he isn't the sharpest being in the universe. Or maybe...........!
I think we should check with Kevin Bacon...it seems that is where they filmed "Tremors"...
Lets spend the billions to feed clothe and shelter the poeople here and save our earth thru responsible living, Instead of finding a new place to inhabit and destroy all over again.
Silly...It's the "respiration system" from the society of little green men that live beneath the Martian Face. Aliens gotta breathe too ya know...
My tax money would be better spent on deeper "mysteries".  Black holes swallow virtually everything.  Quasars puke more stuff than we can explain.  Could a quasar be the back side of another universe's black hole?
Regarding image M0804688.gif, you wrote:

"As far as I can tell, the "shadows" seen here are more likely interpreted as wind tails of the dark underlying material (based on my reading of the sun azimuth, the seeming shadows aren't where they should be)."

See the ancillary data at:

http://www.msss.com/moc_gallery/
m07_m12/images/M08/M0804688.html


According to this page, the sun azimuth is 53.3 degrees. Azimuth angles on MOC images are measured clockwise from the right edge of the image, so the sun is coming from the lower right corner of the image and the dark streaks and dark borders of the "trees" line up pretty well with what might be expected for objects casting shadows. Of course, that could be a coincidence. A picture of the same region with a different sun azimuth would probably be necessary to say for certain whether these are wind streaks or shadows. Color photos would be interesting, too.

I admit the azimuth is rather close, but if you take a 54-degree angle (being generous) and superimpose it over the "shadows," you should find that the "shadows" (or streaks) point upward a few degrees to the right of the 54-degree mark. That's why I have to say it's only my reading of the azimuth ... there may be something I'm missing. The smaller shadows/streaks look a lot like other wind streaks, and the larger trees blend together in the lower part of the frame to look a lot like the spidery terrain seen in post-thaw pictures. But I totally agree that it's worth looking at additional imagery to nail down what's going on.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=2090

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google