ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Making space sexy

Posted: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:30 PM by Alan Boyle

Sex sells ... even when it comes to buying a ride in space. "As Laura Woodmansee, the author of "Sex in Space," put it last weekend at the NewSpace 2006 conference, sex could be "the killer app for space tourism."

Of course, it will be years before spaceships offer the right environment for romance. We still don't even know exactly how candlelight works in zero-G. But the questions surrounding how we might conduct our lives in space - ranging from birth to childhood to sex to family life to aging to death - ought to be a "killer app" for space research.

Here are some of your thoughts on the subject of space sex:

Woodmansee and other students of the subject, including author Vanna Bonta and NASA physician Jim Logan, said that hooking up in zero-G would be trickier than earthly intimacy. But Dennis McClain-Furmanski, longtime Cosmic Log correspondent as well as a longtime member of the Luxuriant Flowing Hair Club for Scientists, was sure that love would find a way:

"As a psychologist, I am confident when I state that those things which the engineering types present as 'problems' will be, to the humans involved, only 'conditions under which.' Sweat? Uncomfortable positions which you can't seem to maintain? A 'wild flail'? Good grief, that's the conditions under which many of the 7 billion of us were created. While the engineers call for assistance devices and choreography as though it were a spacewalk, I have full confidence in the one human drive greater than the one to explore. If NASA really feels the need to provide a technological fix for this 'problem,' they can simply install the back seat out of a car. All those 'problems' occur there and are almost invariably overcome."

Xeni Jardin posted some comments about the story on Boing Boing - including this recollection:

"I went on a zero-gravity flight once with a bunch of astronauts and journalists. Also on board were two guys who won tickets on a radio contest. If memory serves, one of them worked in an auto shop. I was talking with them between floating parabolas, and one of them made a joke about sex in space, and I asked something like - are you guys thinking about that, really? Because all I could think about at the time was not vomiting or bonking my head on the roof when I flew through the air. Sex was the last thing on my mind. The two guys looked at each other and were silent for a moment. Then they burst into extended dude-laughter, and one said, 'Well OF COURSE! Guys always think about that!'"


Vanna Bonta

The "2suit" for zero-G intimacy.


Some observed that Bonta's Velcro-and-zipper design for the "2suit" is way too sensible for intimate apparel, and that there should be more of a stilettos-and-straps look to space fashion.

Bonta's presentation included a couple of other designs that were lot racier (and probably not suitable for a family publication). But you'd have to be careful with stilettos and other sharp objects in zero-G - you might poke somebody's eye out during your "wild flail."

Another Cosmic Log correspondent, T. Hays, stepped back to look at the bigger picture:

"I don't get this article. Instead of imagining how weightlessness affects sex or anything else for that matter, and also considering how detrimental weightlessness is for the human body, why aren't the space scientists figuring out how to provide gravity to people in outer space. What about something like the space station in 2001 that rotated? How hard would it be to rotate a 60-foot tube? Or two or more connected tubes, You get whatever gravity you want depending on the speed. End of problem. Duh! Or am I the idiot here?"

That was indeed the bottom line for NASA's Jim Logan: More research needs to be done on all aspects of space biology, ranging from conception to old age. Because gravity-loading appears to play an essential role in skeletal development and even post-natal neural development, zero-G might have to be an adults-only zone.

The role of gravity in the aging process is another important area for research - and John Glenn's shuttle mission back in 1998 just scratched the surface. In a reduced-gravity environment, those aging bones wouldn't ache as much, and your heart wouldn't have to beat as hard. On the other hand, zero gravity is known to lead to the loss of bone mass and muscle mass - so it's not at all clear how old folks would fare.

We don't even know how reduced-gravity environments - for example, the one-sixth gravity of the moon or the one-third gravity of Mars - would affect phases of life ranging from conception to death. That's why experiments like the Mars Gravity Biosatellite Program would be so intriguing.

If we hope to see humans living permanently on the moon, Mars and beyond - and yes, having sex and raising families - we'll have to expand space research rather than cutting it back.

Feel free to register your comments on the silly and serious sides of space sex studies - but remember, kids, keep it clean.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It was presented in the article “Sex in Space” that it would be very difficult for couples to…uhum…stay connected.  This doesn’t seem like much of problem to me.  We already have many sex toys on the market today that individuals strap on them selves.  All that would be needed is a device that both individuals could strap on together to keep them close to each other.  Maybe even have the devices linked together with a high endurance rubber band to allow partners to rebound back to their partner.  You know the more I think of it the more it sounds fun I think I will start working on a prototype.
I won't post the lyrics here as they are copyrighted, but sometime in the early 80's the following song was written: A RECONSIDERATION OF ANATOMICAL DOCKING MANEUVERS IN A ZERO-G ENVIRONMENT (aka ZERO-G SEX)
Words and music © by Diana Gallagher
All Rights Reserved

A web search might bring it up, but it is listed as filk - science fiction fandom folk songs.  Those of us who have dreamed the future wonder why it took the rest of you so long to catch up.
Dr. Jim Logan seems to have been "the rage" at the NewSpace 2006 in the Sex in Space (SIS) track in as much as he brought some down-to-Earth realities to the topic. This age old topic will evolve into space leading to perhaps some human evolution in the different gravity environments of future generations.
There's nothing new under the sun, even when it comes to zero-gravity sex. Here's a 1983 article that delves into much more detail on the future how-to, with links to still more articles from past years:

http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/SexxxInSpace.htm

I also recall a patent that was issued for a sexual aid that was suggested for use in zero-G... And after puzzling around for a while, I think perhaps Patent No. 4524760 is the one I was thinking of. It's referenced in this document:

http://vsmca.tripod.com/sxd.pdf

...And is the subject of a longtime urban legend. Since one of the archived articles is from the Weekly World News, I wouldn't put much stock in it. ... Nevertheless, there are a few germs of fact to the story:

http://listserv.tamu.edu/cgi/wa?
A2=ind9803&L=folklore&T=0&P=14922


http://www.globalideasbank.org/
site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=247


http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/
story/0,3605,418368,00.html


http://www.electronicareviews.com/?p=36
Oh, come on. How difficult can this be? You have a platform, one of the partners has a strap around their middle that hooks with Velcro to the platform, and uses hand and foot holds on the platform as needed. The other partner positions themself appropriately, also with some hand and foot holds to keep them in place, and docking occurs. This can be accomplished with total nudity, except for the partner with the Velcro strap. The platform would be nothing more than a sleeping area with the adaptations for lovemaking. The one "on top" (there being no up or down in 0-G) might have a little work to do stay docked, but this could be part of the exercise astronauts would use to keep themselves fit. BTW, I worked for NASA 1964-80 at KSC.
Oh come on, if you can do it under water you can do it in zero-g. Hasn't anyone ever gotten busy while skinny dipping? But if NASA ever needs volunteers to test new devices or methods...I'm willing to repeat the act as many times as it takes to get it right!
I have never tried it so I can't speak from experience! The problem I see is getting connected and staying connected.  I can't see a solution execpt some kind of aid to keep one person from flotting around like velcro.  Of course this could be a problem on a "Spur of the momment".  If this is the case there is alternative of a 3-some to keep people from flotting around and I think the "Romantic candle" won't be around in Zero G.  Another reason for a 2001 space station.  
One method that would accomplish likely everything needed is to have a room that has a variable speed fan that blows air into the room from that end and the air is sucked out on the other. A net is then located across the entire room and in front of the "sucking" end.

The situation then is the air flow cools bodies, sucks any moisture into the air system and filters anything out, and it quite frankly is fully adjustable so the two can make love in a full gale force storm or the gentle, soothing breezes of an island paradise beach. The arrangement also provides more terrific body contact and pressure exactly as anyone wants.

So, in my opinion, this is a piece of cake.
FYI:  Standard sport parachute harness works fine - Really.
Why would it really be that hard to stay "attached"?  My girl wraps her arms and legs around me... with or without gravity I couldn't get away if I tried!  I think if the guy is in the footstraps and the girl has love handles... what's the problem?  

I think it was the James Bond movie that really made space sex popular.  Although with an odd blanket around the couple hanging down.

I think they should try the spinning space station soon but the problem is you can't have any windows because you're spinning so fast you'd get sick looking out.  Also there'd be no method of EVA's so in the end why are you in space?  They could rotate on of those on earth and get the same feeling.  Besides, the whole point of the international space station is the zero-G research.  

When Bigelow's Space Hotel is up there I think we'll get to see a lot more "research" in this area.  Just hope the couples aren't shy about discussing it.  When we get to the moon, oh baby that'll be fun on the bun!
From Deep Space:
- "Honey, you are out of this world."
-- "Feeling frisky, huh Space Cadet"?
- "Yes! In space everywhere is 'up' so it is always 'up' out here."
-- "But I told you, Fly Boy, that I needed some space".
- "I can take you to Venus!"
-- "Making love with you was my first experience of light speed, Hot Shot."
- "Afterwards we can watch a movie."
-- "Hmmmmm, you know I love movies, especially Stanley
Kubrick's 2001 A Space Odyssey."
- O.K. then, we'll do it and then watch 2001 A Space Odyssey."
-- "Kubrick thinks that we are evolved monkeys throwing technological bones into the air and you are proving it."
- "Are we near the constellation of Virgo?"
-- "Well, O.K., I get it, but can you set it on 'stun', at least once?"
- "Who should be on top?"
-- "This is space in 0 gravity, there is no 'on top'."
- "Why is this taking so long."
-- "Because of Einstein's Theory of Relativity."
- "You mean time goes slower when you are with your relatives?"
-- "My mother is not going to call, at least not this time."
- "I didn't say anything about your mother!"
-- "Yes you did, you said 'relatives' and that's my mother."
- "How about if we start by watching the movie?"
--"About monkeys who now ride technological bones into the air?"
- "Yea, just to get away from their mothers."
-- "O.K., roll the film."
- "Are my teeth clean?"
-- "Roll the film!"
.

Not related with sex (sorry) but...

I think that the new 5-segments SRB planned for the Ares-I and Ares-V can't work because it can't give more burning time nor more thrust (or a little more than a 4-segments version) but only more internal pressure and up to 140 mT of extra dry mass!

I explain in detail the reasons of my opinion in this article: www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/011srb5.html

Not "the better" but the ONLY choice for the Ares-I and Ares-V is the (standard) 4-segments SRB with (also) the great advantage that it is ready available NOW!

.
Instead of endless debate, why not ask astronauts who have been in space and have had sex, or send folks to try it out in space?  Way i see it, when it comes to sex, WE WILL FIND A WAY!  I think people should be more concerned with things like the government wasting money in the Iraq War.
Check with the Russians, they did these experiments, a long time ago.
You know... this is something I've wondered about ever since NASA started sending up men and women into space.  I find it hard to believe that they never wanted to do an experiment to see what sex was like in zero gravity.  I simply can't believe NASA would miss the opportunity to test this out.
The microgravity effects pertaining to this sort of thing have already been documented in the late 1990s in the adult erotic film "The Uranus Experiment".  From what I understand the German adult movie company wanted to rent out the NASA 'Vomit Comet' to use for the filming of certain key scenes of the movie.  NASA declined and they went with the Russians instead.  It is definitely not a film for the sensitive, as it is quite explicit.
While there are indeed all sorts of off-the-shelf products for...restraining a person for this purpose, I suspect that appropriate foot restraint (plenty of EVA experience to draw on here) will be enough...

You can't just 'try spinning the space station' as it wasn't designed for this. But why couldn't you have windows in one that was built for this? The wider the diameter, the slower the rotation need be (and we may not need one full Earth gravity, anyway) The view (which is a large part of the reason for tourists to go there) will be that depicted in the film '2001' looking from the wheel-shaped Space Station Five.

NASA isn't about to have any open 'experiments' on zero-g sex (at least not with humans)...why hand critics another weapon to use against them? No matter how useful you or I think it would be, it would be a *very* bad PR move. Imagine:

"They spend X billions of my tax dollars just so some people can go up there, and...!"

Espically as no married couple has flown together yet. (I have to think *someone* there has given some thought to this possibility on long-term Lunar stays, Mars flights and any other deep-space missions with mixed [and just as unmarried] crews...people are still people.)

And *if* any NASA personell has ever had 'unauthorized' sex in space, I don't see them admitting it, any time before their retirement, if then. Why do something that would likely make your own career crash and burn?

We may never know the names of the first members of the '200 Mile High Club.'
NASA hasn't explored this because they have to deal with a prudish American public. That public went into orbit when Eugene Cernan said "sonofabitch" as he and Tom Stafford were nearly hurled off into space on Apollo 10's Lunar Module. That public (in the guise of  sanctimonious ministers) also refused to approve a simple vertical mark symbolizing female genitalia on the Voyager plaque -- the male symbol was much more than a mark. And just look at the apoplectic furor over Janet Jackson's *** exposure. I rest my case.
Spider Robinson dealt with this topic in detail in his novel "Stardance"....
Actually, there's the well-known case of STS-47 in 1992, in which married couple Mark Lee and Jan Davis did fly on the same mission. A lot of the chatter over space intimacy has focused on that mission, merely because of the marriage. Lee and Davis have since divorced.

Here's an article that touches upon STS-47 and other facets of the "sex in space" issue:

http://www.retrofuture.com/sex.html
Is it just me or does this seems like a non-problem.

For those less prudish, you can't tell me that you haven't tried a position that you think would work just as well, if not better, in zero G! New positions would be invented as well.

All this talk of assistance devices and tiedowns makes me laugh. You have hands right? Grab hold of your partner!

I'm betting two adventurous "every day Joes" could have sex in zero gravity just as well as any engineer or scientist with only minimal provisions.
You can't just grab your partner in 0-G and expect to have sex in one place. The necessary, um, thrusts will propel the bodies about the spacecraft (remember Newton's law of action/reaction), assuming that they could remain connected at all. While this might seem like fun, it could be injurious to the two partners as they carom off projecting objects in their chamber of love. Also, effective thrusts might be difficult to accomplish without something for the legs to push against. Variety will demand a number of ways of accomplishing the act, so that various devices and means need to be developed on the basis of experiment and experience. Keep in mind that not all positions will work in 0-G without some constraints. Think about Newton's Law.

The way to work it out is to have some scientists and engineers actually try it out first hand (more fun than being a voyeur for science), and let serendipity lift its lovely head.

Hi! I'm Laura Woodmansee, (www.LauraWoodmansee.com) the author of the soon-to-be-released book, "Sex in Space!" I've been following the cosmic log and just wanted you all to know that reading your thoughtful (and sometimes silly) conversations here makes me even more certain that now is truly the correct time to publish this book. Space sex is something that our civilization needs to talk about if we are to become happy space tourists and space settlers. Thanks to all of you for getting the conversation started on this serious and fun topic, especially Alan Boyle.
- Laura Woodmansee, Author of "Sex in Space"
P.S. It turns out that there really IS new (serious and fun) information about sex in space after all. Enjoy :)

Wayne, I don't think the thrust you're thinking of will cause anyone to carom off of anything. The key is to start off in the center of the room, with zero velocity relative to the love chamber. Gyrate all you want while floating and you will not go anywhere. As long as the two remain connected (i.e. a single object), the net energy transfer will be zero regardless of the amount of "thrusting" that occurs.

You mention "Newton's Law;" I assume you are referring to Newton's Laws of Motion. The first law states that every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. A copulating couple in this scenario would be considered a single object as long as they are holding on to each other. Thus there is no "external force;" all the force remains internal to the object. The only thing that would cause propulsion would be heavy breathing, or if one of the partners were to pass gas, thus invoking Newton's Third Law. But even that amount of true thrust would be minuscule compared to the mass of the couple, causing them to slowly drift away from the center. They would easily be spent and exhausted before they gently bumped into any projecting object.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=1507

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google