ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



The science of Superman

Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 8:25 PM by Alan Boyle


Warner Bros. Pictures
Could a real-life Superman leap into outer space? Not with the humanoid body he
has in the comic books and the movies - even if he was born on Krypton.

Hollywood is reviving the saga of the Man of Steel in a big way this month – and that serves to revive the debate over just how scientifically impossible Superman’s powers are. As usual, there are grains of truth beneath the Hollywood hokum.

"Superman Returns" is having its invitation-only world premiere on Wednesday, leading up to the movie's nationwide release on June 28. Over the next week or so, we're likely to be inundated with articles analyzing the superhero's human side.

But what is Superman if not a Space Alien of Steel? From the start, the creators of the Superman saga clothed their hero's superpowers with an astrobiological explanation. For example, Superman is supposed to be so much stronger than mere humans because his anatomy is supposedly accustomed to the much stronger gravity of his home planet, Krypton.

That's what makes Seth Shostak eminently qualified to give the Superman saga a reality check. As senior astronomer at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., Shostak helps direct the real-life search for extraterrestrial intelligence  - and also muses on the shape of aliens to come in books such as "Sharing the Universe."

Shostak sees Superman as a great example of what not to look for in the search for alien life: "The fact that he's very humanoid in his appearance and behavior is of course a conceit that's adopted not only by the comic books, but also by Hollywood. ... If Superman looked like a typewriter, you'd end up having very little sympathy for his inner torment."

Some scientists, such as Simon Conway Morris, assert that the same basic body plan that has served so well on Earth would probably turn up on other planets where life takes root. If this sort of cosmic evolutionary convergence is the norm, it may well be that intelligent life elsewhere would look more like the fictional Superman than like Shostak's typewriter. But even then, Shostak sees plenty of reasons why Superman couldn't live up to his superpowers.

  • "He still walks upright, and that suggests that the high-gravity environment wasn't too high," Shostak said. "If the gravity's really high, you're probably down on all fours, or all sixes." And obviously, there's no way a human-looking musculature would be capable of leaping tall buildings. "The only way he can do that is if he's built in fundamentally different ways."
  • Then there's the energy requirements for all those feats of strength. "It takes a lot of energy to hurtle a 200-pound guy around," Shostak said. The Man of Steel would have to spend most of his time consuming some pretty high-octane fuel to run faster than a speeding bullet.
  • As for Krypton, the physical factors of planet formation dictate that a planet significantly more massive than Earth would be a gas giant, with an atmosphere of methane or ammonia. "He would spend a lot of time sniffing the chemicals used for cleaning bathrooms," Shostak joked.

By now, you're probably protesting that "Superman Returns" is only a summer action movie, with no pretense of being a documentary. So there's no sense in complaining too much about fictional physics. In fact, professors such as the University of Minnesota's James Kakalios have been using superhero science as a teaching aid for years.

For example, Kakalios' students used Superman's leaping ability to calculate that Krypton would theoretically have been six times more massive than Earth. They also theorized that Krypton could have been made from the super-dense, unstable material found at the core of neutron stars - which would explain why Krypton blew up.

In a sense, Superman's creators "got the science right by accident," Kakalios said back in 2002. It turns out there's even a kernel of truth to the idea that Krypton orbited a red sun.

Similarly, Superman's powers have their parallels in real-life technologies, ranging from bulletproof vests (to stop that speeding bullet) to thermal imaging and T-ray vision (which is much more revealing than X-ray vision in real life).

And even before its official release, the new Superman movie has sparked a spirited discussion of special relativity as it applies to the Man of Steel's sojourn back to Krypton (slight spoiler alert). Anything that gets comic-book fans thinking about Einstein can't be all bad.

So go ahead and revel in the science of Superman - or have a laugh over insultingly stupid movie physics. Either way, I'd love to see your comments about the highs and lows of superhero science.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

C'mon, man.  It's science fiction!  Look, Superman represents everything that a man would like to do, but with a soul, which a man with that much power would lack.  Think of him as Jesus.  He performed miracles, and nobody questions him.  Lol.  He can move faster than a bullet, jump over high distances, fly, invulnerable to most kinds of impacts, and super strength.  The science might not be there, but Jesus resurrected.  How do you explain that?  His strength could be measured like a body builder.  He can bench more than you and I, but he can still walk, run, and jump like any of us.  Controlling his powers is probably his most impressive power, and probably explains some science.  Besides, our yellow sun is what gives Superman his incredible abilities.  It gives you and I a nasty sunburn, but it powers him beyond belief.  Remember, the red sun leaves him powerless.  Probably from all the radiation it releases different from our sun.  Just a scientific guess.
For more on James Kakalios and his take on superhero science, you should check out the Web site associated with his book, http://www.physicsofsuperheroes.com/

An excerpt from the book ... http://www.physicsofsuperheroes.com/excerpt.htm#secioi ... delves into the details of Superman's powers, as portrayed in the *early* comics ... that is, when he could only "leap over tall buildings" rather than fly. He goes through detailed calculations to figure out that gravity was 15 times as strong on Krypton than on Earth. It's a hoot! (But don't ask me to explain how to reconcile all that with the estimates for the comparative mass of Krypton, as cited above.)
this story is more than a little disappointing.  did anyone in this article ever watch the movies or, more importantly, read the comic books???  for example, superman's human-looking musculature stems from the fact that he IS built in a different way-- he has an extremely dense molecular structure.  his physical form isn't exactly human either-- "i AM an alien, after all" when talk turns to sex in tv's lois and clark.  in addition, superman derives his energy and sustenance from the sun.  he eats when he is hungry (superman 1) but this is most likely due to his strong psychological link to humanity imbued by jonathan and martha (see death of superman comic)
Sorry it's a disappointment to you, Adam. That's the great thing about these comments ... You're able to set me straight on issues such as Superman's molecular density. Have to admit I was more of a Marvel guy, particularly Dr. Strange. But all this talk about comics is making me think I should pick up a copy of Weird Mystery Tales No. 1:
http://groups.msn.com/AlanBoylesCosmicLog/mayarchive.msnw?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=6
Many, many years have passed since my last physics class but I think his foot would press down with a force of about 12,000 pounds.  I assume a 120 foot leap with 2 feet of acceleration and a 200 pound man.  Hope he leaps from solid concrete.
What's wrong with these "scientists".  Why don't these people read up on what "fuel's Superman's powers?

"hen there's the energy requirements for all those feats of strength. "It takes a lot of energy to hurtle a 200-pound guy around," Shostak said. The Man of Steel would have to spend most of his time consuming some pretty high-octane fuel to run faster than a speeding bullet."

ANSWER:  It's sunlight! His body takes in sunlight. I imagine mister Shostak understands the molecular structure of sunlight doesn't he?  

I'm just so frustrated now at this posting that i have no words to truly express how I feel. ... All you have are theories.  
There are so many things that are so poorly understood in our world, and we, in our arrogance, think that if we cannot understand them, then they must be impossible. What comes to mind is how we have only recently begun to understand how dolphins can swim so fast, or how they can stay underwater so long, or how they can maintain their body temperature. Until very recently, the very idea of a mammal doing this would have been considered as impossible as Superman if we didn't have these mammals on our planet. And how about all the life near the superhot underwater geysers... and so on and so on....
I always take the Superman physics with the perspective of who Kryptonians were.  They were an advanced race of aliens.  Jor-El searched through the universe where his infant would fit in the best, yet have a surviving chance.  A race this advanced would surely understand the how's and why's of the enhanced abilities that a Kryptonian would receive, but I look at it the same way I look at Star Trek or Star Wars, it's science beyond our level of understanding (granted in both examples it is technology rather than biology).  Of course you can't enjoy Superman if you sit there the whole time thinking "that's rediculously impossible".  Just sit back, accept that he *can* do it, enjoy the adventure.

I'd also like to point out that if you are to ridicule the physics of Superman, then the physics of Spider-man would have to grate on your nerves too, because he's just as unrealistic.

I'd like to qualify what I've said.  I'm a die-hard Superman fan, and have spent alot of time trying to defend him to people, so don't take anything I've said to be offensive, it's not meant that way.  It's meant to urge readers to consider that it's not worth getting caught up on the physics, it's just fun to discuss, and so it should be left at just that, fun discussion.
One word, NANOTECHNOLOGY.

Through highly advanced nanotechnology you could create a 'man-of-steel' with superhuman powers.

What if you injected a person with nanobots capable of re-engineering their bodies on an atomic level?  What if it made their skin like kevlar armor but with the softness of skin?  When touched normally it would feel like human skin, but when impacted with a high level of kinetic energy, such as a bullet, it would harden to armor in that one spot?

Likewise, muscle could be re-engineered to be vastly stronger.  This 'super-human' would be nothing more than a biological-robotic hybrid built on the atomic level using nanobot workers.

Actually, I believe THIS will be the next step in human evolution.

Imagine a civilization 100 million years more advanced than ours.  I believe that this will be the nature of their 'nature'.  Eve ate the apple so she could be like God - this is the end result.

As a species, we shall eventually create our own reality.  In order to compete with the robots we will build, we must become partially robot ourselves, yet without losing our basic biolgical natures, which make us uniquely human.

NANOTECHNOLOGY.

I find I can suspend my disbelief long enough to enjoy a Superman movie without too much effort. After all, I am there to be entertained. In the end, I can swallow the whole "dense molecular structure" to explain his imperviousness; the "bio-gravity" where his kryptonian biology releases anti-gravitons as a result of the yellow sun, and therefore he can defy gravity, aka fly (even in space, where the lack of air resistance and pressures would cease any "flying" and only suit rocketing or boosting which Superman does not possess any thrusters that I am aware of); and his yellow sun powered uber-strength again being a result of his Kryptonian alien biology acting as super highly effecient solar cells that then use that high amperage bio-electric energy to super stimulate his ultradense muscular system; or even his "heat vision", after all, the same yellow sun that powers Supes is the same sun that burns our flesh on a semi-regular basis at the beach. What I can't get is how he generates and shoots X-rays AND then somehow manages to receive them again at the back of his retna to determine what the x-rays passed through or not. Are they parabolic, semi-boomerang-ish x-rays? Is it qauntum physics at work by means of the superstring theory?
As the commercial for the first Superman stated, "You will believe a man can fly."
It's only a comic. It's only a comic. It's only a comic. That being said, it's clear that the author hasn't read much of it. Besides, has the Superman franchise ever tried to make us believe any part of it was real? People (MSN bloggers) seem to think we can and should be agitated by anything non-sensical - first Da Vinci Code, now this. IT'S FICTION, boys and girls.
You people are funny, getting all worked up over a comic book character. It's all for entertainment and if thinking baout the physics is fun for some one, let them. Just enjoy it, that's what it's there for.
People: Superman gets his powers from earth's sun. Read the comics, and look up the information. If he was real, he'd have the front page like in the movies, and get the bad guys.
I am a fan of both real science and sci-fi. I have friends that like to dissect my sci-fi shows and movies as to how something is not real or possible. So what! It is fantasy, entertainment, and if you look at the older sci-fi, much of that is actually reality now. It takes the enjoyment out of movies and TV if all you do is complain about the reality of non-reality. So shut up, sit down and pass the popcorn!
I was surprised and delighted to find out superheroes actually exist in our world. Star (who in regular life is the plucky 6 year old Aubrey Matthews, cancer fighter) had the super-powers of super-strength, super-speed, x-ray vision, and super-breath. She captured that terrible villian on all the Neighborhood Watch signs, helped out some ferrets, and won the hearts of her city in her 24 hours of super-herodom.

You can read more about this super-heroine <a href="http://www.idahostatesman.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060617/NEWS01/606170354">here</a>.
The current, modern-age Superman derives all his power from the radiation of our yellow sun. His molecular structure is not only denser than a human's, he is also an extremely powerful solar battery. He wouldn't necessarily exert force upon the surface he takes off from because he doesn't leap in the same sense that we would. He can levitate somehow by changing the gravitational force surrounding him. It has also been established that his imperviousness to harm is some sort of natural force field rather than literally indestructable skin. The field extends to about half an inch beyond the dermal layer, explaining why, in an explosion, his cape can be shredded, but not the clothes close to his body. Everything about him is, in current mythos, explained through energy rather than physical terms. He even became an energy based being for a while. If he is ever in a situation were he can't recharge for a very long time, he will eventually lose his powers. In current canon, there was no Superboy. He gradually came into his powers after years of charging as a child.
As to what fuels Superman's powers is a mystery.  What is not a mystery is that this is a science fiction movie.  Or a fiction movie, a movie to watch in a cool audioatorum to escape these hot days.  A fantasy movie not meant to memic life, and  not meant to be the truth but shown in an cool audioatorum to escape reality for 2 hours.
I hope that Lois Lane has read Larry Niven's _Man_of_Steel,_Woman_of_Kleenix_!
he's just a "super hero" from the terrible 1930's when people needed an escape from the depression.
I'm more interested in how his clothes don't get tattered, burned, or simply disintergrate when faced with bullets, knives, sharp sticks, or even a thermal nightmare such as entering Earth's atmosphere after a casual jump into space to rotate the Earth backwards in time...
I GUESS I WILL EMPHASIZE THE SAME THINGS AS THE PEOPLE BEFORE ME HAVE:  ENTERTAINMENT; THAT IS WHAT SUPERMAN IS. HAVE FUN AT THE THEATRE, AND, IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN LEARNING SOMETHING NEW, CHECK OUT THE SCIENCE, OR LACK OF.  JUST ENJOY, PEOPLE.
If it is true that he relies on solar energy to "power up", then why during his caped crusading does he even wear a suit?  Perish the thought of a streaking Superman, but he'd presumably be even stronger wearing only a Speedo.  Way to go Superman...sacrificing performance in the name of modesty.
"Is Superman Gay?" Are we really this hard up for News and Retoric? Surly there is something more REAL for us to discuss.
One of the DC Comics guys used to do talks for college audiences about the science of Superman. The Q&A always included the inevitable "Oh yeah? So how does Superman fly, smart guy?" To which the speaker would reply "Very well, thank you for asking."
One should read the old essay "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" in any discussion of this type.  Beyond that, we are confronted with the realitization that the original explanation of Kal-El's powers as proposed by 1930s era scientists was simply wrong.  Given how little they knew then, why are we surprized to learn this?  What our newer knowledge has made impossible is not the existance of the Superman, but merely the first proposed explanation.  There is still much we know little of, but also much we can see hints of with today's knowledge.  Nothing is impossible, merely improbable.  Scientists in the 1930s spoke of what they knew.  Neutrinos, anti matter, M theory, they knew nothing of those.  Could not Superman be somehow drawing his energy from Tesla Space?  Perhaps from the still ongoing long ago big bang through some not yet understood ability to manipulate M theory type events?  This offers several advantages to believers as it also allows "flying" (he doesn't actually move, he picks a direction and this Universe moves around him while he remains still), invulnerability (that specimen was injured/killed, but in the instant of, swapped places with an alternate doppleganger from a Universe in which the probability of injury was lessened, OR manipulated probability and stochastics to lessen the odds of injury), heat vision (a simple ability to project a blast of heat drawn from elsewhere/when), faster than light travel (again slipping between Universes OR replotting one's position in the Universe), incredible strength (simple probability manipulation) etc.  Accepting this concept moves the debate from could he exist here, to how unstable life must be in a Universe that allows such a naked Singularity as a Kal-El to exist.  A reading of DC comics confirms that he is a Singularity as many other similar beings prowl their pages as do demons and other magical or spirit world entities such as Specter or Dr. Fate.  Indeed every now and then his very Universe flickers as the stochastic events stretch it's fabric too thin (i.e., Crisis, etc.).  We won't even start on the Green Lantern issue, also existent in Superman's Universe.  Right up there with the Norse God problem confronting Spiderman's Universe.
Also, if Krypton was completely distroyed and Clark is the last survivor, where do all these other "super" people (mostly villans, but also super girl,etc..) keep popping up from.  Were there a hundred pods shot out from Krypton right before it exploded.  And if the Kyrptonians were such an advanced race, why didn't they build bigger pods and take everyone?  
Must not have much news if things have been reduced to having a serious analysis of Superman.......
If you're wondering how he eats and breathes, and other science facts
Then repeat to yourself 'It's just a show, I should really just relax'

Words as true here as they were in the theme-song to Mystery Science Theatre 3000
some people must have a horrible time of the movies. NEWS FLASH!! 99% of the movies you watch are false. yes, thats right, just as fake as superman. sure he can do things no on in real life can, but when is the last time bruce willis actually flew into space to mine a meteor headed for our planet????
"Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" is indeed not to be missed... here's a link: http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html

Seth Shostak made a similar point in part of the interview I didn't include in the original item:

"One thing that certainly must worry Superman ... for any specialized breed, whether it's Superman or King Kong or Godzilla, you really require a minimum breeding density."

He joked that this would explain King Kong's angst over the Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts) character in the ape movie.

"The same is undoubtedly true of Superman, and you would think that would give him sleepless nights."

Of course I agree with all the posters above that even "Superman Returns" is just a movie (though some of the pre-reviews make it sound a bit like revelation). I'm less sure whether the energy input from sunlight would be enough to power Superman's activities (particularly if he's made of super-dense stuff). And what do you do on a rainy day? The point is that all these semi-scientific explanations make the story plausible if you don't look too hard - and also spark intriguing questions about real-life science.
What do you people mean,Superman is a fictional character?He is real!just like Xmen,Batman,Spiderman,Captain America,Aqua man and other characters.I saw him once when he flew in on one of my parties and he said."I just flew in from over seas and my arms are killing me!"Well need i go on any further?Stop by my site sometime and say hello.
It's not science fiction, it's Science FANTASY.

Science Fantasy takes what we know (or believe we know) and takes it 3 steps beyond to create these wonderful adventure stories.

I love them, keep them coming just be true to the characters and the original stories!!!
It seems to me that if there was a super-advanced civilization such as the one that Superman comes from, I would expect it to not necessarily significantly change their members, but rather, would enhance their abilities. So, I would think they would engineer nanobots to be part of their bodies; these could be expected to build tiny nuclear reactors to supply the energies needed for seemingly fantastic feats - flying, jumping, etc. If one gets shot, these nanobots would form superdense armor to deflect the bullet. Similarly for flying, or for superspeed running - the nanobots would assure that someone super-passing a building does not flatten it by carefully managing air currents around the body. In space, the nanobots would re-create oxygen for comfort, and protect from harsh radiation and other hazards. Naturally, such powerful machines might be poisoned by certain materials, such as Kryptonite.

Based on what we knew in the earlier parts of the century, Superman was impossible. Based on what we know now, he's actually quite feasible.
As someone who has read the books for over 20 years I can attest to certain facts:

Superman uses solar radiation from our yellow sun to fuel his body, he does not need to eat but he does.  When he leaves our sun's radiation he grows weaker and weaker until the point he's effectively "human" as he would have been had he grown up on Krypton.

This is the basis for all his other abilities.  The supercharged cells allows him to manipulate the visual spectrum in order to produce xray and heat vision.  The supercharged cells have profound effects on his strength.  His skin isn't super thick or dense, it's protected by a thin layer of "radiation" produced by the supercharged cells.  Bullets, fire and other things never even touch his skin.  That's why his costume never gets torn and tattered but his cape does--it doesn't touch his body.  As for flight, he is able to manipulate the gravitational field around his body using the same principles.  

His body is a solar battery, the more sun he soaks up, the stronger and more capable he becomes.  

Want full details?  There's a book called "The Science of Superman."  Find it, it explains everything complete details.  
get your knickers un-bunched. it is escapist fantasy entertainment, take it at that or leave it be.
quote: I'm more interested in how his clothes don't get tattered, burned, or simply disintergrate when faced with bullets, knives, sharp sticks, or even a thermal nightmare such as entering Earth's atmosphere after a casual jump into space to rotate the Earth backwards in time...

his clothes came with him from krypton. they were made of the blankets he was wrapped in and the bedding he brought with him.
Hi guys, Superman here, given all the intense research you folks have all done, I was wondering if you could help me. You see every time I pee, the force of my outgoing pee stream is so potent that it shatters the toilet, and the wall behind it. Needless to say this has really impacted my plumbing costs. And now I've been banned from Hilton hotels for the same reason. What am I going to do with all of the Preferred Guest credits I've built up, I mean trading them in for airline miles would be kind of pointless.
Superman as depicted could never exist. If he did come to Earth, and actually possessed the super-powers he has, he would have destroyed mankind and taken this planet for his own. (He may have kept Lois around.)
Dag nabit! You're supposed to put the <Spoiler Alert!> _BEFORE_ the spoiler...
Nerds. Ha!
Golly jee wiz Batman, do you think Superman will be able to speed back in time to warn the citizens of LA if the San Andreas fault ruptures as bad as MSNBC’s top headlines reported today?

No Robin!  Superhero or not, I think he’d just be labeled another “doomsayer” and told not to cause premature panic!
now my belief in Superman is shattered.
SO, I don't get it, Is Superman real or not? ANd about the Nanobots, can somebody send me that comic book?
I think if Superman were as moral as he seems he would be deeply troubled by all the people he doesn't save from evil.  Despite his powers he can't be everywhere at once and playing God is a terrible thing to do.
Superman is more than a comic character or impossible fantasy.  He represents what we all want to be and do: to be able to fly, save people with amazing feats of strength, use heat vision to melt a gun in a criminal's hand, move so fast that time itself seems to stand still and most important of all to do it unselfishly and without reward.  This last part is the hardest for us to live up to, for in our own way we are capable of great things as individuals.  Unfortunately we usually are trying to work the angles to our own benefit and our more idealisitic goals are too easily forgotten.  I have loved the Man of Steel since I was a small boy and I have found myself wishing for his presence on more than one occasion but none as much as September the 11th, 2001.  In this post 9/11 world I find it hard to get through the day without thinking of those horrible events and today is no different.  Those fire fighters, policemen, paramedics, soldiers, sailors and civilians who went to the Towers, Pentagon and the cockpit of Flight #93 did what mere mortals are called to do in the face of adversity without the aid of a Superman.  
This debate has been going on for years.  During the 70's Harlan Ellison wrote an essay entitled "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.  This was a hilarious examination of how unlikely it would be that Superman could father a child.  But, come on, we have been assailed by King Kong, ET, Klatu, and a myriad of other figments of the imagination.  Leave reality at home.  This is the movies, nothing is real.  If you don't believe me just look Hollywood's political views.
Holy crap, this is hilarious.  I thought I was a nerd, but look at all the post from people arguing for superman, like he's real.  Hahaha, thanks for lighting up my day!
All of you respondents (and writer)....get a life!  This is a made believe story that someone created for entertainment and monetary gain.  Take it for what it is...pure fantasy and a great role model for our kids! Sort of like Santa Clause....real to only those who believe in him.  The science we should study is how we all can be more like them!
Somebody tell me why is it if Superman is bullet-proof (and we've seen enough bullets bounce off of him), he ducks when a crook throws his gun at him?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=513

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google