ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Hardhat robots wanted

Posted: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:07 AM by Alan Boyle

The group that staged NASA's first-ever Centennial Challenge has issued its first public draft rules for yet another $250,000 contest - this time, for gangs of robots capable of piecing together a plumbing system under outer-space conditions.

NASA is putting up the prize money and says the program "may directly affect how exploration is conducted on the moon." Come to think of it, the challenge just might affect how construction jobs are done here on Earth as well.

I discussed the robo-contest in broad strokes last month, but last night the California-based Spaceward Foundation said it has fleshed out the draft rules and invited public comment. Through July 15, comments can be sent to RoboticRules@Spaceward.org. The final rules are to be published by July 31.

Spaceward's Ben Shelef summarized the concept behind the contest, which is known as the Telerobotic Construction Challenge or the Remote Robotic Assembly competition:

"In order to win the prize, a team has to complete a robotic assembly task, but it must do so while controlling the robots from across the country with a control latency of 20 minutes! The team never gets to see the arena, except through the eyes of its robots. Even advanced knowledge of the arena is accomplished through a 'scout' robot that the team must build.

"The task is to construct a water-tight pipeline between a simulated 'resource generator' and a 'storage tank.' The task is complete when water can flow freely into the latter. The team has 24 hours to complete the task.

"The team 'launches' its robots to Mars by packaging them in a 'lander' and shipping them to the arena. The lander is simply a structure that can survive shipping and allow the robots to egress. When we receive a lander, we simply place it in the arena and activate the communication link. From that point and until assembly is complete, there is no more human intervention except through the communication link."

The robots will have to assemble their pipeline from standard plumbing fixtures, and move the 500-liter, 50-kilogram (130-gallon, 110-pound) storage tank at least 25 meters (82 feet) away from the "resource generator" tank that's filled with water - over terrain that's strewn with boulders and sand traps.

Did I mention that each robot can't measure more than 50 centimeters (20 inches) in any direction, and has to weigh less than the tank it will help move?

The competition would kick off in the latter part of 2007, but it won't be one head-to-head event, like the Space Elevator Games that Spaceward presented last year and plans to repeat this October. Instead, the teams that register (and pay an as-yet-undetermined entry fee) will alert Spaceward when they're ready to make an assembly attempt. The competition ends when no more teams are scheduled to compete, or when a two-year time limit runs out.

If only one team succeeds at the task, that team gets the full $250,000 NASA purse. If more than one team is successful, the first two or three finishers split the money according to a weighted formula.

So what's the point? "If the Telerobotic Construction Challenge can successfully demonstrate the remote assembly of simple and complex structures, many aspects of exploration in general will be affected for the better," Scott Horowitz, NASA's associate administrator for exploration systems, explained in a news release.

Spaceward expands on that idea in its Web posting:

"Suppose we want to build an in-situ fuel/oxygen generation plant on Mars, comprised of an ore processor, a reactor and storage tanks. Or suppose we want to build a human habitat, comprised of several interconnected habitation and support modules.

"With today's technology, we already know how to build the basic machinery, and we also already know how to send payloads to the Martian surface... The problem is that we can only send up to a ton or two at a time (The Spirit and Opportunity packages only weighed about half a ton each), and so have to assemble the structures on the Martian surface - with the human operators still on Earth!

"This is difficult, since communication between Earth and Mars takes 20 minutes (at best) and so immediate 'remote control' is not feasible - check out the Mars Rover Autonomous Mobility Web page for an explanation - and keep in mind that cooperative tasks are infinitely more complex than simply 'driving around'...

"Of the technology development that is required, the topic of cooperative remote robotic operations is probably the one that is the least well understood."

The potential for interplanetary missions is obvious: Theoretically, you could have the robots put together a moon base - and have a hot cup of tea waiting for the arrival of their human overlords.

But if such a system is feasible, you could unleash the robotic chain gangs on tasks closer to home as well. We already have remote-controlled bomb disposal squads in Iraq, and hardhat robots in Japan. Iimagine turning troops of robo-wildcatters loose on inhospitable oilfields, or sending robo-cleanup crews to hazardous waste sites, or switching on a robo-construction crew to build a garage, or even calling the robo-plumber to unclog a pipe.

Could 21st-century life eventually look like a "Jetsons" episode? Is it an technically impossible dream, or just an impossibly expensive dream? Feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

And while we're on the subject, there are a couple of additional red-letter days coming right up for robots and their fans:

  • The RoboCup is continuing in Bremen, Germany, with Carnegie Mellon University's robo-commentators following the action on a mini-soccer field.
  • Carnegie Mellon is also gearing up for its Robot Hall of Fame induction ceremony next Wednesday. As we reported in April, this year's honorees include Maria, the shiny she-robot from Fritz Lang's "Metropolis"; Gort from "The Day the Earth Stood Still"; David from the movie "A.I."; Sony's Aibo robo-dog (which plays a mean game of RoboCup soccer); and the SCARA industrial robot.

The keynote address will be given by Daniel H. Wilson, whose tongue-in-cheek guidebook "How to Survive the Robot Uprising" is being made into a Mike Myers movie for release next year.

We held our own "People's Choice" robot contest in April as well, and you might remember that B9 from "Lost in Space" (a.k.a. Robot) won by an electronic nose. B9's acceptance speech for the virtual award was written way back in 1965, for the original TV show:

"My micromechanism thanks you, my computer tapes thank you, and I thank you."

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

THAT’S the time you want to send people into space – when robots can have your moon base and your L2 space station already there ready and waiting for you.  I’d much rather wait for a time when our species can properly (and safely) expand into space than to go rushing-off to the moon just because China is doing it or prematurely head to Mars just because some people insist exploration is a “human” thing.  It is – but robots do that best, too!
warning ... warning plumber robinson ...warning
Tele-robotic construction seems like a good idea for pre-set up of space habitats, re-fueling systems, etc. The time lag will cause numerous problems until the systems can be made at least semi-autonomous. Even the Martian Rovers have demonstrated semi-autonomous driving capablity, until they got stuck in the sand.

This is a good first step, but serious work needs to be done on the soft ware side of things to make to make on-site, electronic decision making more effective.
It will be a good idea to have robots to do jobs up in space, it will be bad when they do everything for us on earth because the only people making money will be the big business owners, then we wont have to worry about mexicans taking our jobs, it will be robots taking them.
I have a deep interests in robots use for space exploration.  It is obviously more practical to use robots than humans to explore.  Robots don't need feed off of dead animals and plants to live.  We need a lot of resources inorder to have any chance to survive off earth.  It would be wise to explore cheap solutions to build the environments necessary for human survival.  Otherwise it's a waste of money and time.  
What if the rrobots screw up-intentionaly? If they put together a space station but didn't hook up the oxygen, and didn't tell the new visitors! That 1st cup of tea will be really ugly!
Obviously we need to send people along to supervise the robots and be able to take them out in case they disobey and start some kind of robot uprising.

How about Martian Robo-Slave Games as a snappy name for the new contest from Spaceward Foundation?  Let the robots know where they stand.
How about this,.... lets send one or two technicians up to Mars with the robot gangs, the lag time is further cut down due to near instantaneous delivery of orders from the technicians.  

Mass materials will not be needed to support a full human builder team and if the robots break down the technicians can bring them in and fix them.  You will of course need to have a steady shipment of resources being sent and you will need some form of minature habitat available.  

What do you think?  Just a thought


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=423

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google