ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Stars gone wild

Posted: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:54 PM by Alan Boyle


C. Wilson / McMaster U. / NASA / ESA
The galaxy Arp 220 is actually the result of a collision between two separate galaxies. The blue points in this Hubble image represent massive star clusters.

Galactic smash-ups are always good places to look for brilliant bursts of starbirth, and the Hubble Space Telescope has found a real doozy: a mashed-up merger of two galaxies, containing more than 200 mammoth star clusters. Astronomers say the biggest of those clusters contains enough material to make 10 million suns - which makes it twice as massive as any comparable star cluster in the Milky Way.

In today's image advisory, the Space Telescope Science Institute says the galaxy Arp 220, which is 250 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Serpens, is giving scientists a good idea of what the earliest galaxies in the universe could have looked like.

"This is starbirth in the extreme," astronomer Christine Wilson of McMaster University, the leader of the Arp 220 research team, was quoted as saying. "Our result implies that very high star-formation rates are required to form supermassive star clusters. This is a nearby look at a phenomenon that was common in the early universe, when many galaxies were merging."

The two galaxies that merged to form Arp 220 began running into each other about 700 million years ago. Based on an analysis of 14 clusters, Wilson's team says there has been at least two waves of starbirth: one long blast that has produced stars between 500 million and 70 million years ago, and another baby boom 10 million years ago.

Of course, all this is based on a timeline that ends with our current view of the galaxy. If we could magically suspend the special theory of relativity and see the galaxy up-close as it is "today," we would have a very different view of things. In fact, based on the current view, scientists say Arp 220 has enough gas to keep manufacturing star clusters for another 40 million years. Thus, if we could instantaneously travel through a wormhole into the galaxy itself, we would see that the fireworks have settled down by now.

Wilson and her team based their findings on observations made in 2002 by Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys, as well as earlier data from the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer. Their study was published in the April 20 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

This view shows Arp 220 in visible light, but astronomers say the galaxy shines brightest in infrared light. In fact, Arp 220 is a classic ultra-luminous infrared galaxy, or ULIRG. Within such galaxies, new stars turn up the heat on the dust that surrounds them, causing the galaxies to glow brilliantly in the infrared spectrum.

Check out this story from earlier in the week for more about those intriguing ULIRGs - and if you're hankering for more galactic gems, click on over to our gallery of greatest hits from space.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

i think that is interesting. but i would like to hear more about the sagittarius galaxy that is outside and to the right of our location, the one that is falling toward the big picture.  i think it's the sag galaxy.   i love this stuff ... i want to go there someday and save the hubble.  let's take it further out, maybe to the dark side of the moon, use a satellite to  control it ...  just put it on the event horizon
I am a scientist at heart, but seeing images from the Hubble makes me think that perhaps science and faith must be on the same page... but both sides are just too stubborn to realize it.
Alas, Elizabeth, the problem is that neither science nor faith are fully correct... but only science will admit it. Scientists, while being human and prone to mistakes, have bent over backwards dozens of times to learn from the experience of being wrong about prior assumptions. The very concept of faith is belief regardless of facts... it's kind of like cutting your finger off with a knife and refusing to admit it (that is, you never learn a lesson and put future digits at risk of a repeat.)

The beauty of the universe is tainted by more than enough misunderstanding as it is... but recognizing the nature of the universe at face value doesn't do anything to devalue it. Have your faith while you are allowed to, but don't muddy the waters of science with such nonsense.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=386

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google