ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Riding to Hubble's rescue

Posted: Friday, June 09, 2006 2:16 AM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / STScI / AURA
This Hubble view shows the disk galaxy
NGC 5866 tilted nearly edge-on to our
line of sight. A crisp dust lane divides
the galaxy into two halves. Viewed face
on, NGC 5866 would look like a smooth,
flat disk with little spiral structure.

The scientists behind the Hubble Space Telescope delivered yet another stunning celestial image on Thursday, showing a galaxy on edge with a wispy glowing halo. "Hubble-huggers" have been on edge as well, hoping that NASA will send a space shuttle crew to extend the life of space-based astronomy's crown jewel. Although the space agency hasn't yet set a date for that final servicing mission, the shuttle program's manager says preparations are already being made for a rescue.

Shuttle crews have visited the Hubble for servicing four times since the telescope's launch in 1990, and the fifth mission would rank right up there with the first one, which effectively gave Hubble its sharp-eyed sight. New gyros and batteries would replace the ones that are failing. Two major instruments, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph and the Wide Field Camera 3, would be installed.

With the fresh servicing, Hubble could produce unparalleled images for several more years. Without it, the outlook is less bright. Hubble's handlers have developed a "two-gyro" mode of operation that should keep things working until mid-2008, but eventually, the telescope will fall victim to a worn-out guidance system or power system.

NASA Administrator Mike Griffin has ruled out a robotic mission to save the Hubble while leaving the agency's options open for the shuttle rescue scenario. In fact, Hubble's scientists have been told to be prepared for a launch as early as December 2007. Griffin, however, has held off on giving the official go-ahead until the shuttle has a couple of successful test missions under its belt.

That doesn't mean NASA isn't working on the preparations. Shuttle program manager Wayne Hale admitted as much during a news briefing Thursday at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston (where I'm currently burning the midnight oil).

"There are some long lead items that are being prepared, based on the assumption that we will be authorized to do a Hubble servicing mission," Hale told me. "The authorization to do that mission has not yet been given, and I think it is dependent on how well we demonstrate our success in the next flight or two.

"Obviously, everybody would like to go back and service the Hubble again, but that is a decision that's ahead of us. And crew assignments are still up in the air."

Hale's comments notwithstanding, there was an intriguing hint last month about the composition of Hubble's repair crew — in the news that astronaut Scott Parazynski was being taken off the STS-118 mission, targeted for launch next year, "to prepare for assignment to another mission."

NASA spokesman Doug Peterson said Parazynski was being shifted to a different not-quite-yet-assignment because of his expertise in spacewalking — but he declined to provide any more specifics about the job. Expert spacewalkers are exactly what you need for servicing the Hubble. So could there be a Hubble angle to Parazynski's pre-reassignment? Drawing that kind of conclusion would be "too futuristic," Peterson told me with a smile.

Yet another "long lead item" could have to do with new techniques for inspecting the shuttle, and that's where the upcoming shuttle mission could play a role. A Hubble servicing job would be the only kind of trip not going to the international space station — which provides the best place in space for inspecting and, if necessary, repairing the shuttle.

During Discovery's mission, the very first spacewalk would be devoted to testing a technique that links together the shuttle's robotic arm and inspection boom to provide a platform for spacewalkers. That would be the only way to give the shuttle a full inspection if you weren't attached to the space station, explained Discovery spacewalker Piers Sellers.

By now I was firmly in the grip of a Hubble-hugging spell, so I asked if this sort of procedure would come into play during a servicing mission. "That's certainly an application," Sellers said. "For Hubble, you would need it for inspection or repair, because there's no one else around."

It turns out that Discovery commander Steve Lindsey said as much in February during an inspection visit to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Something tells me that a final visit to the lonely Hubble would stir up the general public's interest in spaceflight far more than any trip to the international space station. What do you think?

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I would rather see money go go fix Hubble than go for the ISS, not much pure science there or pictures of deep space
Do not knock the ISS, the mission in Iraq/Afgan., shuttle operations, and/or other NASA/government programs. We can do all these very critical missions including repairing the HST. If you think you can trade one mission for another mission you are being quite foolish and unaware of how things get down in DC and the world. Read between the lines...as long as Griffin gets a couple of safe lift offs and landings the HST will be repaired....
Its worthwhile , if we can spend billions in iraq weekly , and millions on a wall ,on the border , this is a cheap investment for the scientific worth!!
Let the Scientists and Engineers decide the optimum path to proceed on: upgrade or replace this scientific jewel. Your program to further galactic detection, and research has benefits far beyond these monumental scientific achievements. It is America's best Ambassador in the eyes of the World (wheather educated or not!)
Don't lose the spirit of "What can I do for my Country?!" to quote JFK.,eh!
Hubble has given us more bang for the buck then many other space missions. Maintaining Hubble is the sensible thing to do.
Yes the Hubble should be fixed, even if another even better one is in the works, (is There?). The old telescopes on mountain tops are still in use and adding immensly to our knowledge. If the United States cant afford to send a shuttle to fix it, the job should be farmed out to the Russians
The pictures and information being obtained from Hubble on an almost daily basis are reason enough to keep Hubble flying. Get a mission on the schedule ASAP!!
the space program needs to remain active with missions such as these that keep the scientific community prospering. More missions provide more opportunities for people to become excited and involved in the space program.
Unless my perspective is jaded, even sentimental, the Hale telescope is still doing respectable science.  The capabilities of the Hubble are orders of magnitude beyond Mts. Wilson and Palomar.  It strikes me a a huge prospective waste to abandon an excellent and flexible instrument making enormous contributions to Astronomy.
The Hubble images give the scientific world, amateur astronomers and taxpayers something for our money that we can all really enjoy. If NASA desires to continue its space programs, it is imperative for NASA to keep operational the one thing its supporters can actually see the results of their tax dollars.
Hubble is the ONLY telescope capable of accurately measuring the diameter of Xena (UB313), according to Michael Brown (CalTech), Xena's discoverer. Kecks and other groundbased assets, even with world-class adaptive optics, are NOT up to the task. This is but one example of Hubble's unique capabilities that makes it worth preserving and upgrading into the far future.
There's been a lot of talk about how the shuttle can't reach both Hubble and ISS on the same mission because of different orbital angles and the lack of fuel/time to to so.  This puts a shuttle crew at greater risk.

However, what exactly would it take to move Hubble from it's 21 degree orbit to match and meet up with ISS in a 53 degree orbit?  I don't believe fuel would be that much of a consideration, because you have all the time you need to do it with just the onboard gyros.  Yes, I know that only 2 of them are available right now for science operations, but the other 4 could be brought back online for brute-force manuvering over a long period of time.  You could also use the solar arrays as a solar sail to help a little with the long-term manuvering it would take to get the job done.

Plus, you could burn up all the gyros and onboard fuel, and if Hubble is in a 53 degree orbit, then the Shuttle could undertake a refueling/repair mission and STILL make it to ISS ok.  And, along the way, Hubble would still be able to carry out a limited science program.
Slash all funding for that white elephant of a space station and FIX HUBBLE! In all the years that ISS has been up there, I have YET to see anything come out of it that can come close to the least that Hubble does. ISS is nothing more than a political boondoggle and port barrel project. No one cares about it, least of all most scientists, who have always argued against the thing in the first place.

Hey NASA, stop ISS and fix Hubble! We want Hubble, we never wanted ISS!
I'm thinking it's penny wise pound foolish to not service the Hubble.  It can almost be compared to throwing away a great car rather than replace a dead battery.  Inspection tools should reduce risks and I would think that if repairs could not be made, that the shuttle could somehow intercept the space station or another space vehicle launched for rescue purposes.
I think the mission itself would be a big feather in the cap of NASA as well...
If NASA allows the Hubble to fall into a declining orbit you can expect their funding to do the same-The public demands to see at least some of their taxdollars in the stunning photos sent back from the space that NASA is so found of pointing out their mission is to explore-
Save Hubble and scrap the ISS.  An Ion rocket engine should be attached to Hubble to keep its obbit from decaying.
I realy think most people on earth are no longer interessted in the ISS. Servicing Hubble is more sophisticated.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=232

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google