ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



Riding to Hubble's rescue

Posted: Friday, June 09, 2006 2:16 AM by Alan Boyle


NASA / ESA / STScI / AURA
This Hubble view shows the disk galaxy
NGC 5866 tilted nearly edge-on to our
line of sight. A crisp dust lane divides
the galaxy into two halves. Viewed face
on, NGC 5866 would look like a smooth,
flat disk with little spiral structure.

The scientists behind the Hubble Space Telescope delivered yet another stunning celestial image on Thursday, showing a galaxy on edge with a wispy glowing halo. "Hubble-huggers" have been on edge as well, hoping that NASA will send a space shuttle crew to extend the life of space-based astronomy's crown jewel. Although the space agency hasn't yet set a date for that final servicing mission, the shuttle program's manager says preparations are already being made for a rescue.

Shuttle crews have visited the Hubble for servicing four times since the telescope's launch in 1990, and the fifth mission would rank right up there with the first one, which effectively gave Hubble its sharp-eyed sight. New gyros and batteries would replace the ones that are failing. Two major instruments, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph and the Wide Field Camera 3, would be installed.

With the fresh servicing, Hubble could produce unparalleled images for several more years. Without it, the outlook is less bright. Hubble's handlers have developed a "two-gyro" mode of operation that should keep things working until mid-2008, but eventually, the telescope will fall victim to a worn-out guidance system or power system.

NASA Administrator Mike Griffin has ruled out a robotic mission to save the Hubble while leaving the agency's options open for the shuttle rescue scenario. In fact, Hubble's scientists have been told to be prepared for a launch as early as December 2007. Griffin, however, has held off on giving the official go-ahead until the shuttle has a couple of successful test missions under its belt.

That doesn't mean NASA isn't working on the preparations. Shuttle program manager Wayne Hale admitted as much during a news briefing Thursday at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston (where I'm currently burning the midnight oil).

"There are some long lead items that are being prepared, based on the assumption that we will be authorized to do a Hubble servicing mission," Hale told me. "The authorization to do that mission has not yet been given, and I think it is dependent on how well we demonstrate our success in the next flight or two.

"Obviously, everybody would like to go back and service the Hubble again, but that is a decision that's ahead of us. And crew assignments are still up in the air."

Hale's comments notwithstanding, there was an intriguing hint last month about the composition of Hubble's repair crew — in the news that astronaut Scott Parazynski was being taken off the STS-118 mission, targeted for launch next year, "to prepare for assignment to another mission."

NASA spokesman Doug Peterson said Parazynski was being shifted to a different not-quite-yet-assignment because of his expertise in spacewalking — but he declined to provide any more specifics about the job. Expert spacewalkers are exactly what you need for servicing the Hubble. So could there be a Hubble angle to Parazynski's pre-reassignment? Drawing that kind of conclusion would be "too futuristic," Peterson told me with a smile.

Yet another "long lead item" could have to do with new techniques for inspecting the shuttle, and that's where the upcoming shuttle mission could play a role. A Hubble servicing job would be the only kind of trip not going to the international space station — which provides the best place in space for inspecting and, if necessary, repairing the shuttle.

During Discovery's mission, the very first spacewalk would be devoted to testing a technique that links together the shuttle's robotic arm and inspection boom to provide a platform for spacewalkers. That would be the only way to give the shuttle a full inspection if you weren't attached to the space station, explained Discovery spacewalker Piers Sellers.

By now I was firmly in the grip of a Hubble-hugging spell, so I asked if this sort of procedure would come into play during a servicing mission. "That's certainly an application," Sellers said. "For Hubble, you would need it for inspection or repair, because there's no one else around."

It turns out that Discovery commander Steve Lindsey said as much in February during an inspection visit to NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Something tells me that a final visit to the lonely Hubble would stir up the general public's interest in spaceflight far more than any trip to the international space station. What do you think?

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Hey all you brainy guys; You have to fix the Hubble. I'm poor and Hubble images are one of my main escapes as well as awesome intertainment. Excellent job so far!
What do we feel when we see those things that Hubble allows us to see? Beyond its scientific value I can think of few other things more important to all earthlings.We must carry on.
I think Hubble should be serviced and upgraded by one more Shuttle mission.  If the new equipment keeps functioning until the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) is flying, there is no reason why Hubble could not be kept working and periodically upgraded indefinitely.
With all the info we are collecting from the images of Hubble why would Nasa stop. The purpose of Hubble was to look into outer space not just into orbit inner space as with the space station. Letting hubble rot or die would be a big down fall for NASA, similar to the shuttle diasters. Why not have the job out sourced ?
Considering the original cost of the Hubble I believe
it is very important to extend it's life as long as
possible.  Do I think the space shuttle visiting the Hubble would stir up the general public's interest in spaceflight far more than any trip to the international space station?  ABSOLUTELY -YES!!!
I was amazed when I read this article to find that a repair mission to Hubble is a distinct possibility.
After all that Hubble has done, is doing, and will do, it's a no-brainer to repair and update it while the shuttles are still flying.
To throw away a tool like the Hubble would be the height of waste. If we can't keep an orbiting observation platform in service then what is the space program for?
Hubble is worth saving! What else has provided such a wealth of knowledge and beauty? The US economy and political power will not fund a total replacement for Hubble. If there is no plan to replace Hubble as soon as it fails, we must support and maintain this cosmology investigation tool.
Hubble the ultimate eyes for the Astronomers of the world.  The repair of such an important tool is essential to continued progress in the exploration of space. As an amateur viewer of the cosmos, the Hubble telescope give us seers into space the hope of a brighter future of humanity.
I hope Hubble can hold on for a few more years. We will need a President who respects the scientific community and who is willing to invest in abstract results to get these repairs completed. All I hear are rumors of NASA layoffs and program cutbacks. We amateur astronomers don't stand a chance.
Since we are planning to retun to the moon, we should consider this as an exercise to prepare for that trip.  The skills required are akin to what would be needed if we have a replay of the Appollo 13 scenario.
Isn't there a "sister" mirror to the one used in the orbiting Hubble which could be outfitted with the latest and greatest detector technology? Maybe there are more stable gyro's and other updated stabilizing technologies which can also be incorporated into a new, more capable Hubble type telescope, which could be built and launched by an ELV (Atlas V or Delta IV
Heavy), if a rescue mission for the current Hubble is, after all, found too risky for the Shuttle. This may be another, more prudent and derisking way, to extend the Hubble legacy.
The science the Hubble produces is a guarantee.  I'm of the opinion that when you have a winning team, keep it funded and active. The same holds true for the Hubble. If the telescope can be around for another 10 years with servicing, then let it do its job until the thing falls out of the sky.
If man can not look out to the cosmic past how is he ever going to look out to the cosmic future.  And just as that is so the Hubbles past needs a Hubble future.
I would love to see them fix it, and when it is at its end of life, bring it back down and put it in the Smithsonian
Hubble provides the world an eye in space like no other and the Hubble's pictures are a constant reminder of who we are in the universe and how truly small that is. To many it is a monument to HOPE. Until something better is sent to take its place. We need to do whatever we can to keep it alive and well.
It would be a big mistake to allow the Hubble to shut down.  I am not even sure what the space station is doing, but I do pay attention to the wonderful images that are coming from Hubble (and also the Mars rovers).  
Go for it! The Hubble telescope is a far more valuable resource for exploration then the space station will ever be.
If we must risk our astronauts on more space shuttle flights, let it be for something important.
I feel that a repair mission to the Hubble is too important to pass up.  It has provided the world with excellent new science and the images insipre awe for all of us. To upgrade the Hubble would provide even more new science for years to come. If the decision is made to not repair it, then it should be brought down (as it was originally design to do) on a shuttle, so it can be placed in a museum.  There are so many different artifacts from the history of space exploration that cant be brought back, that we should recover one which can be.
It still amazes me that our government can spend billions (287, so far) on the stupid war in Iraq yet can't use a couple of billion to save something worthwhile.
The value received so far from Hubble exceeds that of any other space activity.  Unless a superior device is ready to replace it it should be repaired.
I would very much like to see the Hubble serviced and continue to work. It has already done such a very good job.
Billions for pork, not a dime for Hubble?  Who did we elect to Congress?
Because we can! Thats why we do what we do. So repairing the Hubble is what we need to do. We need more Kodak moments from the cold outer edges of time. Not to mention the thrill of seeing some thing never seen befor by any one. We must push forward.
Regarding Hubble, when we do go to "fix" it, why not do much more?  Fly up some kind of support module that bolts on to the end opposite the "eye."  It should have all the guidance and propulsion systems to keep Hubble going for decades and make the telescope's existing systems redundant so we needn't worry about such frequent maintenance.
Hubble MUST be saved. For NASA to do anything else would be financial suicide. Right now, it is one of the very few visual proofs to the layman that space science is doing anything at all. With a decade or so of development ahead for the next series of exploration vehicles, NASA would be wise to keep space to the front of the taxpayer's minds lest they see other things to spend a budget on.
Alan,
 I really like the format of this page.  The black background is great.  I guess I don't really need to tell you how much I'd like them to save the hubble...
 Maybe Burt Rutan would consider grappling the thing, like I joked about a few years back :)

-Nathan
Pictures from the Hubble not only make good science but they inspire awe and wonder.  Hubble pictures do more to sell the U.S. space program to the public than any comparably priced initiative that NASA could undertake.
I agree that a mission to Hubble would stir more public interest. I have been a fan of Hubble since 1998 and the science being done is invaluable to our understanding of the formation of the universe let alone our solar system. Besides that the images move and stir me so much so that I bought a telescope! We must keep Hubble alive!
A successful trip to Hubble would definitely be more inspiring than another trip to the Space Station.  Of course, everyone will be delighted to see the Shuttle return to service, but the whole purpose of the Shuttle Program was to "Build and Fix Things," not to be a glorified Bus.  Granted, that's too simplistic and the ISS still needs some construction work, but if you're wondering what would get the public excited, fixing the Hubble at it's Eleventh Hour would fit the bill and would be seen as the Shuttle's final great act - the climactic event of it's retirement.
LOVE THAT HUBBLE!!

It's the closest those of us alive today will get to exploring strange new worlds...
You're right about stirring up public interest. I wrote NASA in Feb, 2004 that as wonderful as the Spitzer and the JWST are in their wavelengths, neither can replace what the refurbished Hubble would become in the minds of men: the Eye that can see forever.
We need a new shuttle.  That thing is too old.  How many 1981 vehicles do you see out on the road?
I think Hubble always enchants people, but it's what people do that captures the heart. Images of spacewalkers, the vista of the Earth they see.. this is what seems to get people excited. Sometimes I wonder if sending astronauts out to schools wouldn't be the best insurance for future NASA funding.
A Hubble servicing mission would certainly generate more public interest than routine visits to the space station.  NASA needs to return to the "can do" attitude of old, not the timid, stumbling steps of recent years.  Satellite and Hubble servicing missions bring an incredible sense of awe.  I say, Go For It!  But please, listen to the engineers when they have concerns.
Yes, please fix the Hubble!  It's a view we would never be able to see again in our lifetime if Hubble goes dark.  It'll be well worth the effort, thanks!
The Hubble has been serviced 4 times before by the shuttle, I really fail to see any possible reason that it should not be serviced again and again as long as the shuttle is flying and it is cost effective.  Space flight is one of those dangerous exploratory things that keep mankind from becoming stagnant and children interested in their futures.  As long as the astronauts think the risks are acceptable, we should keep the shuttle flying and doing what it was designed for.
It would be truley an absolute shame to have so much money and resources tied up in the Hubble and then to walk away from it.....It has done more for our exploration of space than the I.S.S.
"Out there" is the only option we have left once we trash this planet. It's critical that we know as much about our solar system and the universe as we can. Hubble provides us the unobstructed view that we need. It is conceivable that it can be maintained past it's life expectancy and provide us with more pertinent data.
Stirring up public interest in space flight by servicing the Hubble is (to me) bad science and the same time of hype and PR that gets us nowhere.  We have such limited funding as it is and it is FAR wiser to launch a new Hubble for about the same cost than it would take to service the old.
Such a repair mission would also cost more than the new Mars Reconnaissance orbiter, which is truly an amazing mission able to gather more data than ALL past Mars missions combined.  Is something like that really worth giving up for just some more pretty pictures?  It is good to be sentimental, but let’s keep it for things like our antique collection, not a scientific project.  

Any money spent on Hubble is worth it, it's some of the only money our government spends that I really approve of.  You have only to look at the information Hubble sends us to know this is better than spending money on war.
The Hubble images gives us taxpayers something for our money that we can all enjoy. So if NASA wants to continue its space programs, it better include the one thing its supporters can get into.

Beautiful photo!  Excessively mature galaxies and eukaryotes without a snowball's chance!  What a mix!

I took a look at the Antikythera Machine reference.  The discussion degenerated into a lot of pro-and con on the relative merits of superstitions!  The author, Michael T. Wright of Imperial College, London did post a link to the paper he is presenting about the machine.  An interesting look at some heavy duty archeology and the sniping that goes on there, too!
Scientific advances for hubble far exceed anything ever accomplished from the International Space Station.  A high priority mission to hubble should be a no-brainer.
The Hubble is the only positive PR that NASA gets these days. That, plus the fact that the public remembers the initial +$1 billion pricetag should be enough to put the 5th visit on the "active" list.
It seems to me that the longer the Hubble telescope is in existance the bigger our universe becomes, therefore it would be limiting our awareness to discontinue this jewel.  What a shame to stop the arrival of the beauty in photos from the heavens around us, inspiring humans to dream bigger dreams..Surely the powers that be, will not take this from us.
Considering the massive amount of taxpayer money that is spent on space station experiments that may, or may not ever benefit the general public who pay the bills, I think we can afford another retrofit mission for the Hubble Telescope, which HAS changed the scientific history books on the state of the universe and benefited our knowledge more than any other device ever conceived.  Face it... the thing does its job.

Our shuttle fleet has not been exactly cost effective just shuttling crews, food and water with some minor scientific experiments and repair parts for the space staiton while in orbit.  Thats my thoughts anyway.
Hubble is better than a $1-BILLION dollar investment
that yields more science and discovery than any single other space shuttle mission. Yes, space is not a risk free environment but the science coming from HST is worth the extra risk. It is my hope that commercial astronauts aboard a Falcon 9 booster may do a 2012 service mission. We need to keep HST alive!
How in the world can we not "risk it" to save the Hubble when the pityful ISS is constant danger from space junk and human error. Besides, aren't we EXPLORING the Universe... the whole bloody thing? Why spend all the effort on two lumps of rock out of an entire Cosmos???
A MOST IMPORTANT ITEM TO BE FIXED. GREAT SCIENTIFIC TOOL FOR THE WORLD TO USE.... NOT TO FIX IT WOULD BE SUCH A WASTE. ITS NOT READY FOR THE SCRAP HEAP YET.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=232

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google