ABOUT COSMIC LOG

Quantum fluctuations in space, science, exploration and other cosmic fields... served up regularly by MSNBC.com science editor Alan Boyle since 2002.

Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for MSNBC.com. He is a winner of the AAAS Science Journalism Award, the NASW Science-in-Society Award and other honors; a contributor to "A Field Guide for Science Writers"; and a member of the board of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Check out Boyle's biography or send a message to Cosmic Log via cosmiclog@msnbc.com.



New spaceship in the works?

Posted: Friday, June 02, 2006 8:18 PM by Alan Boyle


Space Adventures
This is one of Space Adventures' early concepts for a suborbital spaceship. Space Launch Corp., a newly acquired subsidiary, may have other ideas.

Virginia-based Space Adventures, the only travel company to send tourists to the international space station, announced this week that it is acquiring a spaceship-building company called Space Launch Corp. — and it looks as if the move represents a small step toward yet another giant leap into the commercial spaceflight business.

That's the impression you'd get from talking to Eric Anderson, Space Adventure's chief executive officer. In a conversation on Thursday, Anderson was characteristically mum about how exactly Space Launch will figure in his company's business strategy. "When the time is right, we'll announce what the new business plan for Space Launch is going to be," he told me.

But he noted with pride that the 7-year-old California-based company has already done $25 million worth of work for the U.S. military on projects such as the RASCAL orbital launch system. That low-cost system would have been somewhat similar to Orbital System's Pegasus rocket, with a reusable aircraft carrying an expendable rocket up to high altitude for air launch into orbit.

Space Launch fleshed out a design for the system, but the Pentagon decided not to go on to the next phase. Now Space Adventures will be benefiting from that know-how instead.

"They are a strategic asset," Anderson said, "in that we feel much of the technology that they developed is both useful and applicable to commercial human spaceflight projects."

Anderson declined to discuss the terms of the transaction, other than to say that Space Launch will be a wholly owned subsidiary of privately held Space Adventures, with Jacob Lopata staying on as chief executive officer. In a news release, Lopata said he was looking forward to joining Space Adventures "to develop the technologies and business structures required to open the space frontier to all."

Anderson also declined to say whether Space Launch would be developing a suborbital or orbital craft for Space Adventures' use, but he acknowledged that "we clearly have plans to develop space tourism capabilities."

Space Adventures is already working with other companies to have a suborbital spaceship built in Russia, known as the Explorer, and to have spaceports built in the United Arab Emirates and Singapore. Just last week, a Russian news report indicated that the Explorer might not get off the ground until 2009 — somewhat later than initially expected.

Anderson pooh-poohed that report. "Don't believe everything read in Russia," he told me. "I kind of chuckled when I saw that."

He also said the Explorer project and the Space Launch acquisition "have nothing to do with each other." Anderson noted that, because of U.S. export requirements, it might make sense to have access to foreign-built rocket ships as well as domestic ones.

But he emphasized that Space Adventures itself would stay focused on the business of travel arrangements rather than spaceship development. "There are groupings of companies that may have related ownership and even related names, but there is a wall between their businesses," he explained.

That stance may be important as the suborbital spaceflight market develops, because Space Adventures has forged deals with a variety of other spaceship builders to broker seats on future flights. Hypothetically, it might be awkward if Spaceship Company X came to see Space Adventures as a rival as well as a customer.

In other Space Adventures news:

  • Anderson acknowledged that although the financing is in place for spaceport development in the United Arab Emirates, the Spaceport Singapore project is still not fully funded. However, he said, "the project is going very well, and I think it will be funded in a number of months."
  • The company announced today that Japanese entrepreneur Daisuke Enomoto, a client who is due to fly to the international space station in September, successfully completed a round of Black Sea survival training.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I'm all for the idea of space tourism, even though I would probably think it would be for clients with very deep pockets. Some scietific good will come of it, but I can't help wonder about the international security behind it. The possibilities of extreme terrorism are endless with this new source of adventure. If I thought of it, would the wrong sort of indivuals think the same? Just a thought.
I'de doubt terrorist would use it for their evil deeds. If I were a terrorist, I'de hijack the International Space Station and either use it to launch a bio/chem attack anywhere I'de like or drive it right smack into a vital location. Besides, they also got other shuttles and rockets they could use to launch a terrorist attack from space heh, why use this type of shuttle when you got others that could do the same. See my point?
Hi Alan

Nice face-lift for the blog. As for space tourism... has anyone wondered if there's a serious glut of potential operators?
space terrorism/space tourism.  I am just thankful we are no longer leaving the space race to the governments of the world.  Praise be to capitalism.
Terrorism is the first thing you think about when you here that space might be fully open to the public?  How depressing.
   I'm all for the new space tourism.  As some of the previous comments said, a lot of scientific good will come out of this new age of exploration.  I glanced over this article and I was wondering if any could tell me if there was any connection between the "Space Launch" designs and the SpaceShipOne prototype.  
    I'm surprised that someone would talk about the chances of acts of terrorism with this new spaceship.  Extensive measures of security and training would more than likely be placed upon the passengers of the new spaceshuttle.    
Why is it that everyone thinks terrorists are going to attack everything? Fear has been instilled in the masses. Nevermind the fact that the countless targets that exist in this country haven't been hit.

Does anyone really believe that is because Bush has done such a good job stopping terrorists? That's nonsense.

Space tourism has great potential and, yes, would require very deep pockets, at first. Remember how expensive VCRs, DVD players and color TVs were at their onset? The rich have always paid for the R&D of new technologies, the price will eventually come down and it will be feasible for many more people.

Don't believe the terrorist hype. We are no more at risk today than we were on 9-11 or any day before that.
What threat? Suborbital spacecraft are made of composites and other lightweight materials, they can't come down very far from the launch point (which is already likely to be in a remote ares), and do so essentially empty of fuel, like the shuttle. They'd do little damage against any ground structures. And if you have the means to get into orbit to reach ISS, it's much easier to just send weapons down from your own ship, than to somehow re-engineer someone else's station into a weapons platform, and one in a very predictable orbit, at that.

There are just far easier ways for terrorists to do harm.

Also, spaceship pilot training isn't yet something you can easily find schools for...

Hi Alan,
There is nothing to tour in space. There is no destination. You go on the plane. You float and play hackysack. You get off the plane at the same place you left. What's to tour? The cockpit?
Somebody should build a hotel on the moon. That would be worth the large amount of money it would take at first to travel to space. Just watch out for the Mynocks!!!
Mazhavn
For Len Rowe: Why do tourists/sightseers get on aircraft and helicopters 'just' to fly around a given area (NYC, Grand Canyon, parts of Hawaii, etc.) and come back to their takeoff point without landing elsewhere?

They want an aerial view of the place they came to see. For space tourism, that place is...Earth (and eventually beyond, as the technology develops). And seen from the ultimate aerial viewpoint. Plus, the ezperience of zero gravity for more than the minute or less than can be done in an aircraft (a newly available tourist option in itself).

Even on cruise ships, the ship itself is half the fun...

I second what Frank Glover on his previous comment stating, "They want an aerial view of the place they came to see. For space tourism, that place is...Earth (and eventually beyond, as the technology develops). And seen from the ultimate aerial viewpoint. Plus, the ezperience of zero gravity for more than the minute or less than can be done in an aircraft (a newly available tourist option in itself)."

For someone to have to opportunity to view the very ground upon which they live on in from a suborbital viewpoint, nothing can even match the amazement one would encounter from such an experience.  

Plus you can't play a good game of hackysack in zero gravity conditions.  

I really think that you should have aplace where you could go in and eat space food and have a hotel where you could go to the gift shop and also they would have some neat shows to show how the gravity works on the moon.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=76

Latest Tech & Science News

Syndicate This Site

Add Cosmic Log to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google