
Reuters file
A Viking warship replica, Havhingsten af Glendalough (the Sea Stallion of Glendalough), makes its way into Dublin's port in 2007. New research suggests the Vikings used sunstones to navigate in cloudy and foggy conditions.
Vikings could have navigated the oceans in inclement weather with the aid of a crystal that pinpointed the sun's location behind banks of clouds and fog, a new study suggests.
Such a tool, known as a sunstone, is known from legend, but until now experimental evidence that it could actually work as hypothesized was lacking.
Researchers led by Gábor Horváth of Hungary's Eötvös University decided to see if the legend has real world legs. Their results were published online on Monday in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
The theory
The Vikings were Scandinavian seafarers who traveled widely in the North Atlantic, roughly between the year 900 and 1200. Under clear and partly cloudy skies, archaeological evidence indicates that they used sundials to find their way around.
But a sundial is only useful when the sun is shining, raising the question of how the Vikings navigated in cloudy and foggy conditions, which can last for days along their known sailing routes.
In the 1960s, Danish archaeologist Thorkild Ramskou suggested that the Vikings used a sunstone to filter the sunlight so that it all had the same polarization, or direction. By rotating the crystal to and fro, the light would appear brighter or darker, depending on how the crystal was oriented. The brightest point would be toward the direction of the sun.
Two sunstone readings from different points in the sky would allow navigators to pinpoint the sun's location. They could then hold up a torch in that direction to mimic the sun's location, allowing its light to cast a shadow on the sundial.
A widely cited reference to this method of navigation appears in the Sigurd legend, a Viking saga. Horvath and his colleagues refer to the passage in their paper:
"The weather was very cloudy. It was snowing. Holy Olaf the king sent out somebody to look around, but there was no clear point in the sky. Then he asked Sigurd to tell him where the sun was. After Sigurd complied, he grabbed a sunstone, looked at the sky and saw from where the light came, from which he guessed the position of the invisible sun. It turned out that Sigurd was right."
The tests
Critics have questioned whether this technique was actually needed, since experienced navigators could likely estimate the position of the sun even in cloudy weather. They also questioned whether the method would actually work under cloudy and foggy skies.
To answer the critics, the researchers made photographs of cloudy skies with a fisheye lens and asked subjects in the lab to find the sun. The experimental subjects had errors as great as 99 percent, leading the researchers to report that "Viking navigators might have needed some aid to navigate on open seas during cloudy or foggy weather conditions."
So they tested out the sunstone idea under a range of weather conditions on expeditions to Tunisia, a sail across the Arctic Ocean, and at home in Hungary. For a "sunstone" they used a polarimeter, a device that measures polarization.
Their results showed that the method worked in cloudy and foggy weather, though the method wasn't as reliable under completely overcast skies. Further research will test whether the actual crystals from Scandinavia and Iceland work as well as the sensitive polarimeter.
Christian Keller, a specialist in North Atlantic archaeology at the University of Oslo, told Nature News that he is open to the idea that the Vikings used sunstones to help navigate. However, he said the available evidence suggests that they used the sun's position on clear days as a guide, combined with knowledge about the flight patterns of birds and the migration paths of whales, among other cues.
"You don't need to be a wizard," he said. "But you do need to combine a lot of different sorts of observations."
Navigation in nature
Using polarized light for navigation is common in nature, as highlighted in the other papers published this week in Philosophical Transactions B. In one study, for example, Australian researchers conclusively demonstrate that honeybees steer with the aid of a built-in polarization compass.
Another study shows that when dung beetles navigate using the polarization patterns of the moon, they're as accurate in celestial navigation under a crescent moon as they are under a full moon, and that their skill equals that measured for species that orient themselves using the sun, which is up to 100 million times brighter.
But researchers from the University of Queensland in Australia found that other navigating species such as loggerhead sea turtles, which are known to orient via a magnetic compass, appear unable to use polarized light for navigation, at least when they're juveniles.
All of these studies, and several more, are available for free from the journal. To navigate there, simply click here.
More about navigation:
- Butterfly's navigation secret revealed
- Migrating songbirds can be led astray
- The real reason chickens cross the road
- Magnets help ants lead the way
More about the Vikings:
- Viking era triggered by shortage of wives?
- 1,000-year-old Viking shield found in Denmark
- Viking burial site unearthed in England
- Viking ship replica re-enacts age-old journey
John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by hitting the "like" button on the Cosmic Log Facebook page or following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@b0yle).


The Holy Roman Empire came up north ,killed the holy men,destroyed the places of worship,killed the people who worshiped. The viknas or the boys in english, were not happy. IT was war, the empire forgot what started the war but we did not. We knew the world was round,and how to get are warships there.
One of the few, one of the proud,a viknas(or in english one of the boys)
There's a new movie coming out which you might like, or hate, as it's told from the Roman point of view:
Actually, the 2nd century was about 500 years before the Vikings, so even someone with as shaky a grasp of history of as his probably won't be offended...
this finding is OLD news why is msnbc etc reporting on it now???
there was even a tv show on it 2 years ago showing it works........ like um??
bspurloc
I think they are publishing it now because it is based on a study which was published on Monday, that was 2 days ago.
So they used a polarimeter to mimic the possible effect of a supposed "sunstone" crystal, but the article doesn't detail exactly what sort of crystal that might be. What are the possibilities? Calcite? Strong optical effects and can be found in huge deposits in Iceland. Hmm... possible. Ulexite (also known as TV rock)? Supposedly not even discovered until the 1800's. Not a likely candidate.
The article states:
So could it be...
Oh, gee, and they actually call it "sunstone". Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have a winner, but you'd think they might have mentioned it in the article.
it is a crystal its a quartz type stone. this is OLD NEWS, History channel already did a story on this showing it worked.
Holy Odin Batman.
From what I know, the stone in question is Iolite.
Yes they did and that's the truth.
The experiment used to discredit the belief that people can spot the sun in cloudy conditions is faulty.
Photographic film, and to a greater degree, digital photography, has a limited tonal range. It takes the available light and compresses the range of brightness into a very small range, compared to the actual range. This is why photographers have difficulty with scenes that have bright highlights and dark shadows - it's impossible for a camera to record the tonal range that can be discerned by the human eye, never mind the actual tonal range present in any scene of great contrast.
Because of this, photographs of a cloudy sky would lack much of the tonal range present in the original scene. It is possible that on-scene the subjects could have detected tonal differences in the sky that would have allowed them to pinpoint the sun's location in the sky. But the photograph, having a compressed tonal range, may not depict the scene with sufficient subtlety to permit the exercise to be a success.
Another factor is that a still photograph is missing a huge amount of data caused by cloud movement, the sun movement (ok relatively speaking), and apparent cloud density changes from the perspective of the observer.
lithium flouride?....what the heck?...the idea is like-able buy what was it?....what if it was not a polarizer pointing the way through diffuse light?....maybe something that flashed from the hi energy particles coming from the sun like scintillation crystals do?...not know they had the first gamma ray burst detectors in their hands...it is a lot of speculation, I have built different polarizers but I am highly skeptical....sure would be nice to see the chemical analysis of a "real" viking sunstone!...I would sooner believe it was the tool of an ancient alchemist, raw diamond....
The stone the Vikings used for navigation was Iolite.
Could be. I copied and paste this from a web site
Lolite
The stone “Lolite” derives its name from the Greek word “ion” meaning “violet”. The color of this beautiful stone is purplish blue. The more the intensity of the color, more is the value of the stone. This is found abundantly in the countries like India, Sri Lanka, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and Brazil. This precious stone is also known the “stone of the Vikings”. It is being said that the Vikings discovered the deposits of this stone in Green land and Norway.
It is being said that the Viking explorers first used this gemstone as an instrument for directions. The mariners used small pieces of lolite as polarizing filters. The “lolite lenses” helped them to locate the accurate position of the sun, so that they could navigate safely to their destination. The quality that made this gemstone so popular to the Vikings is pleochroism.
That's iolite, with a capiltal "eye", not lolite with a lowercase "ell".
It definitely has a known reputation as the Viking's compass, several websites refer to this, but interestingly, there aren't references to deposits in scandanavian areas as there with "sunstone" which I mentioned above.
Regarding pleochroism, the two color appearance which demonstrates the polarization effect, tanzanite has a similar property, looking purplish from one angle and more bluish from another.
Maybe they had a compass, the 1st known compass dates to 1000 BC. By 200 BC the Chinese were using compass's..
Maybe they used GPS left behind by aliens.
This isn't news; it's been known for many years. Where have these people been?
The Vikings certainly were gifted navigators and would have explored multiple ways to keep track of direction in all conditions. My twin brother and I published research that argues Scandinavian explorers even made it to Minnesota in the 14th century. If you are interested in reading more:
So when are the history book writers going to credit the Vikings for "discovering" North America? Shouldn't histroy be a matter of record, not pride or theology.
maybe they just googled where they wanted to go... wtf... who cares
Eric the Red, a Viking, landed in Newfoundland 300 years before Columbus "Discovered" the New world.
Eric the Red never made it past Greenland. His son, Leif Ericson, likely landed in Newfoundland nearly 500 years before Columbus.
Simon and Schuster's Guide to Gems and Precious Stones (1986) states that the Vikings used cordierite (iolite) for navagational purposes, using the strong pleochroism to find the sun on cloudy days; this mineral has also been dubbed the Vikings' compass. It is found in Finland and Norway.
Thanks Steve, in the quick references I checked there wasn't any mantion of iolite deposits in Scandanavia, so I was wondering (above) about alternatives. I appreciate the clarification.