A partial lunar eclipse may not be as spectacular as totality, but it can sure generate some spectacular pictures. And thanks to all the online channels that are now available to photographers, it's easier than ever to see a worldwide selection.
Well, make that a "half-worldwide" selection: Lunar eclipses, partial as well as total, are visible to half of the globe at once. That's in contrast with total solar eclipses, which can be seen only along a miles-wide track that extends across what's usually an exotic strip of the world (like the South Pacific, which is the focus of next month's brush with solar totality).
The prime viewing for Saturday's eclipse stretched from the western side of the Americas to the eastern edges of Asia. In California's Mojave Desert, the peak time was around 4:30 a.m. in the morning - or "0-dark-30," to use photographer Alan Radecki's term. His multiple-exposure image, featured above, shows our planet's shadow subtly moving from one edge of the moon to the other during the course of the eclipse.
Slamet Riyadi / AP
Earth casts a shadow over the moon during a partial lunar eclipse, as seen on the evening of June 26 from Yogyakarta in central Java. Click here for an interactive graphic that explains eclipse astronomy.
The peak hour came earlier as you went farther west, and on the other side of the International Date Line, it was Saturday night when the eclipse was at its peak. Australian photographer Andrew Ritchie captured a multiple-exposure picture that was somewhat similar to Radecki's, but looking toward the other horizon.
Indonesians gathered in Yogyakarta on the island of Java to watch the show. Others saw the eclipse from the Pacific as well as from Asia, stretching eastward as far as India and Nepal. This NASA map shows the area of visibility.
Slamet Riyadi / AP
An Indonesian student uses a telescope to look at Saturday's lunar eclipse from Yogyakarta in Java.
If you weren't in the eclipse zone, or if clouds (or sleep) kept you from seeing the event as it happened, you can still experience some of the thrill by checking out SpaceWeather.com's gallery of eclipse pics, or doing a PicFog search. Space.com's Tariq Malik rounds up a nice selection of photos, including a time-exposure photo of the International Space Station passing over California's Palomar Mountain during Scott Kardel's eclipse-watching session.
The next lunar eclipse will be a total one, occurring on Dec. 21 with North America in the prime viewing position. But you don't have to wait that long to get an eyeful of the sky. Now is the best time of year to see the space station pass overhead, and NASA's online database tells you when and where to look. (There are four sighting opportunities tonight from my neck of the woods.)
July 11's total solar eclipse won't be at all visible from North America - you'll have to go someplace in the Pacific or South America to see it. But I'm hoping that some scientific expedition groups, such as the Saros Group, will be sending out video streams while it's happening. If you know of webcasters who are making preparations (or Chilean and Argentinian TV networks that are touting live coverage), let me know in your comments below and we'll put together a roundup for armchair eclipse-watchers around the globe.
Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto."



Since we don't have a space to leave our comments regarding "No sex please, we're astronauts." I'm posting here (obviously.)
As the article pointed out, I think that maybe NASA does have a kind of "don't ask, don't tell" policy, meaning, don't let it get out to the public.
There are two different aspects here:
1) Would the astronauts want to have sex because they're sexually attracted to another person?
2) Would the astronauts want to have sex in the name of science? I would think that astronauts are extremely scientific by nature and how space affects all aspects of life. Plus I've heard that astronauts are very uh...uninhibited. I don't know if that's true though. I wish...
NASA would probably want some "volunteers" to experiment with sex, off the record. So I think it's already happened, but NASA needs to keep up a particular appearance. There are a lot of kids interested in space and what NASA does. But I seriously doubt that there are kids who don't know about sex.
Let's get real here.
We'll probably add a commenting feature for those "clippings" in the next little while as part of the second wave of tinkering. Right now it's possible to comment on clips (aka seeds) on the Newsvine side of the fence.
You can comment on the clip in question by using this link:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/28/4577520-no-sex-please-were-astronauts
"in the next little while..."
You sound southern.
* correction*
I'm sure there are some kids who don't know about sex, just as I'm sure there are some adults who think that you can get pregnant from a toilet seat. Sorry to spill the beans.
The eclipse pics are great too. Looking forward to Dec. 21.
I was headed south on us11 with a small scope in the back of the truck just as the moon was setting here on the east coast...I had wanted to get to my destination in time to test out a mock ccd setup but had to settle for the veiw in the windshield....AWESOME!!!....hard to believe it is just the brain vision adjustment system that makes the moon appear so large. Of the many things that keep me tuning in cosmic logs I really appreciate the many links. Thanks and that sure is a nice photo at the top of this page, it is an encourgement to continue my foray into amature astrophotography. I hope others are encouraged as well.